Archive for the ‘Bottle and breast feeding’ Category

Sacramento mom blocked from Facebook for three days over breastfeeding images

by:

A Sacramento mom was outraged when she realized Facebook pulled several images of women nursing their children from the breastfeeding support group page she manages with a friend.

Kristy Kemp was also blocked from the Breastfeeding Mama Talk page for 24 hours, even though Facebook policy says nursing images are allowed on the social media site.

“I was shocked!” she told Fox40. “I’m trying to do good for mothers and I’m getting kicked off for posting pictures of the most beautiful act a mother can do her for kid. It’s not right.”

Facebook and nursings moms have been at odds ever since the social networking first took down breastfeeding images in 2008. At the time, Facebook said it pulled the images because it was concerned about photos of breasts being featured on a site with a minimum age of 13, according to ZDNet. But after thousands of women complained and flooded the site with breastfeeding images, leading to a media firestorm, Facebook decided to allow nursing images and developed a formal policy, which has evolved over the years. The current policy says that breastfeeding images are allowed although those images where a breast is fully exposed and the child isn’t actively nursing are not.

Kemp first ran into trouble with Facebook when one of her pages 4,300 fans posted a close-up image of a nursing baby and it was removed. She was also blocked from the page for 24 hours.

After a day, Kemp returned to the site and noticed an image of a women nursing her 5-year-old. Facebook quickly removed the image and again Kemp was banned from her site. This time she couldn’t get back in for three days, she told Fox 40.

Kemp initially created the Mama Talk page because she was ridiculed when she nursed her son Zander, now age 3, in public, and she wanted to provide a supportive space for moms.

Kemp was once ordered to nurse in a bathroom stall by someone who was offended by public breastfeeding.

“I don’t expect people to eat their lunch in the bathroom,” she told Fox 40. “I would never tell someone to eat their lunch in the bathroom, so I don’t know why I was told to feed my baby in the bathroom. People are trying to sexualize breastfeeding and it’s not sexual at all.”

Kemp reached out to Facebook to ask why they removed her photos but she never heard back. Fox 40 also contacted the social media site and heard back from a spokesperson who said that “the removal was an error and the company apologizes.”

Female Texas lawmaker posts on Facebook that breastfeeding women ‘need to be modest’

by:

Texas Republican lawmaker Debbie Riddle spoke out against public breastfeeding legislation on Facebook. (Harry Cabluck / AP)

A Texas lawmaker sparked ire among moms across the internet when she posted on Facebook earlier this week that she won’t support a breastfeeding bill.

On her Facebook wall, State Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, says that she won’t vote for House Bill 1706, which makes it illegal to stop a mom from nursing in public, because “it is important for women to be modest while feeding their baby,” according to the Texas Tribune.

The 64 year-old Republican, who is married but never had children, added that she thinks most women are modest and respectful.

Riddle has since pulled the post, but after it generated over 1,000 comments, many of them disagreeing with her and some of them downright snarky. One commenter shared, “Please ban cleavage first.”

Texas Republican State Rep. Debbie Riddle spoke out about public breastfeeding legislation on Facebook. (Facebook)

Texas law says that women can breastfeed in public. Yet over the past few years nursing women have faced discrimination. A nursing mom was harassed by employees at a Houston Target in 2011. That same year a Texas woman was breastfeeding in the kids’ area at a gym until a staff member ordered her to move to a more private location where children couldn’t see her. More recently a Houston mom named Donnica Venters made national news when a federal judge decided that she wasn’t discriminated against by her employer who fired her for asking for a place to pump breast milk at work.

State Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, introduced House Bill 1706 because she thinks the state needs a stronger law to give nursing women in these sorts of sticky situations more rights. The bill would provide moms with the power to sue and collect damages from whomever kicked them out of a place for nursing, whether it’s a business, individual, or other entity.

While Farrar doesn’t intend for nursing moms to become sue happy, she does believe that someone like Venters might have had more of a chance in court if 1706 were in place. The U.S. District Judge who ruled against Venters wrote in her decision that “lactation is not pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition,” and as a result isn’t covered by pregnancy or sex discrimination laws, according to CBS News. Farrar’s legislation would have given Venters some recourse.

