Archive for the ‘Debates’ Category

Media bias? Study finds that Romney has received more favorable coverage than Obama since first debate

by:

The tone of media coverage of President Obama and Mitt Romney changed dramatically after the first presidential debate, a new study by Pew Research Center has documented.

Before the Denver debate, which voters overwhelmingly believed that Romney won, 22 percent of all stories about Obama had a positive tone, while the ones about Romney were positive only half as often.

Then things changed.

As Romney gained in the polls in the aftermath of the debate, he got substantially more favorable media coverage: 20 percent positive, 50 percent mixed and 30 percent negative. Obama’s coverage suddenly became more negative. Nearly three times as many Obama-related stories had a negative tone than a positive one: 13 percent positive, 51 percent mixed and 36 percent negative.

Overall, however, Obama still has received slightly more favorable coverage this year. The reason, Pew discovered, is that much of the TV coverage of the campaign involved polling and the daily “horse race.” Since Obama led for much of the year, much of the positive coverage reflected his advantage in the polls.

Excluding such horse-race stories, the tone of media coverage was very similar for both candidates, Pew found.

When looking at the different media types, more distinctions become clear. The so-called mainstream media maintained a pretty balanced tone in their coverage, Pew reported. But the tone tended to get more negative with blogs and social media. Facebook and Twitter posts and conversations were particularly negative — with Romney at a big disadvantage there.

Network news viewers received a different narrative about the candidates depending on when they watched. The morning shows on CBS, ABC and NBC set up a tone that favored Romney more. On the evening news shows, though, Obama was better off.

Cable coverage on Fox News was far more negative toward the president than its positive stories. Still, Pew found that MSNBC was even more one-sided: against Romney.

5 hits and 5 misses on the campaign trail, Oct. 22-26

Hits:

1. The debates, as a whole.  The numbers consistently showed a victory for the president in Monday’s final debate. And it may well have given Obama a point or two swing in the ultra-tight race, which could actually be significant. But did Romney do enough to avoid losing all of the gains he made when Obama slept through the first debate? Without a doubt. Advantage: Romney.

2. The politics of racial polarization, Part 1.  Mitt Romney, accordiing to the latest Washington Post/ABC poll, has a 23-point lead among white voters. Contrast that with last time around, when polls around this time gave McCain a 7-point advantage. McCain ended up winning the white vote by 12 points over Obama, validating theories that many white voters don’t admit heir antipathy to Obama on racial grounds, to pollsters or anyone else, but vote that way. So what’s the real spread this time? 25 to 30 points? Meanwhile, Obama has a lead among black voters generaly acknowledged to be greater than 90-10, and a lead among Latino voters that recent polls place at around 75-25.  Ultimately, this hyperpolarized scenario is a loser for the Republicans. But not, perhaps, in two weeks. The huge advantage among white voters is enormous for Romney, and gives him a path to victory, particularly if he can maintain it in swing states, which is far from clear. Advantage: Romney.

3: The money. Capping what has been an excellent October for Romney after the Obama DDD (Denver Debate Debacle), the challenger outraised Obama by some $21 million in the first two weeks of the month. While the Obama campaign is unlikely to run out of money — both sides are now officially rolling in it, having raised close to a billion dollars apiece — the fundraising edge was a symbol of the increased enthusiasm that the Republican challenger is enjoying. Advantage: Romney.

4. The electoral map: It is what it is. Despite the aforementioned enthusiasm, the numbers still don’t look that good for Team Romney. Closely watched poll-analyzer Nate Silver, who authors the New York Times’ excellent 538 blog, actually sees Obama’s chances of winning higher than ever, at 73 percent as the week came to a close.  The fact is that Obama clings to a lead by almost all accounts in Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan, and that is almost an insurmountable firewall for the challenger. Also, whether from the final debate or for other reasons, Romney’s “mittmentum” seemed to have slowed or even reversed nationwide by midweek according to the tracking polls. Advantage: Obama.

5. The Economy. The GDP grew at 2 percent in the third quarter, we found out Friday. It was a report with something for everyone. Obama supporters pointed to the indication that the recovery is stable and durable. Romney supporters said the report was fresh evidence that things just aren’t improving fast enough. But it’s hard to put a negative spin on basically positive news. Advantage: Obama.

Misses:

1. Missionary stew in Dubuque. H.L. Mencken, the Sage of Baltimore, once remarked on the subject of political pandering: “If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner.” Rience Priebus just promised Iowans another tasty pastoral banquet in 2016. The head of the Republican National Committee said Thursday he would do all he could to preserve Iowa’s first-in-the-nation primary status in 2016. Of course both parties in this squeaker are eying Iowa’s paltry six electoral votes with undisguised lust. But why should Iowa play an enormous role in determining the presidency? The fiction that Iowa is representative of the country at large is just that, fiction. And not only do they not deserve to be the deciders, they do a terrible job of it, with an arcane caucus system that, in 2012, gave Mitt Romney a crucial and, as it turns out, incorrect victory and claim of “momentum.” While disadvantaging everyone else, Advantage: Iowa.

