Focus On The Rainbow

Focus On The Rainbow

New Media Publisher & Writer

Has “Focus On The Rainbow” Become To Provacative For Ct Media/Hearst ? ………. Inquiring Minds Would Like to Know !

Well shut my mouth and shove a you know what up my boo-de-aye. Imagine my surprise when checking the blog listings for The News-Times that ”the ones” who control that page finally added back in at least the most current posting (there use to be two) on the various blogs offered for each Connecticut newspaper publication and I said to myself “self wonders never cease it’s about time”.

Then also imagine my surprise which blog was no longer listed .. three guesses, first two don’t count.

Yep this one right cheer.

Now granted back in July I announced that Focus On The Rainbow would be moving to a pro-LGBT blogging website called OutLoudBlogs and I thanked Ct Media/Hearst for being invited and having the foresight for having such a blog which reports (or re-reports) news about the LGBT community and its issues and struggles.

Then just the other day on the 22nd I added an update to that post writing that because this blog still gets a considerable amount of hits (obviously from Google and other type of search engines) and comments are still being made on postings that I would continue to do a posting now and then, the most recent being on Wednesday.

Now there was a time up until whenever “they” updated the available blogs to view that Focus On The Rainbow was available on The Connecticut Post, The News-Times, Stamford Advocate and The Greenwich Time websites. Now it’s just listed on The Stamford Advocate website.

Guess Ct Media/Hearst figures there’s more figgits and lezzies in Stamford than the Danbury or Bridgeport area, but they are obviously off the mark about Greenwich … and yes we know who you are.

Hey Ct Media/Hearst it’s no skin off my nose if you don’t want to promote this blog, after all I don’t make any money from all the hits here which benefit your advertisers. And I have more than enough to do and time spent on Focus On The Rainbow at OutLoudBlogs.

But it appears as usually happens in media, in particular print, some dumb ass bastard can’t see the forest for the trees and does everything he/she can to decrease circulation, or in this case hits to a popular blog.

Oh well I guess 4,000 to 7,000 hits a month don’t account to much in the grand scheme of things.

Be sure to tell that to your advertisers.

In the meantime for those who do like to stop by I’ll continue to post now and then until Ct Media/Hearst decides to pull the plug on this little part of the Rainbow.

See you in Oz kids.

PS: if you’ll notice “they” still haven’t fixed the photo in the title banner for this blog. What the heck it’s only been 9 plus months and of course some things take time to fix.

Yep  ..  and the printed press wonders why more and more newspapers and magazines go belly up.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in anti-gay | Add a comment

“Halo Camera” Captures Alleged Assualt Of Gay Man By Cop

In Denver on Tuesday members of the LGBT community spoke out about alleged police violence in the wake of a surveillance video which shows a Denver police officer throwing down a gay man to the ground. As KDRV-TV reports,The officers in question were given 3 days suspension without pay for using excessive force against Shawn Johnson and Michael DeHerrera.

The Denver Manager of Safety, Ron Perea, has since resigned.

“As we wait for the findings from the FBI investigation, we must recognize that this is not an isolated incident,” says Mindy Barton, the Legal Director for The G.L.B.T. Community Center of Colorado. “We need a criminal justice system that works to build trust and security among our communities, rather than terrorizing people with fear and violence.”

Be sure to read Focus On The Rainbow at OutLoudBlogs

Bookmark and Share
Posted in anti-gay violence | Add a comment

LGBT Equality ? Not By A Long Shot Most Say In A Survey

In 1920, 144 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, women in the United States achieved the right to vote. Ninety years later, the issues of gender equality remain debated and unresolved.

Among all American adults, 63% agree that the U.S. still has a long way to go to reach complete gender quality. While three-quarters of women (74%) agree with this, so do just over half of men (52%).  By comparison, when this question is posed to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) adults, 73% say the U.S. still has a long way to go, including 95% of lesbians (an especially notable finding when compared with 74% of heterosexual females.)

When querying whether things are fine between men and women, the nation is split – just over half of Americans (52%) disagree that things are fine between the genders while 43% say things are fine. But men and women have a different take on the situation with over half of men (55%) believing things are fine compared to just one-third (32%) of women who say the same.