Riddle disagrees with the legislation because, as she wrote on Facebook, “a bill that would allow for lawsuits” if someone “interfered” with a woman breastfeeding “is really going a bit far” and “is government out of control.”

Riddle has yet to speak to the media about her Facebook post, but Farrar told the Texas Tribune that Riddle’s comment “illustrates the problem” the bill would address.

“Lingerie commercials reveal more than women actually trying to do good for their children and their families,” Farrar added. “… Some people think that breastfeeding is somehow obscene.”

[Texas Tribune, Dallas Observer, CBS News, Daily Mail]

Is it acceptable for a university professor to breastfeed while teaching class?

by:

Even if they’re smart and can read, babies don’t belong in a university classroom. (blessings / Shutterstock)

Every few months a story about a woman breastfeeding in public makes national news. A bus driver orders a nursing mom to get off the bus or a pastor refers to a woman breastfeeding in church as lewd.

I always side with the mom in these situations. Nursing is the most practical and natural way to feed a baby and Americans need to be less prudish and let women do their thing, even if it happens to be in a church pew. The people who find breastfeeding inappropriate, gross, indecent or offensive are just plain wrong, in my opinion.

But the latest breastfeeding-in-public story to take the media by storm has me troubled, and this time I’m finding it difficult to side with the mom.

In this situation, which took place in Washington, D.C., two weeks ago, the mom is an assistant anthropology professor at American University. Adrienne Pine nursed her infant while teaching a class of 40 students. Coincidentally (and humorously), Pine was teaching a feminist class called “Sex, Gender & Culture.” No, a nursing demonstration wasn’t a planned part of the show. The single mom brought her baby to class because the child had a fever and she had exhausted all childcare options. She didn’t want to cancel the first day of class so she showed up with a baby in tow.

The Washington Post reports:

The baby, in a blue onesie, crawled on the floor of the lecture hall during part of the 75-minute class…The mother extracted a paper clip from the girl’s mouth at one point and shooed her away from an electrical outlet. A teaching assistant held the baby and rocked her at times, volunteering to help even though Pine stressed that she didn’t have to. When the baby grew restless, Pine breast-fed her while continuing her lecture in front of 40 students.

Some students were outraged. Jake Carias, 18, told the Post, “I found it unprofessional. I was kind of appalled.”

Although Carias is guilty for inappropriate behavior himself. He told the Post that he sent out a tweet about the incident during class. (Isn’t social media a no-no in class?)

The University issued a statement about the incident, emphasizing “that faculty members should take advantage of options such as sick leave, break times and private areas for nursing mothers to express milk so they can maintain a focus on professional responsibilities in the classroom,” the Post reported.

Pine hasn’t talked with the media but she did publish a response in an essay titled “The Dialectics of Breastfeeding on Campus: Exposéing My Breasts on the Internet” posted on CounterPunch.org. She writes:

So here’s the story, internet: I fed my sick baby during feminist anthropology class without disrupting the lecture so as to not have to cancel the first day of class. I doubt anyone saw my nipple, because I’m pretty good at covering it. But if they did, they now know that I too, a university professor, like them, have nipples. Or at least that I have one.

Now students across the American University campus are asking, Is it appropriate for a professor to breastfeed while teaching a class?

I hate to come down on a breastfeeding mom but I think Pine made a bad decision—and not only because she breastfed in front of her class. I would feel similarly if Pine stood there lecturing while bottle-feeding the baby. The main issue here is the sick baby. Bringing a sick child to class is unfair to the child and the students. Pine should have stayed at home with her sick child or as parenting writer Lisa Belkin suggests in an article for the Huffington Post, the university should provide emergency childcare for these sorts of situations.

Another issue here is the nature of Pine’s job. She’s a university professor and it’s her responsibility to teach, to lecture, to go over lessons. It’s difficult to do that job when you’re caring for a baby. Yes, some jobs can be done with a baby around—not necessarily efficiently or well, but any mom knows that it’s possible to write an email or even conduct a conference call with a baby, even a nursing one, in your lap. If you’re at a desk all day, it’s acceptable to bring a baby to work on that rare occasion, although if the baby were sick, then you should try to get that work done at home.

