Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for December, 2010

How to Cure a New Year’s Hangover

by:


Exercise and B vitamins can help cure a hangover, but coffee won’t help.

Before the party:

– Plan to drink moderately — a maximum of five drinks for men and three drinks for women during a minimum three-hour period.
– To prevent inflammation, take an anti-inflammatory drug such as ibuprofen or Aleve.
During the party:
– Eat first, and then drink, not the other way around. Food slows the absorption of alcohol.
– Drink slowly.
– To prevent dehydration, drink a glass of water after each alcoholic drink.
– Take a B vitamin supplement.

After the party:

– Do not drink and drive.
– Get as much sleep as possible.

The morning after:

– Take another B vitamin.
– Drink lots of water.
– Exercise (if you can stand it). During vigorous exercise, blood circulates three times as fast as it does when you are sitting on the couch. And the faster you circulate blood through your liver and kidneys, the faster your body will remove the toxins.

What doesn’t work:

– Coffee will make you more alert, but it won’t prevent or help a hangover.
– Forget “hair of the dog” — the notion that having a drink can relieve a hangover. It will only make you feel worse.

New and Improved Restaurant Lists

by:

I have added two new restaurants compilations, with name, address phone number, and in most cases, links, and improved two others with more restaurants and more links:

NEW

Weston/Wilton.Redding Restaurants
Trumbull Restaurants

IMPROVED:

Norwalk Restaurants
Bridgeport Restaurants

New Analysis of Food Hardship Shows At Least One in Seven Respondents In Nearly Every State Unable to Afford Enough Food in First Half of 2010

by:

Connecticut food hardship rate : 14.57%

New data show that in nearly every state, at least one in seven respondents reported in first half of 2010 that there were times during the prior twelve months that they did not have enough money to buy food that they needed for themselves or their family, according to the Food Research and Action Center’s (FRAC) analysis of data from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.

This report is the third in FRAC’s series of analyses of survey data on food hardship collected by Gallup as part of the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index. This particular analysis looks at the most recent available food hardship rates by state for the first half of 2010.

For the months of January through June 2010, FRAC’s analysis found that:

-Sixteen states had food hardship rates of 20 percent or higher – one in five or more of those surveyed experienced food hardship;
-Forty-seven states and the District of Columbia had rates of 14.15 percent or higher – one in seven or more of those surveyed experienced food hardship; and
-Only three states – Wisconsin, Minnesota and North Dakota – had a rate below 14 percent.

“Food hardship remains appallingly high in this country. These numbers underscore just how muted the recovery has been for many families, communities, and states. People are still struggling to afford the basic necessities of life,” said Jim Weill, FRAC president.

FRAC also compared the food hardship rates for the twelve months from July 2008 through June 2009 to the twelve months from July 2009 through June 2010. FRAC chose twelve month periods to get a better sense of which states saw a statistically significant change from the heart of the recession to the earliest months of the recovery, albeit a recovery that all agree has been very weak. Comparing those two periods, five states (Alaska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah) saw a statistically significant increase in their food hardship rates and five states (Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Ohio, and Washington) saw a statistically significant decrease.

“States will be facing many fiscal challenges next year, yet unemployment, poverty and food hardship remain very, very high. State leaders must protect programs for low-income families,” said Weill. “They should also look at smart and cost-effective ways to connect families to the federal nutrition programs – strategies like taking advantage of options in the federal SNAP (food stamp) program to get more people enrolled, making new choices to feed children in school and after school from the recently passed child nutrition reauthorization law, and getting a head start on summer food outreach to raise awareness of the program.”

Governor Rell: ‘Jobs Bill’ Provision Triggering $72 Million Investment in Connecticut Companies

by:


Expanded Tax Credit Program Creates New Fund for Growing Firms

Governor M. Jodi Rell today announced that a key provision of the bipartisan Jobs Bill that Governor Rell helped shepherd to passage in the most recent legislative session is triggering a $72 million investment in at least 25 Connecticut small businesses, helping to create jobs, spur innovation and strengthen the state’s economy.

