Jonathan Kantrowitz

Political activist, health nut

Archive for February, 2012

Immigrants contribute significantly to the state’s economy

by:

Immigrants to Maryland contribute significantly to the state’s economy, and were vital to its workforce expansion in both technical and less-skilled occupations from 2000 to 2010, concludes a new report by a Maryland commission. During this period, immigrants mostly complemented rather than competed with U.S.-born state residents for jobs, it adds.

The Commission to Study the Impact of Immigrants in Maryland, a state panel coordinated by the University of Maryland, evaluated the economic contributions of the state’s foreign-born and the cost of government services for them. It also studied the education experience of the children of immigrants, immigration law enforcement issues facing local communities, and the use of the federal E-Verify system to verify workers’ immigration status.

The panel’s final report, The Impact of Immigrants in Maryland, says the state’s foreign-born workers accounted for more than 57 percent of workforce expansion from 2000 to 2010. This was well above the national average of 45 percent.

Also, the report urges legislators to take a long view of immigration, which will show that the benefits significantly outweigh the costs, even the short run fiscal costs of providing state and local services. It says the state would be “foolhardy” to shortchange the education of immigrants’ children, who will be part of the state’s future workforce.

Among the report’s major findings and recommendations:

ECONOMIC IMPACT

“Immigrants have made considerable contributions to Maryland’s leading industries in the information, science, and medical fields,” the report says, pointing to evidence from 2000 to 2010. Additionally, unskilled immigrants play important roles in agriculture, seafood, construction, tourism, and transportation.

“Without the influx of foreign-born workers, expansion in these labor-intensive industries would have been choked off, increasing prices and discouraging growth across the economy,” it finds.

FISCAL IMPACT

Foreign-born workers’ contribution to economic growth largely supplies the tax and other resources needed to cope with the larger population that immigration produces, the report says. A 2007 Congressional Budget Office report concluded that, in aggregate and over the long term, immigrants pay more in federal, state, and local taxes than they use in government services.

The rapid influx of lesser-skilled immigrants can strain the capacity of state and local government budgets to supply health and education services. About three-fourths of the costs of serving immigrants, regardless of legal status, involve providing a public education for their children – services the U.S. Supreme Court says cannot be denied. Many of these children are U.S. citizens.

LAW ENFORCEMENT

The report finds that immigrants are less likely to commit violent crime than the U.S.-born, and it urges communities to be wary of federal programs designed to engage local police agencies in the enforcement of U.S. immigration law.

There are two major programs that can involve local law enforcement agencies. Under “Secure Communities,” fingerprints of those arrested for any criminal offense that are sent for identification to the FBI are automatically forwarded to immigration officials to determine whether the person in custody is subject to deportation. A second program, ”287(g),”creates a partnership that deputizes local officers to enforce federal immigration law.

The Commission’s recommendation: “Programs that enroll local law agencies in enforcing immigration law can work against the interests of Maryland’s communities. Local jurisdictions should engage with these programs only under certain conditions.”

EDUCATION

The education of children of immigrant parents provides many challenges to public school systems, the report finds. Some immigrant youth feel a sense of isolation from their communities and pessimism surrounding their futures, failing to get into a positive cycle of academic enrichment, extracurricular activities, and social engagement.

“Regardless of their status, it is most likely that the children of unauthorized immigrants will be part of the labor force over the coming decades,” the report says. “This labor force will underpin the U.S. and Maryland economies, not to mention the Social Security and Medicare benefits that current workers expect to receive. It would be foolhardy, then, for state and local communities to withhold education and other opportunities from those future workers.”

To insure Maryland’s continued global economic and technical leadership, the state must redouble its efforts to provide superior education at every level to all young residents, including the foreign-born, regardless of immigration status, the report concludes.

Malloy’s Attack on Tenure

by:

Here’s what he says:

To earn that tenure – that job security – in today’s system basically the only thing you have to do is show up for four years. Do that, and tenure is yours.

The bottom line? Today tenure is too easy to get and too hard to take away.

