Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for July, 2010

DELAURO FIGHTS FOR PAYCHECK FAIRNESS

by:

Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (CT-3) praised the President’s endorsement of the Paycheck Fairness Act and his call for the Senate to pass the legislation, which will strengthen the Equal Pay Act and ensure that women are paid equally for their work. Echoing recommendations issued today by the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, the President urged the Senate to take up the legislation originally introduced by Congresswoman DeLauro in 1997. Passed by the House of Representatives last year, the bill now awaits action in the Senate.

“In America today, women make up half of our workforce—and yet, they still only make 77 cents on the dollar as compared to men. And if you look at this statistic even closer, you find that African American women make just 61 cents on the dollar, and Hispanic women only make 52 cents. In 2010, an incredible 47 years after the passage of the Equal Pay Act, which was supposed to ensure equal pay for equal work, and 13 years after I first introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act, these numbers are shocking.

“And it is not just women who are feeling the effects of this continued pay discrimination. With more and more American families each day depending on women as breadwinners, our entire economy is being impacted. That is why it is so essential that we pass the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would strengthen and enforce the Equal Pay Act. By giving this legislation the real teeth it needs, through pay justification, prohibiting retaliation concerning salary information, and enforcing punitive and compensatory damages, we can ensure that this workplace inequity ends.

“The House of Representatives has already passed this critical legislation, and I am so pleased that the President has added his voice in calling for the Senate to act. The recommendations put forth by the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force today clearly show the Paycheck Fairness Act to be a critical element in ending pay discrimination in our country. On behalf of all of America’s women, I urge my colleagues in the Senate to move, and at long last, to make this bill the law of the land.”

Changing System of Tax Breaks Could Reduce Deficit and Improve Our Tax System

by:

Even though unemployment remains well above 9 percent, and the federal government could be doing much more to strengthen the economy, attention in Washington has turned to how best to reduce long-term federal deficits. In “How to Reduce the Deficit and Improve the Tax System without Hurting Most Families,” a new issue brief from The Century Foundation, economist and senior fellow Bernard Wasow weighs in with a solution to a significant part of the long-term deficit challenge that would be relatively pain free for low- and middle-income citizens: reform the income tax system to fix the problems with tax breaks.

President Obama created the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, co-chaired by Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Alan Simpson, to develop recommendations for significantly reducing long-term deficits, and their report is due by December 1, 2010. As deliberations unfold, one common refrain will likely be that there is no painless way to reduce deficits. Many will argue that cuts to important and popular social insurance programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are the only path to fiscal responsibility.

However, Wasow determines that simply by revising our system of tax breaks, it should be possible to collect additional federal revenues while improving the efficiency, fairness, and user-friendliness of the tax system. He reports that the U.S. income tax code’s profusion of tax breaks totals to more than double the additional revenues the government will need after recovery to bring the federal debt under control. He concludes that reforms addressing tax breaks could eliminate half the deficit problem with relatively little consequence for middle- and low-income families. Because most of the existing tax breaks benefit specific industries, and the most costly breaks disproportionately benefit upper-income households, tax reform could be implemented in ways that impose costs primarily on those who can most afford them.

The reform Wasow proposes would combine some tax breaks, eliminate others, cap benefits, and otherwise modify special favors in the code. Reform also could revisit basic income tax rates, which can be cut, even while revenues are increased, because reform of tax breaks will broaden the tax base, namely the amount of income subject to taxation.

Wasow cautions that a successful strategy to reform tax breaks cannot be put together piecemeal. Reform must be planned comprehensively so that costs and benefits are shared; and costs must fall most heavily on those best able to bear them. He proposes that any strategy for comprehensive reform of tax breaks should be based on these principles:

1. Move in the direction of treating income from all sources uniformly (no special rates for capital income-dividends, interest, and realized capital gains).

2. Replace deductions from taxable income with direct tax credits – reductions of taxes owed – which should have a uniform rate for households of all income levels.

3. Put caps or ceilings on the tax benefit a taxpayer can obtain from a single tax break, as well as all tax breaks combined.