Advantage Capital Partners is the first venture capital and small business finance firm to be certified as a fund manager under the newly revised Insurance Reinvestment Tax Credit program, which was updated as part of the Jobs Bill. The program leverages private capital provided by insurance companies that is then invested by state-certified fund managers.

The Jobs Bill – passed by the Legislature in the waning days of the regular session – is a sweeping, bipartisan package that offers incentives for employers, supports small business and emerging industries, provides resources for tuition and training, helps manufacturers find efficiencies and includes accountability measures to safeguard state taxpayer dollars. The bill was the product of cooperative efforts Governor Rell began in the first leadership meeting of the legislative session.

“As I have traveled the state, one of the top concerns I have heard – especially as the economy has struggled – has been the lack of access to capital, especially risk capital for new ventures with considerable start-up costs but high growth potential,” Governor Rell said. “With the changes that we made to the Insurance Reinvestment Tax Credit program, there will be a much-needed infusion of investment dollars into our state to support business formation and growth, as well as strengthen our high-tech work force. I expect that this program will be paying important economic dividends for years to come.”

Advantage Capital Partners, a group of venture capital partnerships that has raised more than $1.3 billion since 1992, has raised $72 million for investment in Connecticut-based companies. The firm provides equity and debt capital, along with value-added counsel and other support, to operating businesses that have the potential for excellent investor returns as well as significant community impact.

For the Connecticut fund, Advantage Capital has partnered with Ironwood Capital, an Avon-based investment management firm focused on private equity, mezzanine and senior debt investments. Ironwood Capital will identify, underwrite and manage these investments.

Advantage Capital’s fund will identify promising debt and equity investment opportunities in everything from seed-stage through mature but growing companies.

“Advantage Capital Partners is committed to fostering the growth of small businesses in Connecticut,” said Steven T. Stull, President of Advantage Capital Partners. “Our firm has a strong track record of raising private capital for investments which promote economic opportunity, enable job creation and retention, and contribute to a robust investment climate. We look forward to working with the State of Connecticut and with Ironwood Capital to accomplish these important goals.”

The revamped Insurance Reinvestment Tax Credit program now allows fund managers to invest in any Connecticut-based business, not just insurance-related companies. Twenty-five percent of the investments must be committed to green technology efforts, while 3 percent must go toward pre-seed investments.

“The passage of the jobs bill earlier this year was a momentous occasion for Connecticut,” said Joan McDonald, DECD commissioner and Connecticut Innovations board chair. “It provided a host of new incentives and resources for businesses to boost investment and create jobs across all industry sectors. The changes made to the Insurance Reinvestment Tax Credit program, most notably in the pre-seed area, are another important building block in our efforts to move to an innovation-based economy.”

To learn more about the Advantage Capital Connecticut fund, please contact Victor Budnick at (860) 409-2108 or John Strahley at (860) 409-2106. Companies seeking capital can submit requests for funding via email to icc@ironwoodcap.com.

New Policies Needed to Help Economically Distressed Communities

by:

Sometimes places—and not just the people who live in them—need government help in recovering from severe economic distress, according to an article in the Winter 2011 Issues in Science and Technology.

Author Michael Greenstone, formerly the chief economist of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, and coauthor Adam Looney found in their research that some U.S. communities that had devastating job losses in previous recessions, such as those of the early 1980s, often suffer economically for decades. They believe that a similar fate may await communities affected by the recent Great Recession.

Greenstone and Looney draw on economic research to argue that a national economic strategy is justified to help future distressed communities avoid or shorten the long period of adjustment that previously distressed communities have endured. They propose a basket of policy options that could begin the process of restoring good jobs to local workers.

ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
is the award-winning journal of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and the University of Texas at Dallas.

New U.S. Food-Safety Measure Balances Interests of Consumers and Manufacturers

by:

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, expected to be signed into law shortly by President Barack Obama, will set the bar higher for food manufacturers, processors and importers, as well as retailers of private label products, according to attorney Janice Lai, a partner in LeClairRyan’s Hartford office. Among other things, the legislation is aimed at giving the Food and Drug Administration the power to mandate food recalls involving fruit and vegetable products, while setting new food safety standards for manufacturers and food processors, and requiring the industry to better track shipments.

