Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for December, 2009

EPA: Greenhouse Gases Threaten Public Health and the Environment

by:

Science overwhelmingly shows greenhouse gas concentrations at unprecedented levels due to human activity

After a thorough examination of the scientific evidence and careful consideration of public comments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced yesterday that greenhouse gases (GHGs) threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. EPA also finds that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat.

GHGs are the primary driver of climate change, which can lead to hotter, longer heat waves that threaten the health of the sick, poor or elderly; increases in ground-level ozone pollution linked to asthma and other respiratory illnesses; as well as other threats to the health and welfare of Americans.

“These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year when the United States Government began addressing the challenge of greenhouse-gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean-energy reform,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Business leaders, security experts, government officials, concerned citizens and the United States Supreme Court have called for enduring, pragmatic solutions to reduce the greenhouse gas pollution that is causing climate change. This continues our work towards clean energy reform that will cut GHGs and reduce the dependence on foreign oil that threatens our national security and our economy.”

EPA’s final findings respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that GHGs fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants. The findings do not in and of themselves impose any emission reduction requirements but rather allow EPA to finalize the GHG standards proposed earlier this year for new light-duty vehicles as part of the joint rulemaking with the Department of Transportation.

On-road vehicles contribute more than 23 percent of total U.S. GHG emissions. EPA’s proposed GHG standards for light-duty vehicles, a subset of on-road vehicles, would reduce GHG emissions by nearly 950 million metric tons and conserve 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of model year 2012-2016 vehicles.

EPA’s endangerment finding covers emissions of six key greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – that have been the subject of scrutiny and intense analysis for decades by scientists in the United States and around the world.

Scientific consensus shows that as a result of human activities, GHG concentrations in the atmosphere are at record high levels and data shows that the Earth has been warming over the past 100 years, with the steepest increase in warming in recent decades. The evidence of human-induced climate change goes beyond observed increases in average surface temperatures; it includes melting ice in the Arctic, melting glaciers around the world, increasing ocean temperatures, rising sea levels, acidification of the oceans due to excess carbon dioxide, changing precipitation patterns, and changing patterns of ecosystems and wildlife.

President Obama and Administrator Jackson have publicly stated that they support a legislative solution to the problem of climate change and Congress’ efforts to pass comprehensive climate legislation. However, climate change is threatening public health and welfare, and it is critical that EPA fulfill its obligation to respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that determined that greenhouse gases fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants.

EPA issued the proposed findings in April 2009 and held a 60-day public comment period. The agency received more than 380,000 comments, which were carefully reviewed and considered during the development of the final findings.

Information on EPA’s findings.

More On It’s All About Joe

by:

The Washington Post reports that Joe has no logical basis for his opposition to the public option, but is just on an ego trip – and faces no consequences for his betrayal:

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) has once again inserted himself into the middle of an inflamed partisan debate, raising questions about his motives, his ego and his fickle allegiance to the Democratic Party…

Lieberman, a Democrat-turned-independent who caucuses with his former party, says he is feeling “relevant” as he threatens to withhold his vote — potentially the decisive 60th — on health-care reform legislation if it includes a government-run insurance plan…

A number of senators are privately furious, Senate sources said. But they added that it is unlikely the Democratic caucus would take punitive action, such as stripping his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee — at least not in this Congress.

….Lieberman says the public option is a sop to supporters of full government-run health insurance. He argues that the proposal lacks public support, although polls show a majority favor the concept. He says the government has no place in providing health insurance, despite its role in overseeing Medicare and Medicaid.

Most of all, he insists that a public option would drive the country further into debt. But this argument muddles how the new system will function and is at odds with independent assessments.

Under the Senate and House bills, those without employer-provided coverage would get income-based government subsidies to help buy coverage in a new insurance marketplace. The case for the public option is to reduce the cost of those subsidies by forgoing profits and reimbursing providers at lower rates, and by private insurers’ rates lower via competition. A strong public option would lower the bill’s cost by tens of billions of dollars, the Congressional Budget Office found…

Confronted with the cost-saving assessments of a strong public option, Lieberman concedes the point, but he says an aggressive government-run plan would put undue pressures on medical providers and force them to shift costs to private insurers. Put simply, he opposes the public option in any form, regardless of whether it reduces costs…

It’s All About Joe

by:

“Joe Lieberman promised Connecticut voters in 2006 that he would support core Democratic issues like health care reform. This tongue-in-cheek ad holds Lieberman accountable for putting his own ego ahead of the overwhelming will of Connecticut voters who demand a public health insurance option.” — Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

POLL CITED IN AD: CT voters want public option 68% to 21%

WASHINGTON MONTHLY: Lieberman’s 7 shifting explanations for opposing public option.

