Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for March, 2011

Libya: Not What We Expected

by:

To me, establishing a no-fly zone in an arena where essentially unarmed civilians are being shot down by air strikes is a reasonable assertion of international authority. Even the Arab League approved such a measure, at least at first, in Libya. But to me, a “no-fly” zone is, and should be, a warning that any hostile military planes in the zone would be shot down. That’s how such a policy was enforced in the air over the Kurdish region of Iraq before the invasion by our forces.

But what we are doing in Libya is far more than that. We are attacking ground forces and facilities. We are, essentially, at war, all without Congressional approval. I don’t like it and neither do many in Congress, from progressives, to moderates, to conservatives:

The criticism is from all directions: from moderates,” like Sens. Jim Webb and Dick Lugar; “from those on the far left and right, like Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) and Ron Paul (R-Texas), who believe the president acted outside the Constitution; and from the establishment on both sides, including House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson of Connecticut and Republican Rep. Candice Miller of Michigan, a self-described ‘hawk.’”

Here’s more on Larson and Courtney:

Rep. John Larson…said he had “deep concerns” about the U.S. involvement. “I understand the gravity of the situation. I understand what a thug and a tyrant Quaddafi is… But this comes only a week after Sec. Gates was very public, as were members of the Pentagon, in warning against even a no-fly zone, in terms of the ramifications,” Larson said, referring to Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

“It seems like mission creep has occurred in record time,” said Rep. Joseph Courtney. Courtney said he was okay with the plan as initially articulated by President Barack Obama on Friday, which “was that the U.S. would be involved in a supportive role to help enforce a multilateral U.N. resolution with our European allies.” But “the first 48 to 72 hours don’t look like a supportive role,” Courtney said, noting that National Guard troops have been activated and the Pentagon spent $100 million on the Libya strikes in the first day alone. “This just makes me very uncomfortable in terms of how quickly it seems to have enlarged,” he said.

Teachers, Nuclear Dangers, Abortion Rights

by:

Greater Danger Lies in Spent Fuel Than in Reactors NY Times

Years of procrastination in deciding on long-term disposal of highly radioactive fuel rods from nuclear reactors are now coming back to haunt Japanese authorities…

Japan, like the United States, has kept ever-larger numbers of spent fuel rods in temporary storage pools at the power plants, where they can be guarded with the same security provided for the plants.

…Most of the dangerous uranium at the power plant is actually in the spent fuel rods, not the reactor cores themselves.

Death By a Single GOP Cut? from Mother Jones

Republicans in Congress have proposed slashing millions in federal funding for immunization programs. Public health advocates warn that these cuts threaten efforts across the country to prevent and contain infectious and sometimes fatal diseases. And they add that lower vaccination rates could eventually result in more outbreaks that endanger public health at a major cost to taxpayers.

Green (and White) Tea’s Health Benefits

by:

White Tea vs. Green Tea

When discussing white tea vs green tea, it is important to realize that they both come from the same plant, the tea plant Camellia sinensis. The main difference between the two types of tea is that the white tea leaves are harvested at a younger age than the green tea leaves. They both undergo very little processing. White tea is not fermented at all, while green tea is partly fermented. By contrast, black tea is fully fermented. Because they are so gently treated, white tea and green tea retain their content of beneficial antioxidants.

However, studies have shown that the young, white tea leaves retain antioxidants in higher concentrations than green tea does. Studies have shown that white tea has a concentration of antioxidants that is three times higher than in green tea. Essentially, white tea contains the same concentrations of antioxidants as the young and fresh tea leaf buds that are still attached to the bush. This makes white tea the tea with the highest antioxidant content, which for many is the main reason for drinking white tea. For comparison, one cup of white tea contains approximately twelve (12) times as much antioxidants as fresh orange juice.

Regularly drinking green tea could protect against Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia

Coffee or tea: enjoy both in moderation for heart benefits

Drinking more than six cups of tea per day was associated with a 36 percent lower risk of heart disease compared to those who drank less than one cup of tea per day. Drinking three to six cups of tea per day was associated with a 45 percent reduced risk of death from heart disease, compared to consumption of less than one cup per day.

Green tea may help improve bone health

Researchers in Hong Kong are reporting new evidence that green tea — one of the most popular beverages consumed worldwide and now available as a dietary supplement — may help improve bone health. They found that the tea contains a group of chemicals that can stimulate bone formation and help slow its breakdown.

Green tea fights prostate cancer

According to results of a study published in Cancer Prevention Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, men with prostate cancer who consumed the active compounds in green tea demonstrated a significant reduction in serum markers predictive of prostate cancer progression.

