Joe's View

With Joe Meyers, entertainment writer

Archive for June, 2011

The perfect gift for your ‘Scarface’-crazed drug dealer

by:

If you have $999.99 burning a hole in your pocket — and hang out with any of the cult followers of the 1983 Brian DePalma film “Scarface” — have I got a one-of-a-kind gift for you!

To celebrate the launch of the Blu Ray edition of the film, 1000 copies are being packaged in a collector’s humidor created by someone the movie company refers to as “the renowned Daniel Marshall” — I’m not up on designer cigar accessories — that is reminiscent of the one in which Tony Montana (Al Pacino) stores the gigantic stogies he smokes throughout the movie.

The object’s exterior is “hand painted and polished with Marshall’s trademark ‘1000 coat brilliant finish.’ The interior – made with untreated Spanish cedar – will properly condition and age approximately 100 cigars at optimal humidity levels.”

“Each individually numbered humidor comes embellished with custom medallions inspired by the iconic film and includes a certificate of authenticity.”

The humidor is another indicator of the enormous cult that has formed around the Pacino-DePalma kitsch extravaganza in the 28 years since it debuted.

The gangster drama is not quite in the so-bad-it’s-good class of “Valley of the Dolls” (1967) or “Mommie Dearest” (1981), but it too is embraced by fans for its craziest excesses.

Pacino’s performance as the Cuban gangster Tony Montana is one of the greatest scenery chewing displays in movie history — on a par with Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford and Patty Duke as Neely O’Hara in “Dolls.”

Some critics charged Pacino with racist stereotyping, but the movie wouldn’t be remembered today without the star’s manic and hilarious performance — if you don’t respond to what Pacino does as Tony, you won’t respond to the movie that barely contains his star turn.

Pacino’s slightly sheepish acceptance of the “Scarface” cult is reminiscent of the way that Patty Duke slowly came around to the idea of embracing the folks who know every line and gesture of her “Dolls” performance.

No other movie the actor has ever done has elicited such fan devotion and that has to be slightly bizarre for a man with “The Godfather” and “Serpico” and “Dog Day Afternoon” on his resume.

In 1983, “Scarface” created something of a scandal with its over-ripe dialogue, suggestions of extreme violence and depiction of the cocaine explosion of the late 1970s and early 1980s. “Scarface” received some respectful reviews, but was also vilified by cultural icons such as Kurt Vonnegut who stormed out of a pre-release celebrity screening.

The film struck a nerve in the entertainment industry because of its focus on cocaine which was then causing so much trouble in Hollywood (the late 1970s were marked by wildly out of control productions such as “New York, New York” and “1941” where drug use reportedly played a role in mammoth cost overruns and narrative incoherence in the finished products).

DePalma and screenwriter Oliver Stone were viewed as bad boys telling tales out of school by some industry insiders who knew of Tony Montana-style monster addicts within their own community.

The “Scarface” humidor will be available in September.

What on earth will they do to mark the 30th anniversary of the movie in 2013?

‘Master Piece!’: stripping at Roseland for fun and (non-)profit

by:

Every year the Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS June benefit — “Broadway Bares” — seems to get bigger and better.

I’m always left wondering how the group will be able to top itself next year, and somehow they always do.

That was certainly the case with “Broadway Bares XXI: Master Piece!” which played to two sold-out houses last week and raised a record-setting $1,103,072 for the theater world charity.

The show was the second one directed by Josh Rhodes — fresh from his gig choreographing the Neil Patrick Harris “Company” — and his theme of burlesque numbers revolving around the art world proved to be incredibly beautiful and sexy.

As usual, well over 200 Broadway dancers and actors volunteered their time, putting together a piece of entertainment as good as anything you could see in one of the mainstream shows they work on eight-times-a-week.

Rhodes and his choreographer collaborators used everything from the Mona Lisa to The Last Supper to “Washington Crossing the Delaware” (left) for numbers that kept the Roseland crowd sky high for 90 minutes.

The joke built into each piece was the question of how you could make something erotic and funny out of Magritte and Monet et al — Rhodes and company scored every time.

