<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not in New York..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/</link>
	<description>Mayor, City of Danbury</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Stevenson GRI</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Stevenson GRI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-94</guid>
		<description>In all this talk about &quot;Islamo-Fascist-Terrorists&quot;, have people forgotten about Timothy McVeigh ?

Based on his fundamentalist Christian beliefs, isn&#039;t it more than fair to refer to McVeigh as a &quot;Christian Terrorist&quot; for killing 500 people - mostly children - in Oklahoma City ? 

I know Mark Boughton is even-handed. No doubt he and I are in agreement on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all this talk about &#8220;Islamo-Fascist-Terrorists&#8221;, have people forgotten about Timothy McVeigh ?</p>
<p>Based on his fundamentalist Christian beliefs, isn&#8217;t it more than fair to refer to McVeigh as a &#8220;Christian Terrorist&#8221; for killing 500 people &#8211; mostly children &#8211; in Oklahoma City ? </p>
<p>I know Mark Boughton is even-handed. No doubt he and I are in agreement on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of Mayor Mark, however I have to differ with him on this subject.  We have a rule of law and as an American, I have complete faith in our system of justice.  Our system is multi-faceted and is architected to not just punish the guilty but to also flesh out facts and create a history and understanding of the crime.  There are so many assumptions around 9/11.  Frankly the trial doesn&#039;t need to be a circus; however it does need to happen.  

By the way, we are kind of playing loose in this country with the definition of &quot;war crimes&quot;.  Because &quot;war&quot; is an often debated state and because Al Qaeda is a movement and an organization, not a country, we can get into some nebulous territory.  

I would submit Mr. Mayor that New Yorkers are pretty tough people, people that like facts and knowledge.  

I would also submit that by calling us into a state of war with an entity like Al Qaeda, you are giving legitimacy to their role in the world of international politics, which is something we should absolutely not do.  I would also submit that a trial will help our police and justice system further extract facts and truth from the bowels of this heinous crime.  Something we need to further prevent the perpetrators colleagues from proceeding with further plans.  Police work is not an end to itself, it is part of the justice process.

Regardless of whether the crimes were created as an act of war or as an act created to throw our country into chaos, I want to know all of the facts and our justice system is a strong fulcrum to extract truth from those that would see it fail and falter.

On a side note, I spent a great deal of time in Israel when I was much younger.  One of the key things Israelis are very good at is getting and extracting information out of terrorists.  We actually have a pretty strong practice in the FBI for doing something very similar (Scott Piro in the FBI was Saddam&#039;s interrogator, the guy is amazing).  Again, law enforcement and our system of justice really does work.  Military trials and torture is the stuff of banana republics.  Especially in Danbury, we have more class than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of Mayor Mark, however I have to differ with him on this subject.  We have a rule of law and as an American, I have complete faith in our system of justice.  Our system is multi-faceted and is architected to not just punish the guilty but to also flesh out facts and create a history and understanding of the crime.  There are so many assumptions around 9/11.  Frankly the trial doesn&#8217;t need to be a circus; however it does need to happen.  </p>
<p>By the way, we are kind of playing loose in this country with the definition of &#8220;war crimes&#8221;.  Because &#8220;war&#8221; is an often debated state and because Al Qaeda is a movement and an organization, not a country, we can get into some nebulous territory.  </p>
<p>I would submit Mr. Mayor that New Yorkers are pretty tough people, people that like facts and knowledge.  </p>
<p>I would also submit that by calling us into a state of war with an entity like Al Qaeda, you are giving legitimacy to their role in the world of international politics, which is something we should absolutely not do.  I would also submit that a trial will help our police and justice system further extract facts and truth from the bowels of this heinous crime.  Something we need to further prevent the perpetrators colleagues from proceeding with further plans.  Police work is not an end to itself, it is part of the justice process.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether the crimes were created as an act of war or as an act created to throw our country into chaos, I want to know all of the facts and our justice system is a strong fulcrum to extract truth from those that would see it fail and falter.</p>
<p>On a side note, I spent a great deal of time in Israel when I was much younger.  One of the key things Israelis are very good at is getting and extracting information out of terrorists.  We actually have a pretty strong practice in the FBI for doing something very similar (Scott Piro in the FBI was Saddam&#8217;s interrogator, the guy is amazing).  Again, law enforcement and our system of justice really does work.  Military trials and torture is the stuff of banana republics.  Especially in Danbury, we have more class than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Fry</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rita,&quot;

You&#039;re absolutely right about America being made great by the ability for a person to sling mud anonymously on the Web site of a small daily newspaper. Congratulations on exercising that right.

Further, the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution says that defendants in all criminal prosecutions are entitled to a speedy and public trial &quot;by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...&quot; The phrase &quot;jury of his peers&quot; appears nowhere there, nor anywhere else in the Constitution, according to a quick search I just did. 