I propose we do it a different way. I propose we hold every teacher to a standard of excellence.
Under my proposal, tenure will have to be earned and re-earned. Not earned simply by showing up for work – earned by meeting certain objective performance standards, including student performance, school performance, and parent and peer reviews.

And my proposal says, you should not only have to prove your effectiveness once, after just a few years in the classroom. My proposal says that if you want to keep that tenure, you should have to continue to prove your effectiveness in the classroom as your career progresses.

Here’s what he means:

He essentially wants to eliminate tenure completely – if you “have to continue to prove your effectiveness in the classroom as your career progresses” then you don’t have tenure.

Here’s why it’s so unfair:

1. The first assumption is absurd: “To earn that tenure – that job security – in today’s system basically the only thing you have to do is show up for four years. Do that, and tenure is yours.”

That’s just out-and-out untrue. Here’s one part of the process new teachers in Connecticut go through:

The Teacher Education And Mentoring (TEAM) Program is being designed around the goal of developing individualized professional growth plans for all new teachers, uniquely designed based on their own needs as educators, and aligned with state standards. The unifying framework for the program will be a series of five modules to be completed within the first two years of teaching that focus upon the following important elements: (1) classroom environment; (2) planning for instruction; (3) implementation of instruction; (4) assessment of student learning; and (5) professional responsibility

Your assigned mentor will work with you to guide the instructional focus of each module based on an individualized needs assessment that will reflect your particular context for teaching – your students, your teaching subject, grade level, curriculum requirements and school and district goals. A written reflection paper or project will be required at the culmination of each module and submitted to a district or regional TEAM committee for review. Successful completion of all five modules will be required for eligibility for the provisional educator certificate.

and here are the Connecticut Guidelines (extensive) for evaluating new teachers.

We’ve come a long way. In 1969 I received emergency certification as a math teacher. I walked into my classroom in a Bridgeport middle school with no training, no preparation and no orientation. I taught for 2 years, and don’t recall an administrator ever appearing in my class. I certainly had no meetings, goal-setting conferences, feedback, or suggestions of any kind.

Now all of the above are very much part of the teacher evaluation process. It’s not just showing up for four years!

2. Teaching doesn’t always attract the best and brightest now. People going into teaching have lower ACT, SAT and GRE scores than many other professions. Removing one of the most attractive aspects of the teaching profession will further impair the quality of new entrants into the profession, and hasten the departure of many of the most qualified currently teaching.

3. This is all part of a larger blame-the-teacher approach to the problems of education, when the teacher is the least of the problems. “Education reform” has gone to people’s heads in very unhelpful ways.

Santorum Insanity

by:

1. We are headed to the guillotine:

2. Abortions have undermined the solvency of Social Security, because there aren’t enough workers available to support retirees.

3. Obama will force Catholics to hire women priests:

and two collections of his insanity:

This one is fun:

Rick Santorum Quotes As New Yorker Cartoons

And here are some from Think Progress:

1) ANNUL ALL SAME-SEX MARRIAGES: Arguing that gay relationships “destabilize” society, Santorum wouldn’t offer any legal protections to gay relationships and has pledged to annul all same-sex marriages if elected president. During his 99-country tour of Iowa, Santorum frequently compared same-sex relationships to inanimate objects like trees, basketballs, beer, and paper towels and even tried to blame the economic crisis on gay people. As Santorum explained back in August, religious people have a constitutional right to discriminate against gays: “We have a right the Constitution of religious liberty but now the courts have created a super-right that’s above a right that’s actually in the Constitution, and that’s of sexual liberty. And I think that’s a wrong, that’s a destructive element.”

2) ‘I’M FOR INCOME INEQUALITY’: “They talk about income inequality. I’m for income inequality,” Santorum said during an event in Pella, Iowa in December. “I think some people should make more than other people, because some people work harder and have better ideas and take more risk, and they should be rewarded for it. I have no problem with income inequality.”