“Broadway Bares” rounded up two of the most dazzling stars on Broadway — Beth Leavel (above) of “The Drowsy Chaperone” and the current “Baby, It’s You” and Patina Miller (below) of “Sister Act” to open and close the show with sensational style.

Every year, executive producer Jerry Mitchell (who created the show) gets Broadway talent to write a new opening number and this year the song was “Going, Going, Gone” (music by Matthew Sklar, lyrics by Chad Beguelin) which gave Leavel terrific material to belt as well as a neat segue into her role as the art auctioneer who launched “Master Piece!”

Patina Miller came out for the finale with a jazzed-up version of Stephen Sondheim’s “Sunday” from his Georges Seurat art-world musical “Sunday in the Park with George” — a perfect capper for the evening. It’s impossible to describe the energy of this last sequence which ended with more than 200 dancers on stage with Miller.

The BC/EFA folks usually start planning next year’s show in July. If you’ve never seen this fantastic show, plan to order tickets for the 2012 extravaganza as soon as they become available at www.broadwaycares.org 

(Photos from www.broadwayworld.com)

How can you do Bob Fosse’s ‘Dancin” without Bob Fosse?

by:

The aura surrounding the late great Bob Fosse has become so intense that the Roundabout Theatre is planning to revive one of his weakest shows next season – “Dancin’.”

The all-dance 1978 piece had its fun moments, but it also showed how empty Fosse’s choreography tends to be outside the context of book shows such as “Chicago” and “Sweet Charity.”     

Bob Fosse didn’t have the chance to direct many movies, but his batting average was awfully good — the director-choreographer received Oscar nominations for three of the five films he completed before he died in 1987 at the age of 60.

Fosse started working in movies in the late 1960s after establishing himself on Broadway with a series of hit musicals including “Damn Yankees” and “Sweet Charity.”

The stage director tried a little too hard to be “cinematic” in his first Hollywood outing, “Sweet Charity,” in 1969. The Shirley MacLaine vehicle suffers now from dated 1960s camera and editing gimmicks that keep throwing us out of the story.

The movie bombed at the box office, so it took Fosse another three years to get a film assignment.

“Cabaret” was shot on a tight budget in Germany, but the financial restrictions worked to the movie’s advantage. Audiences used to glossy, over-produced Hollywood musicals loved Fosse’s grittier approach and the fact that he cut all of the Broadway show’s numbers that took place outside of the decadent Berlin cabaret. The movie felt more “realistic” than any musical that had come before it.

Fosse grew up in show biz — he was a strip club hoofer and Hollywood dancer before he began working behind the scenes — but he always harbored deep reservations about his profession. As much as he loved to razzle-dazzle audiences, Fosse hated the weird mix of sentimentality and vulgarity in show business.

“Cabaret” was a smash that won a bunch of Oscars (including Fosse’s upset win over Francis Coppola for “The Godfather”). The movie gave Fosse the clout to make three blistering show biz dramas — “Lenny,” “All That Jazz” and “Star 80” — that moved song and dance to the sidelines in favor of exposing the crud behind the scenes in Hollywood and on Broadway.

No one has ever bit the hand that fed him with more style and more punch than Fosse. His final three films were bitter pills that went down semi-easy because they were so extraordinarily well made.

“Star 80” (above) is one of the toughest show biz movies, an unsparing look at the Playboy mystique and the pursuit of stardom that uses the sad life and death of playmate/actress Dorothy Stratten as its jumping off point.

Although the film was sold as Stratten’s story (and Mariel Hemingway got top billing in the role), “Star 80” spends more time on the murder victim’s hustler/pimp husband Paul Snider (Eric Roberts) who thought the blonde bombshell was his ticket to fame and fortune.

When Snider lost his wife to Playboy czar Hugh Hefner and film director Peter Bogdanovich (who starred Dorothy in “They All Laughed”), the man had an emotional meltdown and wound up blasting Stratten with a shotgun and then turning the weapon on himself.

“Star 80” was an assault on the culture that continues to pump out “American Idol” and Lindsay Lohan et al, and audiences were sickened by Fosse’s refusal to candycoat the show biz dream.

I talked to Fosse about “Star 80” a few years before he died — when he was working on a touring show that came to Connecticut — and he seemed genuinely shocked by my admiration of the uncompromising movie. He said the backlash was so strong that he wasn’t sure if he would ever be able to put together the financing for another film.