Archaeological Evidence Of Exodus in Egypt!

by:

I normally blog about Biblical archaeology here. But this is so interesting, compelling evidence of a Joseph-like person in Egypt, that I have decided to include it here:

*
An exciting new analysis from one of Egypt’s most prominent archaeologists about the Aper-el or Aper-al tomb in the Saqqara region:

The Whisper of Tombs

29/10/2009
By Dr. Zahi Hawass

Cairo, Asharq Al-Awsat- In my opinion, the Israelite Exodus from Egypt will remain a point of controversy amongst scientists and researchers until the Day of Judgment or until new archaeological evidence is unearthed that is able to settle this issue. However in light of the information currently available to historians and archaeologists, we can do no more than practice moderation and caution.

There have been whispers in the archaeological community following the discovery of the Aper-al tomb in the Saqqara region in the area known as Abwab al-Qotat [Doors of the Cats] by French archaeologist Alain Zivie. Abwab al-Qotat was given its name following the discovery of thousands of mummified cats interred in the tomb…

The discovery of this tomb which took place almost 20 years ago remains an important archaeological event. The reason for this is that the person buried in the tomb was known as “Aper-al” and this is an Egyptianized form of a Hebrew name. Aper-al was the vizier for King Amenhotep III, and later for his son King Akhenaten. Pharaoh Akhenaten was the first ruler to institute monotheism represented by the worship of the sun which he called Aten.

Excavations of this tomb continued for almost 10 years, beginning in 1980 and ending in late 1989. Amongst the artefacts discovered here were several portraits entitled “spiritual father of Aten” as well as “the Priest” and “the first servant of Aten.” This means that Aper-al served as the chief priest of Aten in the Memphis region during the reign of King Akhenaten.

Of course the effects of the news of the discovery of a Hebrew tomb has raised many questions and controversies amongst archaeologists with regards to whether or not a temple for Aten existed in Memphis or not. The portraits found in the Aper-al tomb indicate that such a temple did in fact exist in Memphis, and this is contrary to the tradition accepted by archaeologists which is that monotheism [Atenism] did not exist beyond the city of Tell el-Amrana in central Egypt. Tel-Amrana was the city founded by Akhenaten for his family. Akhenaten swore never to depart the city so long as he lived, and he named it Akhen-Aten meaning the city faithful and loyal to Aten.

In addition to this, there has been prolonged controversy between Torah scholars and archaeologists over the credibility of Aper-al in fact being a Hebrew name. This creates the impression that Hebrews were present in Egypt during the eighteenth dynasty, and that some Egyptianized Hebrews held senior state positions. It is important to emphasize that all the artefacts discovered in the Aper-al tomb, such as the sarcophagus, the mummies, as well as the carvings on the walls of the tomb, are consistent with the Egyptian style of the time. Even Aper-al’s portrait, his cloths, and his jewellery, are purely ancient Egyptian. This is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.


A video describing the findings:

Portrait of Aper-el and his daughter

And another dazzling report:

The remains of the Vizier, his wife and their son were found in beautiful coffins, along with canopic jars of alabaster, objects of daily and religious use, and many jewels. The gold was transferred to the Cairo Museum and is on exhibit there. The beautiful rings and bracelets can be compared only with those found at Thebes at the beginning of this century.

Dr. Zivie’s report, referring to the funerary chamber as the ‘chapel’, stated that:

“…until the end of 1993, only a small part of the chapel itself, near the entrance, was known. A late masonry, very compact and thick, was present almost everywhere at the first level of the tomb, preventing investigation. This masonry is no only present in Aper-El’s tomb, with its representations of the Vizier. Three cult niches were revealed when we removed the masonry and gebel (dry stones) which had blocked the entire chapel..

The decoration on the main, central, niche remained in a very good state of preservation. On the sides are paintings of the Vizier, each with his complete name, Aper-EI, receiving offerings of flowers or purification from two sons previously unknown to us. Their names and titles are present: one, Seny, was a high official; the other, Hatiay, was a priest. The representations are important because they illustrate the art of the time of Akhenaton (the Amarna Period) and its aftermath not at Amarna or at Thebes, but rather at Memphis, which remained the main city of the country.

