<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will New Jersey Net Glen Davis?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/</link>
	<description>Boston Celtics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Well put JB.

It isn&#039;t...... but it is.....maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put JB.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t&#8230;&#8230; but it is&#8230;..maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-337</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rumor v proposal what do you ‘propose’?&quot;

After Ainge 1st. denied the Rondo/Allen to Piston&#039;s proposal and then we got enough details of the lower level of management talks that convinced me (and most others) that overtures were made, it&#039;s hard to believe any more &quot;denials.&quot;

A rumor is a rumor is a rumor..... just something thrown out there with very little reliable confirmation.

A proposed transaction with reliable sources that did not go down is another matter and I think (especially with the re-write) that you have handle this curve well.

The story is in the details.... the more we get, the more we can judge whether it was worth thinking about/reporting, in the first place.

Keep after it..... even the Herald&#039;s report of Ainge&#039;s (and the Nets) denials of offering Davis to the Nets in a sign and trade has been watered down this morning. Murphy&#039;s latest column contradicts itself from paragraph to paragraph. George Orwell would be proud. LOL!

&quot;Though the Celts have attempted to include restricted free agent Glen Davis in several sign-and-trade deals with other teams, sources with the C’s and New Jersey shot down a rumor yesterday that both teams were attempting to make such an arrangement work.

Though the Nets have not approached Davis with an offer sheet, they have made their interest known in the young power forward - interest that still could emerge in the form of a sign-and-trade. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rumor v proposal what do you ‘propose’?&#8221;</p>
<p>After Ainge 1st. denied the Rondo/Allen to Piston&#8217;s proposal and then we got enough details of the lower level of management talks that convinced me (and most others) that overtures were made, it&#8217;s hard to believe any more &#8220;denials.&#8221;</p>
<p>A rumor is a rumor is a rumor&#8230;.. just something thrown out there with very little reliable confirmation.</p>
<p>A proposed transaction with reliable sources that did not go down is another matter and I think (especially with the re-write) that you have handle this curve well.</p>
<p>The story is in the details&#8230;. the more we get, the more we can judge whether it was worth thinking about/reporting, in the first place.</p>
<p>Keep after it&#8230;.. even the Herald&#8217;s report of Ainge&#8217;s (and the Nets) denials of offering Davis to the Nets in a sign and trade has been watered down this morning. Murphy&#8217;s latest column contradicts itself from paragraph to paragraph. George Orwell would be proud. LOL!</p>
<p>&#8220;Though the Celts have attempted to include restricted free agent Glen Davis in several sign-and-trade deals with other teams, sources with the C’s and New Jersey shot down a rumor yesterday that both teams were attempting to make such an arrangement work.</p>
<p>Though the Nets have not approached Davis with an offer sheet, they have made their interest known in the young power forward &#8211; interest that still could emerge in the form of a sign-and-trade. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-336</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also i heard last year that the Nets were down on him so if that’s true they’d be willing to deal him.&quot;

I think that was true. They know that he&#039;s a player with weaknesses. His limitations are mostly on the offensive end. He&#039;s a pretty good post defender, shot blocker.

At this point, who really knows who&#039;s in play. Another internet source says that they are going over a number of player options. It&#039;ll be interesting to see how this shakes out.

Thank Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also i heard last year that the Nets were down on him so if that’s true they’d be willing to deal him.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that was true. They know that he&#8217;s a player with weaknesses. His limitations are mostly on the offensive end. He&#8217;s a pretty good post defender, shot blocker.</p>
<p>At this point, who really knows who&#8217;s in play. Another internet source says that they are going over a number of player options. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this shakes out.</p>
<p>Thank Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Somebody</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d want Josh Boone out of any of those players. I know in the column you write that he&#039;s the nets backup center and he&#039;s the one they like best out of this group, but the C&#039;s need to get something significant back if they&#039;re giving up Baby, so in my opinion that rules out Najera, as he&#039;s only going to give you defense, rebounding and cheap shots. Boone has always been one of my favorite players since his days back at UCONN and i think if he&#039;s put on a good team he could be a really good player. I think this whole garbage in New Jersey has just brought him down a bit.  Also i heard last year that the Nets were down on him so if that&#039;s true they&#039;d be willing to deal him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d want Josh Boone out of any of those players. I know in the column you write that he&#8217;s the nets backup center and he&#8217;s the one they like best out of this group, but the C&#8217;s need to get something significant back if they&#8217;re giving up Baby, so in my opinion that rules out Najera, as he&#8217;s only going to give you defense, rebounding and cheap shots. Boone has always been one of my favorite players since his days back at UCONN and i think if he&#8217;s put on a good team he could be a really good player. I think this whole garbage in New Jersey has just brought him down a bit.  Also i heard last year that the Nets were down on him so if that&#8217;s true they&#8217;d be willing to deal him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Hedge Knight,

The idea of up and coming youth as a role player here seems to have taken a back seat to &#039;win now at all costs.&#039; 

Saying that, I would have liked Moon for the same reason - a younger body. 

