Archive for May, 2012

Maker Faire: Festival of invention and creativity returns to Bay Area

by:

It’s hard to know how to describe the Maker Faire, the two-day “festival of invention, creativity and resourcefulness” that’s taking over the San Mateo Event Center this weekend.

It’s mad science for the masses. A celebration of the do-it-yourself-mindset. A place where you go to play with robots, see a giant metal dragon breath fire, turn old computer parts into cool sculptures, and watch Coke chemically react with Mentos mints, sending geysers of soda shooting the air over twenty feet high. Think Burning Man for geeks and kids with a dizzying array of DIY projects and science demonstrations.

Still don’t get it? Ttake a look at the collection of photos above from Saturday.

There’s still time to check out this event. The Maker Faire runs all day Sunday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Parking is a pain so consider taking Caltrain or riding your bike.

Photos: Nick Girard and Mark Madeo

What’s the most dangerous thing for kids?

by:

It takes two minutes for a small child to drown in an inflatable pool filled with two inches of water.(Shutterstock/grynold)

As parents we worry endlessly about our children’s safety. And as we got overwhelmed by information about everything from food cans lined with carcinogenic BPA to pet turtles carrying salmonella, we sometimes lose sight of the most serious dangers.

As summer approaches, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is reminding us that water is about the most dangerous thing for kids. The cool stuff that we all love to splash around in is a risk for anyone from a toddler playing with a big bucket of water to a teen swimming in a lake—and swimming pools seems to be the most dangerous thing of all.

Drowning is the leading cause of death in children ages 1 to 14 years, and Health Day reports that new federal research finds that “drowning kills more American children 1 to 4 years old than any cause except birth defects.” More than half of the drownings occur in swimming pools.

Those small inflatable pools that families love to leave out in their backyards all summer long can also unsafe. Last year a study found that “a child dies every five days in portable pools during warm-weather months,” according to MSNBC. Most of these children are under age 5.

What can parents do? Here are some tips from the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics:

  • Take a CPR class. While waiting for the paramedics to arrive, your CPR skills could save a life.
  • Always watch your child closely around water, even when a lifeguard is present. Be within an arm’s length of your child.
  • Sign your child up for formal swimming lessons. Research shows that kids ages 1 t0 4 who take lessons are less likely to drown. But even if your child is in lessons, you still need to watch him when he’s swimming.
  • Surround swimming pools with fencing that’s at least 4-feet-tall and make sure that the gate is always locked. Gates should self-close and self-latch.
  • If you’re using an inflatable pool in the backyard, empty it at the end of the day and turn it upside down.
  • Keep a phone by the pool in case of an emergency.

More tips

Source and inspiration: Babble, Health Day, CDC

Hamster or dog? Which pets are best for kids

by:

All kids love pets, but not all pets love kids. Which fidos, fifis and other furry (or fur-less) friends are best for families?

An increasing number of people are being infected with salmonella linked to pet turtles, the tiny varieties with shells less than 4 inches long. A new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds that the number of cases increased from 66 in March to 127 in May, according to Examiner.com. Two-thirds of those infected are under 10 years old.

Yikes, suddenly a cool, little turtle isn’t sounding like the best family pet. Maybe a more traditional dog or cat is a better bet, but you have to consider that not all breeds are kid-friendly. While a mellow and social cat might tolerate being dressed up in doll clothes by a little girl, a timid and skittish one might rush for the closet at the sound of little feet. And while certain breeds of dogs love nothing more than to have their ears rubbed and pulled by tiny hands, others are likely to snap when a child touches the wrong spot.

And then there are those pets like hamsters and rabbits that seem easier for kids to care for because they’re small and live in cages. But when it comes to cleaning the cage, these animals suddenly become burdensome. And many of these little rodents like nibbling on fingers.

Every kid wants a pet, but how do you decide on the right one for your family? Let the slide show above from the Houston Chronicle‘s “Mom Houston” blog help you.

Do you have pictures of your kids cuddling the cat or playing fetch with the dog? Submit photos of your kids and their favorite pets in our gallery and we will feature them in a slide show on SFGate.

