Archive for the ‘School/preschool/kindergarten/elementary school/SFUSD’ Category

Viral video: Teen gives ‘lazy’ teacher a piece of his mind

by:

An unlikely Texas high school student is quickly gaining fame as a video of him giving a lecture to his ‘lazy’ teacher blazes across the Internet.

With a long mane of stringy hair and a lanky frame, Jeff Bliss has the look of a heavy metal band member—and the mind of an inspired orator.

The sophomore at Duncanville High School outside Dallas got kicked out of his World History class on Monday, but before stepping out the door, he gave the teacher a piece of his mind—and he delivers his message eloquently and intelligently, with a touch of teenage sass.

I’m telling you what you need to do. You want kids to come into your class, you want them to get excited for this? You gotta come in here, you gotta make them excited. You want a kid to change and start doing better? You gotta touch his frickin’ heart. Can’t expect a kid to change if all you do is just tell him. You’ve got to take this job serious. This is the future of this nation. And when you come in here like you did last time and make a statement about, ‘Oh this is my paycheck,” indeed it is. But this is my country’s future, and my education.

A classmate got video footage of Bliss’s tirade on his cellphone and posted it on YouTube. The original video was reportedly pulled but other clips of the footage are popping up on YouTube and bringing in hundreds of thousands of page views.

Bliss is going down as a hero. Commenters on YouTube are applauding his tongue-lashing speech. “The kid is 100% right. The teacher is uninspiring and the kid is 100 more intelligent than the teacher,” JayneHefia shares.

The teacher says little in the video. Without hearing her side of the story, it’s difficult judge whether she’s a lazy teacher as Bliss makes her out to be.

Questioning whether this video was staged? Bliss seems to be the real deal as he came forward to talk to the media. He shared with Fox News that he dropped out of high school his freshman year. When he returned as a sophomore, he decided to take school seriously and he “expects teachers to do the same.”

Bliss says schools and administrators have been supportive, and while his mom is proud that her son spoke up, she thinks her son needs to work on his attitude.

Bliss also emphasized that he’s not a hero. “I don’t want people to look up to me as something to idolize or anything, I’m just as human as the next person,” he told Fox News.

This morning the Duncanville school district released a statement in response to the video to NBC 5 Dallas:

As a district with a motto of engaging hearts and minds, we focus on building positive relationships with students and designing engaging work that is meaningful. We want our students and teachers to be engaged, but the method by which the student expressed his concern could have been handled in a more appropriate way.

Guess how much today’s kids are spending on prom?

by:
200446450-001

Spending on the annual high school ritual of the prom continues to outpace inflation and grew for the second straight year, hitting an average of $1,139 per family in 2013. (Getty)

Just like the cost of gas, milk and San Francisco real estate, the price of prom is going through the roof. The average prom bill this year will be $1,139, according to a study conducted by Visa. That’s over a $300 increase from two years ago.

What are kids spending their money on? That perfect $500 dress, a pair of heels, tux rental, limousine rides and party buses, dinner at a white-tablecloth restaurant, a corsage for her, a boutonniere for him, tickets to get into the actual event, a French manicure, a Brazilian blow, leg waxings, spray tans…and the list goes on and on.

“Dresses are more elaborate,” Marshal Cohen, chief industry analyst at market research firm NPD Group, told the Associated Press. “They are now buying two pairs of shoes, one to go to prom and one to dance in.”

All I can say is that my mother wouldn’t approve.

Back in 1992, only weeks before graduating from high school, I was giddy with excitement walking around the campus of my soon-to-be alma mater. A boy had actually asked me to prom.

My mom didn’t share the same enthusiasm. I went to school in the South Bay and my prom was at the Marriott Hotel in San Francisco and this meant students would be spending the night in the city in hotel rooms. Many were riding to the hotel in limousines. And there was sure to be partying, drugs, alcohol.

My mom didn’t approve. She spent her prom night twirling around the dance floor set up in her high school auditorium. The teachers were all there as chaperones.  She danced to the Beatles, watched the prom king and queen get crowned and was probably home well before midnight. This was the 1960s.