But Pine’s job is different because she’s the center of attention and all eyes are on her. She’s a performer, in a sense. Normally, I think nursing in public is fine when you can be discreet about it—which is entirely possible when you’re riding a bus or eating at a restaurant or sitting in a church pew. But if you’re the bus driver or the waiter or the pastor, it’s impossible to quietly care for your baby while you’re actively doing your job and taking care of your passengers, customers, or students. Yes, you can take a 20 minute break to nurse or give your baby a bottle, but Pine didn’t do that. She multi-tasked and tried to do it all at once and that’s not fair to any of the parties involved—the baby, the students or herself.

What do you think? Is it acceptable for a university professor to nurse while teaching a class?

[Huffington Post]

Miami Marlins’ Logan Morrison infuriates moms with breast feeding tweet

by:
Logan Morrison Twitter

Miami Marlins’ Logan Morrison, left, turns to smile at Hanley Ramirez (2) as they walk back to the dugout after Morrison’s two-run homer against the Boston Red Sox in the first inning of an interleague baseball game at Fenway Park in Boston on Tuesday, June 19, 2012. Photo: Elise Amendola / AP

Last week Miami Marlins’ left fielder Logan Morrison, 23, was shopping at a Nordstrom in the Miami area and spotted a woman breast feeding an infant.

Morrison, who is often referred to as LoMo, was reportedly disgusted by the sight and he snapped a photo with his phone and posted it on Twitter, according to the Huffington Post.

Morrison is known for his colorful tweets and has over 119,000 followers on Twitter—and many of them were quick to fire back at the left fielder. Sports Illustrated writer Jay Jaffe tweeted:

Morrison shot back:

The two guys eventually took it offline and Jaffe let his followers know that he and the left fielder had reconciled:

Marlins’ president Craig Samson is concerned about Morrison’s Twitter behavior. “I’m not a dinosaur,” Samson told ESPN, “but I’m not thrilled. It’s very scary to me. I’ve told Logan, ‘People are waiting for you to make a mistake. They’re going to bait you on Twitter to say something inappropriate that you can never take back.’

“It takes an entire career to build a reputation, and one tweet to lose it. As long as he understands that, it’s fine.”

Morrison has since pulled the tweet with the photo of the mom, but I’d also like to see an apology. Secretly photographing a nursing mom and then posting the image on the Internet and mocking her is downright rude, tasteless and inconsiderate. We’re talking about a new mom here who was probably venturing out to the mall for the first time to buy herself a new pair of jeans that actually fit—and I can only imagine that she was frazzled and faced with the difficult situation of finding a place to nurse a hungry newborn. Give the woman a break, please!

Morrison’s childish behavior isn’t setting a good example for his Twitter followers.  ESPN reports that most of them are young teens—and these kids desperately need athlete role models who are respectful and polite. Let’s hope Morrison learns from his mistakes and starts making better decisions. This might already be happening because this week he’s tweeting about raising money for cancer.

[Huffington Post and Miami New Times]

Time’s breastfeeding cover inspires reality TV show—ugh!

by:

Time clearly picked this provocative cover image to sell magazines and attract media attention. Now the cover has gone as far to inspire a reality show. (Martin Schoeller / Time)

Do you remember Time magazine’s recent “Are You Mom Enough?” breastfeeding cover?

The widely debated image features a mom nursing her son who looks old enough to pour himself a glass of milk.

Depending on how you see things, the widely debated image either blazed trails for breastfeeding moms who practice extended nursing, or put unneeded pressure on moms to nurse well past the recommended one-year mark. And the feature story inside either helped put attachment parenting on the map or it made parents who carry their babies in slings and let their kids sleep in their beds look ridiculous.

No matter, the cover and feature story that newsmakers talked about on radio and TV shows across the country have inspired a reality TV show, expected to air this fall “with at least one mother who participated in the Time story,” according to the Daily Mail (a British news site that’s sensationalized yet seems appropriate in this story.)

Appalling? Yes (at least in my book).

Surprising? Hardly.

The show that will focus on extreme parenting is being developed by Jeff Collins, a producer who has worked on shows and one-time specials ranging from The Pregnant Man to Bridezillas to Dance Moms. In other words, this new show will likely spotlight the most unusual situations and portray yet another unrealistic picture of Americans.

“That cover proves what I’ve been saying for the last year – America has become a country of extremes,” Jeff Collins, president of Collins Avenue Productions, told Yahoo! Shine. “I think it’s so fascinating that some Americans find the image of a woman breastfeeding to be provocative, shocking, even sexual when, in fact, it’s the most natural thing in the world.’