Getting a younger player with talent that they can develop over a few years makes sense. I guess that Yi fits that, though there is a question about real age, too.

Thanks for your comments.

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedge Knight,</p>
<p>The idea of up and coming youth as a role player here seems to have taken a back seat to &#8216;win now at all costs.&#8217; </p>
<p>Saying that, I would have liked Moon for the same reason &#8211; a younger body. </p>
<p>Getting a younger player with talent that they can develop over a few years makes sense. I guess that Yi fits that, though there is a question about real age, too.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-333</guid>
		<description>JB, 

Life&#039;s a circle, eh?
 
Agree about Hassell and Hayes if Bowen&#039;s not coming. One&#039;s a defender with no offense and the other&#039;s an offensive player who could learn to play better defense. I think I&#039;d like Hayes better. Nice shot and is a solid and active body.

&quot;Bad News&quot; Williams? lol. I guess so. 

I can&#039;t help thinking that maybe Dooling could be in the picture, in spite of what I wrote. &quot;I don&#039;t believe everything I say.&quot;

Rumor v proposal    what do you &#039;propose&#039;?

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB, </p>
<p>Life&#8217;s a circle, eh?</p>
<p>Agree about Hassell and Hayes if Bowen&#8217;s not coming. One&#8217;s a defender with no offense and the other&#8217;s an offensive player who could learn to play better defense. I think I&#8217;d like Hayes better. Nice shot and is a solid and active body.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bad News&#8221; Williams? lol. I guess so. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help thinking that maybe Dooling could be in the picture, in spite of what I wrote. &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe everything I say.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rumor v proposal    what do you &#8216;propose&#8217;?</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetsFan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>NetsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Whoever started this rumor or take it seriously is plain stupid. Thorn will never give up Yi, new face of Chinese BB for Big Baby.

It could be another player if they really working out a deal. Possibly Trenton Hassel who used to play with Big Ticket in Mini and a very good defender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever started this rumor or take it seriously is plain stupid. Thorn will never give up Yi, new face of Chinese BB for Big Baby.</p>
<p>It could be another player if they really working out a deal. Possibly Trenton Hassel who used to play with Big Ticket in Mini and a very good defender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedge Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-331</guid>
		<description>In my humble opinion, Boston can afford to take a chance on Yi Jianlian.  The Celtics already have a good frontline in Garnett, Perkins, and Wallace.  Wallace is far from young.  He&#039;s probably good for one, maybe two years.  What they need is a tall, young, athletic player whom they can develop.  Getting Yi would also mean another shot blocker on the team, as well as another big man who can hit the jumpshot.  Boston won&#039;t have to play small-ball anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion, Boston can afford to take a chance on Yi Jianlian.  The Celtics already have a good frontline in Garnett, Perkins, and Wallace.  Wallace is far from young.  He&#8217;s probably good for one, maybe two years.  What they need is a tall, young, athletic player whom they can develop.  Getting Yi would also mean another shot blocker on the team, as well as another big man who can hit the jumpshot.  Boston won&#8217;t have to play small-ball anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-330</guid>
		<description>One more thing..... knowing the source of the Bowen &quot;buzz&quot; and also figuring tat  Justin, Alex and Marc Spears would not all be trumpeting a pure message board rumor, I think it&#039;s time we all considered the difference between a &quot;rumor&quot; and a proposal that may not actually become a completed deal....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing&#8230;.. knowing the source of the Bowen &#8220;buzz&#8221; and also figuring tat  Justin, Alex and Marc Spears would not all be trumpeting a pure message board rumor, I think it&#8217;s time we all considered the difference between a &#8220;rumor&#8221; and a proposal that may not actually become a completed deal&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/27/will-new-jersey-net-glen-davis/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=693#comment-329</guid>
		<description>ooops, sorry.....upon re-reading, I do see the base year comp. reference.

&quot;Because Davis is a Base Year Compensation player, only half of his salary counts in a trade. That means the Nets can only trade players worth half of Davis’ new salary, unless another player is included, which means other Net must go, too.&quot;

That&#039;s what happens when I read this stuff with 4 hours sleep. LOL

I am a big Yi fan..... remember Ainge&#039;s wisecrack about how great he looked &quot;playing against a chair?&quot; LOL

.....but there would still be a need for a rebounder strong man in the paint, so I think the Najera inclusion makes a lot of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops, sorry&#8230;..upon re-reading, I do see the base year comp. reference.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because Davis is a Base Year Compensation player, only half of his salary counts in a trade. That means the Nets can only trade players worth half of Davis’ new salary, unless another player is included, which means other Net must go, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what happens when I read this stuff with 4 hours sleep. LOL</p>
<p>I am a big Yi fan&#8230;.. remember Ainge&#8217;s wisecrack about how great he looked &#8220;playing against a chair?&#8221; LOL</p>
<p>&#8230;..but there would still be a need for a rebounder strong man in the paint, so I think the Najera inclusion makes a lot of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
