Author Archive

Science fact: How to keep a bottle of beer cold? Keep it dry

by:
The dew on that glass is doing more harm than good.

The dew on that glass – as romantic-looking as it is – is doing more harm than good.

Okay, there’s global warming and nuclear North Korea and some other big topics out there, but one thing this spring weather has us worried about is the age-old problem of keeping your beer cold.

A test subject being weighed to measure the amount of condensation. The cap prevents air from moving through the opening on top. Photo: UW

A test subject being weighed to measure the amount of condensation. The cap prevents air from moving through the opening on top. Photo: UW

Thankfully, a University of Washington climate scientist decided to tackle the problem and found out that a romantically dew covered bottle or glass of beer/wine cooler/chilled white wine (etc.) will warm up faster because of the condensation on the bottle.

So, want to keep that bottle cold longer – keep it dry.

“Probably the most important thing a beer koozie does is not simply insulate the can, but keep condensation from forming on the outside of it,” said Dale Durran, a UW professor of atmospheric sciences.

The investigation began a couple of years ago when Durran was teaching UW Atmospheric Sciences 101 and trying to come up with a good example for the heat generated by condensation, according to a UW press release on the revelation.

Plenty of examples exist for evaporative cooling, but few for the reverse phenomenon, and Durran thought droplets that form on a cold canned beverage might be just the example he was looking for. A quick back-of-the-napkin calculation showed the heat released by water just four thousandths of an inch thick covering the can would heat its contents by 9 degrees Fahrenheit.

“I was surprised to think that such a tiny film of water could cause that much warming,” Durran said in the press release.

Here’s the rest of that press release:

Though he’s normally more of a theoretician, Durran decided this result required experimental validation. He recruited co-author Dargan Frierson, a UW associate professor of atmospheric sciences, and they ran an initial test in Frierson’s little-used basement bathroom, using a space heater and hot shower to vary the temperature and humidity.

The findings corroborated the initial result, and they embarked on a larger-scale test.

“You can’t write an article for Physics Today where the data has come from a setup on the top of the toilet tank in one of the author’s bathrooms,” Durran said.

First they recruited colleagues in Frierson’s beachside hometown of Wilmington, North Carolina, to duplicate the experiment and compare results with those taken on a hot, dry Seattle day. But they decided they needed to test a wider range of conditions.

Finally, last summer undergraduates Stella Choi and Steven Brey joined the project to run a proper experiment in the UW Atmospheric Sciences building. They unearthed an experimental machine with styling that looks to be from the 1950s, last used decades ago to simulate cloud formation.

With funding for educational outreach from the National Science Foundation, the students first cooled a can in a bucket of ice water then dried it and placed it in the experimental chamber dialed up to the appropriate conditions. After five minutes they removed the can, weighed it to measure the amount of condensation, and recorded the final temperature of the water inside.

The phenomenon at work – latent heat of condensation – is central to Frierson’s research on water vapor, heat transfer and global climate change.

“We expect a much moister atmosphere with global warming because warmer air can hold a lot more water vapor,” Frierson said. Because heat is transferred when water evaporates or condenses, this change affects wind circulation, weather patterns and storm formation.

Durran’s research includes studies of thunderstorms, which are powered by heat released from condensation in rising moist air.

As for his demonstration of the heat released during this process, he and Frierson are now working with the National Center for Atmospheric Research to develop an educational tool that will let students around the world try the experiment and post their results online for comparison.

The example promises to become as classic as a cold drink on a hot summer day.

Jake Ellison can be reached at 206-448-8334 or jakeellison@seattlepi.com. Follow Jake on Twitter at twitter.com/Jake_News. Also, swing by and *LIKE* us on Facebook.

French study: Bras don’t help breasts

by:

Go ahead and toss ‘em. According to a new study, bras aren’t helping anyway. (Getty Images)

After 15 years of meticulously studying the breasts of 130 women, a French sports medicine scientist says: Bras are bogus.

They don’t help a woman with back pain or sagging or pretty much anything, professor Jean-Denis Rouillon, from the University of Besançon in eastern France, told The Local, an English language French news org.

Local writes: According to Rouillon, a sports science expert, the lesson to be learned from the preliminary results of his marathon experiment is that “bras are a false necessity”.

“Medically, physiologically, anatomically – breasts gain no benefit from being denied gravity. On the contrary, they get saggier with a bra,” Professor Rouillon told France Info radio on Wednesday.

One participant in the study told The Local she can “breathe more easily. I carry myself better and I have less back pain.”