White Tea Helps Weight Loss

Possible anti-obesity effects of white tea have been demonstrated in a series of experiments on human fat cells (adipocytes). Researchers have shown that an extract of the herbal brew effectively inhibits the generation of new adipocytes and stimulates fat mobilization from mature fat cells.

Antioxidants in green tea may help reduce periodontal disease

Researchers found that routine intake of green tea may also help promote healthy teeth and gums. The study analyzed the periodontal health of 940 men, and found that those who regularly drank green tea had superior periodontal health than subjects that consumed less green tea.


Green, black tea can reduce stroke risk

Drinking at least three cups of green or black tea a day can significantly reduce the risk of stroke, a new UCLA study has found. And the more you drink, the better your odds of staving off a stroke.

Green tea may delay onset of type 1 diabetes

A powerful antioxidant in green tea may prevent or delay the onset of type 1 diabetes, Medical College of Georgia researchers say. Researchers were testing EGCG, green tea’s predominant antioxidant, in a laboratory mouse with type 1 diabetes and primary Sjogren’s syndrome, which damages moisture-producing glands, causing dry mouth and eyes. “Our study focused on Sjogren’s syndrome, so learning that EGCG also can prevent and delay insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes was a big surprise.”

Drinking Tea May Offer Health Benefits

Cardiovascular: There’s some early evidence that regularly drinking green tea may reduce heart attack risk or atherosclerosis.

Bone and joint health: Green tea could be beneficial in reducing inflammation related to arthritis and slowing cartilage breakdown. Some early data indicate that regular tea consumption might improve bone mineral density in older women.

Memory: Older adults in Japan who drank green tea daily showed less risk of memory difficulty, compared with those who didn’t drink tea regularly.

Green tea boosts production of detox enzymes, rendering cancerous chemicals harmless

Concentrated chemicals derived from green tea dramatically boosted production of a group of key detoxification enzymes in people with low levels of these beneficial proteins, according to researchers at Arizona Cancer Center. These findings suggest that a green tea concentrate might help some people strengthen their metabolic defense against toxins capable of causing cancer.

Green Tea May Help Fight Rheumatoid Arthritis

A compound in green tea may provide therapeutic benefits to people with rheumatoid arthritis. Researchers found that the compound inhibited the production of several molecules in the immune system that contribute to inflammation and joint damage in people with rheumatoid arthritis. The compound from green tea also was found to suppress the inflammatory products in the connective tissue of people with rheumatoid arthritis.


Green tea may help prevent autoimmune diseases

Green tea may protect from inflamed bladder

Citrus Juice, Vitamin C Give Staying Power to Green Tea Antioxidants

Catechins (pronounced KA’-teh-kins), display health-promoting qualities and may be responsible for some of green tea’s reported health benefits, like reduced risk of cancer, heart attack and stroke. The problem is that catechins are relatively unstable in non-acidic environments, such as the intestines, and less than 20 percent of the total remains after digestion. A study found that citrus juices enable more of green tea’s unique antioxidants to remain after simulated digestion, making the pairing even healthier than previously thought. Lemon juice caused 80 percent of tea’s catechins to remain, the study found. Following lemon, in terms of stabilizing power, were orange, lime and grapefruit juices.

Also see Green tea better with asorbic acid (lemon, etc.)

Green tea helps beat superbugs

The results surprised the researchers, showing that in almost every case and for all types of antibiotics tested, drinking green tea at the same time as taking the medicines seemed to reduce the bacteria’s drug resistance, even in superbug strains, and increase the action of the antibiotics. In some cases, even a low concentration of green tea was effective.


Green tea may protect brain cells against Parkinson’s disease


Milk eliminates cardiovascular health benefits of tea

Green Tea Shown to Possess Antitumor Effect in Breast Cancer


Some green tea negatives:
Drinking green tea interferes with some cancer and heart drugs.
Health Benefits of Green Tea May Decrease After Long Storage
Drinking very hot tea can increase the risk of throat cancer

Interesting 3/18

by:

1. New Republic: In Bachmann, A Serious Contender

As the 2012 Republican presidential field finally takes shape over the next few months, one thing is fairly certain: An intensely ideological female politician closely identified with the Christian Right and with the Tea Party movement, someone liberals love to hate, will define the race. But surprisingly, it’s increasingly likely that person will be Michele Bachmann rather than Sarah Palin. The former Alaska governor has been deliberately opaque about her plans, but she looks ever less interested in running for president — and even if she is quietly hankering for a White House bid, her approval ratings have been sliding steadily among Republicans as well as the public at large (worse, a vast majority of Americans think she is unqualified to be president). That leaves an opening for Congresswoman Bachmann, the Tea Party firebrand from Minnesota, who is almost an improved version of Sarah Palin: even more right-wing, which appeals to the base, but also lacking many of Palin’s fatal political flaws…

Moreover, Bachmann is in excellent political position. She could certainly do well in the first-in-the-nation Iowa Caucus, particularly if Mike Huckabee also stays on the sidelines as expected, creating a hunger for a new Christian Right champion in a state where the Christian Right still walks tall. It also helps that she is actually an Iowa native living in next door Minnesota — and it’s hugely important that her very closest associate in Congress is influential Iowa Congressman Steve King.

