Financial Mines

News and notes from the business reporters for the Connecticut Media Group.

Archive for the ‘Main Street’ Category

Conn. gets piece of $500 million generic drug settlement from India

by:

Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen said Tuesday the state will get about $1.5 million from Ranbaxy, the India-based generic drug maker, who settled allegations this week that it was selling generics that were less than full strength or less than pure.

Ranbaxy agreed to settle the charges after a whistleblower made allegations about its drugs in court. The feds and states got involved because, ultimately because Medicaid, like private insurance policies, pushes patients to use cheaper generics when available. In all, the Indian pharmaceutical made 26 generic type of drugs between 2003 and 2010.

Ranbaxy agreed to pay fines and restitution to Medicaid programs, while not admitting it did anything wrong.

 

First Student contract loss leaves employment doubts for 174

by:
Getting on the bus

Getting on the bus

After the last student gets off the bus to go home in June in Trumbull and Shelton the kids will shout and run, feeling the joy of being set free for the summer. For the 174 bus drivers and other employees working for First Student, they’re facing the prospects of not having jobs.

First Student lost the contract for the schools in Trumbull and Shelton and as a result filed a mass layoff notice with the state last week. It doesn’t mean the people will definitely not have jobs come the next school year, changes in bus contracts occur fairly regularly here in Connecticut and the incoming companies often hire the drivers who know the routes and the towns.

Still, in this economy, it’s not the most pleasant way to head into the summer, especially withe every company looking to find a way to shed costs.

 

 

NY AG says Wells and Bank of America need to be sued

by:

New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman announced Monday he intends to sue Bank of America and Wells Fargo for violating the $25 billion national mortgage settlement with the states.

As part of the 2012 deal, which Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen helped craft, the nation’s five largest banks agreed to provide mortgage relief to homeowners and abide by new servicing guidelines, which included timely response to modification requests and to keep track of paperwork.

Wells Fargo maintains it is compliance while Bank of America told the Washington Post it will work to correct any problems.

Schneiderman, in a press release, said his office has received a host of complaints from consumers and the professionals who are helping consumers navigate the mortgage modification process. New York is reporting there were 339 violations by Bank of America and Wells in the Empire State since October of last year.

“The five mortgage servicers that signed the National Mortgage Settlement are legally required to take specific, rigorous, and enforceable steps to protect homeowners,” Schneiderman said in a press release. “Wells Fargo and Bank of America have flagrantly violated those obligations, putting hundreds of homeowners across New York at greater risk of foreclosure. I intend to use every tool available to my office to hold these companies accountable under the terms of the National Mortgage Settlement.”

According to the independent monitor hired to make sure the banks comply, Connecticut was the only state where more professionals, like attorneys and housing counselors, complained about the banks’ process than New York. The monitor tracked complaints between April of 2012 and January of 2013.

However, in Connecticut, direct consumer complaints about the process were among the lowest.

Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen said he is reviewing New York’s complaint.

In an email sent via his spokeswoman, Jepsen said, “As a member of the Monitoring Committee of the National Mortgage Settlement (NMS), I take any alleged violation of the NMS very seriously.  The NMS provides the monitoring committee and each state with the ability to enforce provisions of the settlement, including filing suit, if necessary.  Today I received a copy of New York’s letter identifying potential problems with some banks compliance with the NMS.  I was aware of many of the issues raised by New York.  I am reviewing the information provided by New York’s and will work with the other members of the monitoring committee to ensure full compliance with the NMS.”

The AG’s office maintains that the reports it’s getting from mortgage pros and consumers are that the banks have been more responsive since the settlement, though staff are still hearing complaints about lost documents and a lack of timely communications.

Connecticut’s AG pledges to work with the banks to correct the issues.

Under the agreement, the monitoring committee has 21 days to review New York’s complaints at which time it might decide to move as a group to sue or do nothing and allow New York to go it alone.

Restructuring and closings send layoff pace higher

by:

Companies restructuring or closing down were the leading reasons cited for job layoffs in the first quarter.

Chicago-based Challenger Gray and Christmas said in its latest job cut report that employers trimmed jobs at a faster pace during the first three months of this year compared to a year ago, with big cuts in finance, retail and healthcare pushing up total projected losses beyond 145,000.

Connecticut job reductions totaled 873 in March and totaled 3,975 through the first three months of this year. Here are the top reason

CHALLENGER, GRAY & CHRISTMAS, INC.

