Only in Bridgeport

Award-winning journalist Lennie Grimaldi cracks open the juicy stuff in Connecticut's largest city

Archive for September, 2009

Wanted: City Cheerleader

by:

Bridgeport needs a cheerleader. That’s what I hear from downtown property owners, merchants, workers etc.

The other day the University of Bridgeport hosted a forum featuring Larry Goldman,  chief executive of the New Jersey Performing Arts Center that helped revitalize downtown Newark.

His message: the arts can change perception and transform an image.

Said UB President Neil Salonen:

“The arts are important to us…they’re important to the community. The arts are good for the soul and good for the community in a practical way.”

Amen.

Let’s look downtown and environs: City Lights Gallery, Housatonic art gallery, ballpark, arena, Barnum Museum, Downtown Cabaret, Playhouse on the Green, an emerging restaurant district on Fairfield Avenue, Sweetport Festival, a variety of events at Baldwin Plaza (not just Ann Coulter).

A cheerleader has a lot to work with. So, who’ll step up? It could be the mayor. Cheerleading is not just about we’re great and waving pom poms. It’s about organizing a marketing plan and putting folks in place that can carry it through.

Enthusiasm is one of Bill Finch’s assets. If he can find some breathing room outside the of the grind of running the state’s largest city to focus on marketing city assets the cheerleading becomes contagious. His can pass the baton to his Economic Development Director Don Eversley. “Jesus, Grimaldi, leave me alone. I have enough to do.”

Okay, wouldn’t it be nice if People’s United Bank CEO Philip Sheringham stepped up to help? You talk to anyone about the head of the largest bank based in Connecticut and they’ll tell you Philip doesn’t want to play. He’s from the left coast, no local roots, doesn’t care about Bridgeport. He drives into Bridgeport to work in his Taj Mahal office and drives out of the city when the day is done. Whatever he does to support Bridgeport is tokenism.

Shearingham ordering his marketing department to free up a few hundred grand to support a city marketing campaign is chump change for a bank with billions in assets. Or maybe Shearingham and Finch get together for a you kick in, I’ll kick in exchange? And maybe a few others from the business community play as well.

It’s been proven over and over, market your destination points, promote the arts and people and investors will follow. Gee, what a novel idea.

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

Freedom Of Information Fight

by:

Retired Superior Court Judge Carmen Lopez has become a stick in the eye to the Finch administration.

She has filed a complaint with the state claiming the Civil Service Commission violated Freedom Of Information laws when it dumped Ralph Jacobs as personnel director last month. Jacobs is appealing the termination in court. It’s the first time the city’s non-political personnel director has been canned and opens to door to Mayor Bill Finch to fill civil service slots with political supporters.

City Attorney Mark Anastasi has own take on freedom of information: freedom from information. We’ll see how this plays out. Lopez complaint to the FOI Commission:

Dear Commissioners

On August 21, 2009, the Civil Service Commission of the City of Bridgeport, held a meeting at Bridgeport City Hall. The purpose of the meeting involved the status of Mr. Ralph Jacobs, who was the Personnel Director of the City of Bridgeport.

Upon information and belief, the Civil Service Commission voted to enter Executive Session, for the purpose of discussing Mr. Jacobs performance, and possible dismissal. It entered Executive Session without giving Mr. Jacobs an opportunity to discuss the matter at an open meeting, as required by Section 1-200(6)(A) of the General Statutes. Following the Executive Session, the Commission voted, without comment, to dismiss the Personnel Director.

On September 1, 2009, the undersigned communicated via email with David Dunn, Bridgeport’s Acting Personnel Director. (see attached forwarded email)

I explained to Mr. Dunn that the minutes of the August 21, 2009 meeting were not available for inspection, and had not been posted on the City’s web site. This was, and to my knowledge remains, a violation of Section 1-225(a) of the General Statutes which reads:

“the votes of each member of any such public agency upon any issue before such public agency, shall be reduced to writing and made available for public inspection within forty eight hours and shall be recorded in the minutes of the session at which taken. Within seven days of the session to which such minutes refer, such minutes shall be available for public inspection and posted on such agency’s internet web site, if available….”

