Comments for Political Capitol

Comment on Ex-WWE employees in anti-McMahon mailers just stock photos by BettyFawcett

BettyFawcett — Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:36:22 +0000

Perhaps AFSCME was not able to find any former, disgruntled employees. WWE is a good, solid company that pays its employees well and most of them are probably satisfied. Former employees could have left the company for a variety of reasons, but AFSCME mischaracterizes McMahon as a cold-hearted CEO, who slashed jobs and was only out for her own well-being.

Comment on More on lawyer’s labor complaint against state union leaders by Rafael Diaz

Rafael Diaz — Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:25:35 +0000

I am looking for a lawyer that will fight against my union.

Comment on NBC Anchor Brian Williams on flood of McMahon ads during Sandy by monkeemobile

monkeemobile — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:07:57 +0000

While our ambassadore lay lifeless in our U.S. compound in Libya,our president campagianed in las vegas. Can you find Brian Williams opinon on this issue..

Comment on Ex-WWE employees in anti-McMahon mailers just stock photos by Steve R

Steve R — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:18:03 +0000

To bad you could not have done all this investigative work into Murphy’s business past. Oh wait, he does not have a business past since he is a career politician. Grow up Brian and realize there are many people in CT with vIews other then yours and we need a reporter who will be fair to both sides. If you can’t do it then either get someone who can or get a reporter to give an opposing view. Then will many of us who do not and will not subscribe to the post come back and read it.

You have become the most bias newspaper in the state. What happened to fair and balanced journalism? Long gone. CT POST you should be ashamed at your coverage. You were so much better when you were the Bridgeport Post. At least you represented the cIty which was full of democrats.

Comment on McMahon camp tries to change narrative about Thursday night’s debate by Steve R

Steve R — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:10:21 +0000

One of the reasons I don’t really read the CT post is because of the bias that you so clearly portray. Just reading on my IPad since we have not power I see four articles all critical of Linda McMahon. Where is your neutrality? Where is your reporting? Where are the opposing views? That’s right they do not exist because you have your candidate and you will focus everything you have to get him re elected. Even if he is he most absent sitting congressmen ever to serve CT.

The only thing CT post has become good for is the obituaries. At least they get a fair shake since you do not report on them.

Comment on NBC Anchor Brian Williams on flood of McMahon ads during Sandy by Fredo

Fredo — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:19:53 +0000

I half expected a McMahon blaming Murphy for the hurricane

Comment on NBC Anchor Brian Williams on flood of McMahon ads during Sandy by J. McCann

J. McCann — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:21 +0000

I turn off every radio and/ or TV ad that McMahon pays for. I will not listen to the sleezebag. If any station wants my business, they will not include her in their ads.

Comment on McMahon camp tries to change narrative about Thursday night’s debate by Full

Full — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:41:26 +0000

Brian,

It appears that you and your friends at Hearst Newspapers are going to be endorsing Chris Murphy ? Is that correct ?

If so, you guys need to be a little more objective in your slanded Democratic coverage !

Isn’t there enough liberal media in this country ? Isn’t CT Blue enough ? As for the state election that Malloy won, yes the general public believed that something fishy happened in Mr. Finch’s Bridgeport.

I am hoping we have a storm on Election Day !!

Comment on Why Linda frustrates the Tea Party or “Everybody is flailing trying to figure out who Linda McMahon is.” by Stephanie Paulmeno, MS, RN, NHA

Stephanie Paulmeno, MS, RN, NHA — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:35:26 +0000

I think we are way beyond the point when we should be trying to figure out who our candidates are or what the things are for which they stand for or against! The election is only weeks away. A candidate who is so cunning and unreadable, or who has not been willing to articulate a position or take a stand and stick by it is not, in my estimation, a worthy candidate.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again and again…talk is cheap. Anyone can say anything. We live in an age of technology. Forget what the candidates want you to believe and do your due diligence before voting, and I am a candidate for State Representative for District 150.

Look, instead, at what each of us HAS done and stood for throughout our careers. Google us, check out our resumes, profiles and websites, see the articles we’ve written, not just now during electioneering time but over the years; it will tell you a lot about your candidates. Look at the committees, commissions and projects on which we’ve worked. Does THIS type of community involvement resonate with what YOU are looking for in a candidate?

Running for election should never be about us, the candidates, but what any of us can do for we the people. The candidates who win will need to represent ALL the people, the full 100%.

Comment on McMahon likely to keep after Murphy on mortgage through Election Day by Mike Robinson

Mike Robinson — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:16:26 +0000

Here is a letter to the editor of the CT Post from James C. Smith Chairman and CEO of Webster Bank published Oct 5, 2012.

Standing up for Integrity of Webster Bank

http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Standing-up-for-integrity-of-Webster-Bank-3923162.php