“This is positive legislation that balances the interests of both the consumer and food manufacturer,” says Lai, an experienced litigator who focuses her practice on product liability, food litigation insurance defense, and complex civil litigation. “The bill ensures that contaminated foods, as well as those containing unwholesome or adulterated ingredients, do not reach consumers and grocery shelves.”

Currently, the FDA “has no authority to recall foods,” Lai notes. “They can make recommendations for recalls, but cannot mandate one. With passage of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, they will have that power.”

The legislation requires manufacturers and food processors to evaluate and identify food safety hazards in their facilities, implement preventive controls, and document those measures to the FDA, she says. The legislation also gives the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary greater ability to track and trace foods.

“If someone does become sick—and approximately 325,000 people are hospitalized with a diagnosis of food poisoning every year—the Act will allow HHS to more easily and quickly track and trace the source of the contamination,” Lai explains. “In formulating the regulations, the HHS Secretary will work with the food industry, the Secretary of Agriculture and representatives of state departments of agriculture in pilot programs to develop product tracing programs to more effectively identify recipients of the food to prevent or mitigate food borne illness outbreaks.”

The legislation also allows the FDA to have the resources to conduct more frequent inspections of facilities and articles of food imported into the United States. “Imported foods not meeting the new FDA requirements for food safety will be refused entry into the country,” Lai advises. “These requirements will have far-reaching impact beyond the borders of the United States, extending all the way back up the supply chain to countries like China and India and the rest of the world.”

Meanwhile, retailers selling private label food products governed by the Act will be required to perform risk-based foreign supplier verification indicating that the imported food is in compliance with new FDA requirements and is not adulterated or misbranded, Lai adds. “Under the Act, private label retailers are required to provide the HHS Secretary with certification from an accredited certification entity or other assurances that their foreign-supplied food products are FDA compliant,” she says. “The Secretary can refuse entry of imported foods whose certification or assurances are not deemed valid or reliable.

“Although domestic suppliers governed by the Act have an independent duty to ensure that they are compliant with the new FDA requirements,” Lai continues, “private label retailers doing business with these domestic suppliers should also make their own determination that their suppliers are indeed compliant, such as asking to see a current registration with the FDA as defined under the Act.”

U.S. manufacturers and food processors operating their own farms and plants overseas are also subject to the requirements of the Act. The legislation empowers the HHS Secretary to enter into agreements and arrangements with foreign governments to facilitate inspections of foreign facilities registered with the FDA and permits the Secretary to direct resources for inspection of foreign facilities, suppliers and food products determined to be high-risk. Foods from foreign factories, warehouses and establishments registered with the FDA where the owner or operator refuses inspections by United States inspectors or others designated by the Secretary won’t be permitted into the United States.

Exempted from oversight are food manufacturers and processors with annual sales of less than $500,000 who sell directly to consumers or restaurants within 275 miles of the production site.

RELATED LINKS

http://www.leclairryan.com

Flawed EPA Analysis Blocks Tougher Coal Ash Rule Overstates Value of Coal Ash Recycling By More Than 20 Times

by:

Government’s Own Data Directly Undercuts Grossly Inflated EPA Estimate of Coal Ash Recycling Benefits; OMB’s Effort to Derail EPA Rulemaking Is Based on Numbers that Do Not Add Up

Two years after the Kingston, TN coal ash spill, federal action to regulate coal ash dumps is being held up by concerns that stricter standards would depress markets for coal-ash recycling. “Cost-benefit” analysis estimates prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that coal ash recycling is worth more than $23 billion a year, based on the annual life-cycle benefits of avoiding pollution and reducing energy costs. But there’s just one problem: That estimate is more than 20 times higher than the $1.15 billion that the U.S. government’s own data shows is the correct bottom-line number, according to a review conducted by the independent and nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), Earthjustice, and the Stockholm Environment Institute’s U.S. Center (based at Tufts University).

The deep flaws in the EPA cost-benefit analysis appear to have escaped scrutiny at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which required EPA to include a weaker coal-ash proposal favored by utilities and some coal ash recyclers. Common sense and past experience indicate that stricter standards for disposal will work to increase, rather than decrease, recycling. But either way, EPA ought not to be intimidated into adopting weak rules based on grossly inflated values for coal ash recycling, the three groups explained.