2. It’s Not About the Deficit from Economist’s View by Mark Thoma

I think we make a mistake by talking about this as though the goal of Republicans is actually deficit reduction. It’s not, the goal is a reduction in the size of government and once you understand that, it’s clear why Republicans will not support tax increases of any kind. They’d rather cut taxes now (and argue it’s about jobs or long-run growth rather than ideology), and increase the deficit even more because they still believe the beast can be starved. Anything that increases the pressure to reduce spending will be embraced, anything such as a tax increase that might allow the government to grow larger will be opposed. Logic about the best way to close the deficit won’t win this argument because it has little to do with the deficit itself.

3.Supreme Court decision on sentencing guidelines gives judges more leeway

“By the time of his second resentencing in 2009, Pepper had been drug-free for nearly five years, had attended college and achieved high grades, was a top employee at his job slated for a promotion, had re-established a relationship with his father, and was married and supporting his wife’s daughter.”

Nevertheless, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit said that his original sentence had been too light and that, under federal sentencing rules, the remarkable changes Pepper had made in his life could not be considered at his resentencing. A different judge gave him three more years and sent him back to prison.

The Supreme Court plucked his petition from the thousands that make their way to the court each year. This month, Pepper won his case in a victory that gives federal judges more leeway to provide second chances to the criminals who come before them.

9 million adults joined ranks of uninsured due to job loss in 2010

by:

An estimated nine million working-age adults—57 percent of people who had health insurance through a job that was lost—became uninsured in the last two years, according to the Commonwealth Fund 2010 Biennial Health Insurance Survey. The survey paints a bleak picture for the 43 million adults under age 65 who reported that they or their spouse lost a job in the past two years, finding that job losses are often compounded by the loss of health insurance, leaving families vulnerable to catastrophic financial losses and bankruptcy in the event of a serious illness or accident.

According to the report, Help on the Horizon: How the Recession Has Left Millions of Workers Without Health Insurance, and How Health Reform Will Bring Relief, the unemployed have great difficulty finding affordable health care. Only 25 percent of people who lost employer health insurance were able to find another source of health insurance coverage, and only 14 percent continued their job-based coverage through COBRA. In addition, purchasing individual coverage was not a viable option for most people. Seventy-one percent of adults who tried to buy individual coverage in the past three years, or 19 million people, either found it difficult or impossible to find a plan that fit their needs; found it difficult or impossible to find a plan they could afford; or were turned down or charged a higher price for coverage because of a pre-existing condition.

“This survey tells a story of millions of Americans who lost their jobs during the recession, lost their health benefits too, and had essentially no place to turn for affordable health care coverage—putting their health and financial security at risk,” said Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis. “The silver lining is that the Affordable Care Act has already begun to bring relief to families. Once the new law is fully implemented, we can be confident that no future recession will have the power to strip so many Americans of their health security.”

According to the survey, an estimated 52 million American adults were uninsured at some point during 2010, up from 38 million in 2001. Adults in families with low and moderate incomes were the most likely to be uninsured; 54 percent of lower-income adults (under $22,050 for a family of four) and 41 percent of moderate-income adults ($22,050 to $44,100 for a family of four) were uninsured for some time during the year, compared with 13 percent of adults with higher incomes.

Insured and Uninsured Alike Struggle With Health Care Costs

Health care costs are increasingly preventing people from getting the health care they need, the survey finds. Seventy-five million adults did not get needed health care in 2010, skipping doctor visits, prescriptions, specialist care, and recommended tests or treatments because of costs. This is a 60 percent increase from 2001, when 47 million people reported skipping needed care because of costs. Uninsured adults were the most likely to forego care due to costs, with 66 percent reporting they did so. However, many insured adults were also less insulated from high health care costs—31 percent of adults who were insured all year went without the health care they needed because of costs, up from 21 percent in 2001.