“Star 80″ deserves to be rediscovered as one of the few tough-minded studio financed dramas from an era that was dominated by the kiddie fantasies of Steven Spielberg and George Lucas.

Rent it now: The Elmore Leonard movie nobody knows

by:

(Your faithful blogger is away this week. I thought it would be fun to run some golden oldies. For current microblogging from the road, follow the Twitter feed on this page or at @joesview on Twitter.) 

Many Elmore Leonard novels have been brought to the screen – with mixed results – but my favorite adaptation is one very few people have ever heard of, let alone seen.

The 1986 John Frankenheimer drama, “52 Pick-Up,” suffered the misfortune of being produced and distributed by the Cannon Group, a long-forgotten company that specialized in Chuck Norris action pictures and pop-culture-fad movies about things like break dancing.

The Frankenheimer version of the Elmore Leonard novel is a tough and rather nasty look at the intersection of high life and low life in Los Angeles two decades ago. It’s a crime drama that packs an unusually strong emotional punch.

The late Roy Scheider gives one of the best performances of his career as an industrialist, married to a rising politician (Ann-Margret), who has been having an affair with a pretty young actress (Kelly Preston), new to L.A., who is falling into the porn/prostitution underworld.

A porn director/pimp (played with ferocious force by John Glover) decides to blackmail the businessman with a hidden camera video showing Scheider having sex with the actress.

When the man says “no” and finally confesses to his wife about the affair, the blackmailer ups the ante by killing the mistress and pinning the murder on the businessman.

Scheider manages to make us care about a morally dubious man without ever trying to sugar coat what the adulterer has done to his wife.

When Scheider tells his wife about the affair, the result is one of the best acted scenes to be found in any 1980s Hollywood movie. Scheider’s nervous guilt turns to pain as he watches his wife react to the bombshell revelation (Ann-Margret is simply sensational in this scene).

It was clear watching “52 Pick-Up” that Scheider didn’t care if we “liked” the man he played, but he takes us so far into the character’s dilemma that the empathy factor is strong (when the industrialist is shown a tape of his mistress’ murder, we can see that the man is both horrified by what happened to a girl he cared for and terrified that he has walked right into a trap that will probably destroy him).

“52 Pick-Up” was one of the very few good movies produced by Cannon and  it opened and closed almost simultaneously.

For many years, Frankenheimer was vocal in his pain over the mishandling of the film and the fact that his co-workers Scheider and Glover and Ann-Margret had some of their best screen work go unseen.

“52 Pick-Up” is a lost gem worth searching out.

‘Flame & Citron’: knowing who to trust in World War II

by:

(Your faithful blogger is taking some R&R this week. I am microblogging at @joesview while I’m gone. See you June 27.) 

The Danish thriller/historical drama, “Flame & Citron,” didn’t get many theatrical bookings in this country, so you may not have heard of it.

The movie deserves a spot near the top of your Netflix queue.

Writer-director Ole Christian Madsen tells the true story of two legendary resistance fighters in Denmark during World War II — Flammen (Thure Lindhardt, above) and Citronen (Mads Mikkelsen).

The two men are basically contract killers, but for a good cause — foiling the Nazi occupation in their country through a series of assassinations of Danes who have collaborated with the Germans.

The film begins near the end of the war — in 1944 — when Flammen and Citronen are itching to target Nazis in Denmark rather than Danish traitors.

The younger Flammen wants to kill Hoffman (Christian Berkel, below left), the head of Gestapo in Denmark.

Like Steven Spielberg in his superb espionage drama, “Munich,” Madsen seems to be as much interested in the emotional toll of spying on the individuals who do it as he is in the political impact of this vital work.

Flammen and Citronen are shaken when they are told that some of the people they’ve killed might not actually have betrayed Denmark — they were following orders, but were the men who issued the orders wrong?

The key question raised by the move is: What happens if you stop to think about wartime killing before you pull the trigger? Does it render you useless to the cause?

Madsen was very fortunate to get two of the finest Scandinavian actors for his film. Mikkelsen and Lindhardt are both chameleon-actors who seem to change their personas as well as their physical appearances for every role.

