Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for September, 2011

Regulatory uncertainty is a phony explanation

by:

Lawrence Mishel:

The more persuasive explanation is that the demand for goods and services is depressed because of the collapse of the housing and stock market bubbles—the financial crisis—that has led to both a deleveraging (paying off debts) of households and a cratering of the construction sector.

There is a competing story, widely told by Republican politicians and business trade associations, which claims that business investment and hiring is being held back by uncertainty over future regulations and taxation. As Maine Senator Susan Collins said in introducing her bill to put a moratorium on all new regulations: “Businesses, our nation’s job creators and the engine of any lasting economic growth, have been saying for some time that the lack of jobs is largely due to a climate of uncertainty, most notably the uncertainty and cost created by new federal regulations” (Kasperowicz 2011). Her view has been repeated by others, including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (2011) and the Chamber of Commerce (Donohue 2011).

An examination of current economic trends, and especially what employers are doing in terms of hiring and investment, debunks this story about regulatory uncertainty as the cause of our dismal job growth. An examination of what employers and their economists are saying again and again in private surveys (cited later in this paper) makes it clear that what businesses actually identify as their primary set of challenges does not fit this story either. In other words, what the heavily politicized trade associations in Washington are saying does not correspond to the real challenges facing both large and small businesses, even as they themselves perceive them.

Paul Krugman:

Larry Mishel has a very good piece systematically debunking the zombie claim that fears of regulation are holding back job creation. There is, literally, not a shred of evidence for this claim — not in the numbers, not in what businesses say. Yet it has been eagerly adopted not just by Republican politicians but by Chicago economists, Federal Reserve presidents, and more. I think the willingness of so many people to completely abandon any intellectual principles here, so that they can play for Team Republican — or maybe we should call that Team Oligarch — is part of what has me down these days.

GOP Proposes Slashing Job Training Programs

by:

Breaking Their Promise To Focus On Job Creation, House GOP Proposes Slashing Job Training Programs By Marie Diamond on ThinkProgress:

….Perhaps most surprisingly for a party that claims to be focused on job creation, the GOP budget reduces funding for job training programs that give the unemployed the skills they need to find work in an ailing economy:

Employment Training Administration (ETA) – The legislation provides the ETA with $7.5 billion in new discretionary budget authority – $2.2 billion (-23%) below last year’s level and $2.1 billion (-22%) below the President’s request. Much of this reduction is due to the transition of employment and training programs to a federal fiscal year and the elimination of $2.4 billion in advance appropriations for the 2013 fiscal year.

Slashing funding for these training programs by nearly a quarter will deprive thousands of workers of a better chance to find employment. The bill also cuts the Department of Labor’s funding by $2.6 billion and “increases oversight” of job training programs by requiring the GAO to conduct a study on their cost-effectiveness — a transparent pretext for further diminishing the programs. The budget also laughably claims to “foster a pro-job growth environment” through a number of anti-union measures.

The national unemployment rate remains above 9 percent and 25 million Americans are unemployed or can’t find full-time work. Yet this is not the first time congressional Republicans have tried to zero out job training programs.

In February the plan proposed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) — and approved by almost the entire GOP caucus — gutted federal job training funding by nearly 50 percent. Republicans’ preoccupation with abolishing these programs illustrates that their talk about creating jobs is nothing more than empty rhetoric to conceal a pro-corporate agenda.

Milestones Approaching

by:

Some of the other sites I maintain are indeed approaching milestones:


Renaissance Magazine
5,779 people like

Health News Report 1,493 Posts

Education Research Report 1,195 Posts

Invasive Sea Squirt Threatens Connecticut’s $30 Million Shellfish Industry

by:

The invasive sea squirt, Styela clava, has now been discovered along the Eastern Seaboard as far south as Bridgeport Harbor and poses a significant danger to Connecticut’s $30 million shellfish business, according to field research conducted by Carmela Cuomo, head of the marine biology program at the University of New Haven, and several of her students.

The migration of the non-native pest, sometimes called an Asian clubbed tunicate, southward from Canada and northern New England threatens farming of bivalves such as clams, mussels, scallops and oysters in Long Island Sound. Styela clava’s efficient feeding, rapid reproduction and tendency to form large colonies enable them to crowd out other species.

Connecticut’s shellfish industry provides 300 jobs statewide, generates $30 million in sales and has 70,000 acres of shellfish farms in the state, according to the Connecticut Department of Agriculture.

