Joe's View

With Joe Meyers, entertainment writer

Archive for March, 2012

‘Happy Endings’ theme at Broadway striptease benefit

by:

Once a theater insiders’ secret, the annual “Broadway Bares” benefit in June has skyrocketed over the past decade into one of the most highly anticipated events of the Broadway season.

The combination of sexy strip routines done by more 200 of the dancers featured in current Broadway musicals and comedy guest stars ranging from Nathan Lane to Kristin Chenoweth makes the show tremendously entertaining, as well as extremely helpful to a very good cause, Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS.

The show is very racy but never tips over into grossness — it would be rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America rather than NC-17.

In 2001, the benefit raised $340,000. Last year, “Broadway Bares” brought in an astounding $1,103,072 from the two performances on a single night. The benefit is restricted to two performances on a Sunday night because that is the only time all of the Broadway musicals are dark (the dancers and actors rehearse for many weeks in between their regular eight performance schedule).

On Thursday, BC/EFA announced that the theme for the June 17 show — with performances at 9:30 p.m. and midnight — will be “Happy Endings” with all of the numbers paying tribute to favorite fairy tales.

In the words of BC/EFA, “In this 22nd edition of ‘Broadway Bares,’ more than 200 of New York’s sexiest and most delectable dancers will take you to a land where rubbing a magic lamp reveals more than just a genie. These storybook happy endings would make seven dwarfs whistle before and after they work.”

The event creator Jerry Mitchell was a chorus dancer when he put together a small show at a Chelsea club in 1992. Since then, he has become one of the top director-choreographers on Broadway but still takes the time to serve as executive producer of every benefit.

Mitchell’s first show raised about $8,000. Through 21 subsequent benefits, “Broadway Bares” has raised more than $8.6 million.

The show remains very affordable at $65 for a standing room spot in Roseland Ballroom.

Higher priced VIP packages are available for those who would rather sit at tables in the mezzanine, but the show only runs about an hour and a big part of the fun is being close to the stage in one of the most energized audiences imaginable.

For ticket information call 212-840-0770, ext. 268 or visit www.broadwaycares.org.

The producers of the show also maintain a site at www.broadwaybares.com that is packed with great pictures from past benefits.

The utter pointlessness of HBO Films’ ‘Cinema Verite’

by:

To those of us who were around in 1973, the Loud family of Santa Barbara, California, need no introduction.

They were the featured attraction in a pioneering TV series called “An American Family” that was shot over seven months in 1971 and then aired on PBS in twelve one-hour parts in early 1973.

This was decades before so-called “reality television,” so getting a seemingly intimate peek at the lives of an ordinary family galvanized critics and TV viewers 39 years ago — we hadn’t seen anything like it before.

The show attracted an average audience of 10 million viewers a week which I believe is still a PBS record (that’s roughly three times the number of people who watched the season premiere of “Mad Men” on AMC Sunday night.)

Last year, HBO produced a bizarre dramatization of the filming of the PBS series — “Cinema Verite” — which is being released on DVD next month. Rather than examine the phenomenon of the show and the way that the shocked Loud family recoiled from widespread public criticism of their behavior, the HBO production simply follows the filming of the series.

It presents the major events captured by the TV crew — the collapse of the marriage of parents Bill and Pat, and the oldest son Lance becoming more open about his gay lifestyle — as if they are being revealed for the first time. “Cinema Verite” appears to have been made for viewers who have never heard of “An American Family” before and the rushed 90-minute drama winds up a pointless exercise in recreating unflattering 1970s fashions and hairstyles on a game cast that includes Diane Lane as Pat, Tim Robbins as Bill and James Gandolfini as producer Craig Gilbert.

What made the show a pop cultural event was not so much the surface content of the series as the reaction to the idea of doing such a documentary project — i.e. the debate over how having a camera crew in your house for the better part of a year might influence the behavior of everyone appearing in front of it.

“Cinema Verite” rakes the Louds over the coals again and trumps up a thin case for Gilbert being a string-pulling manipulator. You don’t have to know much about how these projects are put together to figure out that the married couple who shot the documentary, Alan and Susan Raymond, were the major consultants (they’re the only ones who come off well).

When the Louds reacted negatively to the script, they were given a cash settlement with the understanding that they not speak publicly about the HBO production.

HBO would have done us all a much bigger service by simply re-airing the original series and then issuing it on DVD (for all of its landmark status, “An American Family” has never appeared in any commercial video format).

The amazing ‘larger than life’ Carol Channing

by:

Using her insider status as a working Broadway producer, Dori Berinstein made “Show Business” (2007), a great documentary about what goes on during a single New York theater season.