Mr. Dunn informed me that the minutes “are being prepared,” and asked that I request a copy, “in writing.” I expressed to him my belief that an email is “a writing” and satisfies the requirements of Section 1-212(a)of the General Statutes, which requires a person to apply for a copy of a public record “in writing.”

In addition, Mr. Dunn informed me that the City Attorney would review the minutes before they were made public. The taking of minutes would seem to be a function of the Commission’s secretary or Clerk, and not the City Attorney.

To date, I have received no response from Mr. Dunn, or from the Office of the City Attorney concerning my request for copies of any minutes which may have been prepared, despite a second communication on September 10, 2009. (see attached forwarded email.)

I am therefore requesting that the City of Bridgeport be found in violation of the Freedom of Information Act, due to its failure to compile, post, and make available, minutes of the August 21, 2009 Civil Service Commission meeting.

I also believe that there has been a violation of the Act, upon information and belief, because the Executive Session was illegal, and the public should not have been excluded.

Furthermore, requesting a document from the City of Bridgeport via email is a “writing” as that term is used in the applicable statute.

I believe that some or all of the above referenced violations of the FOI Act were committed without ‘reasonable grounds’ in violation of Section 1-206(b)(2) of the General Statutes.

I therefore request that a civil penalty be imposed.

A Tight AB Operation?

by:

Gee, could that really happen? One third of votes that  City Council candidates Lydia Martinez and Manny Ayala received on Tuesday’s Democratic primary came as a result of absentee ballots.

That doesn’t happen in Bridgeport, does it?

It has me thinking, and that’s never a good thing, about an autumn day in 1991 when a young Joe Ganim, Democratic candidate for mayor, expressed concern about political operatives for Republican Mayor Mary Moran running up an absentee ballot count.

“I’m worried about them cheating,” Ganim told a wise old political hand who had a quick reply.

“Don’t worry, Joe, all the cheaters are working for you.”

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

Ramos Rams Home Explanation

by:

Superintendent of Schools John Ramos says don’t listen to the media, ignore those blogs! Well, since I’m in a good mood today and in the spirit of fairness and goodwill I present for your reading pleasure the school chief’s explanation of how he missed $2 million that could have been spent on the kids. Here ya go, without sarcastic rejoinder…

AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT

The Budget Surplus

Good Afternoon. Last week we shared with the Board of Education the fact that the budget balance for ‘08-’09 was $2 million higher than expected. In what was a highly complex budget year, the reasons for this development are multiple and include culpability on the part of both us, the Board of Education, and the city. Once this information became evident to us, we immediately brought it to the attention of the elected Board of Education and the public. Further, we are continuing to salvage whatever portion of this surplus that we can, and working to ensure that any missteps are not repeated. I’m sharing this with you at this time so you will have heard it directly from me. I urge you not to draw your conclusions from the media or local blog. If you have questions, please call me. Most of us work hard. We need every dollar that we fight for. The additional surplus is painful, but we will continue to fight on in every venue for our scholars.

Sincerely,

Dr. John J. Ramos, Sr., Ed.D., Superintendent

Bridgeport Public Schools

 

MEMO EXPLAINING THE BUDGET SURPLUS

MEMORANDUM

To: John J. Ramos, Sr., Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools

PC: Board of Education Members

Robert Henry, Chief of Staff

From: Julio Molleda, Director of Finance & Business Services

RE: FY08-09 Bridgeport Public Schools Operating Budget Report

 

 

Date: September 9, 2009

The information presented below intends to provide additional factors contributing to the increased surplus.

As of 7/24/09, a modified budget surplus of $2,370,664 was being projected (see attached budget report). As of 9/4/09 and after all outstanding purchase orders were closed and year-end accruals were finally posted, a modified budget surplus of $4,571,922 resulted (budget report also enclosed). This surplus is $2,071,922 over the BOE committed surplus of $2,500,000 to assist the City in addressing the projected fiscal deficit.

Below is a summarization of variances by major account categories:

$ 546,115 In planning for fiscal year 09-10 MUNIS implementation the City stated that the payroll for July 10, ‘09 would be charged 100% to fiscal year 08-09 to allow for a “as clean as possible” transition into the MUNIS system; however, the reversal of this decision by the City generated the additional surplus by charging three days of salary to the fiscal year 09-10.