The state, world famous for its oyster industry in the 1800s, has been working since the 1960s to rebuild its shellfish beds and clean up the pollution that led to the industry’s demise. Connecticut shellfish beds produce oysters, mussels and scallops as well as Quahog, steamer, razor and other clams.

“The spread of this particular species of sea squirt westward in Long Island Sound, along with laboratory studies of its temperature tolerance, indicates it can survive at higher water temperatures than scientists had previously believed,” Cuomo said. “If further testing confirms that Styela can reproduce in warmer waters, Styela may pose a greater threat than had previously been imagined and may even be able to spread as far south as Florida.”

Styela clava is an invertebrate that can travel great distances by attaching themselves to the hulls of ocean-going vessels. In fact, the styela here are believed to have originated in waters off the coast of Korea and were first documented in British waters in 1953, after that nation’s warships returned from service in the Korean conflict.

Styela has been reported in waters off Canada, and beginning several years ago were spotted in Fisher’s Island Sound near Groton, Conn. and in Noank, Conn. It was later discovered in Atlantic waters near the eastern mouth of Long Island Sound. Only recently has the species been observed within the Sound itself where the water is warmer than in Fisher’s Island Sound.

However, Styela’s preference for cooler water—between 35 and 73 degrees Fahrenheit—made it seem unlikely it would travel much further south.

A UNH graduate student, Melody Wood, working in Cuomo’s lab, has documented survival of adult Styela in waters as warm as 86 degrees F. In addition, Nicholas Brunetti of Saddle Brook, N.J., an undergraduate also working in Cuomo’s lab, has been investigating whether or not adult Styela clava can reproduce at higher temperatures, along with whether or not their larvae can survive at such temperatures.

Another undergraduate, Samantha Davidson of Groton, Conn., has been studying the communities of organisms found growing on Styela. Additionally, Wil Dixon, a graduate of Amity Regional High School in Woodbridge, Conn., spent several years working in Cuomo’s lab on the effects of temperature on Styela’s filtering rate. He won several awards at science fairs for his work and is now a freshman at the University of Michigan.

Similar to other sea squirts, Styela consumes plankton by filtering seawater through a bronchial sac inside its body cavity. These animals are called “squirts” because they pump and expel the water they have screened for food.

Styela is a particularly efficient feeder, and reproduces rapidly through a long reproductive season. Each organism resembles a knobby, leathery club attached to a tough stalk and may grow to three inches or longer in length. Styela grows in dense clusters of as many as 1,500 per square yard.

Cuomo and two undergraduate researchers in the marine biology program at UNH, Kathleen Sandin of West Haven, Conn. and Brunetti, have spent the past two months traveling along the northern coast of Long Island Sound looking for Styela clava. The results of this work reveal that Styela has spread as far west as Bridgeport, Conn., moving closer to the oyster farms that thrive in the Sound near Norwalk, Conn. Cuomo and her students are continuing to track the path of the species southward, as well as to study its environmental tolerances.

“At present, there are few good ways to stem the progress of Styela’s invasion,” according to Cuomo. “The invertebrate does not appear to have any natural predators in the region, and any agent that might be introduced to kill the organisms en masse—such as concentrated salt or lime—could also damage the species Connecticut has worked so hard to protect,” she said.

The most reliable method to eliminate Styela is to scrape any specimens free of surfaces to which they have adhered such as the hull of a ship, a technique that could provide fishermen, pleasure boaters and others with an excellent opportunity to help protect the local ecology although one has to be careful not to trigger the release of gametes (reproductive cells) when they are in the water.

Some Koreans go a step further: They eat Styela steamed, in a mixture with beef, clams, vegetables and ground rice, known as mideodok-chim. Harvesting the Styela, however, would be ill advised in areas such as New Haven where there is a ban on harvesting shellfish. Styela sequesters heavy metals in their tissues and eating them from most Connecticut waters would be unhealthy.

And if the threat by Styela were not enough, John Kelly, assistant professor of marine biology at UNH, and graduate student Beth Shedden of Stamford, Conn. also have identified an invasive species of shrimp in Connecticut waters. Oriental shrimp, also known as Palaemon macrodactylus, like Styela, are native to the waters off of Korea, Japan, and China. They were first detected on the east coast of the U.S. in 2001, near New York City and were recently found in the Mystic River.

Kelly and Shedden have collected samples of oriental shrimp from numerous locations in Connecticut, including within the New Haven Harbor. They are trying now to determine how well established the shrimp is in the area, what habitats it prefers and whether or not it is a threat to native species.