2. The politics of racial polarization, Part 2. On Thursday, Republican Colin Powell  endorsed President Obama,  citing his leadership on health care, on the economy, and in foreign affairs. Romney campaign co-chairman John Sununu said he thought there was another reason Powell made the endorsement — the President’s race. Friday morning, he retreated from that observation, but the bell was not unrung. It was another through-the-looking-glass moment in a campaign that’s been full of them — is there no depth we will not reach? (I found real irony in that one of the most surreal things I saw at the Republican Convention in Tampa was Sununu as one of the party’s two principal speakers at a Spanish-language press conference for Hispanic media. Is that really as close as Republicans could come to someone who could speak to Latino issues in Spanish?) The question of how Sununu’s race-baiting on Powell will play is an interesting one. While Sununu’s comments will surely please the ultraright ”base,” they will equally irritate the Democratic base. The cynical calculation is that it was backlash-proof because black voters are already massively motivated. But it had to hurt with white voters who admire Powell and actually listened to what he said in his endorsement. Advantage: Obama.

3. Rape and God, redux. Indiana Tea-Party senatorial candidate Richard Mourdock added to the week’s surreal landscape — not to mention joining the GOP’s honor roll of man-splainin’ white guys who know all about how women’s bodies work, and how rape fits into God’s wonderful and mysterious plans for us. Romney refused to answer questions about Mourdock, also refusing to pull the ad in which he personally endorsed Mourdock, which started running a day before Mourdock’s controversial statement that even when a pregnancy is the result of a rape, it’s God’s will. While Mourdock says he has no doubt he has gained support since the statement, it can’t play well nationally and comes at a particularly terrible juncture, as the GOP seemed to be making strides to narrow or eliminate Obama’s advantage among women. And the same establishment Republicans Mourdock scorned when he beat Richard Lugar in the primary were forced to come to his defense. You feel for John Cornyn, who’s running the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. He can’t keep throwing Senate candidates over the side, so he had to hold his nose and be supportive. Advantage: Obama.

 4. The Donald. Speaking of the surreal, here was Donald Trump again, doing goofy things. This time it was his $5 million offer Wednesday for Obama’s college transcripts and passport. Huh? Obama had the last and best word: “This all dates back to when we were growing up together in Kenya,” he told Letterman.  Advantage: Obama.

5. Just don’t talk about it, maybe no one will notice. Quick, what’s the major issue neither candidate will come close to addressing? Okay, besides gun control? Right — climate change. The title of Al Gore’s polemic on the subject, “An Inconvenient Truth,” comes to mind. Whether they think it’s a bunch of junk-science hooey or it’s one of the most urgent policy issues we face — and there aren’t many more options than those two — don’t the candidates owe the American people something better than the ostrich act we’ve seen on the subject so far? Yes. Will they get it? No. Advantage: Nobody.

Israel mentions at debate: 31. Climate change: 0 (VIDEO)

by:

For keeping track of issues NOT discussed during the recently-concluded presidential debates, there was NO mention of climate change during the three presidential and one Veep debates. That’s the first time that the climate was shut out since 1988.

“President Obama and Governor Romney’s failed leadership on climate this election season is beyond words,” said Maura Cowley, Executive Director of Energy Action Coalition.

“While President Obama & Mitt Romney joked about horses and bayonets, they stepped back into the dark ages themselves by completely ignoring climate change, one of the most pressing foreign policy issues of the 21st century.”

The raw political reason doesn’t make sense. Yes, people care about climate change but we know it isn’t their top priority.

Meanwhile, “Israel” was mentioned 31 times Monday night.

Let’s harken back to the first time when the issue — climate change, not Israel — was mentioned on a national debate stage. The year was 1988…..(cue flashback music)….

“The greenhouse effect is an important environmental issue.”

Who said that? Republican Dan Quayle. He even said that “in a George Bush administration, you can bet that we will” get working on solutions.

But now? Green bupkis. Here’s the video from 1988:

“Horses and bayonets” top Twitter moment in debate (CHART)

by:

Here is how Monday’s debate tracked on Twitter. The peak moment was President Obama’s zinger about “bayonets.” At 6.5 million Tweets, it was the least-tweeted about debate….which means there are a LOT of Giants fans in the Twitterverse.

For some fact-checking on the Lies, Half-truths and Contradictions told Monday, see our breakdown here.

Social media battle: Obama engages more voters despite aggressive Romney debate strategy

by:

The pundits have declared Barack Obama to be the winner of last night’s third and final presidential debate of the 2012 general election.

The big loser?

It’s not Mitt Romney.