However, when these overall findings are contrasted with the attitudes of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals and transgender adults, the differences become even sharper.  Only 22% of lesbians (and 32% of gay men) suggest that things are fine between genders, as well as only one-third or 34% of all LGBT adults sampled.

These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,412 adults surveyed online between June 14 and 21, 2010 by Harris Interactive including 341 adults who self-identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender by Harris Interactive, a global market research and consulting firm, in conjunction with Witeck-Combs Communications, Inc., a strategic public relations and marketing communications firm with special expertise in the LGBT market.  [Please note that this survey was designed to measure the general attitudes and beliefs of American adults about the changing roles of men and women in society – and not specifically about issues surrounding gender identity and expression nor about continued discrimination towards transgender Americans.]

Whether the issue of gender equality should be addressed is another question in these times with so many other pressing concerns. Three-quarters of U.S. adults (74%) agree that they do not think gender equality is perfect, but there are more pressing issues to fix first. And men and women are in agreement on this (74% of men agree as do 75% of women).  A smaller majority (59%) of LGBT adults agrees that while gender equality is not perfect, there are other priorities requiring attention.

Source – PR Newswire – read more about the poll HERE

Read the new version of Focus On The Rainbow at OutLoudBlogs

Bookmark and Share
Posted in LGBT Rights/Protection | Add a comment

We’ve Moved Folks .. Come Over And See Us At Our New Homes

 

Well the time has come to move on to bigger and better things, so after testing two new websites, Focus On The Rainbow has moved to OutLoudBlogs and Sportsfags.com where readership is growing by leaps and bounds.

I’d like to thank CT Media/Hearst Newspapers for giving Focus On The Rainbow a platform but as there has been a severe lack of promotion for this blog unlike the new homes of Focus On The Rainbow and Focus On The Rainbow – Sports it’s time to move on.

Hopefully the webmasters here will keep this blog up so you can go into the archives, but just in case get the Twitter feeds available in the links section or add the new sites to your favorites. This will be the final posting at this website.

The obvious question which will be asked is “why move ?” .

One answer is there are only so many hours in a day, or the wee hours of the morning after working an evening shift to work on three blogs. Another is to help a friend give his two websites for LGBTs a kick start in readers. But the main reason is for me to highlight or “focus” on one particular story which I feel other LGBT websites may not have covered or readers weren’t aware of. Throw into that I want to create an eclectic mix of news, satire and more edgy postings which I can’t do here. God forbid I offend heterosexuals with some BEEFCAKE now and then.

The new version of Focus On The Rainbow is different than the one found here. Less relying and passing on press releases but more re-reporting news which I already do at the sports version and on occasion write longer “essays” ( or Special Edition Posting) on a topic, sometimes in multiple parts. So as you can see it’s not a simple one reason answer.

I’ve always wanted Focus On The Rainbow to be different from other LGBT blogs which many just copy from one to another the same story or topic on any given day. You won’t find all the news on Focus On The Rainbow and I don’t feel I have to present that with everyone being able to setup their own RSS feed selections by which they can select the stories they wish to read. With this in mind both versions at Sportsfags and OutLoudBlogs will now allow me to present a unique presentation of news and issues which matter to the LGBT community.

I want to in the simplest terms to focus on the Rainbow not here’s the news of the Rainbow.

Thanks to all the readers who have stopped by here over the past year but I’ve learned if you want to do blogs about LGBTs you really do need to do it on the other side of the Rainbow.

Peace, love and have a Rainbow Day.

Lyndon Evans

Publisher/Focus On The Rainbow

UPDATE – 8/22/10 – As Focus On The Rainbow is still getting a considerable amount of hits and even comments on various postings I’ve decided to continue off and on to post press releases from sources regarding a variety of topics.

I do invite all of the LGBT community who happen to stop by here to check out our new home at OutLoudBlogs and also our sports version at Sportsfags.

The new version of Focus On The Rainbow has now become exactly what I had hoped to accomplish. Not necessarily to be an end all news blog but spotlighting events, topics, persons and at times even history of LGBTs.

For those who are not of the LGBT community be warned the new version is at times a brutally frank discussion on varying topics without the self-imposed censorship deemed necessary for the version here at CT Media/Hearst.

Starting with the posting dated 8/22/10 there will be a link at the bottom of each posting to Focus On The Rainbow at OutLoudBlogs.