Murphy up on Shays by 4, McMahon by 7 in CT

by:

According to a new poll, Chris Murphy remains Democrats’ strongest bet to hold Joe Lieberman’s soon-vacated Senate seat, with newly announced candidate Chris Shays the GOP’s closest contender.

Murphy leads Shays by a 43-39 margin; tops last year’s GOP nominee Linda McMahon,
50-43; and beats former Rep. Rob Simmons, 45-36. Former Secretary of State Susan
Bysiewicz leads McMahon only 47-46, and trails Simmons, 42-41, and Shays, 48-37.
State Rep. William Tong trails Simmons and McMahon by seven points and Shays by 19.

“Chris Shays could make this a pretty close race,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “His problem is that Democrats like him more than Republicans. That’s not a good formula for surviving a GOP primary with Linda McMahon.”

PPP surveyed 592 Connecticut voters from September 22nd to 25th. The margin of error
for the survey is +/-4.0%. This poll was not paid for or authorized by any campaign or
political organization. PPP surveys are conducted through automated telephone
interviews. PPP is a Democratic polling company, but polling expert Nate Silver of the
New York Times found that its surveys in 2010 actually exhibited a slight bias toward
Republican candidates.

The Right-Wing Uses Misleading Numbers To Claim The Rich Are Unfairly Taxed

by:

REPORT: How The Right-Wing Uses Misleading Numbers To Claim The Rich Are Unfairly Taxed

Last week, Republican spokesperson and former Bush administration operative Karl Rove showed up on Fox News to tell host Neil Cavuto that, contra the claims President Obama has made to justify the new taxes in his proposed deficit reduction package, the rich are already paying more than their fair share in taxes.

ROVE: Here are the facts. One percent of the American taxpayers pay 39 percent of the burden. The top two percent pay over half the burden. 50 percent of all the taxpayers pay 97 percent of the burden. You know, people are paying their fair share.

….First of all, these numbers apply only to federal income taxes.

But individual income taxes made up only 44 percent of federal revenues in 2009. That same year, payroll taxes made up 42 percent of federal revenue. And in 2006, 86 percent of households with wage earners had higher payroll taxes than income taxes.

Payroll taxes apply a flat percentage rate to all of an individual’s income under $106,800, which makes payroll taxes highly regressive — i.e. the overall portion of income lost to the tax goes down as a person’s income goes up. In other words, while roughly two-fifths of the federal government’s revenue comes from progressive income taxes which fall harder on wealthier Americans, another two-thirds of that revenue comes from payroll taxes which fall harder on poorer and working class Americans.

Once state and local taxes are added, the right’s picture of the overtaxed rich deteriorates even further. State and local taxes are highly regressive: in 2007, the lowest 20 percent of earners lost 11 percent of their income to these taxes, while the top 1 percent lost just over 5 percent. When all taxes — federal income, federal payroll, and state and local — are accounted for, the percentage of total taxes contributed by the top 1 percent is almost exactly equivalent to their percentage of the nation’s overall income…

Accounting for all federal taxes, the top 1 percent paid 37 percent of their total income (including capital gains) to taxation in 1979. By 2006, that number had dropped to 31.2 percent. The rest of the country also saw a drop in their total effective federal tax rate, but not as large. And over the same time period, the share of all income in the nation going to the top 1 percent increased from 9.96 percent to 22.82 percent.

In other words, while the total effective federal tax rate on the richest Americans fell nearly 6 percentage points, their share of overall national income jumped more than 12 percentage points. During this same time period, the top 1 percent’s average income increased more than 250 percent, while the average income for the bottom 90 percent increased less than 75 percent. Meanwhile, the top 10 percent saw their total federal tax rate fall over 2 percentage points, while their share of income rose 15 percentage points….

CONNECTICUT CHEFS CHALLENGE WINNERS

by:

It all came down to three dishes: braised beef short ribs with homemade ravioli stuffed with trumpet royale and oyster mushrooms, coriander encrusted seared tuna with a medley of fermented heart of palm and heirloom greens and crab infused with an exquisite Jack Daniels inspired sauce over pappardelle pasta. More than 120 guests sampled these dishes at the Connecticut Chefs Challenge at the Lincoln Culinary Institute last Saturday evening.