4. Eliminate to the maximum extent possible narrow, special interest breaks for industry.

Wasow believes that because the economy still is struggling, it would be premature and counterproductive to try to reduce tax breaks today. But since the debate over deficit reduction is sure to focus on cuts to programs that mainly help middle-class and poor Americans, it is important for the public to understand that there are other alternatives that would be less painful and more beneficial to the country as a whole. “Once the economy has recovered beyond the need for fiscal stimulus, reforms such as these should be introduced,” he writes. “But now is the time to begin a new, long overdue debate over reforms to the federal income tax.”

“How to Reduce the Deficit and Improve the Tax System without Hurting Most Families,”

What does the research say to do to avoid dementia and Alzheimers?

by:

A reader of my Health News Reports has asked:

Other than physical exercise and moderate drinking, what else is there to do to avoid dementia and Alzheimers?

Here are the relevant research reports:

Eating foods rich in vitamin E associated with lower dementia risk

High blood levels of vitamin E reduces risk of Alzheimer’s

Vitamin D Promotes Mental Agility in Elders

Abdominal fat at middle age associated with greater risk of dementia

Caffeine may slow Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, restore cognitive function

Magnesium Helps You Remember – But Not Supplements

Dr. Slutsky advises people to get their magnesium the old-fashioned way — by eating lots of green leaves, broccoli, almonds, cashews and fruit. The effects on memory won’t appear overnight, she cautions, but with this persistent change in diet, memory should improve, and the effects of dementia and other cognitive impairment diseases related to aging may be considerably delayed.

High fruit/vegetable = high cognitive performance

Results published in the August issue of the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease indicated higher cognitive performance in individuals with high daily intake of fruits and vegetables.

Mediterranean Diet = Slower Cognitive Decline

Higher adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet is linked to lower risk for mortality and chronic diseases. In an examination of the association between adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet and cognitive performance and risk of dementia, researchers found that high adherence to the diet was associated with slower decline in some measures of cognitive function.

Mediterranean diet, exercise fight Alzheimer disease

Elderly individuals who had a diet that included higher consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereal and fish and was low in red meat and poultry and who were physically active had an associated lower risk of Alzheimer disease.


Methionine could increase risk of Alzheimer’s

A diet rich in methionine, an amino acid typically found in red meats, fish, beans, eggs, garlic, lentils, onions, yogurt and seeds, can possibly increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, according to a study by Temple researchers.

Still, Praticò emphasized, methionine is an essential amino acid for the human body and “stopping one’s intake of methionine won’t prevent Alzheimer’s. But people who have a diet high in red meat, for instance, could be more at risk because they are more likely to develop this high level of circulating homocysteine,” he said.

Other possible help; Green tea, dark chocolate, grapes, apple juice (references upon request.)

SERVICE WORKERS “GO ALL IN” TO BACK DAN MALLOY AND NANCY WYMAN TO LEAD CONNECTICUT

by:

Members of the 55,000-strong Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Connecticut State Council are endorsing Dan Malloy and Nancy Wyman as the Democratic Party’s 2010 nominees for governor and lieutenant governor. Delegates representing the coalition’s six affiliates voted Friday to throw the full weight of the state’s largest and one of its most politically active labor unions behind the Malloy-Wyman ticket for the August 10 Primary Election.

The vote by the delegates to the State Council sets considerable combined member mobilization efforts in motion for an election that observers are predicting will go down to the wire. The locals that had already launched internal “get out the vote” drives will be integrated into a comprehensive campaign of phone banking, door-to-door canvassing, and literature mailing to union households over the next three weeks.

SEIU Connecticut State Council Director Paul Filson said Friday that rather than a “piecemeal approach,” the affiliated locals decided to “go all in” to support Malloy and Wyman in their bids to be the state’s next governor and lieutenant governor.

Prior to Friday’s meeting of State Council delegates, Malloy had earned the backing of the members of four of its affiliated unions. In May, healthcare and nursing home workers in the New England Healthcare Employees Union, District 1199/SEIU and custodians and security guards in Connecticut District/SEIU Local 32BJ voted to support the former Stamford mayor for governor. CSEA/SEIU Local 2001 and CEUI/SEIU Local 511 both announced last week their active and retired state, municipal and schools employees had also chosen Malloy to lead Connecticut for the next four years.