But also in some neighboring tombs. This masonry can almost certainly be dated to the beginning of the Ptolemaic (Greek) Period. The site would have been consolidated then for re-use in cat burials at the sanctuary of Bastet above the cliff.

It was necessary to remove the blocking (late masonry) in order to explore the chapel completely… a technical task, not a work of excavation. We undertook it with the agreement of the Egyptian Antiquities Organization. The operation provided the Mission with a chance discovery: the larger part of the chapel of the tomb had been hidden by the masonry. The decoration had been very well preserved behind the stones and mortar.

The work took several months, but the chapel is now completely cleared… Now we have a complete picture of the first level of the tomb. The result is impressive. There are three square pillars, one completely unknown before, on the inner faces of which one can still discern representations of the Vizier and of his son. The fourth pillar is no longer present. A splendid ceiling, beautifully decorated in brilliant colors, is also almost completely preserved.

Will “Mikulski” Trump “Stupak?”

by:

On Thursday the Senate accepted the Mikulski (D-Md.) amendment to the Senate health care bill by a vote of 61-39. The Mikulski amendment requires group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health insurance to provide coverage for and not impose cost sharing requirements on “preventive care” for women “as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).”

The amendment does not explicitly require abortion coverage. However, anti-choice activists are up in arms about the possibility that the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) could categorize abortion as “preventive care,” and would therefore recommend coverage for abortion by all private plans.

Great video of Senator Mikulski presenting the amendment. (I wish I could embed it.)

An amendment summary.

The Mikulski Amendment.

Senator Murkowski proposed an amendment would have ensured that abortion is not classified by the government as “preventive care” or as a “preventive service:”

The amendment read, in pertinent part:

Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed to authorize the Secretary, or any other governmental or quasi governmental entity, to define or classify abortion or abortion services as ‘‘preventive care’’ or as a ‘‘preventive service’’.

The Murkowski proposal was defeated 41 to 59.

Texas Has Highest Rate of Working-Age People Without Health Insurance

by:

Nearly a third of people in Texas who are of working age do not have health insurance, Baylor University researchers found as they analyzed U.S. Census Bureau data.

Texas is the fastest-growing state, but 31 percent of those ages 18 to 64 were uninsured for an entire year. The Census Bureau defines people as insured if they were covered by any type of health insurance coverage for part or all of the previous year. Many others may have lacked health insurance for a signifiant part of the year.

“There is a broad and obviously inaccurate presumption that employers provide health insurance,” said Dr. Charles Tolbert, chair and professor of sociology at Baylor University.

“By starting with the working-age population, who are most widely believed to be covered by employer insurance, the data are all that much more telling,” he said.

So what are the chances that Republicans in Congress from Texas will vote for Health Care Reform?

Politics Aside, ‘We Need Healthcare Reform’

by:

Watch the video of Dr. Rick Streiffer, professor and chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the Tulane University School of Medicine, discussing why he believes the changes and improvements in our healthcare system being discussed are long overdue.

“Healthcare costs are out of control, and this country simply cannot afford to have the cost of health care growing at the rate that it’s been growing,” says Streiffer. “The United States spends more per capita on health care than any industrialized country, yet we are at the bottom of quality and outcomes assessments.”

2 CT Dems Vote with Republicans on Estate Tax

by:

The House of Representatives passed on December 3, 2009 of the Permanent Estate Tax Relief for Families, Farmers, and Small Business Act of 2009 by a vote of 225 to 200. All 225 votes in favor were Democrats. Among the 200 votes opposed were every Republican voting, and, voting with the Republicans, 26 Democrats, including Jim Himes and Chris Murphy from Connecticut!

Without some new legislation in place, 2010 would see the complete abolition of the estate tax – for that year alone – but also a move to a ‘modified carryover basis’ system for valuing inherited assets that could increase the income tax burden of beneficiaries and would be very difficult for executors and accountants to deal with.

The House bill provides for a $3.5 million estate tax exclusion, ($7 million to a spouse), a tax rate on the excess beginning at only 18%, a top estate tax rate of 45 percent and a continuation of stepped-up basis.

CCH has issued a Special Tax Briefing on its provisions which, if adopted by the Senate, will provide certainty for estate taxes and estate planning, largely by freezing the status quo as of this year.

The measure moves on to the Senate, where the bill’s lack of indexing for inflation may pose a difficulty, but many observers believe some kind of estate tax “fix” is imperative this year.

Why Murphy and Himes voted against this necessary and responsible bill is anybody’s guess.