The prom of the 1990s, in her opinion, was unnecessarily excessive and expensive. But I was generally a rule follower as a teenager and she trusted me and agreed to let me go—though this didn’t mean that she was going to entirely give in to all the lavishness. When I came home from a trip to the mall with a girlfriend and told her that I found the perfect $199 dress, she told me, “No way!” She borrowed a black velvet dress from a friend of hers for me to wear. I was disappointed but looking back I was probably one of the more tastefully dressed girls at my dance.

But not all parents are willing to tell their kids no—and the pressure in the 21st century to have that designer dress is high. “You don’t want your kid to be the only kid who doesn’t have what the other kids have,” Kit Yarrow, a consumer psychologist and professor at Golden Gate University, told the Associated Press.=.

And what exactly does it cost to have what the other kids have?

Tuxedo rental: Anywhere from $60 to $200, Men’s Wearhouse told the Associated Press.

Dress: David’s Bridal, with 300 stores selling prom dresses, told the Associated Press the average dress is $170. Cache, a popular mall store for dresses, told KCRA that the most expensive dress in the store is $598.

The Visa survey results are a result of phone conversations with 3,000 parents of prom-age high school students. The survey revealed some interesting regional trends. The Northeast led the nation in spending, with the Midwest spending the least.

  • Northeastern families will spend an average of $1,528;
  • Southern families will spend an average of $1,203;
  • Western families will spend an average of $1,079; and
  • Midwestern families will spend an average of $722.

Parents on average covered 59 percent of the cost while teens picked up 41 percent.

One troubling statistic is that parents surveyed who fell in the lower income brackets (less than $50,000 a year) plan to spend more than the national average, $1,245, while parents who make over $50,000 will spend an average of $1,129.  Additionally, single parents plan to spend $1,563, almost double the amount that married parents plan to spend at $770.

“Prom has devolved into a competition to crown the victor of high school society, but teens shouldn’t be trying to keep up with the Kardashians,” said Nat Sillin Visa’s head of US Financial Education. “The prom is an opportunity to teach teens how to budget. If they want that sparkling dress, fancy dinner, and limo ride, this is the opportunity to set a budget and save.”

How much did you spend on your prom—share the year and the price? Does $1,000 for 2013 sound reasonable or too high?

Nine of California’s top 20 public high schools are in the Bay Area

by:

Nine of the 20 best public high schools in California are in the Bay Area, according to U.S. News & World Report.

The online news magazine released its list of 2013 U.S. public high school rankings this week as well as rankings by state.

Pacific Collegiate School, a charter school in Santa Cruz (a city that many consider to be part of the Bay Area), landed the top spot in California and was ranked No. 11 nationally.

“In my opinion, the thing that makes us so great is we have a clear mission,” says Simon Fletcher, the interim principal at Pacific Collegiate. “We’re a college prep school that’s focused on academics. We ask that our students put school first. This is a place that you come to be intellectual, to work hard and to challenge yourself to get better everyday. We also want our students to be world citizens and to think critically about the world and their place in it.”

Pacific Collegiate is in its 14th year and offers grades seventh through 12th. Fletcher says that his school was ranked in the top 3 in California for several years and about five years ago the school was No. 2 in the nation.

Oxford Academy, a public school in Cypress, holds the No. 2 spot in the Golden State and Whitney High School, a public school in Cerritos, was third.

The American Indian Public High School in Oakland was the next Bay Area school on the list, ranking No. 5 in California and No. 38 nationally. San Francisco’s Lowell High School scored the No. 8 spot in California and ranked No. 43 nationally.

The online magazine collected data on over 21,000 public, magnet and charter high schools in 49 states and Washington, D.C., and ranked the best ones. (Nebraska didn’t have sufficient data). U.S. News ranked 501 schools in California (see the top 20 above and the full list here) and a total of 4,805 schools throughout the United States. The national rankings were divided into gold, silver and bronze groups and “California leads the pack with close to 28 percent of the nearly 1,800 eligible schools in the state earning gold and silver medals,” according to U.S. News.

The School for the Talented and Gifted in Dallas, Texas, held onto its distinction as the No. 1 school in the country. BASIS Tucson in Arizona claimed No. 2, climbing up from last year’s No. 6 spot. And Gwinnett School of Mathematics, Science and Technology was No. 3; the school opened in 2007 and earned its first-ever ranking this year.