$ 123,000 Unanticipated Special Education Revenues received during July and August and crediting the out-of – district tuition line.

$ 147,646 Year-end pre-buys moved to FY09-10 as a result of vendors not being able to deliver goods or services together services with invoices prior to June 30, 2009 as required by the City related to the MUNIS system implementation. In prior years, goods needed to be encumbered by 6/30 and merchandise could be received and paid against the open purchase order once the goods had been received. Services had to be rendered by 6/30 but invoices could be processed till the end of mid August.

 

$ 363,016 Special Education Transportation savings and gasoline.

$1,028,670 Facilities Maintenance and Repairs including Custodial Supplies, Utilities, Landscaping Services, HVAC Equipment, Maintenance & Repairs, etc. The entering and approval of invoices into the financial system is centralized under the Accounts Payable function in City Finance. The experienced staff turnover due to City wide lay-offs and the delay in replacing positions, negatively impacted the Department’s ability to perform routine financial functions. Some past-due invoices in Utilities and Cleaning supplies have been incorporated in this latest forecast. The process of identifying other past due invoices by the Facilities Department continue at the present time.

In Summary, control over some basic financial operations functions residing in City Departments does not necessarily address the operating needs of the school system. MJLM report addressed, among several recommendations, the need of a single line budget item approval by City Council that was not adopted by the Education Committee of the City Council even though this recommendation was approved in full by both the BOE and the City Council in previous meetings. Some of these functions, like the posting of payrolls, journal entries, purchase order creation, etc. are examples of items currently handled by City Finance.

Some of the current procurement issues deal with the lack of approval for “standing” orders also known as “blanket” purchase orders. This means that individual lines have to be entered in the requisition stretching limited personnel resources and delaying the creation of purchase orders and therefore the delivery of goods and services on a timely manner. It is not uncommon in the Education field to have purchase orders with multiple lines.

Regarding the Internal Service Fund, cost projections were not shared with our Department during Budget Development despite our request. Attached please find copy of City Ordinance regarding the Internal Service Fund. Attached please find FY08-09 and FY09-10 Summary information regarding the Internal Service Fund. Please note that the projected expenditures FY 09-10 are fully funded by our requested increase of 6.5% and meets the $40 million obligation.

All the above illustrate the manner in which the financial management of the BOE affairs are continuously handicapped in the performance of its duties, which in most school districts is a given. Furthermore, this was an unusual year in which we were first approached regarding a $7 million dollar contribution to the city to assist in eliminating the larger deficit of $20 million. This continued to manifest throughout the year causing employee lay offs, furloughs and bumping of staff into positions that required training and upgrading of skills.

 (Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

Finch Steps Up For Nurses

by:

Mayor Bill Finch and city labor representatives are moving closer to resolving the pay dispute between city school nurses and  Superintendent of Schools John Ramos. (See prior commentary for details.)

Nurses had worked out an agreement that called for zero pay increases for four years in exchange for summers off with a 52-week pay period. Ramos rationalized he didn’t have to pay them this summer.

Finch on Thursday urged Ramos to make good on the deal and it appears Ramos has told his people to implement the pay action. As a result nurses are expected to hear officially in a letter to be distributed on Monday the process for making good on the pay. Stay tuned.

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

Cuckoo Cuckoo: Nurses Ratchet Up Ramos Pay Diss

by:

Where’s Nurse Ratchet when you need her? Well, a lot of nurses working for the city wouldn’t mind examining the brain cells of Superintendent of Schools John Ramos.

School nurses that come under the umbrella of the Board of Education went payless this summer because Ramos suffers from an I-think-I-don’t-remember moment regarding a deal the nurses union cut that waived salary increases for four years as well as provided other givebacks in exchange for having summers off — just like teachers — with pay checks spread out over 52 weeks.

The nurses stepped up at the city’s time of need. Ramos earns just about a quarter of a million a year as school chief, more than four times the pay of the base nurse salary. Nurses couldn’t pay rent, car loans, mortgages because Ramos said I didn’t cut that deal, it was the mayor. Well, BOE people did agree to the deal and now Ramos is trying to back off, even though the money is in the budget. Maybe he has other ideas for that money?