JOB-CUT ANNOUNCEMENT REPORT

JOB CUT REASONS

March YEAR-TO-DATE
Restructuring 23,817 74,414
Closing 9,335 29,514
Cost-Cutting 3,074 12,858
Demand Downturn 659 3,366
Economic Conditions 3,266
Merger/Acquisition 2,197 2,893
Legal Trouble 2,600 2,809
Government Contract Loss/Sequestration Concerns 2,717 2,717
Outsourcing 864 2,114
Natural Disaster 2,000
Bankruptcy 667 1,920
Loss of Contract 800 1,851
Voluntary Severance 255 1,105
Labor Dispute 1,000
Federal Spending Cuts 917 917
Relocation 418 859
Government Regulation 230 380
Reorganization/Consolidation 290 290
Drought 200 200
Competition 190
Order Cancellation/Reduction 187 187
Funding Loss 160
Health Reform 28 28
TOTAL 49,255 145,038

Rates fall as mortgage applications slip on cooling refi activity

by:

Jumbo mortgage interest rates fell 0.5 percent last week.

Mortgage refinancing activity slipped 6 percent last week, but new home buyers continued to increase and now comprise 26 percent of the total mortgage lending market.

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, showed total activity for mortgages decreased 4.0 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.

“Total purchase applications increased last week, due to an almost 7 percent increase in purchase applications for government loans.  This was likely driven by borrowers applying for loans prior to the scheduled increase in FHA premiums that took effect on April 1,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.  “On a year over year basis, purchase applications are up about 4 percent, in line with the trend we are seeing in home sales volumes.”

The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 74 percent of total applications from 75 percent the previous week.The adjustable-rate mortgage share of activity remained constant at 5 percent of total applications.  The HARP share of refinance applications decreased to 28 percent from 29 percent the prior week.

Rates for both jumbo and conforming loans fell, though the wealthy set saw a bigger discount last week than the rest of the market.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances decreased to 3.76 percent from 3.79 percent. The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances decreased to 3.85 percent from 3.90 percent.

Back in grasshopper mode for American economy

by:

Return of the grasshopper economy. Photo source, Getty Images

If Aesop were alive and writing today, the hard working Ant, who saves and preps for disaster, would get stepped on by Ben Bernanke and the Grasshopper, who lives for today, would get nothing but encouragement to keep on ignoring the future.

The National Foundation for Credit Counseling released its seventh annual Financial Literacy Survey Monday finding that Americans are spending more money, but more than three-quarters don’t feel secure financially.

“This year’s survey results provided somewhat of a mixed message,” Susan C. Keating, president and CEO of the NFCC, in a press release.  “More than one in four consumers indicated they are spending more than last year, yet 77 percent admitted to having financial worries, listing insufficient savings as their top financial concern.  While consumers moving out of recession mode and becoming more comfortable with spending is positive for the nation’s economy, they need to be mindful of the fact that increasing spending without a safety net in the form of savings could have a negative impact on their personal economy.”

As the economy has heated up, Federal Reserve figures show more Americans are taking on more debt. Yet, wages according the Labor Department have fallen in the last year, with the average weekly pay in the nation dropping $10.  In the meantime, Americans who would like to be disciplined and save have little chance of that, with banks paying less than a percent on savings accounts and other core products upon which people used to build nest eggs.

It begs the question, how is this economic expansion, in which the costs for gasoline, food, college, health care and housing are all increasing, are Americans keeping up.

Well, here’s a picture of how they’re doing from the NFCC’s survey of a representative sample of more than 2,000 Americans:

Regarding consumer responses around financial concerns, respondents were asked which areas of personal finance currently worry them the most, and were allowed to select multiple responses, with results as follows:

1.    Not enough savings – Overall, 57 percent of Americans indicated they are worried over a lack of savings, including forty-three percent who are concerned about not having enough “rainy day” savings for an emergency, and 38 percent concerned about retiring without having enough money set aside.  Although fairly evenly divided, the data suggest that having enough money to resolve daily emergencies takes precedence over the longer term retirement planning.
2.    Not being able to pay financial obligations – A total of twenty-six percent of U.S. adults, or roughly 61 million people , were worried  about servicing their debt commitments, including  concerns around paying credit card debt, 13 percent, repaying student loan debt 8 percent,
an inability to make monthly vehicle payments 7 percent, and not being able to pay off existing medical debt 6 percent.
3.    Health insurance – One in four U.S. adults are worried about health insurance – either not being able to afford it 19 percent and/or not having any 17 percent.
4.    Credit – While 19 percent were worried about their credit score and/or lack of access of credit overall, 16 percent were anxious about their  score, with nine percent concerned over their lack of access to credit, suggesting that consumers continue to realize the importance of credit in their lives.  However, most adults have neglected to review their credit report 65 percent or score 60 percent in the past year.
5.    Job loss – Eighteen percent, or more than 42 million Americans , indicated fear of job loss as a major concern, a number that is disturbingly high.
6.    Foreclosure – As the least of consumers’ concerns (among those listed), a comparatively small four percent of Americans are worried over losing their home to foreclosure, undoubtedly a positive signal for the housing industry and the economy as a whole.
The good news is that 20 percent of U.S. adults indicated they do not have any financial worries, a strong sign of consumer confidence.