High out-of-pocket spending is increasingly common: the survey found that 49 million working-age adults spent 10 percent or more of their income on out-of-pockets costs and health insurance premiums in 2010, up from 31 million in 2001. In addition, health insurance is not providing the protection from health care costs that it used to—nearly one-third (31%) of adults insured all year spent 10 percent or more of their incomes on health care costs in 2010. In contrast, in 2001, 19 percent of people insured all year spent 10 percent or more of income on health care costs.

Americans Continue to Face Medical Debt

According to the survey, 73 million people reported problems paying their medical bills or were paying off medical debt, up from 58 million in 2005. An estimated 44 million people were paying off medical debt in 2010, up from 37 million in 2005.

Medical debt and medical bills are leading Americans to make significant trade-offs. The survey found that an estimated 29 million people have used up all of their savings to pay medical bills, 17 million have incurred credit card debt, 22 million were unable to pay for basic necessities like food, heat, and rent, and 4 million declared bankruptcy because of medical bills.

“The survey shows that over the last decade, increasing numbers of people across the income spectrum went without health insurance, avoided timely health care because it was too expensive, and struggled with medical debt,” said lead study author and Commonwealth Fund Vice President Sara Collins. “Millions of working families reported making difficult trade-offs between paying off their medical debt, buying other life necessities, and saving for the future. The sweeping changes health reform will bring to the nation’s health insurance system will ensure that families will have the financial means to get the health care that they need, both in good economic times and bad.”

Additional Report Findings:

A quarter of adults with chronic conditions who took medications skipped their medications or didn’t fill a prescription for their condition because of cost. Uninsured adults with chronic conditions were most likely to have medication problems related to cost—52 percent reported problems compared to 18 percent of adults that were insured all year.
Of the estimated 26 million adults who bought, or tried to buy, health insurance on the individual insurance market in the past three years, 16 million found it very difficult or impossible to find a plan they could afford. An estimated 9 million were turned down or charged a higher price because of a health problem, or had a preexisting condition excluded from their coverage.
Only half of all adults were up to date on recommended preventive screenings, the survey found. Less than half (42%) of uninsured women aged 50-64 had had a mammogram in the past two years, compared with 79 percent of insured women.
Moving Forward

The survey’s authors note that the Affordable Care Act provisions that are already in effect are bringing some relief in the form of preexisting condition insurance plans, allowing young adults up to age 26 on their parents’ plans, small business tax credits, elimination of lifetime limits on benefits, and required coverage of preventive care without cost-sharing, to name a few.

Once the law is fully implemented in 2014, nearly all of the 52 million currently uninsured American adults, including those who became uninsured during the recession, will have access to comprehensive health insurance coverage through expanded Medicaid, private health plans with consumer protections, and tax credits for those with low and moderate incomes to purchase insurance. In addition, health benefits will have to conform to an essential benefit standard, and no one will be denied coverage or charged more because of a preexisting health condition.

Methodology

The Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from July 14 to November 30, 2010. The survey consisted of 25-minute telephone interviews in either English or Spanish and was conducted among a random, nationally representative sample of 4,005 adults ages 19 and older living in the continental United States. A combination of landline and cell phone random-digit dial (RDD) samples was used to reach people, regardless of the type of telephones they use. In all, 2,550 interviews were conducted with respondents on a landline telephone and 1,455 interviews were conducted on a cellular phone, including 637 with respondents who live in a household with no landline telephone access. This report limits the analysis to respondents ages 19 to 64 (n=3,033).

The data are weighted to the U.S. adult population by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, household size, geographic region, population density, and household telephone use, using the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. The resulting weighted sample is representative of the approximately 183.59 million U.S. adults ages 19 to 64.

Respondents’ insurance status in the past 12 months is classified as either insured all year, insured when surveyed but uninsured during the past 12 months, or currently uninsured. These categories enabled exploration of insurance instability and its role in access to care and financial security.

Interesting 3/17

by:

1. Connecticut’s achievement gap not just an inner city issue By Sarah Butrymowicz, The Hechinger Report

Three entire grade-levels: That was the size of the gap between Connecticut’s low-income students and their more affluent peers on the fourth- and eighth-grade NAEP reading tests in 2009. By this measure, Connecticut ranked dead-last out of all 50 states. And it’s not just because the state’s affluent students perform extraordinarily well. Overall, Connecticut’s low-income students are outperformed by low-income students in more than 30 states on the nationwide test.

2. Teaching in the U.S. is unfortunately no longer a high-status occupation

International comparisons show that in the countries with the highest performance, teachers are typically paid better relative to others, education credentials are valued more, and a higher share of educational spending is devoted to instructional services than is the case in the United States.