(Source and inspiration: Mom Houston and Examiner)

Is new book on making LEGO firearms harmless or scary?

by:

This month a book with instructions on how to build four of the world’s most iconic firearms with LEGOs goes on sale. Should parents be concerned about “LEGO Heavy Weapons,” a book that was written by a 17-year-old yet intended for geeks who get off on gun porn?

Jack Streat is an accomplished LEGO weapons builder. The 17-year-old living in the U.K. can make an exact replica of an AKS-74U assault rifle with folding stock from tiny plastic blocks (No it doesn’t shoot real bullets! Think about it: The plastic would melt).

Streat shared his creations on YouTube and his dozens of videos have received over 16 million views. A video on building an AK-47 was viewed more than 3.3 million times and received nearly 6,000 comments. His fans cheer him on with colloquial zeal: “Like for awesome,” “OMG The greatest Lego gun ever!” and “You are good Dude!”

Yes, Streat has a huge following and his work is well-loved. That’s why No Starch Press, a small San Francisco-based publishing house, approached the teen about producing a book, and this month LEGO Heavy Weapons goes on sale for $24.95.

While Streat’s fan base is psyched some parents might be concerned because the book recommends using a well-loved children’s toy to build replicas of weapons designed to kill. When the same publisher released the book Forbidden LEGO: Build the Models Your Parents Warned You Against in 2007, Britain’s Daily Telegraphed dubbed it the “the Anarchist Cookbook of the nursery,” according to Fox News.

LEGO Heavy Weapons features building instructions for replicas of the world’s most iconic firearms out of LEGO: a massive Desert Eagle handgun with working blow-back action, the compact but deadly AKS-74U assault rifle with folding stock, a bolt-action Lee Enfield sniper rifle (a.k.a. Jungle Carbine), and a pump action SPAS combat shotgun.

While the LEGO guns only shoot plastic bricks they are strikingly realistic to warfare weapons—and this makes Jon Trew, a father of two who lives in the UK, uncomfortable. “This is very sad!” he says. “I’m not a pacifist, or a utopian hippie but I’ve always loved the way that Lego bricks never made very convincing guns and just by it’s very form, channeled children into being constructive, imaginative and creative rather than aggressive and confrontational.

“If adults want to make models of automatic weapons and realistic guns, let them do it, but not using Lego. Using the bricks for this purpose really undermines and subverts a brilliant children’s toy. The pictures made me both sad and angry especially as the founders of Lego have consciously tried to avoid their products being used in this way. It made me feel a bit like when you see pictures of 13-year-old girls used as models in fashion magazines, it’s just wrong, wrong, wrong.”

LEGO’s kits include guns and weaponry. But the Denmark-based company has long had a policy “to avoid realistic weapons and military equipment that children may recognize” from war zones around the world. A statement in the 2011 Corporate Responsibility report reads: “We have strict rules for the use of weapons and violence in our products. The LEGO play experience must never be related to real world modern warfare, killing, torture or cruelty to animals.”

Trew of Cardiff was so disturbed by the book that he wrote LEGO letter. He quickly received a response and posted it on the site BoingBoing where there’s a discussion happening around the book. The email letter LEGO sent to Trew reenforces the company’s policy to steer clear of realistic military weapons:

We’re always disappointed to hear our LEGO® sets are being used in this way…It’s over 50 years since we decided not to make toys with a military theme, and we’re still sticking to that decision! So although we now make loads more toys, I hope you see it’s still really important to us that all the LEGO sets we invent are fun, imaginative and help fans, young or old, to learn.

Bill Pollock, founder and president of No Starch, thinks LEGO’s policy is hypocritical. “Have you seen their Bionicle line? They all carry guns.”

Pollock is right. The Bionicle robots come decked out in all sorts of blasters and launchers. In fact, these days many of LEGO’s sets sold in toy stores all over the world include gun-toting figurines. They might not be realistic but the weapons are still big and aggressive. In a Star Wars kit, Storm Troopers carry guns that are practically larger than the figurines themselves.