Berinstein spent most of her time behind the scenes at the creation of four key musicals in the 2003-2004 season — “Taboo,” “Wicked,” “Caroline or Change” and “Avenue Q” — and her approach was affectionate but honest. Two of the shows became blockbuster hits (that are still running) and two were fast flops.

“Show Business” has gained in time capsule value with each passing year.

Now, Berinstein is back with another theater documentary that focuses on one of the greatest stars in Broadway history, “Carol Channing: Larger Than Life,” and the result is  poignant, funny and enlightening.

Now 91, Channing’s Broadway days are behind her, but the movie shows her making personal appearances around the country and charming people with her honesty and intelligence (I was lucky enough to interview the star a decade ago when she made an appearance at Quinnipiac University — she seemed prepared to answer any question that came her way, including one about her notorious 1980s flop “Legends”).

Berinstein mixes archival footage from “Hello, Dolly!” and “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” with new interviews and a wonderful sequence where the filmmaker and the star walk through the theater district together. Channing stops to chat with some suitably thrilled chorus boys from “Memphis” who are taking a break in Shubert Alley.

The film is discreet about Channing’s famously unhappy third marriage for 42 years to her publicist Charles Lowe. “Larger Than Life” focuses on the star’s fourth marriage in 2003 to her high school sweetheart, Harry Kullijian, who called her out of the blue when she mentioned him in her memoir.

Judging by the evidence of the footage of them together in the documentary they were deliriously happy right up until Harry’s death last December (after the film was completed). It’s a pretty amazing love story.

Berinstein found the perfect climax for her film when Channing performed at a big Broadway benefit two years ago with some of the men who worked in the chorus of  mid-1990s touring production of “Hello, Dolly!” The dancers share some great stories about life on the road with the star and then we get to see the sensational audience response when the one and only Dolly Levi sang and danced on on a Broadway stage for the last time.

(Dori Berinstein will be talking about “Carol Channing: Larger Than Life” after a 7:30 p.m. screening on April 11 at the Avon Theatre in Stamford. The film is set for DVD release on May 22.)

Channing Tatum becomes a star — even with his shirt on

by:

Few young men who have entered movies based almost entirely on their looks have been as smart about their careers as Channing Tatum.

The ex-stripper and Abercrombie and Fitch model drew more notice for his abs than his personality in his first major screen role — in the 2006 teen comedy “She’s the Man” — but later the same year did some very impressive dancing in the Disney hit “Step Up.”

The jury was out on his “acting” ability, however, until 2008 when “Boys Don’t Cry” director Kimberly Pierce took a chance on Tatum and cast him in the most challenging role in “Stop-Loss.”

The excellent Iraq War drama met the same fate as all of the other films that have dealt with the conflict — good reviews and meager box-office results — but Tatum came through with a powerhouse performance as the vet who had the most trouble adjusting to civilian life. Ryan Phillippe got top billing in “Stop-Loss,” but people came out of the movie buzzing about Tatum.

Since then, the actor’s filmography has been a savvy mix of ultra-commercial big studio fare (2009’s “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra”) and smaller scale indie productions such as “The Eagle” (2011) and “Ten Year” (2011).

Tatum’s growing popularity, and steadily increasing assurance on screen, put him in place for an amazing one-two punch at the box office this year with two blockbusters released within a month of each other — the February romantic drama “The Vow” and “21 Jump Street” which opened March 16 and is racing toward the $100 million mark after less than two full weeks in release.

Before the end of June, we’ll be seeing the new star in two more pictures, the “G.I. Joe” sequel “Retribution” and the much more interesting “Magic Mike” from writer-director Steven Soderbergh (with a script partially based on Tatum’s own experiences as a stripper in Florida before he broke into movies).

Before “21 Jump Street” opened, Tatum appeared to be one of those expressively limited young hunks who would appeal primarily to women and gay men based mostly on his physical attributes (think Richard Gere during his “American Gigolo” and “Bloodbrothers” period).

Now that Tatum’s previously untapped comic skills have been revealed in his hilarious partnership with Jonah Hill, there would appear to be few limits for this increasingly appealing star.

‘Just Sex’: when Internet porn replaces real life

by:

Brandt Johnson’s play “Just Sex” did so well at the Theater for the New City’s Dream Up Festival earlier this season that it has reopened at the same venue for an extended run through April 15.

The comedy is slightly underdeveloped — the intermissionless 80-minute piece ends just where ACT II should start — but it’s a provocative look at the way porn-fueled fantasies have disrupted “real” sexual encounters.

“Just Sex” follows a married couple — William (played by the writer) and Katherine (Tasha Lawrence) — who have both started to indulge in fantasy role-playing sessions on the Internet.