Mayor Bill Finch and Chief of Staff Adam Wood want the nurses paid in full. Wood was part of meetings with city labor negotiators and BOE personnel that worked out the arrangement placing school nurses under the BOE with payment obligations by the BOE. The City Council budgeted the money to cover the labor deal.

The mayor and Ramos were scheduled to meet on this subject Thursday afternoon. If I’m the mayor (aren’t you relieved I’m not) I’d try to reason with Ramos. Failing that I’d say, “Okay, John, here’s the deal: whether you like it or not you’re stuck with me as mayor for at least two more years. Live up to this agreement with the nurses. If you don’t, I’ll make sure come budget time you get nothing. Nothing. And then I’ll be happy to explain to anyone willing to listen that good hard working people suffered because of your inaction.”

And if that fails I’d call in Nurse Ratchet. All of them.

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

‘We Want You, We Need You, We Love You’

by:

Hey, does anyone care that Democratic primaries in four City Council districts will take place in less than one week? Yup, mark your calendars, Sept. 15. Polls open at 6 a.m.

What will the turnout be? Probably 10 percent, maybe a little more. Me, I love voting. It’s a great chance to get even, or actually support a candidate you like. Primaries are strange birds. They’re all about identifying friends and dragging them to the polls. “What do you mean you’re getting a pedicure! I need your vote.”

Sometimes a candidate can have more support going into primary day than a challenger but lose because of a stinky get-out-the-vote operation.  So lots of phones will be ringing in the next few days from candidates dialing for votes. And who knows, maybe a few votes out of St. Michael’s Cemetery? Nah, that doesn’t happen in city elections.

Bridgeport has 10 City Council districts with two members per district. A quick recap of the candidates:

District 135, North End, Whiskey Hill: Peter Clarke and Mary McBride-Lee will challenge incumbents Warren Blunt and Richard Bonney. Isa Mujahid is also in the hunt running solo.

District 136, the Hollow, portion of Noth End and East Side: Mark Trojanowski, running solo, will take on incumbents Angel DePara and Carlos Silva.

District 137, East Side: Maria Valle and Christina Ayala versus endorsed candidates Lydia Martinez and Manny Ayala. Valle is an incumbent City Council member who was dumped by Democratic Town Committee members.

District 138, Upper East Side: Andy Fardy and Ann Barney are taking on incumbents Bob Curwen and Rich Paoletto. So too James Morton and Tyreke Bird. Endorsed candidates listed on the top line, followed by Fardy and Barney and then Morton and Bird.

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)

Where Have You Gone Mr. T? Plus: Pleasure Beach Demo And Hennessy Statement

by:

My last entry about candidates that may play in a Democratic mayoral primary in 2011 drew some  emails.

Lennie, what is the matter with you! No mention of a black candidate or a candidate that appeals to the black community?

Bridgeport has a long history of electing white guys, except for Mary Moran, the last Republican to hold the office (1989-91) when the electorate went berserk following Democrat Tom Bucci’s admission that the city was broke and needed a state bailout. (Full disclosure: I worked in the Bucci administration.)

Well, Mary, a good person, strong public speaker without a thorough grasp for what a federal bankruptcy filing could do to the state’s largest city, sought federal bankruptcy protection in June of 1991 saying the only way to break the back of union agreements was to declare the city bankrupt. Wall Street threw a fit, torpedoed the city’s ability to borrow money to fix schools, repair bridges, etc. Overnight home values plummeted. Bottom line: a federal bankruptcy judge ruled city finances weren’t bad enough to warrant bankruptcy.

Enter Joe Ganim, 32 years old, a political outsider who emerged because no one wanted the job at $52k a year. The city enjoyed 10 straight years of balanced budgets without a tax increase, significant union concessions, strong department heads, a ballpark, arena, new home for Housatonic Community College. Ganim was the mayor who finally cleaned up Mount Trashmore, a mountainous blight of illegal demolition and dumping in the East End. Ganim was loved in the black community.

(Another full disclosure: I served as Ganim’s closest political advisor and made idiotic decisions when Joe had his hand out.)