In this film, the actors mine every conceivable emotion from an incredibly complex moral and emotional dilemma: Is a form of soul death inevitable in the sort of pretense and violence necessary for Flammen and Citronen to do their work?

The tension increases as Flammen falls for Ketty Selmer (Stine Stengade) who may be a double (or even triple) agent.

The spy partners begin to lose their bearings when it seems likely that their supervisor could have a hidden agenda that has nothing to do with foiling the Nazis in Denmark.

“Flame & Citron” is a terrific picture that deserves to be discovered on DVD in this country.

The scariest horror movie of the new century?

by:

(Another golden oldie during your faithful blogger’s weeklong R&R. To stay up to the minute, follow my Twitter feed on this page or at @joesview) 

Adapted from a Stephen King novella by writer-director Frank Darabont (who performed the same chores on two other King stories, “The Shawshank Redemption” and “The Green Mile”), “The Mist” (2007) came and went with unusual speed.

At the time, I couldn’t figure out if the fast flop was due to a poor promotional campaign or the fact that the movie was simply too bleak for mainstream audiences looking for a few cheap thrills.

Using the King story as a jumping off point, Darabont fashioned a dystopian tale — set in contemporary America — that makes “The Road” look like child’s play.

Most end-of-the-world stories start after whatever disaster has caused the collapse of civilization. “The Mist” begins casually in a small Maine town, on an ordinary day, as chaos slowly descends on people who are caught in the middle of that most mundane of chores — shopping in a supermarket.

A strange mist envelops the parking lot — some people think it’s nothing, others sense impending danger — and before you know it, a very believable mix of ordinary Americans is trapped together wondering what the hell they should do.

Darabont appears to have studied Alfred Hitchcock’s “The Birds” and George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead” in the design and execution of this claustrophobic horror film.

Just as in those two classics, the trapped people start fighting among themselves, with a very scary faction forming around a religious hysteric played by Marcia Gay Harden (left, the most believable character of this type since Piper Laurie played Carrie White’s mad mother in the 1976 King adaptation, “Carrie”).

What could have been just another B-horror movie — in the vein of John Carpenter’s “The Fog” — is elevated by Darabont’s terrific casting. Thomas Jane (of the HBO series “Hung”) leads a tip-top ensemble that includes Frances Sternhagen, Andre Braugher, William Sadler and Toby Jones.

The creatures that come out of the mist — the result of a military experiment gone terribly wrong — are truly frightening, but it’s the way the trapped and scared people turn on each other that makes this tale of fantasy feel all too horribly real.

‘Spent’: addicted to shopping & credit cards

by:

(Part three of my memory lane ramblings. Follow my R&R Twitter feed on this page or on Twitter at @joesview.)

We’ve had countless memoirs about drug addiction and all sorts of sexual debauchery, but Avis Cardella’s new book “Spent” (Little, Brown and Co.) is about a vice that the culture too often presents as a virtue — living way beyond your means thanks to that insidious banking “product” known as the credit card.

A few months ago, when the Obama administration’s credit card “reforms” went into effect, millions of Americans got a horrendous wake-up call — a new little box on their monthly bill spelling out exactly how long it will take them to pay off their rotating balance if they stick to minimum monthly payments.

I have a friend who found out that the life of her five-figure credit card balance will extend well beyond the real time she probably has left on Earth (according to life insurance actuarial tables).

What the Obama people probably thought was a service — making the banks tell card holders how much they can save if they pay off their bills in three years rather than 30 — is turning out to be a monthly torture for people who are in too deep to start really chipping away at their balances.

It might have been more of a service to middle class America to reinstate the pre-Reagan Era caps on the amount of interest that can be charged on credit cards — the current rates go way beyond the 20 percent fees that were once outlawed as ”usury” and were strictly the province of  mob-connected loan sharks. Sadly, the banking industry lobbyists did their job when it came to halting any legislation that might offer practical financial relief to credit addicts.

Cardella’s book shows us the underbelly of the Carrie Bradshaw lifestyle at the turn of the century when the writers of “Sex & the City” could joke about the way their free-lance writer heroine had used enough credit on designer shoes to have financed the down payment on a Manhattan apartment. Cardella lived the Carrie life of working for fashion magazines — where she became particularly prized for her pieces on fashion photography — but she was secretly going deep into debt as her spending went out of control.