Thanks to all who stop by here and at the two other Focus On The Rainbow locations.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Focus On The Rainbow, Focus On The Rainbow - Sports | 1 Comment

The DADT Survey From The “Army Times” Perspective

As with all things political, blogs, websites and even various media can be biased in their presentation or opinion of news. This week that of course happened, depending where you read about it, with the DADT survey.

For a different perspective (and not implying this article is biased one way or another) here is an article written by William H. McMichael at the Army Times.

If don’t ask, don’t tell is repealed and you had on-base housing and a gay or lesbian service member was living with a same-sex partner on-base, what would you most likely do?”

The 400,000 active-duty and reserve troops who received the Pentagon’s survey on its policy on gays can choose from eight answers to that question: Two suggest normalcy or an effort to get to know the new neighbors, four suggest discomfort and even moving off base, one is simply “something else” — followed by a space to be more specific — and the last is simply, “don’t know.”

The survey, which went out Wednesday, aims to gauge troops’ attitudes on the possible repeal of the 17-year-old policy against openly gay service members. A copy was leaked Friday by the Santa Barbara, Calif.-based Palm Center, a pro-gay research group.

The Pentagon confirmed the authenticity of the question and dozens of others contained in the confidential survey, although it said the Palm Center’s copy was not the complete product.

As with a draft version obtained and published online by Military Times on Wednesday, the final version leans heavily on questions about performance, mission completion and morale. While some of the questions are reworded and several new ones are included, the leaked survey generally hews to the tenor of the earlier draft.

As earlier confirmed, it consists of questions in three basic categories:

• Baseline questions regarding respondents’ backgrounds.

• Respondents’ overall experiences in the military, past experiences serving with individuals they believed to be gay, and the effect that had on unit performance and morale.

• How respondents feel a repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” would affect the services across a broad range of issues.

The survey questions were developed by the independent research group Westat in cooperation with the Pentagon.

The Pentagon declined to provide the questions it said were left out of the corroborated final version.

‘Derogatory and insulting’

The survey underscores Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ March 2 guidance that the 10-month study on the impact of repeal be carried out in a “thorough and dispassionate” manner, said the Pentagon’s top public affairs official, Assistant Secretary of Defense Douglas Wilson.

At least one advocacy group vehemently disagreed.

“While it remains safe for gay and lesbian troops to participate in this survey, it is simply impossible to imagine a survey with such derogatory and insulting wording, assumptions, and insinuations going out about any other minority group in the military,” said Alexander Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United and a former Army interrogator who was discharged under “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

“Flawed aspects of the survey include the unnecessary use of terms that are known to be inflammatory and bias-inducing in social science research, such as the clinical term ‘homosexual’; an overwhelming focus on the potential negative aspects of repeal and little or no inclusion of the potential positive aspects of repeal or the negative aspects of the current policy; the repeated and unusual suggestion that a co-worker or leader might need to ‘discuss’ appropriate behavior and conduct with gay and lesbian troops,” he said.

Pentagon spokeswoman Cynthia Smith said Westat worked with the Defense Manpower Data Center to both develop the questions and come up with the list of 200,000 active-duty and 200,000 reserve and National Guard e-mail addresses.

Westat sent out the surveys and is charged with maintaining the confidentiality of respondents, including those who fill out a confidential “online dialogue” after completing the survey, which they must do within 72 hours, she said.

The survey itself must be completed by Aug. 15, Smith said.

Smith urged service members to fill out the questionnaires and to take the 20- to 30-minute task seriously.

“We want them to be open, candid and honest,” Smith said.

The survey is one part of the work of the Comprehensive Review Working Group, established by Gates in the wake of President Obama’s call to reverse the ban on open service by gays, which Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen endorsed during February testimony. Since then, the full House has passed a reversal of the law, as has the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The questions

The final survey questions are nearly all multiple choice; 11 ask about the potential impact of repeal on individual and perceived unit morale.

There are questions on leadership challenges; attitudes toward gay co-workers if repeal takes place; the impact of repeal on the ability of a respondents’ unit to complete both deployed and non-deployed missions; and off-duty social impact.

Apparently new to the final version were questions about the importance of off-duty socializing among members of the respondents’ unit; about whether the respondent thinks he or she is serving with any gays; and about how many other members of a combat unit shared a respondent’s belief that one of them was gay.