Presented today by Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice, and the Stockholm Environment Institute, the new EIP analysis shows that the huge discrepancy is due to several factors, including double counting of pollution reductions that the EPA has already claimed would occur separately under Clean Air Act rules adopted in August 2010, overstated emission levels from cement kilns, and unrealistic assumptions about potential energy savings from reducing energy consumption at cement kilns and gypsum plants. For example:

- About half of the coal-ash recycling benefits claimed by EPA are based on assumptions that substituting fly ash for 15 percent of U.S. cement production would cut fine particle emissions by more than 26,000 metric tons per year. But the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation has estimated that the entire cement kiln industry releases just over 15,000 metric tons per year, and projected emissions already would decline to about 3,500 metric tons by 2013 when separate Clean Air Act standards for that industry take effect.

- EPA estimated that recycling fly ash in cement kilns saves $4.9 billion in energy costs in the analysis prepared for the coal ash rule. But the Agency’s Office of Radiation, in analysis developed to support the separate and more far-reaching Clean Air Act standards, estimated total energy costs for the entire industry at no more than $1.7 billion.

EPA’s cost-benefit analysis also neglects to account for many of the quantifiable benefits that would result from stricter standards, and puts an enormous dollar value on the so-called “stigma” that would supposedly attach to coal ash recycling by virtue of regulating disposal sites. These economic assumptions are haphazard, unsupported by the record, and designed to slant the playing field against regulations that are based on protecting the public’s health.

Environmental Integrity Project Director Eric Schaeffer said: “Unfortunately, EPA and OMB just got this wrong. The ‘regulatory impact analysis’ prepared by EPA to support its proposal exaggerates the economic life cycle value of coal ash recycling, which could end up stacking the deck in favor of the weaker regulatory option favored by industry. Somehow, the agency has let itself be distracted by bogus economic arguments, instead of determining how best to protect the public from leaking ash dumps. In any case, coal ash recycling would not stop under the stronger of the two rules at the EPA. Coal combustion waste can be recycled responsibly, help reduce disposal costs and, in some cases, reduce energy or raw materials cost when coal ash is used as a substitute. All evidence suggests that strict regulation of coal ash disposal sites will encourage recycling, as industries seek to avoid the higher disposal costs.”

Frank Ackerman, senior economist, Stockholm Environment Institute, said: “We found numerous errors, large and small, in EPA’s cost-benefit analysis of the proposed rules. Once we corrected those errors, the strict regulatory option is the clear winner. The only argument for the weaker option is industry’s unsubstantiated claim that strict regulation of ash disposal would cause immense, long-lasting harm to the market for ash recycling. In reality, strict regulation of disposal would make recycling more attractive, not less.

Abigail Dillen, staff attorney, Earthjustice, said: “It should come as no surprise that requiring safe landfills for coal ash is less costly than allowing ash dumps to contaminate water in hundreds of communities around the country. What is surprising, in the face of this major public health threat, is that the books are being cooked to accommodate the coal industry.”

Why is strong federal action needed? The groups emphasized the following facts:

- About $400 million has been spent so far to clean up the TVA Kingston spill with more than three million tons of spilled ash removed from the site. However, the cleanup is far from complete. Meanwhile, at least 50 similar, unregulated high-hazard dams around the country continue to pose a similar risk of catastrophic failure, and many more ash dumps are currently contaminating groundwater. EPA, EIP, and Earthjustice have documented over 100 dump sites where coal ash has poisoned water supplies.
- EPA’s own risk assessments reveal that arsenic levels in drinking water around unlined ash ponds can be high enough to cause cancer in one of 50 people – which is 2,000 times EPA’s acceptable risk level. Yet there is evidence that this high cancer risk is substantially underestimated. The leading arsenic experts in the country observe that this risk is actually 17.5 times greater.
- A review of state regulations shows that the majority of states fail to require essential safeguards for coal ash landfills and ponds, including liners, groundwater monitoring, leachate collection, dust controls and financial assurance. In the two years since the disaster in Kingston, little has been done to improve state controls. Only four states in the U.S. require all landfills to be monitored and only six states require all ponds to be monitored for leaks.

ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT

The Environmental Integrity Project is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for effective enforcement of environmental laws. EIP has three goals: 1) to provide objective analyses of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and affects public health; 2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with environmental laws; and 3) to help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws.

ABOUT EARTHJUSTICE

Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment.

STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE

The Stockholm Environment Institute is an independent international research institute that has been engaged in environment and development issues at local, national, regional and global policy levels for more than 20 years. SEI has established a reputation for rigorous and objective scientific analysis in the field of environment and development. SEI’s goal is to bring about change for sustainable development by bridging science and policy. SEI’s U.S. Center is a research affiliate of Tufts University in Massachusetts.

The Best and Worst of 2010: The World

by:

— by Jeffrey Laurenti, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation.

The advent of a new year draws me back to Century’s blog to offer my idiosyncratic picks on the most important developments worldwide of this past year, for better and for worse, that are likely to have repercussions or at least offer telling lessons for years to come. Summarized compactly in two to three sentences each, the “10 best” and “10 worst” are randomly alphabetized rather than priority ranked:

The 10 Best

– Climate concerns regain traction.

The failure of the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit to produce a binding treaty deflated the hopes and expectations of scientists and negotiators alike for effective international action, but this December’s follow-up meeting in Cancun yielded surprisingly specific agreements on a 2 degree C temperature target for mitigation, a system for monitoring progress on emissions reductions, forestry protection, and climate assistance that all bridge the traditional divide between developed and developing countries. Still, the inability of a filibuster-strangled U.S. Senate to vote on House-passed climate legislation provided a bracing unreality check on the political will of the world’s largest carbon-consuming countries to achieve binding reductions in emissions.

– Cuba feints toward liberalization — economically.

Havana’s communist government approved a striking loosening of the strict socialist straitjacket on the country’s economy, taking the political risk of cutting a half million jobs from state companies by spring 2011 and permitting private businesses to hire non-family employees in hopes of jump-starting a dynamic private sector that could spark a surge in employment and income. But Raul Castro’s regime made clear it was not interested in liberalizing the political system; even as it released 52 political prisoners in an agreement with Spain and the Catholic Church, it forced most of the freed human-rights advocates into exile — and the Obama administration, avoiding engagement, simply renewed the widely discredited U.S. embargo.

– India presses into the global inner circle.

Long the Avis of the developing world, India this year won from President Obama a coveted promise of U.S. support for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council — even though the Indian parliament had effectively nullified the U.S. nuclear industry’s hopes for big new contracts under President Bush’s nonproliferation-busting nuclear agreement with New Delhi by insisting on holding suppliers liable for operators’ accidents (to say nothing of India’s awarding much of the reactor business to Russian firms). In the spirit of prime minister Manmohan Singh’s pragmatic reformism, India had already jettisoned much of the cold-war prickliness that had seemed so whiny and irritating to Westerners, and proved a capable partner in climate and energy negotiations and G-20 economic policy debates; at the same time, Singh confounded conservative U.S. geo-strategists who had hoped to draw India into an anti-Chinese alliance by strengthening relations with #1, China. Stubborn civilian resistance to Indian rule in Kashmir and the heavy costs of continuing a virtual armed occupation there began to register with the political class in New Delhi this year, raising faint hopes for eventual resolution of a long-festering conflict that has burdened Indian diplomacy.

– Iraq sets its own course.

The once-heavy hand of foreign occupation and tutelage was all but lifted from Iraq in 2010, as President Obama fulfilled his pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat forces from the country by June while steadfastly refusing to request revision of President Bush’s reluctant commitment to withdraw the remaining 50,000 non-combat forces by the end of 2011. It took nine months gestation after the March parliamentary election, but at year’s end Iraqi politicians finally formed a governing coalition, prime minister Nuri al-Maliki having secured a new mandate through an alliance with the fiercely anti-occupation Sadrist bloc. It wasn’t the coalition Washington would have liked, but the Americans still pressed a willing Security Council to lift the last vestiges of the U.N.’s Saddam-era sanctions on Iraq.

