<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celtics Role Player Bids Require Patience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/</link>
	<description>Boston Celtics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Did you check that in the trade checker? Do the numbers work with Davis being a Base year Comp guy? 1/2 of salary counts.

Money aside...

The only problem I see with that trade is NJ gets quite a bit shorter. Not sure they&#039;d go for that. And TA seems to be unwanted around the league.

But I&#039;d take it for the Cs end, though I think Baby is better than either big from NJ. Getting both would give us a strong depth for post defense, anyway.

I think Hayes and Scal for Indy would be nice, but I&#039;m thinking that the salaries there are too high for Indy.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you check that in the trade checker? Do the numbers work with Davis being a Base year Comp guy? 1/2 of salary counts.</p>
<p>Money aside&#8230;</p>
<p>The only problem I see with that trade is NJ gets quite a bit shorter. Not sure they&#8217;d go for that. And TA seems to be unwanted around the league.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d take it for the Cs end, though I think Baby is better than either big from NJ. Getting both would give us a strong depth for post defense, anyway.</p>
<p>I think Hayes and Scal for Indy would be nice, but I&#8217;m thinking that the salaries there are too high for Indy.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Somebody</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-344</guid>
		<description>The C&#039;s Pacers and Nets should get to gether and do this:

Celtics get: Josh Boone, Sean Williams, and Marquise Daniels
Pacers Get: Jarvis Hayes and Scalabrine
Nets get: Glenn Davis, and Tony Allen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The C&#8217;s Pacers and Nets should get to gether and do this:</p>
<p>Celtics get: Josh Boone, Sean Williams, and Marquise Daniels<br />
Pacers Get: Jarvis Hayes and Scalabrine<br />
Nets get: Glenn Davis, and Tony Allen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-343</guid>
		<description>....know.

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.know.</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Your &#039;comments section&#039; comment has been passed up to the highest levels of the Land of Oz. The wizard is taking it under consideration.

I&#039;ll let you.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8216;comments section&#8217; comment has been passed up to the highest levels of the Land of Oz. The wizard is taking it under consideration.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halzack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>halzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-341</guid>
		<description>The risk is noted...and real.

The lure of big money is a compelling thing. Davis, will, no doubt play less minutes this season. The question is how many less.

If he can get 20 minutes a game, he can make an impact. If he&#039;s cut back to 10-15, he&#039;s just a stop gap - more or less.

Also, if he gets injured himself.....and the weight issue.

The other possibility that I didn&#039;t mention is that the Cs offer him a decent multi year contract...say....9 million over 3 years. That would worth grabbing, IMO. 

You are set for life unless you are an imbecile. And you continue to develop on a top notch team. Win-win.

I think there&#039;s an article there!

thanks, JB!
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The risk is noted&#8230;and real.</p>
<p>The lure of big money is a compelling thing. Davis, will, no doubt play less minutes this season. The question is how many less.</p>
<p>If he can get 20 minutes a game, he can make an impact. If he&#8217;s cut back to 10-15, he&#8217;s just a stop gap &#8211; more or less.</p>
<p>Also, if he gets injured himself&#8230;..and the weight issue.</p>
<p>The other possibility that I didn&#8217;t mention is that the Cs offer him a decent multi year contract&#8230;say&#8230;.9 million over 3 years. That would worth grabbing, IMO. </p>
<p>You are set for life unless you are an imbecile. And you continue to develop on a top notch team. Win-win.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s an article there!</p>
<p>thanks, JB!<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-340</guid>
		<description>How can you create buzz and a strong comments section here when it takes hours to get a comment, &quot;moderated?&quot;
I&#039;ll be back at 5:00PM..... by then.... who knows if I&#039;ll even remember to return and see if it got a response..... Who is in charge here? LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you create buzz and a strong comments section here when it takes hours to get a comment, &#8220;moderated?&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ll be back at 5:00PM&#8230;.. by then&#8230;. who knows if I&#8217;ll even remember to return and see if it got a response&#8230;.. Who is in charge here? LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/2009/07/28/celtics-role-player-bids-require-patience/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ctnews.com/halzack/?p=732#comment-339</guid>
		<description>&quot;the one year Qualifying Offer?&quot;

Davis was willing to roll the dice once. Remember when he took a 2 year rookie deal, instead of the 3 year one that almost all rookies sign, so he&#039;d come up for free agency sooner?
This might solve a lot of problems for everyone.......... although a huge risk for Davis, now that Wallace is on board and he may get less minutes than last season and will surely have a lesser role than in last years playoffs from which his performance is what set his present value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the one year Qualifying Offer?&#8221;</p>
<p>Davis was willing to roll the dice once. Remember when he took a 2 year rookie deal, instead of the 3 year one that almost all rookies sign, so he&#8217;d come up for free agency sooner?<br />
This might solve a lot of problems for everyone&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. although a huge risk for Davis, now that Wallace is on board and he may get less minutes than last season and will surely have a lesser role than in last years playoffs from which his performance is what set his present value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