To create the 2013 list, researchers looked closely at schools’ reading and math results on state proficiency tests and compared these with the state average to determine whether students were performing better than statistical expectations. They also analyzed scores from disadvantaged students (black, Hispanic and low-income) to see whether they were “performing better than average for similar students in the state.”

Those schools that were considered high level made it to the final stage of analysis and their students were judged on their college readiness. Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate test data was used “as the benchmark for success.”

Petaluma middle school decides girls’ leggings must be covered

by:

Teens at a middle school in Petaluma, Calif., can now only wear leggings if they’re covered with a garment such as shorts or a skirt. (Getty)

How tight is too tight for school? Administrators and teachers at a middle school in Petaluma, Calif., are asking themselves this question as they implement a new dress code policy around girls’ form-fitting pants.

Kenilworth Junior High has been making national news for prohibiting girls from wearing tight-fitting pants because they’re “distracting to teenage boys,” according to KTVU-TV.

Last Thursday, April 4, all the girls at Kenilworth Junior High were told to skip the last period of the day and instead report to a multi-use room where an administrator expressed concern over the tight-fitting pants female students were wearing to school, according to KTVU-TV. They were reportedly told that they would be sent home if they wore form-fitting pants.

Many students were frustrated and left thinking they could no longer wear the popular skinny jeans, yoga pants or leggings to school. “It takes away like half of my clothes because I have a lot of yoga pants and leggings, so everyone’s kind of like mad about it,” Makenna Mattei told KTVU.

“We didn’t think it was fair how we have all these restrictions on our clothing while boys didn’t have to sit through it at all,” Brittany Kruljack chimed in.

Parents were equally baffled by the new rule. “It is not our girls’ fault that these boys have quote ‘raging hormones’ they can’t control,” Lisa Simond, a parent at Kenilworth, told KTVU.

After the KTVU segment ran on Friday, April 5, news outlets across the country picked up the story and a string of mom bloggers wrote posts declaring the dress code ridiculous. And over at Cafe Mom Jeanne Sager shared her outrage over the school banning tight pants because they’re distracting to boys.

“You’ll have to pardon me for thinking here (after all, I’m just a girl, what do I know?), but wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier to sit the boys down for a talk and tell them to cool it?” Sager wrote. “Not only would it save the parents of every girl in the district from having to revamp their kids’ wardrobes, but it would prepare the boys for what will happen when they walk out into a dress code-free world where women walk around flaunting bare ankles and even, gulp, showing their knees!”

On Friday night, Kenilworth administrators issued a statement to its families:

With warmer weather and the arrival of Spring the bounds of the dress code were being tested. We had an assembly yesterday with our female students to discuss this issue based on input from staff and the rest of the Administration. The intent of yesterday’s message was to maintain a calm and focused environment for the remainder of the school year.

In my efforts to achieve this goal some of my statements went farther than they should have. We issued a clarification to parents and students that there has been no change in the dress code. We continue to prefer students to dress as if this were a business environment and they were coming to work. The guiding principle in all dress codes is that the manner in which students dress does not become a distraction in the learning environment and we get that guidance from California Education Code.

Kenilworth principal Kathy Olmsted clarified with SFGate that only leggings with no covering such as a skirt or shorts are banned. Skinny jeans and yoga pants are still allowed. (One Kenilworth student said to SFGate that that the girls were originally told that all tight pants are banned, but the school changed its policy after the outcry from students and parents and media attention.)

“This isn’t a change in our dress code,” Olmsted said. “Kenilworth school feels that appropriate attire contributes to a positive learning environment.”

“The concern my staff and I have is basically seeing underwear,” Kenilworth principal Emily Dunnagan told Inquisitr.com. “With girls, leggings can be very, very thin, and leggings are fine as long as there is something over the top of them. We want to keep the learning environment distraction-free.”

Olmsted says the school decided to meet with the girls because several teachers had complained that female students were wearing leggings that revealed their undergarments.

Olmsted was surprised by the media attention her school was getting but she said, “I think it’s leading us to have an important discussion over what clothing is appropriate for kids to wear to school.”

Schools across the country have made news headlines for introducing dress codes. Here’s a look at some of those stories.

Public school reformer Michelle Rhee sends child to private school: Should we care?

by:

Rumor has it that education reformer Michelle Rhee sends one of her daughters to an elite private school with small class sizes and no standardized testing. Should we care? After all, Rhee is a staunch advocate for large class sizes and testing in America’s school system?