3) CONTRACEPTION IS ‘A LICENSE TO DO THINGS’: Santorum has pledged to repeal all federal funding for contraception and allow the states to outlaw birth control, insisting that “it’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

4) GAY SOLDIERS ‘CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN CLOSE QUARTERS’: During an appearance on Fox News Sunday in October, Santorum defended his support for Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell by arguing that gay soldiers would disrupt the military because “they’re in close quarters, they live with people, they obviously shower with people.” He also suggested that “there are people who were gay and lived the gay lifestyle and aren’t anymore.”

5) OBAMA SHOULD OPPOSE ABORTION BECAUSE HE’S BLACK: During an appearance on Christian television in January, Santorum said he was surprised that President Obama didn’t know when life began — given his skin color. “I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say ‘now we are going to decide who are people and who are not people,” he explained.

6) WE DON’T NEED FOOD STAMPS BECAUSE OBESITY RATES ARE SO HIGH: Speaking in Le Mars, Iowa in December, Santorum promised to significantly reduce federal funding for food stamps, arguing that the nation’s increasing obesity rates render the program unnecessary.

7) ABORTION EXCEPTIONS TO PROTECT WOMEN’S HEALTH ARE ‘PHONY’: While discussing his track record as a champion of the partial birth abortion ban in June, Santorum dismissed exceptions other senators wanted to carve out to protect the life and health of mothers, calling such exceptions “phony.” “They wanted a health exception, which of course is a phony exception which would make the ban ineffective,” he said.

‘Newt Gingrich: Talks Like a Preacher, Lives Like a Porn Star’

by:

Truth Wins Out is placing a provocative full-page ad in the Capitol Hill publication Roll Call today admonishing Newt Gingrich for his stunning hypocrisy on the issue of marriage equality. The ad’s headline reads, “Newt Gingrich: Talks Like a Preacher, Lives Like a Porn Star.” It takes the anti-gay presidential candidate to task for his adulterous affairs and serial marriages and includes an original cartoon dubbed “The Marriage-Go-Round.”

TWO’s hard-hitting ad comes one day before Newt Gingrich speaks at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington. The ad ends by saying, “On behalf of loving, life-long same sex couples: Newt, you are a spectacular hypocrite. Shame on you!”

“It takes breathtaking chutzpah for Newt Gingrich to deny loving, committed same-sex couples the benefits of marriage that he has enjoyed three times,” said Truth Wins Out Executive Director Wayne Besen. “The bizarre embrace of Gingrich by CPAC proves that modern conservatism is not ‘pro-family,’ it is simply anti-gay.”

This ad comes on the same week that Proposition 8, California’s voter approved ban on marriage equality, was ruled unconstitutional in a federal appeals court. While polls show that Americans are now in favor of marriage equality, GOP presidential candidates, including Gingrich, appeal to their base by promoting intolerance and discrimination.

“The idea for this ad came on the day of my own marriage,” said TWO’s Besen. “As we were getting dressed to go to city hall, I heard Gingrich on television preening and prattling about the sanctity of marriage. At that moment, I decided that we had to stand up and speak out against such blatant demagoguery and brazen hypocrisy.”

“Newt Gingrich must be blind not to see the glaring dissonance between his belief that he should have whatever kinds of marriages – open or otherwise — that he wants, and his stated conviction that LGBT Americans shouldn’t be allowed to marry at all,” said John Becker, TWO’s Director of Communications.

Truth Wins Out is a non-profit organization that fights anti-LGBT religious extremism. TWO specializes in turning information into action by organizing, advocating and fighting for LGBT equality.

DNC Targets Romney Once Again

by:

Which is always fun:

And in my next post, Gingrich get what he deserves. Watch for it!

But shouldn’t we be targeting Santorum now?

Bridgeport, Stamford, Danbury Get Screwed

by:

From Wait, What by Jon Pelto

The Educational Cost Sharing Formula is $800 million short of what it was supposed to be in order to assure sufficient funding for primary and secondary education. Connecticut’s stated goal was to cover 50% of local educational costs with state funds and 50% with local funds.

