Archive for the ‘Gear’ Category

Are mean-faced Lego guys creating angry kids?

by:
Lego figurines have gotten grumpier over the years.

Lego figurines have gotten grumpier over the years.

In the 1970s and 80s, when my brother and I were building elaborate cities with colorful plastic bricks on our bedroom floors, the Lego figurines who inhabited our urban centers were all topped with the same yellow heads with two dots for eyes and a rainbow of a smile. Even when my brother decided an earthquake must strike and I shrieked in horror as our skyscraper came crashing down, all the two-inch figures remained happy in Pleasantville.

Today the Danish toy company makes a wide array of figures with different facial expressions and a team of New Zealand researchers has discovered that a growing number feature angry faces. The researchers are concerned that all of these grumpy and sneering faces could impact children’s moods and the way they play.

“We cannot help but wonder how the move from only positive faces to an increasing number of negative faces impacts how children play,” Christoph Bartneck, a professor at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand and the study’s lead author, wrote.

(Canterbury University)

Christoph Bartneck discovered that Lego figurines are no longer taking their happy pills. (Canterbury University)

Bartneck and his team analyzed the Lego heads produced between 1975 and 2010, taking a close look at a representative sample of 628 expressions, according to NBC News. They found that up until 1980 Lego produced only bright yellow smiley-faced heads. The company introduced a variety of faces in the 1990s, and by the mid-1990s about 80 percent of the figures wore happy expressions. The Lego people grew progressively crankier and by 2010 only 50 percent of the figurines expressed cheerfulness. (Lego must have cut back on the Prozac supply!) The pleasant expressions were replaced with looks of anger, horror, disdain, superiority and disgust.

“The children that grow up with Lego today will remember not only smileys but also anger and fear in the Minifigures’ faces,” Bartneck wrote.

Yes, this might all seem a little ridiculous and you might wonder who even notices those tiny faces, but as a mother of a son who played Lego for four hours straight yesterday, I was intrigued by this study. My son collects and cherishes his Lego figures. He has all the little pieces—the hats and helmets, swords and guns, pants and tops—sorted in a fishing tackle box, and he carefully chooses pieces when he assembles a figurine. After completing a figure, he often sticks it in his pocket and carries the guy around for the day, talking to it in the backseat of the car, making it act out scenes at the breakfast table.

This afternoon I decided to sort through my son’s Legos and take a look at the figurine faces. In his neatly arranged tackle box, I found 50 faces. Three of them were happy; the rest looked at me scornfully.

I talked to my son about the study and he had some interesting things to say. He told me that the figurines feature angry faces because, “There’s a lot of fighting in the Lego sets. Good guys are battling bad guys.”And he’s right, my son plays with the stereotypical boyish Lego lines: Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Ninjago, Indiana Jones. In all of these sets, good is fighting evil and the figurines come with mean- and fierce-looking faces as well as a lots of weapons.

My son went on to tell me the Legos that he plays with at his grandparents’ house, which are the plastic blocks my brother and I snapped together as kids in the 70s, “don’t have a lot of fighting so the people are happier.” And he’s right. The sets my brother and I played with were gender-neutral and meant to build houses, hotels, fire stations, shops, cafés. We also had a few space sets featuring smiling-faced astronauts.

All of that said, I think it would be far-fetched to say that today’s mean-faced Lego figurines are responsible for unhappiness among America’s youth. Bringing back the smiley faced Lego guys certainly isn’t the answer to solving kids’ struggles with depression and anger. But I do think these cranky guys are part of a larger trend among today’s children’s toy figurines, dolls, TV characters, and more. In the girl-oriented toys and characters, we’re seeing a lot more attitude and brattiness and with the more boyish toys we’re seeing more violence and conflict—and all of this is resulting in our kids seeing a lot more angry faces.

How much of this are kids picking up on? I asked my son if he notices the angry faces on his Lego guys. “Not really,” he told me. And then he wisely told me, “I notice your face more.”

And he’s right, at the end of the day what really matters is whether mom and dad are wearing smiles on their faces—because ultimately parents have the biggest influence on their kids.

The simple reason Finland has a lower infant mortality rate

by:
Every expecting mom in Finland receives a baby starter kit. (Visa Kopu / Roxeteer / Flickr)

Every expecting mom in Finland receives a baby starter kit. (Visa Kopu / Roxeteer / Flickr)

It’s not unusual to find new babies in Finland sleeping in cardboard boxes. Huh?

For the past 75 years, the Finnish government has given all pregnant women of all social backgrounds a big present: A box filled with everything a new mom needs—except an actual set of extra hands and a few hours of extra sleep—to get through that first year. The cardboard box contains over 50 items, from a set of cloth diapers and sleepers of different sizes to a hooded bath towel and snow suit. Every box has a mattress at the bottom and the two together can be used as a crib.

The Finnish government believes, according to the BBC, that all babies deserves “an equal start in life.”

To some Americans this might sound like less of a thoughtful gift than an intrusion of Big Government into family life. The government outfitting a nation of babies in the same clothing screams socialism (although of course Finns have a choice in whether to actually receive the box and use the clothing) and goes against the American values of individuality and self-expression. Here in America most pregnant moms like to frequent the mall where they can freely choose their own onesies at their favorite chain and big-box stores. They put a lot of time and thought into registering for exactly what they want their baby shower guests to buy for them. Nobody is going to tell these women what blanket to swaddle their baby in!