– Malaria, polio cornered despite economic downdraft.

After recent years’ backsliding in the global effort to eradicate polio, international efforts succeeded once again in reversing the spread of the disease, with a 99 percent drop in new cases in Nigeria — the country whose neglect had launched re-infection in 15 previously polio-free countries in Africa, most of which this year likewise stopped those outbreaks — and with near-eradication in India’s worst polio-prone states. President Bush’s global initiatives for controlling malaria and AIDS similarly bore fruit in 2010, with malaria infection rates slashed by more than half in eleven African and 32 other malaria-endemic countries, and new HIV infections dropping by 20 percent by the turn of the decade.

– Nuclear weapons face tighter controls.

President Obama began to produce some major deliverables on his commitment to rolling back nuclear weapons, concluding a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia to replace the expired 1993 pact, convening the first-ever nuclear security summit in Washington with 47 heads of government, reviving international commitment to enforcing the nonproliferation regime through agreement on a new plan of action at the Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference, and at year’s end winning Senate consent to ratification of the new START. The NPT agreement included a call to convene a conference on a Mideast nuclear-weapons free zone, which annoyed Israelis but which diplomats credited with facilitating Security Council approval of stiffened global sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program.

The unexpected difficulty in winning 67 votes for what should have been a no-brainer START treaty was a signal, however, of how deeply entrenched the Strangelovian attachment to nukes among conservatives has become, making next steps in their control and phase-out an ever harder slog.

– “Re-set”: U.S.-Russian relations yield tangible gains.

American efforts to restore amicable ties with Russia, after the antagonisms that metastasized in the years before Obama came to power, paid tangible dividends in a new nuclear arms reduction pact, indispensable Russian support for tightening the U.N. sanctions noose on Iran’s nuclear program, and Russian collaboration on NATO missile defense and supplies for Afghanistan. President Dmitri Medvedev’s participation in the NATO summit in Lisbon signaled the repair of Russian-Western relations ruptured in the South Ossetian war of August 2008, reopening the door to Russia’s political as well as social and economic integration with the West.

– Ukrainian public settles NATO issue.

Obama was spared conservative charges of selling out Ukraine’s membership in NATO to court better relations with Russia (or, even worse, to curry favor with West Europeans skeptical of further alliance expansion) when Ukrainians overwhelmingly repudiated president Viktor Yushchenko, who had worked closely with the Bush administration to lock in NATO membership. The victory of Viktor Yanukovich, a firm opponent of joining the alliance and a party apparatchikof the old school, put a swift end to the NATO application, which had not enjoyed much public support anyway; but Yanukovich’s razor-thin margin over braided prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko underscored the country’s uncertain identity and continuing east-west divide. Now, if only neighboring Belarus could similarly be persuaded to trust its people to freely decide their future …

– U.N. Women mobilized.

While consensus-building on Security Council reform accelerated to a snail’s pace this year, the United Nations did achieve a landmark consolidation of scattered small bureaucratic outposts into a single U.N. agency for high-level global promotion of women’s empowerment, the awkwardly named “U.N. Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.” To give the new agency visibility and heft, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Michelle Bachelet, the first woman to become defense minister and then president in Chile, who would have credibility not only on traditional “women’s” issues like workplace equality and girls’ education but also on implementation of U.N. mandates to include women in peace-making and post-conflict reconstruction.

– World Bank and I.M.F. shift voting power.

It may not look big, but April’s transfer of 3.13 percent of World Bank and International Monetary Fund voting shares (and financial contributions) to fast-growing large developing economies was a seismic tremor, after long rearguard resistance by European members to shrinkage of their shares. China’s and India’s shares jumped from 2.77 percent to 4.42 and 2.91 respectively, making China the Bretton Woods institutions’ third largest contributor, ahead of Germany, and India their seventh largest, ahead of Italy; with “developing and transition” countries now holding an aggregate 47 percent share of voting power, Bank president Robert Zoellick called the transfer “crucial for the Bank’s legitimacy.”

The 10 Worst

– Afghan torpor undercuts allied effort.

