Archive for the ‘pregnancy’ Category

OB-GYN in trouble for complaining about patient online

by:

A St. Louis OB-GYN might lose her job for complaining about a patient on Facebook, according to KMOV-TV.

Dr. Amy Dunbar of Mercy Hospital didn’t reveal intimate details about her pregnant patient but she did express irritation about her arriving late for appointments and failing to show up for an induction. In the comments, Dunbar added that she is forced to put up with the patient’s tardiness and isn’t cancelling the induction because she had a prior still birth.

While Dr. Dunbar’s post received dozens of likes and encouraging comments, it also enraged many people who felt the doctor shared too much information about a patient online. Some are going as far as to demand that Mercy fire the OB-GYN.

Earlier this week the hospital released a statement addressing the incident.

Mercy values the dignity and privacy of all our patients and we are very sorry that this incident occurred. While our privacy compliance staff has confirmed that this physician’s comments did not represent a breach of privacy laws, they were inappropriate and not in line with our values of respect and dignity.

The hospital also commented on demands that Dr. Dunbar lose her job:

Mercy holds its physicians and other co-workers to high standards in ensuring the protection of patient information. We cannot comment on specific disciplinary actions, but we will use this as an opportunity to reinforce our standards through additional education of our physicians and co-workers, including appropriate use of social media.

What do you think? Should Dr. Dunbar lose her job?

I don’t think she should be fired, after all she never even names the patient. But she needs to learn that griping about patients, even if unnamed, in a public forum is entirely wrong and unacceptable. Women often share close relationships with their OB-GYNs. After all an OB is given a window into the most private part of a woman’s body. What’s more these doctors are often the holders of many secrets and information that nobody else knows. They know about the abortions, the date rapes, the sexually transmitted diseases, the dysfuntional marriages. Women need to be able to trust their OB-GYNs, in some ways more than anyone else, and Dr. Dunbar clearly broke that trust. If she needs to vent about an annoying patient (and in this case the patient sounded frustrating) then she should complain to her partner or best friend but not on Facebook!

[Huffington Post and KMOV]

Pregnant Malaysian will compete in Olympics shooting event

by:
Nur Suryani Mohamed Taibi pregnant Olympics

Nur Suryani Mohamed Taibi will shoot for two at the London 2012 Olympics. (Hoang Dinh Nam/Getty)

When Nur Suryani Mohamed Taibi competes in the London Olympics 10m air rifle event this summer all eyes will be on her stomach. The 29-year-old Malaysian shooter will be eight months pregnant next month, and according to The New York Times, “Nur Suryani looks likely to set the record for the most heavily pregnant competitor in Olympic history.”

As the media focuses in on Nur Suryani’s growing belly, her participation in the games is bringing up the question, do pregnant women belong in the Olympics?

Nur Suryani might be an Olympic athlete but shooting targets isn’t any more strenuous than vacuuming a house. Her unborn baby will be perfectly safe during the event. Nur Suryani told the Times that her biggest concern is that the baby “will kick just as she pulls the trigger” and cause her to miss a target.

Only three other women (see slide show below) have competed in the Olympics while pregnant. In 1920 Swedish figure skater Magda Julin was three months pregnant when she took home a gold medal; at the Turin 2006 Winter Olympics, Germany’s Diana Sartor was nine weeks pregnant when she competed in the women’s skeleton event; and at the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics, Canadian curler Kristie Moore was five months along when she and her teammates won a silver.

While the number of pregnant Olympic athletes is few, these women and their bellies were scrutinized and made fun of in the media. Sports writers joked that curling couldn’t be a real sport because it was being played by a pregnant woman, and Sartor was called selfish for putting her baby at risk by competing in one of the more dangerous Olympic sports.

Nur Suryani faced criticism from Malaysian sports authorities who were concerned about the pressure of the events on her health and the safety of traveling to London close to her due date, which is September 2. They also expressed concern about her ability to “perform at her best” while pregnant, according to the Times, and suggested that another athlete take her spot.

Nur Suryani wasn’t going to let the authorities kill her dream, and she convinced them that her pregnancy has actually improved her game. She told the Times that the weight gain due to her pregnancy has given her better stability. In the end authorities supported Nur Suryani and the Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak promised that the government would take care of all her medical needs in London.

The discussion around whether pregnant women should compete in the Olympics is the same one that comes up repeatedly with pregnant women in the business world. Do pregnant women belong in the workplace? Do they have a place in the Olympics? Will Nur Suryani still hit the targets even though she’s pregnant? Can Marissa Mayer save a struggling Yahoo while expecting a child? It’s the same tired debate that comes up every time a hard-working, successful woman gets pregnant. Will she still be able to perform? Something tells me that Nur Suryani is up for the task.

“My aim is to do everything perfect and then the result will come after. If you aim for a gold medal, you put yourself under pressure,” she told the Times.