No matter, Pollock doesn’t think kids will be the ones buying LEGO Heavy Weapons. “This is a book for geeks,” he says. No Starch is known for publishing the “finest in geek entertainment” and its bestsellers include Hacking: The Art of Exploitation and The Manga Guides. These books attracted a computer programming crowd and Pollock expects that the LEGO book will be popular with the same people. “These are geeks who are fascinated by military weaponry not gun-carrying members of the NRA,” Pollock says.

Dr. Michael Thompson, author of It’s a Boy! Understanding Your Son’s Development from Birth to Age 18, understands this geeky male attraction to guns. “I get it. They are geeky LEGO guys,” Dr. Thompson says. “I have one. He’s [my son and] he’s in art school. There’s nothing he’d like more than building something from this book. He’d have a blast with it. My son is fascinated by the idea of guns. But my son would never hurt anyone. He’s never even punched someone.”

Dr. Thompson says that many parents just don’t get boys’ fascination with guns. “Moms are always asking me what they should do about their sons’ violent play,” he says. “I tell them, ‘Violence and aggression are intended to hurt. but play isn’t intended to hurt. Play is play.’”

Dr. Thompson adds that there’s no research showing that playing with toy guns can lead to aggression.

But playing with toy Nerf guns and Star Wars LEGO figurines holding lightsabers is one thing. The guns in this book are incredibly realistic. Shouldn’t parents be concerned? “They’re not realistic,” Dr. Thompson says. “They don’t shoot. These guns are related to the impulse to create, not the impulse to kill.”

This is all true, but U.K. father Jon Trew brings up another important point: Could these toy guns confuse children into thinking it’s OK to play with real guns? “Whatever side of the argument you are on, no one in their right mind would want encourage children to play with realistic models just in case they came across a real one and thought they could play with it in the same way,” Trew says.

Dr. Thompson has a solution for Trew’s concern. “Talk to your kids about guns,” he advises. “Toy guns provide a teaching opportunity to talk about why real guns aren’t toys and aren’t safe.”

What do you think about the new LEGO Heavy Guns book? Scary or harmless?
Source and inspiration: No Starch website and BoingBoing.

Video: SNL makes fun of Time magazine’s breastfeeding cover

by:

Over the weekend, Saturday Night Live had fun mocking Time magazine’s controversial cover image promoting attachment parenting. The photograph features a mom nursing her son who is nearly 4 years old.

Jamie Lynne Grumet, the 26-year-old California cover mom, has been widely criticized for being thin and beautiful and wearing skinny jeans and a cool expression on her face. The consensus seems to be that she looks too good to be a mom and that she’s presenting an unrealistic depiction of a nursing mom. Mom bloggers, the media, and now Saturday Night Live have ruthlessly attacked her.

In a mock news report called “Really?” Seth Meyers asks, “Really, Time magazine this is the image you went with for Mother’s Day?”

Meyers goes on to skewer Jamie: “When I first glanced at the cover, I didn’t think ‘Oh, it’s a mom breastfeeding her son?’ I thought did the kid from Modern Family sexually assault his yoga instructor. Really this photo doesn’t say I’m a loving mother feeding my son. It says I’m the crazy queen from Game of Thrones.”

Watch the clip below.

Photo contest winner: Like mother, like daughter

by:

Two weeks ago SFGate invited readers to submit photos that capture likenesses between mothers and daughters. The response to the “Like mother, like daughter” photo contest was huge and we received dozens of submissions.

Many thanks to everyone who entered. You helped us put together a collection of photos that celebrate the beautiful connection between moms and their daughters—and capture the magic, mystery and love in these relationships.

Take a look at the photos and be sure to scroll down past the slide show to see our favorite pick. Happy Mother’s Day!

We loved all the photos and practically feel guilty singling out one favorite but this image of a hip-looking pair with their backyard chickens stood out to us as the one with the most personality and style. Plus it gave us a good laugh. It’s so Portlandia and speaks to this new generation of mothers and daughters who are making old-fashioned activities such as sewing, gardening, and baking bread cool again. Feminists might gripe about this, but who can argue that a mother and daughter raising chickens together isn’t an amazing bonding experience.