“Dan understands what it means to be ‘fair to those who care,’” said Francene Bailey, a certified nursing assistant at a nursing home in Windsor. “We need a governor who can bring people together for good jobs, safe staffing levels, and quality services. Dan will be the kind of governor who’s willing to put quality care for the elderly and the frail first,” said Bailey a member of the elected Executive Board for District 1199.

“In his 14 years as Mayor, Dan Malloy did a lot for the people of Stamford,” said Sara Pasterelli, a member of the union who sits on 32BJ’s Executive Board. “And as Governor, he’ll be able to do even more for the people of Connecticut. He has spoken out to protect the rights of all workers — including immigrant workers — and is making sure that working families will have the sick days we need,” said Pasterelli.

The recommendation by the elected leaders of both District 1199 and 32BJ to vote for Malloy was based in large part on his 14-year record as mayor of the City of Stamford. Malloy’s demonstration of consistent support for working families helped him edge out his last remaining rival for the Democratic Party’s primary nomination, and put him far ahead of all the candidates seeking support among GOP voters.

“Dan and Nancy are committed to real retirement security for all seniors,” said Donna McElduff, who retired as a registered nurse from Connecticut Valley Hospital where she established a utilization review that helped save millions in taxpayer dollars by holding managed care companies accountable. “Instead of targeting public employees’ benefits, they’re asking why more private sectors workers have lost theirs. That’s why Dan and Nancy are the kind of leaders Connecticut deserves,” said McElduff, a member of the retiree council in CSEA/SEIU Local 2001.

In their votes to support his candidacy, the leaders of both CSEA and CEUI recognized Malloy’s record as an advocate for vital public services and a vocal supporter of the workforce that delivers them. He has made frequent references to seeking partnerships with foresters, correctional lieutenants, school bus drivers, health inspectors, bridge repair workers, classroom aides, public safety officers, senior caregivers, and the many public servants providing value to the people of Connecticut each and every day.

The SEIU State Council organizes a months-long democratic process each year for its affiliated locals’ membership in order to facilitate informed electoral choices and determine the best use of campaign resources. Malloy and the other gubernatorial hopefuls seeking an endorsement were required to complete a lengthy questionnaire on working families’ issues and participate in a well-attended membership forum in April to answer questions about their service records and campaign platforms. Member political activists and elected leaders from the Council’s affiliated locals interviewed Wyman on her candidacy in June.

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is the largest and fastest growing labor organization in the nation, with more than 2 million members. Its Connecticut State Council represents over 55,000 active and retired members in six affiliated locals, making it the state’s largest union. Healthcare workers in District 1199, state and municipal employees in CSEA, CEUI, and IBPO, college faculty and staff in the 4Cs, and property services workers in 32BJ make up its diverse membership.

Republican Fundraising Going Nowhere Fast in CT-5

by:

Fifth District Republican Challengers All Report Depleted Campaign Accounts

Three Republican candidates vying to challenge Congressman Chris Murphy (CT-5) are going nowhere fast, filing fundraising reports showing less money in the bank at the end of the second quarter of 2010 than they had at the end of 1. Meanwhile, Murphy reported raising nearly $500,000 in the second quarter and increased his cash on hand by $300,000 to a total of $1.5 million.

With the Republican primary looming and all of the Republican candidates reporting less money in the bank by the month, it’s nearly impossible to see how the eventual nominee- whomever he is- will muster the resources, the enthusiasm, or the will to take on Chris Murphy.

Caligiuri Fails to Capitalize

After winning the Republican convention in May, Waterbury State Senator Sam Caligiuri has totally failed to capitalize on his victory. Incredibly, he reported less money in the bank today than he had on April 1st. Despite winning the Republican convention, Caligiuri heads into an expensive primary with the least amount of cash on hand of all three Republican candidates at $190,000, a mere 12% of Murphy’s total.

Bernier Sinking Fast

After losing the Republican convention, former Congressional staffer Justin Bernier’s fundraising completely dried up. He raised a meager $66,000 for the entire fundraising quarter, and will face Caligiuri and Mark Greenberg in the Republican primary with $197,000 cash on hand – and no momentum after his failed convention bid.

Greenberg Has No Support

Nearly every dollar that Mark Greenberg has reported has come from his own bank account. Greenberg’s report shows a scant $15,000 from donors other than himself, displaying a total lack of grassroots support for his campaign.