The draft survey included a question widely voiced by troops, including those who took part in Military Times focus groups last winter and whose opinions, along with those of gay service members and poll respondents, were the basis of a February story on the potential impact of repeal: “If Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is repealed and a gay or lesbian service member attended a military social with a same-sex partner, which are you most likely to do?”

Potential answers: “continue to attend” such functions, “stop bringing my spouse, significant other or other family members with me to military social functions,” “stop attending” such functions,” “something else” — again, followed by a blank to be filled in — and “don’t know.”

The Military Times poll showed that troops generally are satisfied with the current policy banning open service by gays, but that opposition to repeal is steadily dropping.

In addition to the survey sent out Wednesday, the Working Group continues its visits to various military bases, meetings with advocacy groups at the Pentagon, and gathers data via an “online inbox” at www.defense.gov/dadt, which requires a Common Access Card, Smith said.

In early August, a confidential online survey of 150,000 family members will be launched.

Still to be completed, Smith said, is an update of the 1993 Rand Corp. study, “Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy: Options and Assessment.”

The group’s implementation plan is due to Gates by Dec. 1.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in DADT | 1 Comment

US District Judge In MA Rules DOMA Is Unconstitutional

The federal law banning gay marriage is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of a state to define the institution and therefore denies married gay couples some federal benefits, a federal judge ruled Thursday in Boston.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro ruled in favor of gay couples’ rights in two separate challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, a 1996 law that the Obama administration has argued for repealing. The rulings apply to Massachusetts but could have broader implications if they’re upheld on appeal.

The state had argued the law denied benefits such as Medicaid to gay married couples in Massachusetts, where same-sex unions have been legal since 2004.

Tauro agreed and said the act forces Massachusetts to discriminate against its own citizens in order to be eligible for federal funding in federal-state partnerships.

The act “plainly encroaches” upon the right of the state to determine marriage, Tauro said in his ruling on a lawsuit filed by state Attorney General Martha Coakley. In a ruling in a separate case filed by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, Tauro ruled the act violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

“Congress undertook this classification for the one purpose that lies entirely outside of legislative bounds, to disadvantage a group of which it disapproves. And such a classification the Constitution clearly will not permit,” Tauro wrote.

Nancy Gill, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit brought by GLAD, said she is “thrilled” with the rulings.

“I’m so happy I can’t even put it into words,” she said.

Gill and Marcelle Letourneau married in Massachusetts in 2004 after being together for more than 20 years.

Jenny Pizer, senior counsel to Lambda Legal, a gay rights legal organization, said the Massachusetts decision “reinforces and illustrates” the arguments made by plaintiffs in the legal challenge to California’s Proposition 8, which prohibited gay marriage. So while the decision is not binding in California, Pizer said the case could have influence here.

Source – various

Bookmark and Share
Posted in DOMA | Add a comment

Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle Says NO To Same-Sex Civil Unions

As is being reported by The Associated Press, and should come as no surprise, gays and lesbians are being denied joining in civil unions.

Hawaii’s governor on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have permitted same-sex civil unions, ending months of speculation on how she would weigh in on the contentious, emotional debate.

Republican Gov. Linda Lingle’s action came on the final day she had to either sign or veto the bill, which the Hawaii Legislature approved in late April.

“There has not been a bill I have contemplated more or an issue I have thought more deeply about during my eight years as governor than House Bill 444 and the institution of marriage,” Lingle said at a news conference. “I have been open and consistent in my opposition to same-gender marriage, and find that House Bill 444 is essentially marriage by another name.”

“The subject of this legislation has touched the hearts and minds of our citizens as no other social issue of our day,” Lingle said. “It would be a mistake to allow a decision of this magnitude to be made by one individual or a small group of elected officials.”

In response, HRC (Human Rights Campaign) wrote the following at their website.

Today, a coalition of leading lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender organizations in Hawaii denounced Governor Linda Lingle for vetoing HB 444, Hawaii’s Civil Union legislation. The bill provides that equal rights and responsibilities of married couples in Hawaii be afforded to thousands of non-married couples in the state – including same-sex couples. Coalition members include Equality Hawaii, the GLBT Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, the Human Rights Campaign, PFLAG-Oahu and Pride Alliance Hawaii.

