<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell Tower ruling indicates need for new rules.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/05/31/cell-tower-ruling-indicates-need-for-new-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/05/31/cell-tower-ruling-indicates-need-for-new-rules/</link>
	<description>Mayor, City of Danbury</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessie</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/05/31/cell-tower-ruling-indicates-need-for-new-rules/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=9#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The Stadley Rough area needs this tower. Best if disguised as a tree or flag pole, but in any case, very much needed. I live in the area. A cell tower in a wooded area, even close to homes, is not the same as high voltage power lines that intrude on the appearance of properties over large areas. We need better communcations. Support the tower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stadley Rough area needs this tower. Best if disguised as a tree or flag pole, but in any case, very much needed. I live in the area. A cell tower in a wooded area, even close to homes, is not the same as high voltage power lines that intrude on the appearance of properties over large areas. We need better communcations. Support the tower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruskin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/05/31/cell-tower-ruling-indicates-need-for-new-rules/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>ruskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=9#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Your blog post is very timely as the Riverside Association (in Greenwich) advised its membership earlier today that T-Mobile has applied to the Planning &amp; Zoning Commission in Greenwich to erect an 80 foot tower disguised as a flag pole in a residential neighborhood in North Mianus. My post, which links to yours, is at http://blog.ctnews.com/ruskin/a-cell-tower-in-riverside/68/ I am interested in the City of Danbury&#039;s appeal of the Siting Council&#039;s decision.  Keep your readers apprised!

Best regards,

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Your blog post is very timely as the Riverside Association (in Greenwich) advised its membership earlier today that T-Mobile has applied to the Planning &amp; Zoning Commission in Greenwich to erect an 80 foot tower disguised as a flag pole in a residential neighborhood in North Mianus. My post, which links to yours, is at <a href="http://blog.ctnews.com/ruskin/a-cell-tower-in-riverside/68/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ctnews.com/ruskin/a-cell-tower-in-riverside/68/</a> I am interested in the City of Danbury&#8217;s appeal of the Siting Council&#8217;s decision.  Keep your readers apprised!</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