3. No JOLTS to Complacency by Paul Krugman

Although unemployment remains very high, at this point that’s mainly due to lack of hiring; layoffs are quite low. This means that people who still have decent jobs aren’t feeling much at risk of losing them. So any urgency would have to come from concern about those who don’t have jobs — those who lost them in the slump, and of course young people trying to get started on their working lives.

And those people — at least one in six workers— don’t seem to have much political or psychological visibility. In effect, they’re being written off.

Connecticut Earns “F” in Annual Report of Transparency in Government Spending

by:

Connecticut got an “F” when it comes to openness about government spending, according to Following the Money 2011: How the States Rank on Providing Online Access to Government Spending Data, the second annual report of its kind by the Connecticut Public Interest Research Group (ConnPIRG). Included with the report is an interactive online tool that allows users to view what Connecticut is doing best and worst compared to other states’ transparency practices.

“The good news is that since last year’s Following the Money report, state governments across the country have become far more transparent about where the money goes,” said Jenn Hatch, Program Associate at ConnPIRG, “But Connecticut still has a long way to go.”

Though Connecticut received an “F” grade because it lacks a website with checkbook-level detail, the State’s Office of Fiscal Analysis (OFA) has been working over the last year to build an on-line searchable database, set to go “live” on July 1st of this year.

Alan Calandro, the Director of the Office of Fiscal Analysis noted that Connecticut’s website is being created with in-house resources and with the cooperation of several individuals and agencies. “In addition to the searchable database, OFA has was been working toward increasing the level of information available on our website, such as the posting of state budgets back to 1973 and all formal reports and analyses that can be searched by keyword. OFA anticipates that the level of information on the website will continuously escalate,” said Calandro.

Since last year’s Following the Money report, there has been remarkable progress across the country with new states providing online access to government spending information and several states pioneering new tools to further expand citizens’ access to government spending information. This year’s report found that 40 states now provide an online database of government expenditures with “checkbook-level” detail. The states with the most transparent spending also include data on economic development subsidies, expenditures granted through the tax code, and quasi-public agencies. Six states have launched brand new transparency websites since last year’s report and many more have made improvements to existing websites. The best state transparency tools were highly searchable, engaged citizens, and included detailed information about government contracts, tax expenditures, tax subsidies and economic development incentives. The leading states with the most open spending are: Kentucky, Texas, Indiana, Arizona, Louisiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, and Oregon.

States that have created or improved their online transparency have typically done so with little upfront cost. In fact, states with top-flight transparency websites actually save money for taxpayers, while also restoring public confidence in government, and preventing misspending and pay-to-play contracts.

“Having one of the best transparency websites in the nation is important because it would shine a light on Connecticut’s government spending. We’ve got plenty of room for improvement, but with the enthusiasm at the OFA in looking to other states as models for Connecticut, we’re looking forward to the new searchable site going live in July, and moving forward from there” said Hatch. “Given the current severity of our budget problems, Connecticut residents need to be able to follow the money.”

National report spotlights criminal justice reform in Connecticut

by:

More than 20 states in the United States have changed or are considering changes to their policies around trying kids as adults according to a new report, State Trends: Legislative Changes from 2005-2010 Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System, released by the Campaign for Youth Justice.

The report praised Connecticut’s Raise the Age Reform, which returned 16-year-olds accused of minor crimes to the juvenile system, where recidivism rates are lower. The state plans to do the same for 17-year-olds in 2012.

“Connecticut has set a powerful example for other states that it is possible to help youth without compromising public safety. The results of the first year of implementation are promising,” the report says.

The report details reasons to keep minors out of the adult system, including lower recidivism and the high rates of suicide and victimization children suffer in adult prisons. In the past 5 years, 15 states have changed their state policies and at least another 9 are underway with active policy reform efforts.

“State policy makers are beginning to understand the overwhelming research that kids are not adults and need educational and rehabilitative services,” said Neelum Arya, State Trends Author and Research and Policy Director for the Campaign for Youth. “State Trends documents the ineffectiveness of prosecuting youth in adult criminal court and tracks the trends of returning to the original promise of the juvenile court.”

In the rush to crack down on youth crime in the 1980s and 1990s, many states enacted harsh laws making it easier for youth to be prosecuted in adult criminal courts. Every state allows youth to be prosecuted as adults by one of several mechanisms such that an estimated 250,000 children are prosecuted, sentenced, or incarcerated as adults each year in the United States. In more than half of the states, there is no minimum age limit on who can be prosecuted as an adult. This means that in these states very young children, even a 7-year-old, can be prosecuted as adults.