The city’s NRZs are speaking out about the number of halfway houses and group-living facilities in the city. Here is an abridged version of their release:
“From the late 70s to today our communities have become the home of a substantial number of residential programs that our neighbors would not allow in their towns such as rooming houses, half-way houses, and inmate facilities. The big homes and empty industrial sites in the historic Hollow, West and East Sides, East, West, and South Ends were perfect for residential community groups.
While it may make best sense to put these facilities throughout the region (including the suburbs) in a representative fashion it quickly became clear that putting a half way house in through suburban zoning commissions and communities was increasingly difficult since they fought anything that wasn’t consistent with what they envisioned their communities to be.
So aiming at Bridgeport minority communities where renters and absentee landlords were unresponsive and Zoning boards allowed for spot zoning became the easy answer.
Fast forward to today and you have yet another community group that wants to put an incredible 120 bed inmate half-way house in the South End across from a park for families and two blocks from a burgeoning charter school. Some suggest Bridgeport has reached its event horizon so it doesn’t matter. We disagree.
We believe Bridgeport can still recuperate and so we have decided to fight back. We believe the policy of utilizing federal and state funding for residential facilities and programs that the suburbs find undesirable and have up to now been regularly placed in Bridgeport, almost exclusively in its minority neighborhoods is unjust to all Bridgeporters, more specifically people who live in those communities.
We, and other urban communities for that matter, must send a message to the capitals in Hartford and Washington, letting them know that these policies are unhealthy to cities that are carrying the burden while suburbs resist taking on little if any responsibilities.
Of the eight regional facilities in southwestern Connecticut like the one that’s being proposed in Bridgeport six are already in Bridgeport and none in the entire Fairfield County suburbs.
We’re not making the argument that the facility isn’t necessary, or that it should be smaller and more manageable, or placed in another more affluent Bridgeport neighborhood. We’re saying – Not one more unit should be placed in Bridgeport. We’re sending a message to all policy makers that it is time our suburban neighbors step up and share the responsibility. That’s why we will speak out against the application for a 120 bed inmate facility proposed on February 28th before the Planning and Zoning Commission.”
NRZ Leadership Committee
Rev. Carl McCluster
Chairman, South End NRZ
Frank Borres
Chairman, West End NRZ
Joe Ianiello
Chairman, Black Rock NRZ
Paul Barnum
Chairman, East End NRZ
Paul Mendes
Hollow NRZ
Tom Burns
Mill Hill NRZ

