Archive for January 8th, 2013

White House drug czar: We’re having a “serious conversation” about pot

by:

We are, according to the White House drug czar as of Tuesday afternoon, “in the midst of a serious national conversation about marijuana.”

Whoa. That’s huge coming from the White House.

Drug czar Gil Kerlikowske said that Tuesday in response to three online petitions asking the White House about marijuana legalization.

Using the words “serious national conversation” is major progress for the MJ legalization crowd. Yes, recreational marijuana use is now kosher in Colorado and Washington, but even users there are still in limbo until they have federal legitimacy.

As Tom Angell, an advocate with the Marijuana Majority said Tuesday:

“From ‘legalization is not in my vocabulary and it’s not in the president’s,’ as Gil Kerlikowske often used to say, to ‘it is clear that we’re in the midst of a serious national conversation about marijuana’ is a pretty stark shift. Of course, what really matters is to what extent the administration actually shifts enforcement priorities and budgets, but I sure do like hearing the US drug czar acknowledge the fact that marijuana legalization is a mainstream discussion that is happening whether he likes it or not.”

Here’s what Kerlikowske, whose real title is “Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy,” wrote Tuesday in the form of an auto-response to the tens of thousands of folks who signed legalization petitions:

Thank you for participating in We the People and speaking out on the legalization of marijuana. Coming out of the recent election, it is clear that we’re in the midst of a serious national conversation about marijuana.
At President Obama’s request, the Justice Department is reviewing the legalization initiatives passed in Colorado and Washington, given differences between state and federal law. In the meantime, please see a recent interview with Barbara Walters in which President Obama addressed the legalization of marijuana:

Referring to a Barbara Walters interview? Uh, really? OK…here goes:

Barbara Walters:

Do you think that marijuana should be legalized?

President Obama:

Well, I wouldn’t go that far. But what I think is that, at this point, Washington and Colorado, you’ve seen the voters speak on this issue. And as it is, the federal government has a lot to do when it comes to criminal prosecutions. It does not make sense from a prioritization point of view for us to focus on recreational drug users in a state that has already said that under state law that’s legal.

…this is a tough problem because Congress has not yet changed the law. I head up the executive branch; we’re supposed to be carrying out laws. And so what we’re going to need to have is a conversation about how do you reconcile a federal law that still says marijuana is a federal offense and state laws that say that it’s legal.

When you’re talking about drug kingpins, folks involved with violence, people are who are peddling hard drugs to our kids in our neighborhoods that are devastated, there is no doubt that we need to go after those folks hard… it makes sense for us to look at how we can make sure that our kids are discouraged from using drugs and engaging in substance abuse generally. There is more work we can do on the public health side and the treatment side.

LGBT groups raise stakes in Chuck Hagel nomination

by:

Despite the enthusiastic support of California gay activist Rick Jacobs, the Chuck Hagel nomination for Defense Secretary is getting more flack from LGBT groups Tuesday. On Monday, Jacobs called out the Log Cabin Republicans, saying the group’s hypocrisy on Hagel (after supporting Romney) is worthy of The Onion.

A sleeper issue is how Hagel would enforce Section 533(a)(1) of the new National Defense Authorization Act, which requires the military to accommodate the conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs of all members of the military. Written by Rep. Todd “Legitimate Rape” Akin, R-Mo., the clause worries civil libertarians who worry it could be used to discriminate against gays and lesbians. President Obama singled it out in his signing statement, saying his “administration remains fully committed to continuing the successful implementation of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and to protecting the rights of gay and lesbian service members; Section 533 will not alter that.”

At a minimum, the consensus among gay groups seems to be to hold Hagel’s feet to the fire in his Senate confirmation hearings. Hagel cannot afford to lose any Democratic votes given the unease with the nomination on the pro-Israel left.

GetEqual came out against the nomination Tuesday, citing Hagel’s 4 percent rating with the Human Rights Campaign. The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force demanded Monday that Hagel “fully explain his views during the confirmation process and what steps he intends to take as defense secretary to demonstrate his support for LGBT members of the military…”

Richard Socarides, former President Bill Clinton’s liason to the LGBT community, called Hagel’s comments during the James Hormel nomination fight “discouraging and damaging,” saying, “Hagel’s remarks signaled that the extreme anti-gay right wing was increasing the pressure on Republican senators to oppose the nomination because Hormel was gay, and that moderate Republicans were failing in line.”

That brought this riposte from Andrew Sullivan: “I recall no moment in his career in which Socarides apologized for selling out the gay community in every single possible way in order to stay comfortably ensconced in the Clinton White House.” Like Jacobs, Sullivan said if anyone should be held to account for the wave of anti-gay policies during the 1990′s, it’s Bill Clinton, who actually signed the Defense of Marriage Act and imposed Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, among other things, including the ban on persons with HIV entering the U.S.

Andrew Belkin, director of the pro-gay Palm Center think tank, laid out five things Hagel should promise to do for LGBT troops to demonstrate his new-found commitment, including addressing the issue of transgender troops.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein supports the nomination; Sen. Barbara Boxer is neutral.