Former Washington D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee chats with a third grader. (Washington Post / Getty)

America’s best-known and most controversial education reformer, Michelle Rhee, 43, doesn’t want the public to know where her two daughters go to school. Are they attending public or private? Should we even care?

The former Washington D.C. schools chancellor who went on to found an organization that lobbies for education reform was evasive about her daughters’ schooling when recently questioned by the Los Angeles Times.

The LA Times was running a story on Rhee and asked her spokesperson, Does Rhee send her daughters to public or private school?

The response: “She is a public school parent,” Erin Shaw sent in an email.

And so the Times described Rhee’s two daughters as attending public school, which seemed like a truthful statement since a 2012 Reuters profile reported the same information. And this year, Rhee told Nashville’s City Paper, “I am a public school parent,” a statement that Rhee repeatedly uses when addressing crowds to express her understanding of the nation’s school system.

The American Federation of Teachers, a group that strongly disagrees with Rhee’s ideas, quickly took issue with the statement in the Times and revealed that one of Rhee’s daughters attends a private high school.

The Times went back to Rhee’s spokesperson and specifically asked if one of her children is a private school student.

Shaw responded:

It was not our intention to be misleading. It is our policy not to discuss where Michelle’s children attend school out of respect for their privacy. While it is true Michelle is a public school parent, we understand how that statement was misleading, and we apologize to the Los Angeles Times.

The Times pushed for more specifics on which schools the girls attend, and Rhee refused to comment.

The AFT claims that both of Rhee’s daughters attend school in Tennessee, one public the other private. In a blog post published on March 29, education historian Diane Ravitch wrote that one of Rhee’s girls is a student at Harpeth Hall, an elite girls school for grades 5-12. (Rhee herself attended a similar type of school in Toledo, Ohio.)

The girls, Starr, 13, and Olivia, 10, live with Rhee’s ex-husband, Kevin Huffman, commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Education. Rhee splits her time between Tennessee and California where she and her second husband former NBA player and Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson have a home. Rhee runs her political advocacy organization StudentsFirst from Sacramento.

Starr and Olivia were students at Oyster-Adams public elementary school when the family lived in Washington D.C.

Los Angeles Times reporter Michael J. Mishak recounted the exchange between the Times and Rhee’s spokesperson in a story titled “Michelle Rhee: Public school parent?” that ran last week. His piece leaves you wondering, Should I care where Rhee sends her children?

Americans generally care where political figures involved in our nation’s public education system send their kids to school. When Barack Obama first became president, public education advocates hoped he and Michelle would send Sasha and Malia to a public school in Washington, D.C. People felt that if the Obamas sent their daughters to a U.S. public school the President would be showing that he has faith in the system and his first-hand experiences would allow him to make better decisions about education in America. The Obamas did reportedly consider the D.C. school district but in the end they decided on Sidwell Friends, a private Quaker school where Bill and Hillary Clinton sent Chelsea. President Obama said they decided on this school because it could best provide the necessary security.

In the case of Rhee, some find her choice to send one of her children to a private school hypocritical because, as Ravitch explains it in her blog post, Rhee “advocates that other people’s children should have large classes, inexperienced teachers, merit pay, evaluations based on test scores, and nonstop testing” and she’s sending her daughter to a school with “small classes, lovely facilities, a rich curriculum, and experienced teachers.”

Washington Post reporter Valerie Strauss feels similarly. “Harpeth Hall is an independent school that views education in a very different way than Rhee — and her ex-husband, the education commissioner — promote for other children in their highly public jobs,” Strauss writes. “Rhee and Huffman both advocate a corporate-based school-reform agenda that uses standardized test scores as the major accountability measure for students, schools and teachers. Harpeth Hall doesn’t subject its students to standardized tests. Nor, for that matter, does private Sidwell Friends School, which President Obama’s two daughters attend in Washington”

Should we care where Michelle Rhee sends her children?