The Constitution is a big reason why, as you pointed out, America is great. Perhaps you should read it before making cynical, moronic arguments about criminal procedure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rita,&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right about America being made great by the ability for a person to sling mud anonymously on the Web site of a small daily newspaper. Congratulations on exercising that right.</p>
<p>Further, the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution says that defendants in all criminal prosecutions are entitled to a speedy and public trial &#8220;by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed&#8230;&#8221; The phrase &#8220;jury of his peers&#8221; appears nowhere there, nor anywhere else in the Constitution, according to a quick search I just did. </p>
<p>The Constitution is a big reason why, as you pointed out, America is great. Perhaps you should read it before making cynical, moronic arguments about criminal procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-91</guid>
		<description>We love Mayor Mark and his fine leadership - Landslide!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We love Mayor Mark and his fine leadership &#8211; Landslide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francsco Machuca</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Francsco Machuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-90</guid>
		<description>i agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Spinner</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Spinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with Mayor Mark.  These were not criminals but terrorists. They do not deserve the same consideration criminals are treated with... A criminal has the right to a jury of his peers... Where will you find peers for these people?  But then, I can make a cheap shot here and say, at least they&#039;ll find a lawyer with the likes of Ethan Fry. Sorry, Ethan, didn&#039;t like you as a journalist and will like you even less as a lawyer.  But that&#039;s what makes america great.  I can say that in a forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with Mayor Mark.  These were not criminals but terrorists. They do not deserve the same consideration criminals are treated with&#8230; A criminal has the right to a jury of his peers&#8230; Where will you find peers for these people?  But then, I can make a cheap shot here and say, at least they&#8217;ll find a lawyer with the likes of Ethan Fry. Sorry, Ethan, didn&#8217;t like you as a journalist and will like you even less as a lawyer.  But that&#8217;s what makes america great.  I can say that in a forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan gillotte</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>dan gillotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I like that the mayor of Danbury has a blog. Good going! That being said, I&#039;m disturbed that you&#039;re on the knee-jerk reactionary side on this topic. I think Ethan summed it up nicely above. These acts of terrorism are best suited for federal court (as has been shown in 195 other post 9/11 terrorism cases which have been successfully tried in federal courts)The argument for military tribunals suggests that our criminal justice system is so broken that we won&#039;t get the proper sentence for these guys and that a tribunal will. I just don&#039;t believe that to be the case. And, I too, feel really strongly that it sends JUST the appropriate message about the United States&#039; belief in the rule of law and sets us up as the proper leader in the free world for this sort of thing. This administration is doing the right thing in prosecuting this case in this manner and people like Rudy Giuliani and others are just plain wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that the mayor of Danbury has a blog. Good going! That being said, I&#8217;m disturbed that you&#8217;re on the knee-jerk reactionary side on this topic. I think Ethan summed it up nicely above. These acts of terrorism are best suited for federal court (as has been shown in 195 other post 9/11 terrorism cases which have been successfully tried in federal courts)The argument for military tribunals suggests that our criminal justice system is so broken that we won&#8217;t get the proper sentence for these guys and that a tribunal will. I just don&#8217;t believe that to be the case. And, I too, feel really strongly that it sends JUST the appropriate message about the United States&#8217; belief in the rule of law and sets us up as the proper leader in the free world for this sort of thing. This administration is doing the right thing in prosecuting this case in this manner and people like Rudy Giuliani and others are just plain wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Fry</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Bring it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Boughton</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Jacky- Love to debate this on the issues page. Let me know.

Pedro- Our contract was signed with Vio-Alert for all collections on back taxes in the spring of 09&#039; There really was no &quot;plan&quot;, the city looked at a variety of options that Vio-Alert offers for collection and we opted for the booting program- we had hoped to start in July, but ran into issues about payments and logistics. No consideration was given towards elections.

Sorry if you got booted, but with almost 2 million dollars owed to the City that we probably would never collected, this program as already proven a success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacky- Love to debate this on the issues page. Let me know.</p>
<p>Pedro- Our contract was signed with Vio-Alert for all collections on back taxes in the spring of 09&#8242; There really was no &#8220;plan&#8221;, the city looked at a variety of options that Vio-Alert offers for collection and we opted for the booting program- we had hoped to start in July, but ran into issues about payments and logistics. No consideration was given towards elections.</p>
<p>Sorry if you got booted, but with almost 2 million dollars owed to the City that we probably would never collected, this program as already proven a success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacky Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/2009/11/17/not-in-new-york/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacky Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/boughton/?p=120#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, want to take the gloves off and debate this on an Issues page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, want to take the gloves off and debate this on an Issues page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