Collins is right. Breastfeeding is entirely natural, even beautiful, and Americans need to be less prudish and let women do their thing, but the the Time magazine cover wasn’t only enticing because it showed an almost-4-year-old nursing. A lot of the controversy revolved around the fact that the image didn’t present breastfeeding in a natural light. Time showed a woman breastfeeding her son in an awkward position. What’s more, they showed a gorgeous, skinny woman who was made to look like she’s about to step on the set of Desperate Housewives—while the average mom nurses in her PJs.

But that’s all beside the main point. This post is about the new Extreme Parenting reality show that promises to reveal the most kooky, bizarre and extreme parenting rituals known to moms. What specifically this includes isn’t clear, but Collins told Yahoo that the show will be about much more than attachment parenting and moms who nurse sharp-teethed toddlers.

The fact that extended breastfeeding would even be considered to fit into the “kooky” category makes me mad. Women all over the world nurse their kids for 2, 3 and 4 years. No big deal. Nursing is the best way to nourish kids and breast milk is the cheapest and healthiest food source. I fear that this show is going to make moms who nurse 3 year olds look outlandish.

Getting back to Collins’ point that breastfeeding is natural. If he finds nursing so natural then I hope that he will depict it in a natural, hey even inspirational, way. Or will the show only highlight the most shocking situations in order to attract viewers?

I can already picture the scene with some frazzled, stressed-out mom whose 4 year old throws a tantrum at the shopping mall because he wants to nurse. The mom ends up finding a janitorial closet where she’s forced to nurse because she doesn’t want anyone to know that she’s still breastfeeding. A mom at her lowest point of the day. This isn’t what moms needs to see. We need to see parents at their best—that same mom sitting peacefully, cuddled up on a couch with her child. Other moms need good role models and the world needs to realize that there are good parents in America—but something tells me that doesn’t make good TV.

Does Time magazine’s breastfeeding cover go too far?

by:
Time breastfeeding cover

Is breastfeeding a 3-year-old freakish or natural? (Martin Schoeller/Time)

This week’s issue of Time magazine features a mom breastfeeding her son who looks old enough to pour himself a glass of milk. The boy, just shy of 4 years old, is standing on a chair to reach the breast falling out of his mom’s tank top. The pose makes the point that this boy is too big and old to be held in his mother’s arms—but he can still breastfeed.

Shocking?

Time clearly picked this provocative cover image to sell magazines and attract media attention. The actual story inside the magazine is titled The Man Who Remade Motherhood and it’s about Dr. Bill Sears, an internationally recognized pediatrician who’s known as the leader behind the attachment parenting movement that calls for extended breastfeeding (as well as co-sleeping and baby-wearing).

But the grey-haired doctor isn’t pictured on the cover. Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old California mom, and her breast-sucking son made the cover instead.

Makes sense from a need-to-sell-magazines standpoint. A mother nursing a preschooler is more arresting—and bound to spark a heated debate around the topic of extended breastfeeding.

And the cover has been successful in doing that. Today, every mom blogger seems to be asking, Is breastfeeding a 3-year-old freakish or natural?

My personal feelings about the cover image are conflicted. A part of me loves this bold photo that promotes breastfeeding, the best-known way to feed a baby. The image seems to be blazing trails for women by helping prudish Americans become more comfortable with the sight of a nursing mom. We live in a country where bus drivers kick nursing moms off buses, and maybe Time is helping stop that ridiculousness.

What’s more, the image gives U.S. mother’s permission to nurse well past that widely accepted 1-year point. While mothers in many countries openly breastfeed their toddlers, here in America we’re squeamish about extended nursing and moms often feed their 2-year-olds behind closed doors to avoid disapproving looks (I did with my son). This image challenges that thinking and invites breastfeeding moms of older kids to come out of the closet. Suddenly extended nursing seems cool!

But another part of me hates this image and I fear that it will put yet more pressure on moms to achieve unobtainable goals. While the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that moms breastfeed until 12 months, only 44 percent of moms make it to 6 months. And the gorgeous, thin blonde, standing proudly with her hands on her hips on the Time cover seems to be challenging moms to go longer. “Girls, you can do more!” she seems to be saying in a super annoying, competitive way.