The inaugural fundraiser was held by the Optimus Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to raising funds for Optimus Health Care, Inc. a leading network of community-based clinics offering affordable health care in Bridgeport, Stamford and Stratford. The chef finalists came from Fairfield County, and all of the hors d’oeuvres were made of locally produced ingredients. “Our goal was to not only bring the best chefs from our area but also offer guests gourmet samplings such as cheeses and appetizers made from the freshest products from our very own area”, said Chef Gary Costa, Culinary Program Manager for Lincoln Culinary Institute.

Chef Costa also honored three of the Institute’s top culinary students by allowing them to work alongside each of the night’s master chefs in the competition. As one student put it, “An opportunity like this doesn’t come very often – these chefs are amazing.”

“From the jazz music, to the wines, the chefs creations and student offerings, everything blended so well in such a great setting.” said Tom Hill, Optimus Chief Operating Officer.

The driving force of the evening was the genuine admiration and respect each of the chefs had for each other. “To be competing against Pierre of Metric and Peter of Avellino’s is a great honor and one that will bring the best out of our team,” said Massimo Tobacco of Amici Mei Italian Café in Bridgeport.

In an innovative move concocted by the event organizers, guests were allowed not only to enter each chef’s kitchen space but were also invited to discuss the recipes. “What a fantastic idea,” said event chairman Collin Baron, “To be able to eat such great food, just as it’s coming off the stove and then share your thoughts with a top chef is truly amazing!”

A luminary panel of three judges: Chef Jerry Revron, Chef Director at The Taft School, Chef Daniel Lestrud, Center for Culinary Arts and Chef Gary Costa of Lincoln Culinary Institute made their decisions based on a lengthy criteria list which included taste, originality and presentation. The judges awarded Best Entrée to Peter DelFranco from Avellino’s of Fairfield for his braised beef short ribs with homemade ravioli. This entry also received the People’s Choice Award, garnering the most votes by the guests in attendance.

In the category of Best Appetizer, the judges award went to Chef Pierre Andre Desruisseaux of Metric Bar & Grill in Bridgeport for what many guests described as the best tuna they have ever eaten. “I began thinking of what would be a spice that many people have not tried with seared tuna,” shared Chef Pierre Andre. “I chose coriander because of its unique character. I was so pleased to see how many people loved it.”

Chef Daniel Lestrud, one of the evening’s judges, was impressed with the entries. “This was a very difficult competition to judge. Each entry had its own uniqueness and on its own would be an enviable signature dish in any restaurant.”

“Our goal was to launch an annual fundraiser that emphasizes good health through great cuisine,” said Ludwig Spinelli, CEO of Optimus Health Care. “I’d like to thank our sponsors, guests, Lincoln Culinary Institute and especially the master chefs for such an amazing evening. I can’t wait to taste next year’s entries.”

Through the Connecticut Chefs Challenge, the Optimus Foundation hopes to raise awareness and much needed funds to carry out its initiatives in underserved communities. Thanks to sponsors like Pullman and Comley, Henry Schein Medical, JP Morgan Chase, Quest Diagnostics, Viking Construction, Noble Americas, Community Health Network of Connecticut and Slavin’s Professional Pharmacy as well as the generous attendees, the Chefs Challenge raised nearly $20,000 for the Optimus Foundation.

BUSINESS LEADERS CAUTION AGAINST TRANSFER OF CORPORATE RESOURCES FROM JOB CREATION AND INNOVATION TO CAMPAIGN SPENDING

by:

Top business leaders and members of the Committee for Economic Development (CED) has urged corporations to refuse to participate in the unlimited corporate campaign spending free-for-all made legal by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Instead, they should invest precious corporate resources in job creation and other core business functions. At a Washington event with business and policy representation, CED urged corporate leaders not to spend corporate resources on “independent” political organizations – and if they do, to disclose fully that fact to shareholders and the public.

According to three related reports released by CED, the rollback of campaign spending and transparency reforms (strengthened in the wake of Watergate) presents a serious threat to jobs and the economy, public faith in the corporate sector, and the vitality of our democratic institutions. During the 2010 election, the first after the Citizens United decision, it is estimated that some $600 million was spent on independent political campaigns, a significant portion of which came from unknown sources. That figure is expected to skyrocket during the 2012 presidential election.

“A secret flow of hundreds of millions of dollars from companies to campaigns is bad for business’s reputation, bad for innovation, bad for job growth, and bad for our democracy,” said CED President Charles Kolb. “Corporate America can take the lead in the corporate campaign spending crisis by sending one message to every business, big and small: ‘Don’t give, but If you do, disclose.’”

Page 1 of 812345...Last »