“Today is a sad day for the thousands of Hawaii families who remain second class citizens,” said Alan Spector, legislative affairs co-chair for Equality Hawaii. “We fail to see how the Governor’s actions are in the best interest of Hawaii’s future and are nothing more than political maneuvering at the expense of people’s lives. We’re disappointed and outraged that same-sex families will not be treated equally under Hawaii law, but vow to come back and fight this fight another day.”

“Today was the first time a civil unions bill passed both Houses in Hawaii by solid margins and was on the Governor’s desk for signing,” said Jo-Ann Adams, Chair of the GLBT Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii. “With such broad support from the legislators, who are the elected officials closest to the public, and the consistent results of the professional polls showing broad support for civil unions as a civil rights issue, we are deeply disappointed that the Governor ignored the will of the people and vetoed the bill. We are determined, no matter how many sessions and election cycles it takes, to achieve full recognition for our families.”

“Americans nationwide share in the disappointment and outrage of thousands of Hawaii’s families who will not receive equal treatment under law,” said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. “Thankfully, there are local advocates as well as leaders in the Hawaii legislature who will continue to further the cause of equality. For decades, we have been a loyal partner in this fight for fairness in the Aloha State and we pledge to stand with them for years to come.”

“Today, on July 6, 2010, Gov. Linda Lingle denied social justice when she vetoed HB444 for Civil Unions,” said Rev. Carolyn M. Golojuch, President of PFLAG-Oahu. “Her denial is a violation of the integrity of her office and a violation of her oath of office. Governor Lingle’s denial of equal rights, benefits and protections for one segment of our citizens is a denial for all of our citizens of Hawaii.”

“The members of Pride Alliance Hawaii are greatly disappointed in Governor Lingle’s decision to veto the Civil Unions bill and allow the state to continue its discriminatory practices against same-sex couples,” said Tara O’Neill, President of Pride Alliance Hawaii. “Two separate and independent economic studies, a poll conducted by a nationally recognized polling organization, and the thousands of residents who vocalized their support of the bill to the Governor and the Legislature over the past two years makes clear that the passage of HB444 is good economic sense, is socially just, and is supported by the people of Hawaii. The LGBT community’s fight for equality in Hawaii will continue.”

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Same-sex marriage/partners, anti-gay | Add a comment

Amtrak’s Ad Campaign Markets LGBTs To Travel By Rail

According to an article at The Daily Caller Amtrak is the newest travel segment to go after LGBTs.

For the first time, Amtrak is courting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered travelers with a targeted $250,000 multimedia advertising blitz this summer.

The government-owned rail company is looking to the LGBT community for business with the hopes that its propensity for travel will translate well into rail transportation.

While Amtrak spokeswoman, Karina Romero did not go into specifics, she told The Daily Caller, “We are always looking for new ways to reach potential passengers and this community travels a lot.”

Darlene Abubakar, the director of national advertising for Amtrak, told TheDC, “Most all of the major airlines, hotels and others in the travel and tourism industry target the LGBT market segment … Amtrak ’s goal is to raise the level of awareness of the benefits of train travel and increase consideration and ridership amongst this segment.”

Abubakar said that for this fiscal year, ending in September, the publicly funded company will spend a quarter million dollars to market its services to the LGBT community. She was quick to add that the corporation does have plans to continue the campaign into the next fiscal year but has not yet finalized its budget. Amtrak allocates about 10 percent of its media budget to diversity and advertising  campaigns but that amount fluctuates year to year.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Travel | Add a comment
Page 1 of 6812345Next »...Last »

Recent Comments

More blogs

Sean Bowley

SPB's High School Football

News, analysis, commentary and features on Connecticut high school football by Sean Patrick Bowley.
Lennie Grimaldi

Only in Bridgeport

Award-winning journalist Lennie Grimaldi cracks open the juicy stuff in Connecticut's largest city.
Danielle Travali

Ruby Red Stilettos

Holly is a quirky, stiletto-clad writer, foodie, health nut in search of good friends and good fun.

Joe's View

Joe is the Connecticut Post's entertainment writer.

Archives

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug «-»  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
  • Archives

Note: The blog is written by a reader and is not edited by the Connecticut Media Group. The blogger is solely responsible for content.