William is goaded to have no-strings cyber fun by his best friend Kurt (played by Alex Kilgore, who directed the play) but is shocked to find out that his wife has already been fooling around online for several months.

The play first asks the question if this sort of fleshless role-playing constitutes “cheating” but then gets more complicated when Katherine pushes for some “real” encounters that she says should not impact her love relationship with her husband.

Enter 21-year-old Amanda (Meghan Miller) who shows up dressed as a schoolgirl to fool around with William, suggesting that she might enjoy the encounter even more if they pretended she was a few years younger than her actual age.

“Just Sex” is about the dangers of living in a fantasy sexual world that probably cannot be replicated in reality without great personal risks. For years, psychologists and sociologists have been writing about young men who are having difficulty with the women in their lives because they aren’t like the completely pliant female figures they see in pornography.

Johnson scores a lot of laughs with his satirical jabs but most of the play stays on the surface of things, like an above-average TV sitcom (The “master of my domain” episode of “Seinfeld” comes to mind frequently during the male-female sexual competition aspects of the story.)

“Just Sex” is thoroughly enjoyable, and very well performed by the four actors, but the play stops rather than ends, just at the moment where the characters look like they are ready to act out their Internet bragging. Another scene or two is desperately needed.

‘A Man and a Woman’ — who says CDs are dead?

by:

Bruce Kimmel and his Kritzerland Internet company have defied all of the odds — and technological trends of the past decade — by carving out a very successful niche catering to those of us who still love owning a CD rather than a digital download.

Kimmel releases rare motion picture soundtracks and original Broadway cast recordings in limited editions — generally 1,000 copies — and nine times out of ten, if you don’t order a title quickly, you won’t be able to get a copy because it will be sold out within weeks of the announcement.

Case in point: the fantastic Francis Lai soundtrack recording for one of the key art house hits of the 1960s — “A Man and a Woman” (1966) starring Anouk Aimee and Jean-Louis Trintignant.

The romantic classic follows a budding love affair between a widow and a widower whose children go to the same school. She works as a movie script “girl” and he races cars.

The picture has very little plot, but director Claude Lelouch shot it beautifully, guided his stars to super-charismatic performances and really lucked out with Lai’s score.

The very catchy (and very sexy) title tune became one of those 1960s film  songs you heard everywhere you went in the months after the movie came out (it ran a close second to “Lara’s Theme” from “Doctor Zhivago”). Even people who didn’t see the French picture bought the soundtrack album for its eclectic but extremely listenable mix of pop love songs, sambas and a few of Lai’s instrumental tracks.

As Kimmel writes in his liner notes: “Is there a person anywhere in the world who was around in the 1960s and 1970s who could not instantly recognize the theme from ‘A Man and a Woman’? Doubtful, unless you were living under a rock in a cave in Siberia, and even then you’d probably have heard it. In fact, it became one of the most beloved movie themes ever written almost instantly.”

“It was the right theme from the right film at the right time. Upon its release in 1966, ‘A Man and a Woman’ became a sensation everywhere it played. It became the film to see for anyone who considered that they had a romantic bone in his or her body…The film was fresh, unique, and beguiling, and so was its score by Francis Lai. It was the perfect marriage of image and music.”

When Kritzerland announced that it was issuing a CD of this long out-of-print soundtrack, I sent my order in immediately — it’s one of my favorite film scores — and sure enough, by the time I received “A Man and a Woman” in the mail last week, the limited edition was sold out.

Collectors prize these CDs so highly that you will rarely see them offered for resale on eBay (I know, because I keep looking there for the sold-out Kritzerland recordings of the “Tom Jones” and “Topkapi” soundtracks).

If you love movie and Broadway music, you should check www.kritzerland.com on a regular basis, and if you see something you want, order it immediately!

‘Strawberry Statement’: nostalgia for student revolutionaries

by:

1970 was a turbulent, confused year in America and that cultural craziness was reflected in the movies that Hollywood released at the start of a new decade.

The surprise success of a series of oddball 1960s movies — from “Blow-Up” in 1966 to “Bonnie & Clyde” the following year — paved the way for such 1969 sleeper hits as “Easy Rider” and “Midnight Cowboy.”

Hollywood knew that younger audiences wanted more realistic pictures like the European imports playing in U.S. art houses throughout the 1960s, but they didn’t want to completely turn off older moviegoers who were leary of profanity, nudity and gory violence.

The hits of the late 1960s made studio heads less nervous about releasing pictures that simply would not have been produced a decade earlier, so 1970 saw the release of such catering-to-youth pictures as “Zabriskie Point” and “Getting Straight,” both of which attempted to deal with campus unrest (and the nationally televised police riot at the 1968 Democratic Convention).

