Archive for the ‘Facebook’ Category

OB-GYN in trouble for complaining about patient online

by:

A St. Louis OB-GYN might lose her job for complaining about a patient on Facebook, according to KMOV-TV.

Dr. Amy Dunbar of Mercy Hospital didn’t reveal intimate details about her pregnant patient but she did express irritation about her arriving late for appointments and failing to show up for an induction. In the comments, Dunbar added that she is forced to put up with the patient’s tardiness and isn’t cancelling the induction because she had a prior still birth.

While Dr. Dunbar’s post received dozens of likes and encouraging comments, it also enraged many people who felt the doctor shared too much information about a patient online. Some are going as far as to demand that Mercy fire the OB-GYN.

Earlier this week the hospital released a statement addressing the incident.

Mercy values the dignity and privacy of all our patients and we are very sorry that this incident occurred. While our privacy compliance staff has confirmed that this physician’s comments did not represent a breach of privacy laws, they were inappropriate and not in line with our values of respect and dignity.

The hospital also commented on demands that Dr. Dunbar lose her job:

Mercy holds its physicians and other co-workers to high standards in ensuring the protection of patient information. We cannot comment on specific disciplinary actions, but we will use this as an opportunity to reinforce our standards through additional education of our physicians and co-workers, including appropriate use of social media.

What do you think? Should Dr. Dunbar lose her job?

I don’t think she should be fired, after all she never even names the patient. But she needs to learn that griping about patients, even if unnamed, in a public forum is entirely wrong and unacceptable. Women often share close relationships with their OB-GYNs. After all an OB is given a window into the most private part of a woman’s body. What’s more these doctors are often the holders of many secrets and information that nobody else knows. They know about the abortions, the date rapes, the sexually transmitted diseases, the dysfuntional marriages. Women need to be able to trust their OB-GYNs, in some ways more than anyone else, and Dr. Dunbar clearly broke that trust. If she needs to vent about an annoying patient (and in this case the patient sounded frustrating) then she should complain to her partner or best friend but not on Facebook!

[Huffington Post and KMOV]

Tired of looking at baby photos on Facebook? Unbaby.me can help you with that

by:

Tired of looking at baby photos every time you open up Facebook? A new Chrome extension called Unbaby.me can replace those images of pudgy-cheeked faces in your news feed with photos of fluffy kittens, greasy bacon, shiny Ferraris, smiling manatees and all sorts of other “awesome stuff.”

All I can say about this is, really? Are people really so annoyed by babies that they’re taking the time to install this plug-in? Would some people really rather look at a Ferrari than their best friend from elementary school’s day-old baby?

The sad answer is yes. The new free extension only launched last Wednesday and quickly caught on after a write-up in the Los Angeles Times. Unbaby.me has received over 50,000 Facebook likes and over 14,000 people have downloaded the extension.

Three colleagues at a New York ad agency–Yvonne Cheng, Chris Baker and Pete Marquis–are behind the service. Not surprisingly, they’re all in their 20s and 30s, according to The Times, and none of them are pushing Bugaboos around Manhattan.

“We were having drinks one night after work and were joking around about how Facebook is just lousy with babies, and wouldn’t it be funny if you could replace all those photos with cats,” Cheng told The Times.

All I can say about this is, really? My dog-owner friends are posting more pictures than my friends with new babies. Where are all these “lousy” baby pics? I’d like to see more of them in my feed! I find that most parents don’t want dozens of images of their kids floating around the Internet so they might only upload that first baby photo and then give you little teasers at each birthday, on the first day of kindergarten…

But if your friends aren’t as cautious as mind and you’re feeling overwhelmed by adorable baby photos, Unbaby.me is easy to install—and uninstall (if you later change your mind). Just visit the Chrome store. Here’s a rundown from The Times on how the extension works:

Once it is running, it will scan your Facebook feed for key words such as “cute,” “adorable” and “first birthday” — trigger words that indicate a baby photo may be attached. You can also add your own key words. Then it replaces the offending baby photo with a different photo from an RSS feed of pictures. The current default feed is cat photos.

Pictures of babies that have no captions will not be replaced, though, so if you are looking for a complete baby-photo-eradicating solution, this may not be it.

Who would ever want to completely eradicate baby photos?

[LA Times and Jezebel]