Martha Dean backs conspiracy theorists

Back to article

Comments

4 Responses

  1. A formidable share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing a little bit evaluation on this. And he in truth bought me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If doable, as you develop into expertise, would you thoughts updating your weblog with extra details? It’s highly useful for me. Large thumb up for this blog submit!

  2. Sean Murphy says:

    Saw the original post in question personally. The commentary on what Martha supposedly did is patently false.

  3. Martha Dean says:

    (2/18/13 4:45 pm – There were a couple of typos in my original post of this message, earlier today, so I am reposting it, below, with the typos corrected and some further editing:
    Dear Dirk, I was stunned to read your short 1/17/13 “news” article, above, for the first time today. The article’s statements are false, misleading, and clearly agenda-driven. This is not what I would expected from you, based on my experience getting to know you as a reporter during the 2010 AG race. I am quite frankly shocked by this level of dishonesty and willingness to manufacture news. I do not — and have never — “backed conspiracy theorists.” Also, I have never believed – nor suggested — in any way, shape, or form — that I believe that President Bush (or anyone else) “masterminded the 911 tragedy.” In order to attribute such false beliefs or statements to me, you intentionally left out part of the quote that you use in the article. (The original post is still on my Facebook page for anyone who cares to discover the truth.) This type of “reporting” makes you the kind of reporter that gives the media a bad name. (BTW, after investigating the claims made by some, the Associated Press decided to NOT run a story; they went to my FB page and found that I had not said what you and a few others claim.) I am sorry if you may have felt that you needed to succumb to pressure placed on you by others at your paper or in the political realm to sink to this level. My advice, for what it’s worth: Your reputation is everything, so guard it zealously; you are capable of much, much better than this. – Martha

  4. Martha Dean says:

    Dear Dirk, I was stunned to read you short “news” article above. Frankly, your false, misleading, and clearly agenda-driven reporting was not what I would ever have expected from you. During the 2010 AG race, I got to know you and I am frankly shocked by this dishonesty. No, I do not — and have never — “backed conspiracy theorists.” Nor have I ever suggested that I believe — in any way, shape, or form — that President Bush (or anyone other than the terrorists and their terrorist organization leaders) “masterminded the 911 tragedy.” In order to attribute such beliefs or statements to me, you left out part of the quote you use in the article. (The original post is still on my Facebook page for anyone who cares to discover the truth.) Frankly, with this type of reporting, you are the kind of reporter who gives the media a bad name. I am sorry that you succumbed to any pressure that may have been placed on you by others to sink to this level. Based on my time getting to know you and your work, you are capable of much better than this. – Martha