Remaining stubbornly consistent over the past three years, 40 percent of U.S. adults gave themselves a grade of C, D, or F on their knowledge of personal finance, thus it is not surprising that nearly four in five 78 percent agree that they could benefit from additional advice and answers to everyday financial questions from a professional.

Push for minimum wage hikes: Prelude to wage inflation or labor unrest?

by:

This weekend the Mines has dug into the minimum wage hike issue, leaving the tailings for readers to think about and hopefully discuss.

Ten states raised the minimum wage this year. Almost a dozen, including Connecticut and Maine are looking at raising the floor on wages in coming years. And, in Washington, D.C., there’s a proposal to require employee to pay American workers a minimum of $10 an hour.

There are numerous political elements at work here, but financial pain is really at the heart of why there’s so much traction to the push for giving workers a raise.

Check out these numbers:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics released a little report on Thursday detailing the results of its quarterly survey of employers. This is a comprehensive report on employment and wages every employer in the nation that pays unemployment insurance taxes must file.

According to the BLS, workers in only three states in the third quarter of 2012 were making more money than they did in 2011. Two states, Minnesota and Oregon, reported the average wage had not changed in a year.

So in 45 states, workers actually made less on average than the year before. The BLS also found that of the 328 largest counties in the country, 274 of them saw wages fall. Fairfield County, which ranks 9th in the nation for highest average weekly wage, suffered the fourth largest decline in pay among counties. The average pay in Fairfield County dropped $58 to $1,371. In America, the average worker took home $906 a week, $10 less than the year before.

It’s a slap in the face to a lot of families that have labored through four or more years without a raise while costs for gasoline and food have gone up. Many Dr. Dooms in the investment community have been predicting the U.S. is headed for a period of hyper-inflation, largely due to the money printing at the Federal Reserve, which has kept interest rates effectively at zero allowing cheap credit to permeate the economy. Despite this, inflation hasn’t jumped, one reason is that wage inflation hasn’t happened. After all, if a loaf of bread rises to a cost of $70, wages will have to follow.

And so now, we get a push on minimum wage as people continue to fall behind.

Tsedeye Gebreselassie, a staff attorney with the National Employment Law Project, which supports many of the minimum wage hike campaigns, put it pretty succinctly. The reason minimum wage needs to rise is because it’s no longer just for entry level workers. There are adults trying to live off of $8.25 an hour in Connecticut. The national minimum wage is $7.25.

And there’s support for this contention. A survey of workers in Connecticut by Connecticut Voices for Children found that 47,000 parents in the state worked for minimum wages in the state. Of the more than 226,000 low paying jobs in Connecticut, 185,000 were filled by people over the age of 20.

So, at last, it looks like there’s going to be a little wage inflation in the country, but it’s not going to be easy.

During a debate on Connecticut’s minimum wage in February, one opponent to the minimum wage said if it goes up, employers will hire fewer workers and expect more out of them.

Talk to anyone who has kept a job through this recession and tough times and they’ll tell you they’re doing a lot more for the same amount of money. Now, financially stressed families barely making it now, will be told to work harder and longer hours, for a raise that still only keeps their heads above water.

Now there have been worse times for American workers. Certainly workers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries had it worse than those today, but the question is, if employers continue to ask workers to do more for effectively less, does that set the stage for a period of labor unrest?

Construction hiring threatened by Fed cuts

by:

Construction companies added jobs in 35 states in February creating 48,000 jobs nationally, the largest one-month gain in nearly six years, according to an analysis by the Associated General Contractors of America of Labor Department data. Connecticut was not among the states that saw a gain in February and there are concerns about future growth here and nationally.

The association is concerned a failure to invest in public projects, including schools and roads, could mute the recovery. And while Connecticut has been approved to receive $250 million in funds to help people rebuild after Hurricane Sandy, real questions persist about future disasters and what kind of federal aid could be available.

“The turnaround in construction hiring that began in a few states two years ago has now spread to most of the country,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. “There are strong indications that the expansion will continue for residential and private nonresidential construction, but investment in infrastructure and public buildings is likely to shrink further.”

Simonson noted that only 12 states and D.C. lost construction jobs between January and February, while employment held steady in three states: Connecticut, Montana and Vermont.

Connecticut ranked 36th for construction jobs creation in February but is 43rd compared to a year ago. The Nutmeg State is down 1,300 jobs compared to February of 2012.

Page 1 of 2012345...Last »