The History

If history is a guide, the Republican candidates’ lack of resources points to a disastrous showing in November. David Cappiello, who lost to Murphy in 2008 by 20 percentage points, reported over $700,000 in the bank at this point in the race – triple that of this year’s crop of challengers. At this point in the 2006 race against incumbent Nancy Johnson, Murphy had over $1 million on hand.

MALLOY/WYMAN SHARE IDEAS FOR REINVIGORATING CONNECTICUT TOURISM

by:

Dan Malloy and Nancy Wyman, the Democratic Party’s endorsed candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor, visited the Mystic Seaport and Aquarium this morning to discuss their plans for boosting Connecticut’s tourism industry. The pair said that a renewed focus on the industry will help grow jobs and invigorate our state economy.

“Connecticut’s tourism and hospitality industry is a major driver of economic activity,” said Malloy. “If we can make better targeted and more effective investment in this sector, it will pay our state back in countless ways. Connecticut tourism helps grow jobs, increases state revenue, and preserves the art and culture that makes Connecticut such a great place to work, live and raise a family.”

Added Wyman, “The puzzling decision by the current administration to eliminate Connecticut’s tourism-marketing budget is another example of why this state needs new leaders that know how to make intelligent, cost-effective investments that will help us attract visitors and create jobs. The Malloy-Wyman administration will not only revive our state’s vital marketing budget, but will create a forward-thinking plan to use those dollars to spark economic recovery and lay a foundation for long-term prosperity.”

Tourism is a key segment of the Connecticut economy. It drives $9.3 billion in economic activity annually for the state, employs more than 64,000 people and generates an estimated $1.4 billion in revenue. Malloy and Wyman would support and strengthen that industry in the following ways:

· Proposing a $15 million budget for marketing the state, to be increased as a percentage of the hotel occupancy tax, as those tax returns increase, with a goal of matching those funds with an equal amount of private investment from attractions, hotels, businesses, developers and realtors.
· Engaging local Chambers of Commerce as key resources for marketing Connecticut and supporting the tourism industry.
· Using the Greater Mystic Visitors Bureau as a model for managing tourism efforts statewide.
· Investing in transportation projects that tourism, such as making Shoreline East a practical solution for residents and visitors, and a refocused attention on making Bradley International Airport a more competitive New England hub.

Nation’s Cosmetics Industry To FDA: Regulate Us!

by:

In a groundbreaking initiative intended to enhance existing protections for millions of American consumers, the nation’s cosmetics industry today announced plans to support legislation that would strengthen and modernize regulatory oversight of the industry and create a greater role for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in assessing ingredient safety for personal care products.

The proposal represents the culmination of more than three years of planning and research by the Personal Care Products Council (the Council), the cosmetics industry’s trade group, which has consistently advocated for more FDA funding to support additional regulatory oversight. The Council detailed its proposal in a letter to key health policy leaders in Congress. The proposal would enhance current FDA and industry safety initiatives.

The Council is seeking to create formal processes for FDA to review ingredients for safety at the request of the public and stakeholder groups and to review all safety determinations made by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel. No such FDA processes currently exist.

“For decades, the industry has had an impeccable safety record under the existing requirements implemented by FDA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Our products remain among the safest in the marketplace,” said Lezlee Westine, the Council’s president and chief executive officer. “Nonetheless, we believe it is time to develop a more contemporary approach that includes a greater federal regulatory role. In fact, for the last 30 years, we have aggressively implemented numerous safety initiatives and processes to strengthen industry safety practices. Our consumers deserve multiple layers of protection and transparency.”

Westine emphasized the proactive nature of today’s announcement, which is being made in the absence of any specific public health risk or legislative mandate involving personal care products, which remain safe to use. Rather, the industry is responding to American consumers who are requesting and deserving more transparency from government and industry while ensuring their ability to keep pace with continued demand for innovative products.

“From Wall Street to the Gulf of Mexico, we have seen what can happen when there is a breakdown in the relationship between government and the private sector,” said Westine. “Our initiative recognizes the need to establish a more collaborative and constructive relationship with federal regulators.”