A feckless Afghan government seemed unable to grasp the opportunity the Obama administration’s stepped up military effort was giving it to regain the initiative after a four-year Taliban resurgence, even with NATO allies’ warning not to count on them past 2014. Deepening public disgust at officials’ corruption, punctuated by insiders’ self-dealing in cases like the collapsed Kabul Bank, manifested itself in the precipitous drop in voter turnout in this year’s parliamentary elections — in which an admirably independent election commission again had to invalidate widespread fraudulent returns — and, more ominously, in Taliban penetration even into parts of the non-Pashtun north.

– Cote d’Ivoire tests democracy thesis.

While diplomats had long seen elections as the key to resolve the deep divisions between Cote d’Ivoire’s traditionally dominant coastal south and its Muslim north, the two rounds of balloting confirmed a disturbing trend in African politics previously evidenced in Kenya and Zimbabwe: democracy is too important to be left to incumbents seeking reelection. Laurent Gbagbo, who may have actually been elected in 2000 but whose administration triggered a north-south civil war, annulled decisive votes from the north that lopsidedly favored his challenger, Alassane Ouattara, a former I.M.F. official and prime minister, and with his control of Ivorian security forces in the capital he challenged the peacekeepers of the United Nations, which had confirmed the election commission’s certification of Ouattara’s victory. Despite African unanimity in recognizing Ouattara as the elected head of state, Russia blocked coercive measures by the Security Council to pry Gbagbo out of the presidential palace, and the year ends with no road map in sight for a peaceful transition.

– European outrage at abuse scandals rocks Vatican.

Pope Benedict XVI’s hopes to lead Europe back to the historical Christian roots nurtured by the Catholic Church since Constantine’s time were shattered by the explosion of priestly sex abuse scandals that brought down one leading cleric after another in Belgium, Ireland, Netherlands, and even the pontiff’s German homeland. Many Vatican insiders had dismissed the first iteration of clerical abuse revelations in 2002 in the United States as a frenzy orchestrated by American secular media, but their return with a vengeance in Europe — and the cover-ups and impunity associated with the abuse — so shook the trust and, yes, faith of the laity across Europe as to create an existential crisis for the authority of Europe’s most ancient continuing institution.

– Isolated, Iran hunkers down.

The government convincingly showed its control of the Tehran street at the Islamic republic’s 31st anniversary in thwarting protests against the legitimacy of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad’s disputed 2009 election, but it could not duplicate abroad its domestic success in crushing resistance. Not only did it fail in its effort to derail tightened U.N. sanctions on its nuclear program by playing Turkey and Brazil against Washington, but–faced with a humiliating defeat by Maldives for a seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council–it withdrew its candidacy before the General Assembly could vote; and UNESCO revoked its sponsorship of a World Philosophy program in Tehran after the government’s announcement of new restrictions on social sciences — especially law, political science, and philosophy — in Iranian universities. At year’s end, Ahmadinejad’s abrupt dismissal of foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki and execution of a long-dreaded (though economically sensible) quadrupling of subsidized fuel prices suggested the mounting strains from Iran’s isolation.

– Israel-Palestine negotiations enter deep freeze.

The prospects for peace between Israelis and Palestinians this year might never have been bright, given the opposition of hard-right parties in Binyamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition to picking up where previous negotiations had left off, but U.S. mediator George Mitchell’s patient efforts finally produced face-to-face talks between Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas in September — which ended within weeks on the resumption of accelerated Israeli settlement construction in the occupied territories. Bereft of viable options and seeing the success of international pressure in forcing a relaxation in Israel’s blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza after the Turkish flotilla incident in May, Palestinians dusted off once again their campaign for international recognition of their state within the 1967 borders, wooing Europe and winning Argentina and Brazil; the Obama administration limply repeated the mantra that the best way to “achieve that [statehood] is through negotiations by the two parties.”

– Korean tensions escalate.