The most interesting of the 1970 campus protest pictures “The Strawberry Statement” finally made its DVD debut earlier this month — via the Warner Archive division — and it’s a fascinating time capsule of the time in which it was made.

The movie was based on a 1969 non-fiction account of the campus unrest at Columbia University in the spring of 1968 but the school wanted no part of the MGM production so the film was shot in San Francisco (with a “campus” cobbled together from anonymous locations).

Bruce Davison stars as a jock on the university rowing team who is politicized by what he sees going on around him on the campus. He is also drawn in to the protest scene by a pretty activist coed played by Kim Darby.

Because the movie steered away from anti-Vietnam War politics and toward economic issues, it now resonates with the recent Occupy Wall Street movement, so it is not quite as dated as you might think (other than in terms of its fashions and music, of course).

“The Strawberry Statement” was an attempt at a topical youth picture — getting a 1968 story on the screen within two years — but it suffered from being released within a few weeks of the National Guard shootings on the campus of Kent State University that left four students dead.

The mood in the country shifted almost overnight — away from major campus protest gatherings and toward more individual forms of political expression — leaving audiences of all ages uninterested in a movie that tried to bottle the anti-Establishment passion of just a few months earlier.

The slick visual style of “The Strawberry Statement” — the director Stuart Hagmann came to movies from the world of TV commercials — also turned off the few young people who caught the movie in the spring of 1970.

The crowd that was expected to patronize the campus protest flicks instead flocked to the hugely successful spring, 1970, release of “Woodstock,” the epic Warner Bros. concert film that stressed sex, drugs and pop culture rather than the politics of the previous summer’s festival in upstate New York.

The only real impact made by “The Strawberry Statement” in 1970 was its popular soundtrack album which had great tunes by “Woodstock” stars Crosby, Stills, Nash and  Young and many other fine artists who were probably somewhat embarrassed by their connection to a project that had so quickly gone cold.

42 years later, “The Strawberry Statement” has gained considerable interest as a memento from a period when the large corporations that ran movie companies became so caught up in the anti-capitalist zeitgeist that they financed hate letters to themselves.

‘Wild Strawberries’: the Bergman film Woody Allen remade

by:

It’s going to be fun — and very nostalgic — to introduce a “Critic’s Choice” screening of the 1957 Ingmar Bergman classic “Wild Strawberries” tonight at the beautifully restored Bijou Theatre in Bridgeport.

I was too young to see the film when it first came out, but caught up with it several times in the late 1960s when it became an art house staple (usually on a double-bill with another Bergman classic such as “The Seventh Seal” or “Smiles of a Summer Night”).

Often considered Bergman’s breakthrough film, “Wild Strawberries,” is one of his most emotionally engaging stories — the tale of an elderly professor (Victor Sjostrom) who is a man of accomplishment but filled with regrets about the roads he didn’t take when he was younger.

The picture contains many elements that would become Bergman trademarks — creepy dream/nightmare sequences and elements of fantasy that are seamlessly blended with realistic moments.

Running only 90 minutes, “Wild Strawberries” is one of the Swedish master’s tightest films (which made it perfect for U.S. art house double-feature bookings).

Hollywood had its Golden Age in the late 1930s. The similar era in Europe began in the 1950s and ran well into the following decade, introducing such great directors as Fellini, Antonioni, Visconti, Chabrol, Truffaut, Godard, and many others.

The volume of great films coming out of Europe in that pre-cable, pre-DVD era was staggering, but because there were so many art houses scattered around this country, movie buffs were able to play catch up at the theaters dedicated to classic cinema.

I can still remember a wonderful summer in the 1960s when the late Philadelphia art house operator Art Carduner put on a European classic series at his slightly rundown Germantown venue, the Bandbox. That was when and where I connected with so many masterpieces for the first time, including the one I’ll be hosting tonight.

These films also made an indelible impression on the young directors who were coming of age in the 1960s and who wanted to bring to American film the same adult subject matter, psychological realism and bold stylistic qualities that made the work of Bergman and his peers so thrilling.

Woody Allen was so taken with Bergman that he would borrow elements from the Swedish director throughout his career and also make two flat-out homages — “Interiors” in 1978 and “Another Woman” ten years later. In the latter film, Gena Rowlands (below) plays a slightly younger version of the professor in “Wild Strawberries” and, like Sjostrom in the Bergman film, she visits places from her past where she is able to walk right into scenes from her own youth.

It will be wonderful to revisit “Wild Strawberries” tonight at the Bijou and to see it in a beautiful digital restoration.

(For more information on the screening, visit www.thebijoutheatre.com)

Page 1 of 41234