Maryland school district bans hugs

by:

Update: This week St. Mary’s County School District has drawn attention from national media for a new policy forbidding parents from hugging students who aren’t their own. Online news sites have also reported on a new rule prohibiting parents to pass out homemade food to any students other than their own. Since reporting this story, the district has issued a statement softening their new guidelines. In a letter to parents, Superintendent of Schools Michael Marirano writes that “local, Washington and Baltimore, national, online media and social networks” have sensationalized the new policies and “St. Mary’s County Public Schools is not banning hugging and homemade treats.”

“However,” he adds, “we are raising the awareness of safety issues and the need to provide more guidance and training to our parents and volunteers.”

Parents can no longer hug kids at St. Mary’s County schools unless they’re their own. (Koichi Saito/amanaimagesRF)

In the aftermath of the Newtown tragedy, schools across America are tightening security, putting up fences, installing video surveillance equipment and hiring security guards. The horrific shooting has created an overwhelming uneasiness at schools and some districts, like one in southern Maryland, are looking beyond basic security to make sure they’re doing everything possible to protect their students from harm.

Administrators at St. Mary’s County School District have introduced a long list of new policies meant to create a safer environment for students at its 17 public elementary schools. Many of these rules, such as background checks for non-parent volunteers, are standard and make sense—but one of them, a restriction on hugging, has some people wondering if the district’s staff and community are taking things too far?

Yes, horrible things happen in the world and many people are untrustworthy, but is it so bad that we can no longer allow hugs at school?  Don’t kids need more, not fewer, hugs?

St. Mary’s new policy allows parents to hug their own children but parents and volunteers are forbidden from hugging or touching children who aren’t their own. A parent who is attending lunch recess can’t push a kid who isn’t her own in a swing or help a kid who scraped her knee put on a Band-Aid. If you’re a parent who volunteers at your kids’ elementary school, you know this could be tough, especially when that weepy kindergarten runs up to you and gives you a huge hug because someone just swiped her lunch bag in the cafeteria. But rules are rules, and at St. Mary’s schools you’d have to tell that little girl to step away.

“The fact is that we want to make certain our teachers and our staff are trained in what’s defined as the appropriate touching of a student versus inappropriate touch of a student,” Superintendent Michael Martirano told NBC News.

Based on feedback from parents, principals and school staff, an outline of the new policies was drafted in the fall and finally implemented after news broke about the 20 school children and six adults left dead in the tragic Sandy Hook shooting. The majority of the guidelines are meant to put restrictions around visiting parents and volunteers. Parents are prohibited from bringing younger siblings into school when it’s in session and from approaching teachers for a conference while visiting, according to the SoMdNews.com. District staff wants parents to schedule conferences ahead of time.

Parents who want to attend recess aren’t allowed to play with students other than their own. All school visitors are now required to check in at the front office and have their picture taken by a computer camera. Any volunteer who isn’t a parent must have a background check.

Homemade treats are forbidden because many kids have allergies and parents can now only serve store-bought goodies with clear ingredient lists to students other than their own. Birthday invites can’t be passed out at schools because those students who aren’t invited to a party might feel left out.

“We think it’s the right balance between safety and parental involvement,” Kelly Hall, executive director of elementary schools and Title I, told SoMdNews.com.

Not everyone in St. Mary’s County agrees with the new policies. “I think this is horrible,” board member Cathy Allen told NBC News. “The idea that you can’t go into a school and be hugged by a child, or go in (to) have lunch or be out on the playground and that you can only push the swing for your child and no one else [is unacceptable.]”

Many of these policies are standard in our modern-day world. Most teachers encourage their students to only pass out invitations in class if everyone in the room is invited. And many schools have restrictions around treats brought in from the outside due to the increasing number of kids with allergies.

But, like Allen, I think the rule banning parents and volunteers from interacting with kids at recess is extreme, sad and unnecessary. When kids are in elementary school, especially kindergarten and first grade, it’s common for parents and grandparents to volunteer at lunch and recess because schools are understaffed and desperately need parents to help little hands open milk cartons and peel oranges in the cafeteria, break up squabbles on the play ground, turn jump ropes, apply Band-Aids, and give out hugs. I can’t imagine how a parent would possibly be of assistance on the playground yard without being able to touch a child, give a high-five, help put on a jacket or lift someone up to the jungle gym bars.

Yes, there are horrible people out there who do horrible things but they are the minority and it saddens me that we have to go to the extreme of banning hugs in order to stop these people. As parenting blogger Michele Zip over at Cafe Mom wisely points out, “…a hugging ban isn’t going to prevent someone from doing something sinister … if that’s what this is about. Evil doesn’t follow rules.”