The writer doesn’t blame the banks for her scary situation — and a ruined credit rating — but it does seem to be unethical to encourage people with limited means to go so deeply into high-interest debt.

Cardella writes with great style of the irrational exuberance of the high flying late 1990s: “Toward the end of the decade, there was a giddiness that seemed to have taken hold of Manhattan. It mixed with the oxygen in the air. There was opportunity, optimism, and froth: an endless stream of all the right parties and all the right people.”

The author flew to Paris where she attended a Louis Vuitton party in a “Rifat Ozbek gown with a bodice ornamented with tiny mirrors.”

“There I was, at cocktails, mingling with Gerard Depardieu, Rupert Everett, Beatrice Dalle, and Vivienne Westwood. Later, I sat through dinner watching, dumbstruck, the extravagant presentation, a commingling of live animals, contortionists, and one-of-a-kind handbags. The event was luxe and lavish and completely surreal.”

Unlike middle class people of the 1950s and 1960s, the Cardella generation didn’t have to be content with sitting in movie theaters or at home watching television dreaming of deluxe consumer goods that would be forever out of financial reach. Thanks to credit cards, the writer was able to live in a delusion of wealth, where the $500 “impulse” purchase of a pair of shoes was totally possible.

Cardella later realized that her money madness was part of the prolonged denial of the grief she stifled after her beloved mother died, but she didn’t really wake up until she was in her 40s and saw that sexual relationships and even some of her friendships had been built on lies she told herself about money. “Spent” is about a society in which our leaders counseled us to shop as a way of coping with September 11.

“Shopping, they suggested, was patriotic. It was good for the economy. It was an activity that would help people regain a sense of normalcy,” Cardella writes in one of the book’s strongest sections.

“Wasn’t that what I had been doing almost all my adult life? Hadn’t that been exactly what I had done to regain normalcy after my mother’s death? Still, it struck me as a peculiar prescription in a moment of unprecendented destruction. Go shopping! Is that what we had become as a nation?
Buying is much more American than thinking.”

Another reason to love Frank Sinatra

by:

(Part two of my remembrances of things past while I take a few days off. Follow my R & R Twitter feed at @joesview. See you on June 27!)

New York magazine’s The Vulture blog ran a great 1990 letter from Frank Sinatra to the editors of The Los Angeles Times Calendar section.

The Vulture cited the Letters of Note blog for this piece of correspondence written after Sinatra read a profile of George Michael in which the singer complained about the “tragedy” of fame:

FRANK SINATRA

September 9, 1990

Dear Friends,

When I saw your Calendar cover today about George Michael, “the reluctant pop star,” my first reaction was he should thank the good Lord every morning when he wakes up to have all that he has., And that’ll make two of us thanking God every morning for all that we have.

I don’t understand a guy who lives “in hopes of reducing the strain of his celebrity status.” Here’s a kid who “wanted to be a pop star since I was about 7 years old.” And now that he’s a smash performer and songwriter at 27 he wants to quit doing what tons of gifted youngsters all over the world would shoot grandma for – just one crack at what he’s complaining about.

Come on George, Loosen up. Swing, man, Dust off those gossamer wings and fly yourself to the moon of your choice and be grateful to carry the baggage we’ve all had to carry since those lean nights of sleeping on buses and helping the driver unload the instruments

And no more of that talk about “the tragedy of fame.” The tragedy of fame is when no one shows up and you’re singing to the cleaning lady in some empty joint that hasn’t seen a paying customer since Saint Swithin’s day. And you’re nowhere near that; you’re top dog on the top rung of a tall ladder called Stardom, which in latin means thanks-to-the-fans who were there when it was lonely.

Talent must not be wasted. Those who have it – and you obviously do or today’s Calendar cover article would have been about Rudy Vallee – those who have talent must hug it, embrace it, nurture it and share it lest it be taken away from you as fast as it was loaned to you.

Trust me. I’ve been there.

(Signed, ‘Frank Sinatra’)

© 1990 Frank Sinatra

Page 1 of 3123