Moms are already overwhelmed with societal pressures that leave them feeling like failures if they don’t make their own baby food, get their kids to bed on time, and start touring preschools before the first birthday. Do moms really need the added pressure to nurse for three years? They certainly don’t need this coming from a mom wearing skinny jeans and a tight tank top—who can relate to her, anyway?

For many of us, getting a child to latch to the breast in the first place is a challenge and nursing becomes more about chapped, cracked, bleeding nipples than sweet cuddly moments. And some babies don’t want to continue nursing. A few weeks before my daughter turned 1, she started refusing my breast. I remember sobbing as she screamed out at me and slapped my chest while I tried to force her mouth on my breast. I wanted her to make it to the 1-year mark and felt frustrated when it didn’t happen. I would have felt even worse if my mind had been set on 3 years.

Read more: Attachment parenting: Is it imprisoning?

Should hospitals pass out free baby formula to new moms?

by:

Breastfeeding advocates believe new moms shouldn’t receive free formula samples at the hospital. (Kati Molin)

When you give birth in a hospital, you receive a corporate-sponsored goody bag filled with free diapers, wipes, a couple onesies, a bulb syringe for sucking snot from your baby’s nose, and formula samples. All of these items might be helpful to a new mom but they’re essentially advertisements for baby product companies. And those packets of free formula are controversial because study after study proves that breast milk is the best source of nutrition for a new baby. If breast is best, should hospitals be handing out free baby formula? Here’s a look at a the heated debate that’s brewing around this issue, and I’ll chime in with my opinion at the end.

No, hospitals shouldn’t be passing out formula

Breastfeeding advocates want to stop hospitals from passing out baby formula because they say it discourages some new moms from breastfeeding.

This week dozens of consumer and health organizations put their names on a letter that was sent to more than 2,600 hospitals asking the facilities to stop distributing free samples of formula and participating in the marketing efforts of pharmaceutical and food manufacturers’ products at the expense of patients. They are also petitioning the $4 billion infant formula industry’s leaders — Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson Nutrition Co and Nestle SA — to stop passing out free samples at hospitals.

The campaign is part of an effort to increase U.S. breastfeeding rates. Only 14 percent of mothers breastfeed exclusively for the first six months, and breastfeeding numbers are especially low among lower-income women.

Last year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a “Breastfeeding Report Card” revealing that only 14 percent of hospitals have a written breastfeeding policy in place. The report also indicated that formula companies provide hospitals with free formula as long as they include samples in the swag bags they pass out to new moms. When a mother is struggling with breastfeeding, a nurse often uses the free formula to get a mother started with bottle feeding rather than troubleshooting the problem and encouraging the mom to persist with nursing.

About 66 percent of hospitals still give away formula, according to the report, down from nearly 73 percent in 2007.  Some states have banned the formula giveaways including California, New York and Texas. In these states, moms might receive a breast-milk cooler and disposable nursing pads.

Yes, hospitals should be passing out formula samples

Formula companies are quick to defend their samples. “We can’t forget that some moms even though they plan to breastfeed, they either can’t or they decide not to,” International Formula Council Executive Vice President Mardi Mountford told Fox News. “We believe they want more information, not less.”

The American Hospital Association released a statement responding to the letter and said its members’ policies were based on mothers’ preferences and that while breastfeeding was best, “having information and resources available for mothers who choose not to breastfeed is a responsible and supportive approach for the hospital,” according to Fox News.

The bottom line

Big corporations are invading America’s hospitals and taking advantage of new parents at a very vulnerable time. They’ve been increasing the number of products in their swag bags over the past 40 years and last year Disney started sending representatives into maternity wards to pass out Disney-themed apparel for newborns.

While these companies might be trying to come off as altruistic by passing out free products, it’s clear that their motives are to lock families into specific brands. I think these swag bags should be banned all together.

And what about formula? Yes, study after study proves that breast is best and hospitals should be supporting moms in nursing. But there are some moms, like those who give birth to preemies, who can’t nurse. These moms shouldn’t be forgotten and hospitals need to have formula on hand for these mothers. But should every mother go home with a big bag full of formula? Probably not.

Should hospitals pass out free baby formula to new moms? What do you think?