What’s more, this is an artistic image that seems to celebrate the differences and similarities between moms and daughters.  The brown-haired mom is symbolically holding a lighter-colored chicken while the lighter-haired daughter hugs her brown bird. These two girls are clearly individuals but they’ve both got the same groovy sense of style with their big sunglasses.

20 utterly inspiring moms

by:

Too often the moms who make news headlines aren’t good role models. Consider some of the reality TV stars.

And so for Mother’s Day, we put together a photo collection of well-known moms who inspire us with their courage, grace, intelligence, creativity, and dedication. While they might work in a wide range of fields, from business and politics to the arts and film, they’re all making the world a better place. These women are role models and they’re helping us define our own lives.

We included only 20 inspiring moms in our list and we hope you’ll suggest more in the comments.

Does Time magazine’s breastfeeding cover go too far?

by:
Time breastfeeding cover

Is breastfeeding a 3-year-old freakish or natural? (Martin Schoeller/Time)

This week’s issue of Time magazine features a mom breastfeeding her son who looks old enough to pour himself a glass of milk. The boy, just shy of 4 years old, is standing on a chair to reach the breast falling out of his mom’s tank top. The pose makes the point that this boy is too big and old to be held in his mother’s arms—but he can still breastfeed.

Shocking?

Time clearly picked this provocative cover image to sell magazines and attract media attention. The actual story inside the magazine is titled The Man Who Remade Motherhood and it’s about Dr. Bill Sears, an internationally recognized pediatrician who’s known as the leader behind the attachment parenting movement that calls for extended breastfeeding (as well as co-sleeping and baby-wearing).

But the grey-haired doctor isn’t pictured on the cover. Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old California mom, and her breast-sucking son made the cover instead.

Makes sense from a need-to-sell-magazines standpoint. A mother nursing a preschooler is more arresting—and bound to spark a heated debate around the topic of extended breastfeeding.

And the cover has been successful in doing that. Today, every mom blogger seems to be asking, Is breastfeeding a 3-year-old freakish or natural?

My personal feelings about the cover image are conflicted. A part of me loves this bold photo that promotes breastfeeding, the best-known way to feed a baby. The image seems to be blazing trails for women by helping prudish Americans become more comfortable with the sight of a nursing mom. We live in a country where bus drivers kick nursing moms off buses, and maybe Time is helping stop that ridiculousness.

What’s more, the image gives U.S. mother’s permission to nurse well past that widely accepted 1-year point. While mothers in many countries openly breastfeed their toddlers, here in America we’re squeamish about extended nursing and moms often feed their 2-year-olds behind closed doors to avoid disapproving looks (I did with my son). This image challenges that thinking and invites breastfeeding moms of older kids to come out of the closet. Suddenly extended nursing seems cool!

But another part of me hates this image and I fear that it will put yet more pressure on moms to achieve unobtainable goals. While the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that moms breastfeed until 12 months, only 44 percent of moms make it to 6 months. And the gorgeous, thin blonde, standing proudly with her hands on her hips on the Time cover seems to be challenging moms to go longer. “Girls, you can do more!” she seems to be saying in a super annoying, competitive way.

Moms are already overwhelmed with societal pressures that leave them feeling like failures if they don’t make their own baby food, get their kids to bed on time, and start touring preschools before the first birthday. Do moms really need the added pressure to nurse for three years? They certainly don’t need this coming from a mom wearing skinny jeans and a tight tank top—who can relate to her, anyway?

For many of us, getting a child to latch to the breast in the first place is a challenge and nursing becomes more about chapped, cracked, bleeding nipples than sweet cuddly moments. And some babies don’t want to continue nursing. A few weeks before my daughter turned 1, she started refusing my breast. I remember sobbing as she screamed out at me and slapped my chest while I tried to force her mouth on my breast. I wanted her to make it to the 1-year mark and felt frustrated when it didn’t happen. I would have felt even worse if my mind had been set on 3 years.

Read more: Attachment parenting: Is it imprisoning?

Page 1 of 212