But before you denounce Finland’s baby box as creepy and conformist, consider this: Studies have shown that the box plays a role in the country’s low infant mortality rate. While the United States has one of the highest infant mortality rates of any industrialized nation, Finland has one of the lowest. The rate has dramatically decreased ever since the 1930s when the government started passing out the boxes to all moms. These boxes ensure that every child has a safe place to sleep—something not every American child can count on. What’s more, the boxes show that the nation as a whole cares for each and every child.

What do you think? Should the U.S. government start passing out boxes to expecting moms?

[BBC and The Atlantic]

Kate Middleton paid how much for a baby stroller?

by:
The British press reports that Kate Middleton might have paid as much as $1800 for a baby stroller.

The British press reports that Kate Middleton might have paid as much as $1800 for a baby stroller.

Kate Middleton’s pregnancy will undoubtedly go down as the most closely watched in history. The Duchess of Cambridge can’t eat a single morsel without the British media and the American celebrity rags turning it into international news.

And this week Middleton took a huge “newsworthy” step toward motherhood: She bought a stroller. While reports have trickled out about her other baby purchases, such as a wicker Moses basket, this is much bigger “news” because a mom’s stroller choice makes a statement.

Kate, now six months’ pregnant, is said to have told a group of Army wives at a recent drinks reception in Aldershot that she has bought a Bugaboo in light blue — which some have taken as a clue to her unborn baby’s gender,” according to the British Daily Mail

And what kind of statement does a Bugaboo make? Well, Kate certainly didn’t pick an affordable, practical option. The Bugaboo is known as one of the most expensive, flashy rides (think of it as the Lamborghini of the stroller world), running from about $700 to $1800 for a pram. While the high-priced wheels have a reputation for being well-made and sleek in style, the stroller is bulky, making it too big for the trunk in a small car and difficult to maneuver through a bus aisle (something Middleton doesn’t need to worry about). What’s more, many complain that the Bugaboos are difficult to fold down and open up.

Bugaboo first made it big when Cynthia Nixon rolled out the company’s Frog on Sex in the City. Many balked at the $700 price tag, but more women clamored to get their hands on the slinky stroller. Bugaboo quickly achieved a status not unlike a pair of Manolo Blahnik stilettos. Gwyneth Paltrow, Elton John, Victoria Beckham, Sienna Miller, Jon Stewart, Kate Hudson and Amy Poehler are all A-list celebs who’ve been spotted pushing a pimped-out Bugaboo.

But celebs aren’t the only ones forking over the money to join the Bugaboo brigade. When the Dutch company unveiled its Donkey at a red-carpet event in New York in 2011, the $1500 stroller sold out before it even hit stories. “Mimicking the clamor for the Porsche Cayenne, thousands of excited parents have ordered the convertible stroller and been placed on wait lists,” the New York Daily News reported. “Even with the high price tag, it’s selling faster than Tickle Me Elmo.”

And now that Middleton has bought a Bugaboo, the luxury baby company’s sales are expected to sky-rocket yet again. “The Duchess is the ultimate endorsement. An hour after wearing a polka-dot dress from Topshop to the Harry Potter film studios in Hertfordshire on Friday, the £20 frock had sold out online,” the Daily Mail reports.

 Since Kate Middleton is proving herself to have a taste for luxury, here are a few other high-end (outrageously priced) baby products for her to consider.

Potty training goes high-tech with new iPotty

by:
iPotty

The iPotty aims to keep kids entertained during toilet training.

Which product is stopping people in their tracks at the 2013 International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this week?

The new iPotty, from CTA Digital. Who would have ever guessed?

“Everybody walking by the CTA Digital booth at CES 2013 does a double-take at a colorful plastic object on the ground,” writes Amanda Kooser in a story for CNET. “They stop and stare. They take pictures. One woman declares it the best thing she’s seen at CES.”

This toilet-training device with a special holder for an iPad allows kids to be entertained while learning to use the potty. At only $40, the iPad doesn’t come with this potty, but it does include a special splash guard for your iPad as well as a pee guard that’s placed at the tip of the pot so your fancy tech gadget doesn’t get wet.

Ridiculous? I certainly think so! The American Academy of Pediatrics has made it clear that young kids shouldn’t be in front of screens and as a mom, I’d recommend training kids the old-fashioned way: with a good picture book. But this crazy product, which will be available on Amazon next month, does win a few bonus points for cleverness.

Is the iPotty the craziest baby invention ever? Take a look at these other weird and wacky baby products and then decide.

Are these baby products totally absurd or amazing?

by:

A fan specially designed to dry wet bottoms. A suction device for sucking out snot. A miniature urinal. Leave it to the world of parenting to come up with some of the world’s wackiest inventions.

But wait…the Pee Pee Teepee designed to put over a baby boy’s thingy while you’re changing a diaper is actually quite smart. Who wants a stream of baby pee in the face?

Are these totally far-out baby products actually clever and cool? Take a look at our slide show and then you can decide what’s amazing and what’s downright absurd.