In 1990 the state reached its high point of funding 45% of the costs – the number now is between 38-40% depending on how you calculate it – but the formula has been “corrupted” to the point where wealthy towns do much better (as measured by percentage growth) now than they did in 1990 and poorer towns do much worse.

Of the $50 million in new ECS funding, Governor Malloy’s proposal will send $39.5 million to the 30 poorest and lowest performing communities.

However, Governor Malloy’s plan also requires that school districts transfer $1,000 for each student attending an area charter. Malloy’s budget also provides each charter school with an increase of $1,600 per charter student, for a combined $2,600 increase per charter school student when the new state money and local transfer are counted

Once the transfers to the charter schools are made, the 30 poorest districts will then be sharing $33.5 million in new education funds.

Here’s the way it all works out:

School District

Number of Students*

Increase in Funds*

Increase per student*

Achievement First – The Charter School Company

2,440 (approx)

$6.2 million plus

$2,600

Waterbury

17,656

$4.4 million

$249

Hartford

20,774

$3.7 million

$178

Bridgeport

21,054

$3.3 million

$156

New Britain

10,854

$2.7 million

$245

New Haven

17,633

$2.3 million

$130

Meriden

9,187

$1.8 million

$193

East Hartford

8,027

$1.7 million

$214

Danbury

10,505

$1.7 million

$176

Bristol

8,762

$1.3 million

$159

West Haven

7,390

$1.4 million

$187

Manchester

7,502

$1.2 million

$160

Middletown

5,384

$798,000

$148

Windham

3,345

$764,000

$228

Norwich

11,165

$730,000

$65

Vernon

3,735

$670,000

$180

Naugatuck

4,855

$635,000

$131

New London

5,384

$620,000

$115

Stamford

15,127

$600,000

$40

Hamden

6,945

$583,000

$84

Congratulations to Thomas Maxwell, of Bridgeport, Conn.

by:

I knew him way back when!

Thomas Maxwell, of Bridgeport, Conn., has been named the director of financial services and administration for the 2012 Republican National Convention to be held in Tampa, Fla., August 27-30.

Maxwell is the principal of MAXimum Compliance, LLC, a full service campaign finance consulting firm. He has worked on campaign finance issues in a variety of roles.

Maxwell served as deputy director for financial services for the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn. Prior to that, he was the FEC director at the National Republican Senatorial Committee and a reports analyst at the Federal Election Commission.

He says he is happy to further his relationship with the Republican National Convention this year.

“I look forward to working with all of the departments within the Committee on Arrangements to ensure the office is run in an efficient and fiscally smart way.”

Convention CEO William Harris says Maxwell’s experience in handling complex campaign finance matters will be an invaluable asset during the months leading up to and through the convention next August.

“[Maxwell] will keep us on-budget and make sure we are where we need to be fiscally all around. He takes his responsibility seriously and everyone in the office appreciates his conscientiousness.”

Maxwell graduated from Southern Methodist University with a Bachelor of Arts in History. He has moved temporarily to the Tampa Bay area for his new role.

Himes Ranks among Most Pro-Environment Legislators

by:


League of Conservation Voters gives Himes a 97% for his voting record in 2011

Congressman Jim Himes (CT-4) ranks among the most pro-environment legislators in Congress, according to the League of Conservation Voters’ (LCV) 2011 National Environmental Scorecard. Himes earned a grade of 97 percent for his work in the House last year. Click here for the scorecard.

“I’m proud to support an agenda that keeps our water safe to drink and our air clean to breathe,” said Himes. “At at a time when environmental protections are under attack, we must be especially conscious of this responsibility.”

Members of Congress were graded based on 35 votes on issues ranging from public health protections to clean energy to land and wildlife conservation. According to the LCV, the 2011 Scorecard reflects the most anti-environmental session of the House of Representatives in history, featuring unparalleled assaults on our nation’s bedrock environmental and public health safeguards. In every case, Himes voted to protect the environment and uphold the principle that the best effect we can have on our planet is none at all.