The subject of parents protesting the discussion or reading of particular books has been brought up many times both in the mainstream media and LGBT blogs/media.
As is the case again some LGBT blogs have started another firestorm because parents protest the reading of books for children in elementary school which have a “gay and/or lesbian theme”.
Now it’s because of an article/news story done by WCVB-TV in Boston about the complaint of parents over the reading of a book to second graders at a Lexington, MA school about two gay men.
There is more controversy at a Lexington elementary school, where once again a parent is upset about gay themes being inserted into the curriculum.
This time, the mother of a second-grader is upset that her son’s teacher read the class a book highlighting two gay princes.
It would be fine if the discussion on LGBT blogs such as Pam’s House Blend was left at that, but because of who the parents are making the complaint and because of who the WCVB-TV reporter is, the issue takes on a whole new spin.
That, I’m not even going to get into here. For those interested for another opportunistic bashing of “the Conservative Right” you can click the link for Pam’s House Blend and join their biased and zealous take on it.
Instead this commentary deals with just how young is too young and when is it appropriate to start discussing in school the gay and lesbian lifestyle.
When books like the one in question and others are brought to the forefront in the media, the schools in question say it is to bring an understanding that we’re all equal regardless of sexuality, while the Right-Wing Conservatives and religious zealots call it “the indoctrination of homosexuality in our youth”.
And by the same token, the more ultra-liberal and extreme minded members of the LGBT community would I’m sure have the books read to the child shortly after the baby exits the womb.
Being the often centrist and moderate thinking person which I am, I myself often ask when is it appropriate to offer these books into school curriculum. Are first or second graders really able to grasp the concept of a child with two mommies or daddies, or gay penguins or two gay princes ?
Can’t we let our little kids be just that for as long as they can without having to have a complete understanding of the world around them ?
To put this into some perspective, in a way my being a little kid in second and third grade was taken away because of “duck and cover”. We had to practice what to do in case of a nuclear attack. Granted we may not have had a complete understanding of what it all meant, but it scared the be-jebus out of me and other children in my class, that I can remember for sure.
And if a school is going to offer these books as part of curriculum, what can possibly be wrong in giving the parents no matter the reason in their objection the opportunity to opt-out of the child’s participation.
I don’t know what the magic age would be. Perhaps fourth grade, I really don’t have an answer.
Little kids grow up fast enough, why not let them be little kids for as long as they can without having to take on the “social responsibility and acceptance” of adults. And then when needed, let the parents enlighten the children at home, or as I was often scolded by a teacher, not to pick on another child and explain why.
I wish I never had to learn about “duck and cover” and could have enjoyed being a little kid for a bit longer.
This isn’t exactly Art Linkletter’s “Kid Say The Darnedest Things”