Caught between a brittle communist leadership intent on steering the succession to a third-generation Kim in the North, and a confrontational conservative leadership in the South that has abrogated one North-South commitment of its predecessors after another, Koreans this year faced rising tensions and the riskiest exchanges of live fire since the 1953 armistice. The sinking of the South’s warship Cheonanin disputed waters (by a North Korean torpedo, say Seoul’s supporters), the North’s artillery shelling of Seoul-controlled Yeonpyeong island in response to military exercises there, and Pyongyang’s unveiling of a new nuclear facility did not shake the Obama administration from its path of unswerving backstopping of its rightist partner in Seoul and of hopefully pressing China to turn against its old ally in Pyongyang. With State reluctant about opening an official track, the communist regime this year turned again to American luminaries outside the administration — Jimmy Carter and Bill Richardson — to signal its intentions on nuclear weapons and a would-be peace settlement.

– Mexico drug war deaths surge past 30,000.

With over 12,450 deaths from Mexico’s drug wars in 2010 — nearly five times the number of Afghan war deaths this year — the rate of killings by drug cartels and by government forces trying to suppress them has grimly accelerated; by comparison, the wars took 9,635 lives in 2009 and 6,844 in 2008. The cartels have redoubled their efforts to place allies in key electoral positions, and opposition politicians increasingly voice skepticism about president Felipe Calderon’s determination to suppress the violent criminal networks. Recognizing that it is Americans’ drug habits (and gun sellers) that have fueled the narco-insurgency, the Obama administration this year pressed for sharply increased U.S. demand reduction initiatives and tighter reporting on weapons sales in states along the Mexican border.

– Pompeii collapses spotlight World Heritage erosion.

While UNESCO continues to inscribe new sites on its World Heritage list — this year adding the Thang Long citadel in Hanoi, an ancient pastoral settlement site in Tajikistan, and the episcopal city of Albi in southwest France, among others — staggering losses this fall at the mother of all world heritage sites, the excavated Roman city of Pompeii, underscored the failure of many governments, even in wealthy countries as economically heritage-dependent as Italy, to maintain their heritage sites. The “House of the Gladiators” (Schola Armaturarum) collapsed in early November, followed only weeks later by the crumbling of the “House of the Moralist,” triggering an urgent visit by a UNESCO team of experts to a site in a country that was more accustomed in the past to send such preservation experts to advise other countries on maintaining their sites.

– Star-crossed Haiti survives — barely.

Buffeted by death, hunger, pestilence, and civil strife, for Haiti 2010 was the year of the Apocalypse. It opened with a catastrophic earthquake that by the Haitian government’s count killed a quarter million people — including the archbishop of Port-au-Prince, as well as the head and deputy head of the U.N. mission and 83 of their colleagues–left a million homeless, and so completely shattered the country’s fragile infrastructure that emergency relief was chaotic and clean-up and reconstruction efforts were hobbled for the entire year; cholera was a grim by-product. The magnitude of the disaster sparked unprecedented global assistance, and Obama tapped his two predecessors to lead a massive fund-raising effort; but Haiti’s own administrative structures were overwhelmed and incapable, stoking public frustration and anger with the government that exploded at the announced results of the first-round presidential election in November, in which outgoing president Rene Preval’s unpopular favorite candidate was assigned a berth in the runoff.

– United front for economic recovery fragments.

The resolute unity of the international community in confronting the 2008 economic crisis through coordinated stimulus may have averted a second great depression last year, but it frayed in 2010 as China rejected realignment of its grossly undervalued renminbi and European governments U-turned to embrace deficit reduction and fiscal austerity, spooked by a eurozone debt crisis that quickly metastasized when German politicians balked at nipping it in the bud in Athens. Europe’s turn to austerity — echoed in the United States by resurgent conservatives challenging Obama — occurred even though, two years into the crisis, all four of its leading economies had still not recovered their GDP levels of 2008, and all but Germany still had markedly higher rates of unemployment; the U.S. at least was expected to end 2010 with a 1.7 percent GDP gain over 2008, though bearing an unemployment rate two-thirds higher than at the crash. Strikingly, however, it was the largest developing country economies that paced the global recovery this year, not the old G-7: the I.M.F. estimated China’s 2010 GDP at 21.3 percent above its 2008 level, India’s at 13.4 percent, and Brazil’s at 23.7 percent.

Page 1 of 612345...Last »