Toward that end, the Council’s five-point plan includes mandatory industry reporting and mandatory Good Manufacturing Practices, two provisions currently in HR 759, the Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act of 2009, introduced by Congressman John Dingell (D-MI), and three additional provisions that industry is seeking.

The Council plan includes:

(1) Enhanced FDA Registration. It requires that personal care products manufacturers who market their products in the United States comply with the following:

• Register with FDA all facilities where those products are manufactured.
• File with FDA product ingredient reports disclosing all of the ingredients used in those products; and
• Report to FDA any serious unexpected adverse event with a personal care product experienced by consumers.

(2) New Process to Set Safety Levels for Trace Constituents. When requested or on its own initiative, FDA would be required to establish safe levels for trace constituents in cosmetic ingredients and products;

(3) New FDA Ingredient Review Process. Once a request has been made, or FDA unilaterally determines action is warranted, the agency would be required to review the safety of any ingredient intended for use in a personal care product and set safety use levels for such ingredient on a specified timetable;

(4) New FDA Oversight of CIR Findings. FDA would be required to review current and future findings on the safety of cosmetic ingredients by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel and determine if these findings are correct. If there are instances in which it determines a CIR finding is not correct, FDA would determine by guidance or regulations if, or under what conditions, the ingredient can be used safely in personal care products;

(5) FDA-Issued Good Manufacturing Practices. FDA would establish industry-wide “Good Manufacturing Practices” requirements.

“The current process has served the public well for decades, but the time has come for us to advocate for additional safeguards as science and technology evolve. Today’s consumers have even higher expectations for the products they choose for themselves and the companies that provide them,” said Westine. “Our companies commend Rep. Dingell for his ongoing work to better protect consumers and increase transparency. We look forward to working with the current and next Congress to ensure these changes are meaningful and attain the full force of federal law.”

For more information about cosmetic and personal care products, visit www.cosmeticsinfo.org.

Based in Washington, D.C., the Personal Care Products Council is the leading national trade association representing the global cosmetic and personal care products industry. Founded in 1894, the Council’s more than 600 member companies manufacture, distribute, and supply the vast majority of finished personal care products marketed in the U.S. As the makers of a diverse range of products millions of consumers rely on every day, from sunscreens, toothpaste and shampoo to moisturizer, lipstick and fragrance, personal care products companies are global leaders committed to product safety, quality and innovation.

What Will Protect 110 Million Americans, Create 8,000 Jobs & Stimulate Local Economies?

by:

The Chemical and Water Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2868) was adopted by the House on November 6, 2009. It requires disaster prevention policies that eliminate catastrophic risks through the use of safer, more secure chemical processes. At least 284 chemical facilities have converted to safer chemical processes which have eliminated theses risks to 38 million people. Yet 300 U.S. chemical plants together put 110 million Americans at risk of a poison gas disaster whether triggered by terrorism or accidents. H.R. 2868 would make the highest risk chemical plants subject to conditional requirements to use safer chemical processes.

Very similar legislation was introduced in the Senate today by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). The overall spending levels ($840 million) in the Lautenberg bill are identical to the House bill in the first year. The Lautenberg bill allocates more of this funding ($525 million) toward conversion of high risk chemical plants and continues those levels through 2015. A blue-green coalition of 90 organizations supports this legislation.

This legislation, designed to secure U.S. chemical plants and prevent catastrophic chemical disasters that put millions of American at risk, is threatened by unsubstantiated claims by opponents that disaster prevention standards will eliminate jobs and hurt the economy.

Greenpeace contracted Management Information Services, Inc. (MISI) to conduct an independent economic analysis of bill. The MISI analysis thoroughly rebuts claims by opponents of this legislation. MISI shows that the House bill will actually create 8,000 jobs and leverage nearly $2 billion in economic stimulus. Furthermore, the two sectors of the economy that will benefit the most are the chemical industry and publicly-owned water treatment plants.

MISI concluded, “The gross jobs impact attributable to the legislative initiative is forecast to stay at around 8,000 every year through 2020…In summary, the analysis suggests that H.R. 2868 will have a slight positive impact on the U.S. economy and a small increase in net employment nationwide. In addition, the legislation will place thousands of employees and millions of U.S. residents in a vastly safer environment.”