Meet the boy, 9, who will wow you with his thoughts about the universe

by:

In a YouTube video approaching 1.5 million plays, a “9 year old discusses the meaning of life and the universe,” as the title of the video puts it.

It’s wonderful. The young lad is so open minded, clear and full of wonder about what our universe might be like and what he doesn’t know, that he’s going to win you over … and even get you to thinking about the universe and the wonderment of young minds.

But, hey, judge for yourself.

The videographer is Zia Hassan. As he describes himself on his blog, he is a singer-songwriter, filmmaker, music producer, blogger, podcaster, educator, sensory designer and magician from Washington, DC. He uses art for its true purpose: unraveling the universe.

Robert Krulwich writes on his blog Krulwich Wonders:

What’s going on in this house? Are these kids outrageously smart? Zia says they’re “certainly bright,” but not scarily so. Is it something the parents are doing?

“I’ve gotten lots of questions about how they’ve raised [their kids],” Zia wrote me. “I don’t think they have a particular method or anything like that. They’re both excellent human beings and they treat their kids as if they’re intelligent young people, and not children who couldn’t possibly understand how the world (or universe) works.”

(H/T Krulwich Wonders, NPR)

What’s with the dustup over monkey bites among troops in Afghanistan?

by:

A monkey rides on the back of a U.S. Army soldier Oct. 23, 2008, at combat outpost Dallas in the Kunar Province of eastern Afghanistan. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

Put this on the list of “strange but true” stuff we didn’t know about but cause others to get all worked up:

“To the Editor: We take serious issue with the dispatch by Mease and Baker on monkey bites among US military members in Afghanistan during 2011. In particular, we are troubled by the first paragraph,” several doctors and researches wrote to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently.

Wait a second – monkey bites among the troops in Afghanistan?

The authors of the letter to the CDC’s Emerging Infectious Diseases journal condemning the published study Monkey Bites among US Military Members, Afghanistan, 2011 first suggest that putting monkey bites on any list of the harm that can befall our troops in that war zone is a mistake.

“ … listing bites from rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) as one of the many risks faced by military personnel deployed to Afghanistan. Although technically a true statement, it is misleading in its perspective. Since 2001, ≈2,000 US soldiers have died in Afghanistan and another ≈18,000 have been wounded in action. The authors juxtapose this toll with minor injuries incurred by 10 soldiers who flouted explicit rules prohibiting contact with pet monkeys,” write authors Gregory A. Engel, Agustin Fuentes, Benjamin P.Y.-H. Lee, Michael A. Schillaci, and Lisa Jones-Engel.

Okay …

A rhesus macaque relaxes in its enclosure after eating watermelon, provided by zookeepers to help the monkeys deal with hot summer temperatures, at the Kamla Nehru Zoological Gardens in Ahmedabad in 2012. The rhesus monkey (macaca mulatta) is native to northern India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Burma, Thailand, Afghanistan and southern China. (SAM PANTHAKY/AFP/GettyImages)

But what was the point of the original study by Luke Mease and Katheryn Baker, both affiliated with Army hospitals?

Essentially, the two just wanted to point out that there is a risk of getting a nasty monkey bite in Afghanistan and that bite can transmit bacteria and viruses. So, you know, heads up.

“In August 2011, a 24-year-old US Army soldier died of a rabies infection contracted while in eastern Afghanistan. This tragedy highlights the threat that animal bites pose to deployed military members.

“During 2001–2010, a total of 643 animal bites among deployed US military members were reported (1). Dogs were implicated in 50% of these bites, but several other animals pose risk as well. Prominent among these is the nonhuman primate M. mulatta (rhesus macaque), native to and commonly kept as a pet in Afghanistan (2) (Figure). Risks from M. mulatta monkey bites include physical trauma and/or infection with B-virus (Macacine herpesvirus 1), oral bacteria (including Clostridium tetani), and rabies virus.”

So is this just scientists quibbling over esoteric minutiae?

Turns out, the critics appear to be pretty darn worried about the monkeys – as well as the troops:

“Although it is advisable to avoid contact with monkeys, risk for disease transmission should be placed in proper perspective. Exaggerating risks of bites has, in the past, led to irrational culling of entire populations of macaques,” the critics wrote.

The original study’s authors responded: Fine …

“Nonetheless, we believe that risk for monkey bites deserves the attention of deployed medical providers. Risks for bacterial infection and major local trauma are critical for any macaque bite. We acknowledge that risk for contracting viral disease (rabies or B virus infection) from macaques in the wild is probably low, but we believe that it merits consideration.”

One of the interesting aspects of this dustup is the window it provides into the lives of regular ol’ young men and women in a strange land under stress … acting like, well, curious young Americans in a place where monkeys, domestic and wild, are routine.