So, what’s the point? Bridgeport has had one (and only one) black candidate for mayor who actually knew how to organize a community, be as cunning as any mainstream politician and understand every side of an every issue. His name is Charlie Tisdale who currently serves as director of Advancement for Bridgeport Community Development, the city’s anti-poverty agency. 

In his day Tizzy (his followers were known as Tizzies) intimidated white people, although not by design: he was big, black, smart and opinionated. In 1983, he was nearly elected mayor in a municipal election that turned out 70 percent of the vote. That’s right boys and girls, 70 percent. (To compare, in the last mayoral election in 2007 the turnout didn’t hit 25 percent.) The 1983 election featured Tizzy, Republican incumbent  Lenny Paoletta, no slouch in his own right, and former Democratic Mayor John Mandanici, no slouch either running as an independent after Tizzy won the Democratic primary when a bunch of white guys split the white vote. Understand back then white voters dominated.

Tizzy organized the minority community in ways the city never experienced before or since.

Bucci had a strong connection with the black community. Mandanici had a bad one which led to his defeat in 1981. Tizzy could never connect with the white community. In fact after Bucci and Tisdale, who served as economic development director under Bucci, had a falling out in 1991, Tisdale challenged him in a Democratic mayoral primary. Bucci, the white Italian-American, defeated Tisdale in black Bridgeport.

Ganim was popular citywide until the revelations that took down his administration.

The  city (and country) is a much different place from the black voters that Tizzy inspired. Just because you’re black doesn’t mean black voters will be a lock vote. And just because you’re white doesn’t mean white voters will line up. Paging Barack.

So, what candidate can galvanize the black community? Too soon to tell. State Rep. Don Clemons may take a look at 2011. Mayor Bill Finch has some work to do if he wants to win reelection, but there’s still time. State Rep. Chris Caruso has built some coalitions there as a result of running for mayor twice. Former Mayor John Fabrizi has his share of support. And what about former State Senator Ernie Newton, the Moses of his people who is expected to be released from prison in 2010?  And Joe Ganim right behind him?

Ah, yes, the possibilities. But if you know someone who’s a better fit let me know.

(One final full disclosure: I can’t wait!)

Beach Bummer Issue

All this finger pointing over the demolition of the carousel house on Pleasure Beach has me wondering: anyone have a clue about what’s going on? Connecticut Post reporter Mike Mayko has done a nice job trying to get to the bottom of all the debris and rubble, and who’s responsible for it. For images of Pleasure Beach then and now see www.savepleasurebeach.com. Thanks to Tim Gordon English for sharing the link.

Mayor Finch issued the following statement Friday afternoon:

“Our Fire Department personnel were concerned that the decades-old buildings on Pleasure Beach posed a significant public safety hazard, especially after one of our deputy chiefs witnessed several kids running from one of the buildings during a routine visit to the island. At the behest of our Fire Department, Burns Construction Co., which was doing some work on the island for the Town of Stratford , used their equipment to push the two buildings over. All involved recognize that the work should have been done with a demolition permit in place. We will take appropriate action to ensure that this situation does not occur again in the future. In the meantime, the Public Facilities department is determining how best to dispose of the rubble left from the buildings on the island.”

And as long as we’re into statements this Labor Day weekend, here’s one from State Rep. Jack Hennessy:

Dear Bridgeporters:

By now, readers of the Connecticut Post are very familiar with the Associated Press photos that show me playing computer solitaire during the most recent session of the General Assembly.

It was certainly bad judgment for me to play a computer game during the final House session on the budget. As a result, I am embarrassed and I apologize to each and every person in my legislative district.

Although my actions were inexcusable, I want to assure Bridgporters that my poor judgment in this instance in no way indicates that I ignored your interests on this very serious matter.

Over the past seven months, as a member of the General Assembly’s Finance Committee, I participated fully in the budget process and played an active role in crafting and passing a State budget that provides the necessary services to our communities and minimizes any negative impact on the City of Bridgeport and its people.

Again, I sincerely apologize to each of you and look forward to having the continued privilege of representing you and your interests in Hartford. I thank you in advance for your understanding and have been humbled by those of you who have already expressed your understanding and forgiveness.

 Very truly yours,

 Rep. Jack Hennessy (D-Bridgeport)

(Check out my daily blog at www.onlyinbridgeport.com)