Jonathan Kantrowitz

Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

“Were we lied into war? Yes”

As always, Paul Krugman says it best:

Bush and Blair wanted a war, exaggerated intelligence to get it, and disregarded warnings that the war would help, not hurt, Al Qaeda.

Were we lied into war? Yes.

As proof, Krugman cites the UK inquiry into this exact question, as described here:

This process of exaggeration was gradual, and proceeded by accretion and editing from document to document, in a way that allowed those participating to convince themselves that they were not engaged in blatant dishonesty. But this process led to highly misleading statements about.. the Iraqi threat that were, in their totality, lies.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Social Security Disability Insurance: Fiscal Implications

Yesterday the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a brief about the Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) program. The DI program pays cash benefits to nonelderly adults (those younger than age 66) who are judged to be unable to perform “substantial” work because of a disability but who have worked in the past; the program also pays benefits to some of those adults’ dependents.

Between 1970 and 2009, the number of people receiving DI benefits more than tripled, from 2.7 million to 9.7 million. At the same time, the average inflation-adjusted cost per person receiving DI benefits rose from about $6,900 to about $12,800 (in 2010 dollars). As a result, inflation-adjusted expenditures for the DI program, including administrative costs, increased nearly sevenfold between 1970 and 2009, climbing from $18 billion to $124 billion (in 2010 dollars). Most DI beneficiaries, after a two-year waiting period, are also eligible for Medicare; the cost of those benefits in fiscal year 2009 totaled about $70 billion.

The jump in participation, which significantly outpaced the increase in the working-age population during that period, is attributable to several changes—in characteristics of that population, in eligibility criteria, and in opportunities for employment. For example, the aging of the workforce and an increase in the number of women working have boosted the number of people receiving DI benefits. Older workers are more likely to suffer from debilitating conditions and are more likely to qualify for DI—and between 1970 and 2009, the share of working-age women who had worked enough to qualify to apply for disability insurance rose from 41 percent to 72 percent.

Developments in federal policy have also contributed to the growing number of DI beneficiaries. Legislation enacted in 1984 eased the medical eligibility requirements, and limited funding has caused backlogs in reviewing cases to determine whether beneficiaries are still eligible for DI benefits. Participation also grows when economic conditions are weak and employment opportunities are scarce, as occurred during and immediately following the recessions in the early 1990s, in 2001, and over the past few years.

Under current law, the DI program is not financially sustainable. The program’s expenditures are drawn from the Disability Insurance Trust Fund, which is financed primarily through a payroll tax of 1.8 percent; the fund had a balance of $204 billion at the end of 2009. CBO projects that by 2015, the number of people receiving DI benefits will increase to 11.4 million and total expenditures will climb to $147 billion (in 2010 dollars). However, tax receipts credited to the DI trust fund will be about 20 percent less than those expenditures, and three years later, in 2018, the trust fund will be exhausted, according to CBO’s estimates. Without legislative action to reduce the DI program’s outlays, increase its dedicated federal revenues, or transfer other federal funds to it, the Social Security Administration will not have the legal authority to pay full DI benefits beyond 2018.

A number of changes could be implemented to address the trust fund’s projected exhaustion. Some would increase revenues dedicated to the program; others would reduce outlays.

Posted in General | Add a comment

DODD: NEW GRANTS WILL GIVE AMERICANS MORE CONTROL OVER THEIR HEALTH CARE

Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) announced today that states can begin applying for grants to establish and strengthen Consumer Assistance Offices that will help people make the right decisions about their health care. The grants are available through a provision authored by Dodd and included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

In addition to these grants, new regulations were announced today that will give Americans in new health plans the right to appeal decisions made by their health insurers. The new rules will give consumers in new health plans in every State the ability, for the first time, to appeal decisions made by their health plan to an outside, independent decision-maker.

“As a result of the new health care law, Americans will finally have full control over their health care,” said Dodd. “We are cutting down on the red-tape and putting the fine print under a magnifying glass. Americans will now be able to turn to Consumer Assistance Offices, like the one we have in Connecticut, when they need help making tough decisions about their health care coverage or need assistance filing complaints and appeals against health plans.”

The $30 million grant program authored by Senator Dodd will allow states to establish and strengthen Consumer Assistance Offices, like Connecticut’s Office of the Healthcare Advocate. These offices provide consumers with information on health insurance options. Connecticut’s Office of the Healthcare Advocate, headed by Kevin Lembo, assists Connecticut residents with health care issues including helping make an informed decision when selecting an insurance plan and helping consumers resolve problems with their plans.

As Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Children and Families, Dodd has been a leader in efforts to empower Americans to make informed choices about their health insurance options. He successfully fought for the inclusion of the grants being announced today in the final health care bill. The grants will enable states to establish, expand, or provide support for offices of health insurance consumer assistance and/or health insurance ombudsman programs. These independent offices will assist consumers with filing complaints and appeals, educate consumers on their rights and responsibilities, and collect, track, and quantify consumer problems and inquiries. These new regulations will not only help individuals take control of their care but will also provide significant health care related savings consumers.

Posted in General | Add a comment

Recent Comments

Categories

More blogs

Sean Bowley

SPB's High School Football

News, analysis, commentary and features on Connecticut high school football by Sean Patrick Bowley.
Lennie Grimaldi

Only in Bridgeport

Award-winning journalist Lennie Grimaldi cracks open the juicy stuff in Connecticut's largest city.
Danielle Travali

Ruby Red Stilettos

Holly is a quirky, stiletto-clad writer, foodie, health nut in search of good friends and good fun.

Joe's View

Joe is the Connecticut Post's entertainment writer.

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan «-»  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
Note: The blog is written by a reader and is not edited by the Connecticut Media Group. The blogger is solely responsible for content.