This normal activity leads to less sperm in young men

by:

Healthy young men looking to have kids had better get up off the couch, according to a new study led by researchers at Harvard School of Public Health.

Using time spent watching television, the researchers found that otherwise healthy men were clocking in lower sperm counts than their active peers. In fact, men who watched more than 20 hours of TV a week had 44 percent less sperm count than men who watch almost no television.

“We know very little about how lifestyle may impact semen quality and male fertility in general so identifying two potentially modifiable factors that appear to have such a big impact on sperm counts is truly exciting,” lead author Audrey Gaskins, a doctoral student at HSPH, said in a press release.

On the flip side, men who exercised in a moderate to vigorous fashion for 15 or more hours a week had 73 percent higher sperm count than those exercising less than five hours a week.

“Mild exercise did not affect sperm quality,” the study found.

The authors caution that, while a reduced sperm count has been linked to lower fertility, it does not necessarily preclude men from fathering a child.

Kate Upton leads in pre-hype for teasers of Super Bowl 2013 ads

by:

Coke got out of the gate first, but frankly, a commercial purported to show Kate Upton washing a Mercedes-Benz in SLOW MOTION has, in our estimation, taken the lead in the pre-hype of upcoming teasers for Super Bowl XLVII.

Not the game. The ads.

Here’s the tease (and it is just that, in more ways than one):

(Our own tease: You can see a lot more of Upton in the gallery below!)

Critics of the ad on YouTube point out that you can’t see much of the car, which doesn’t appear to be the point of the ad. The point of the ad appears to be that you’ll watch to see if Upton gets wet (ahem — in SLOW MOTION) and then up pops an advertising link saying, “Click here for a sneak peek at the ad that will appear in the Super Bowl.”

That ad (below) appears to have nothing to do with Upton in slow motion or the whole car-washing thing.

Mercedes writes on the YouTube page: “In an old New Orleans cafe, a powerful force is undeniably present. What it is won’t be revealed until the Super Bowl. Will you be watching?”

Will that force be Upton in a wet T-shirt? Well, who knows. We do know from a press release that Upton will be appearing in a Super Bowl ad for the Mercedes-Benz CLA four-door coupe.

“The ad, which was created by Merkley+Partners (NYC), is a tongue-in-cheek depiction of how far a person might go to get their heart’s desire and what shape the ‘good life’ might take. Filmed in part on location in New Orleans, MBUSA went full throttle with star power including Kate Upton and Usher playing themselves.”

OK, we give up. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see (but if you want to see more of Upton now, remember, we’ve provided a gallery below).

Update 1-24-13: In the “You just can’t please some people” category, the Daily Mail of London reports that parents are outraged over not seeing more car than Upton, while others are mad they don’t see enough of her.

A spokeswoman for the Parents Television Council told the MailOnline that the car commercial ‘isn’t selling cars, it’s selling sexual objectification’ while disgruntled viewers think they don’t see enough of Upton, the news org wrote.

Back to our story:

The stakes are high for companies and their commercial creators. As ABC News reports: The Super Bowl is generally the largest TV audience of any year. Last year more than 111 million watched the game and over 114 million tuned in for the halftime show. And Super Bowl commercials this year will run for up to $4 million for 30 seconds.

Now, on to some more-straightforward hype for teases of upcoming Super Bowl ads.

First, this video is an interview with an Anheuser-Busch dude about what we can expect from the beer-maker … in short, long legs, superstition and the Clydesdales.

Now, Coke’s pre-ad tease:

The Associated Press reports:

The company is asking viewers to cheer for three very different groups in an interactive marketing blitz during the big game: A troupe of showgirls, a band of cowboys and a biker-style gang of “badlanders” — all on a quest for a thirst-quenching Coke in a desert.

Beginning Wednesday through the end of the Super Bowl users can vote online or send a tweet to choose their favorite group, and try to sabotage other groups. The winner, tallied in real time, will be shown in an ad immediately following the final whistle of the Super Bowl.

Last and maybe least is Best Buy’s pre-ad hype.

Again, the AP reports:

Best Buy Co. has enlisted actress and comedian Amy Poehler to get its brand message across in a humor-focused spot during the Super Bowl XLVII. Ho-hum.

Oh, and … the Ravens and the 49ers are playing in the 2013 Super Bowl, which airs Feb. 3 on CBS.

Jake Ellison can be reached at 206-448-8334 or jakeellison@seattlepi.com. Follow Jake on Twitter at twitter.com/Jake_News. Also, swing by and *LIKE* us on Facebook.