What do you think? Are hugging restrictions at elementary schools ridiculous or necessary?

High school sophomore catches teacher stealing students’ money

by:

A California high school hid in a gym locker to catch her teacher stealing kids’ money. (Getty)

A California high school student decided to play Nancy Drew when money was being repeatedly stolen from backpacks during gym class, according to ABC News.

Justine Betti, a sophomore at Linden High School outside Stockton, conducted her own sting by hiding in a locker to try to spot the thief.

After all of the students shuffled outside, the gym teacher stayed back to pilfer money from backpacks.

Betti was shocked. Her own gym teacher was the culprit. Who would believe her?

Betti played detective again, but this time she took her cell phone into the locker to capture video footage. She set up a second camera in another locker.

The teacher struck again, and Betti got clips of her rummaging through her students’ bags.

Betti showed the video to the school principal who said he’ll look into the matter. The principal also asked Betti to delete the clips but the student had already sent them to her father.

The district superintendent didn’t respond to questions from ABC, but the news organization did determine that the teacher is on administrative leave.

The unnamed teacher has reportedly been teaching for over 30 years and is well-liked. Yet students have applauded Betti for catching the thief.

“They’ve been supportive and said that we did the right thing,” Betti told ABC. “We feel like we did the right thing, but it’s still kind of hard.”

Wonder when the CIA will recruit Betti?

College student wins stalking order against helicopter parents

by:

Unfortunately your browser does not support IFrames.

A 21-year-old college student was fed up with her protective parents who sometimes insisted that she leave Skype on through the night to ensure she was sleeping in her dorm room. Aubrey Ireland went to court to request a civil stalking order against her parents and won, according to ABC News. Now David and Judy Ireland must remain at least 500 feet away from their only child.

Aubrey is studying theater at the College-Conservatory of Music at the University of Cincinnati, and her parents have been paying for the tuition, which costs over $60,000 a year. She says her parents were always overly involved in her life and the unhealthy attachment continued even when she went away to college.

“They basically thought that they were paying for my college tuition and living expenses that they could tell me what to do who to hang out with … basically control all of my daily life,” Aubrey told ABC News.

Aubrey’s parents live 600 miles away in Kansas yet often showed up in Cincinnati unannounced. Her mom insisted on regularly Skypeing and sometimes demanded that her daughter leave the program on all night so she could watch Aubrey sleep. The parents accused their daughter of doing drugs and being promiscuous and when they installed monitoring software on her phone and computer, she complained to the school Dean.

Of course David and Julie have their own side of the story and claim that their daughter is lying and used her acting skills to convince the judge.

“We’re not bothering her,” Julie told ABC News. “We’re not a problem.”

No matter, Ireland’s parents have refused to pay further tuition and they’re demanding a refund from the University of Cincinnati for this year. Aubrey has already obtained a scholarship for her senior year.

When I was in college I talked to my parents about once a month. My mom occasionally sent care packages, my dad letters. They visited on the annual parents weekend. I went home over the holidays, though by my sophomore year I was even spending my summers at school.

Today’s college kids have far more contact with their parents as a result of email, cell phones and texting.

Barbara Hofer, a psychology professor at Vermont’s Middlebury College and co-author of The iConnected Parent: Staying Close to Your Kids in College (and Beyond) While Letting Them Grow Up, told NPR that college students communicate with their parents on average 13.4 times a week. Research in the 2012 book Generation on a Tightrope: A Portrait of Today’s College Student by Arthur Levine and Diane Dean reveals that 40 percent of college students call, email, text or visit their parents at least once a day.

While parents might offer helpful encouragement and advice to their students, they’re also never allowing their kids to stumble, fall, grow, and gain independence. College is a time when children can choose their classes, their friends, their clothes, their boyfriends and girlfriends, and they can learn from their choices, both good and bad.

David and Julie Ireland are obviously an extreme example of overprotective parents but if Aubrey is telling the truth and her parents are really installing monitoring software on their 21-year-old daughter’s phone, then it’s a signal to our society that things have gotten out of hand. Parents need to step back and let their kids make mistakes and find their own successes.

Page 1 of 212