The loser in the bid for buzz was social media itself. Twitter and Facebook, the prime sources of instant commentary on the presidential campaign, rung up lower numbers than the record-breaking response to the first debate.

Call it debate fatigue or social media overkill.

Besides the spike in activity over Obama’s “fewer horses and bayonets” comment, Twitter came 4 million tweets short last night of breaking the record set by the first presidential debate.

Despite the social media slump, both campaigns were able to enlist new followers on various social media platforms.

And who was the winner?

Even though Republicans clearly approached social media with a specific strategy in mind, Obama’s team was once again able to engage more users throughout the night.

How it all played out:

Breakdown of mentions was provided by U.S. Politics on Facebook (www.facebook.com/uspolitics) and @gov on Twitter (www.twitter.com/@gov). (Jana Kasperkevic/Hearst Newspapers)

This might have been a foreign policy debate, but the conversation often strayed to other topics as well, including economy (20 percent), taxes (7 percent), and energy and environment (4 percent).

Engagement:

Just as in the last debate, Obama’s campaign out-tweeted Romney’s. @BarackObama Twitter account was actively tweeting and re-tweeting during the debate, even re-tweeting non campaign accounts such as @ThinkProgress and @EdHenryTV.

While @RomneyResponse did tweet quite frequently during the debate, @TruthTeam2012 not only tweeted more but also engaged more users by also re-tweeting non campaign affiliated accounts such as @TheFix and @JeffreyGoldberg.

Both campaigns also utilized Twitter to solicit donations by sending out the following tweets:

(Jana Kasperkevic/Houston Chronicle)

Prior to the debate, both campaigns posted engaging messages accompanied by colorful graphics on their Facebook pages. Romney’s graphic received more “likes,” 183,979 to Obama’s 139,931, but it only got half of the shares and comments that Obama’s graphic did. Considering, that Romney only has one third of the followers on Facebook that Obama has, one could say that they were equally successful in engaging Facebook users.

Both campaigns attempted to engage their followers and supporters prior to the debate. (Jana Kasperkevic/Houston Chronicle)

However, Obama’s campaign also shared the following graphic on Twitter and on Facebook. The campaign engaged the Facebook users by specifically asking them to “Share” the post and within 34 minutes, the graphic was shared 19,743 times. The tweet containing the graphic did not include any instructions for engagement and consequently, over the span of nine hours, the graphic was only re-tweeted 7,458 times.

Obama’s campaign asked their followers and supporters to share the image above if they thought that President Obama had won the third and last presidential debate. (Jana Kasperkevic/Houston Chronicle)

The Last Presidential Debate in Trends: P

Republicans went into this debate prepared to dominate the social media. While Romney for President Inc. splurged for a promoted trend of #CantAfford4more, organizations such End Spending Action Fund and American CrossRoads paid for promoted pro-Romney/Ryan tweets, which appear on various searches for both Obama and Romney.

YouTube, which was streaming the debate, also paid to promote tweets on such searches.

Stop the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) organization had its own plans for last night’s debate – to Twitter bomb it with hash tag StopNDAA. #StopNDAA did in fact trend in Texas early on and later even became a nationwide as well as worldwide Twitter trend.

The Twitterverse might have been suffering from debate fatigue during this third and final presidential debate, considering that the amount of tweets sent out during the debate only reached 6.5 million, down from 7.2 million during the second debate and 10.3 million during the first debate.

However, as always there were number of peak moments during the debate, with Obama’s “fewer horses and bayonets” and Shieffer’s “I think we all love teachers” comments.

(@gov/Twitter)

Romney’s campaign might have paid to have a promoted trend, but Obama’s zingers such as his response that Romney is attempting to “airbrush history” and his “fewer horses and bayonets” comment quickly became worldwide trends. Even his response “Nothing Governor Romney says is true” became a “Nothing Gov” trending topic in the U.S. and “Nothing Governor Romney” worldwide.

Was Romney having an Albert Brooks/Richard Nixon sweating moment (VIDEO)

by:

Maybe it was tiny, non-HD screen we watched Monday’s debate on, but we didn’t quite get soaked by the tsunami of sweat that some on social media are buzzing that Mitt Romney was spewing.

Or, as Albert Brooks — icon of the greatest TV flop-sweat moment in movie history in “Broadcast News — tweeted: “If Romney sweats anymore I get a royalty.”

Hi-yoooooooo! Here is Albert’s famous scene:


Broadcast News _ Sweating The News by hulu

Of course the quintessential Presidential Debate Flop-Sweater was Richard Nixon during his 1960 debate with John Kennedy. On CNN, former Obama White House appointee Van Jones dropped the Romney-as-sweaty-Nixon reference.

Here, in living black-and-white TV, is vintage Dick:

Buzzwords: Romney talks in generalities, Obama goes into detail

by:

Beyond the battleships and war horses, what did Barack Obama and Mitt Romney talk about in their foreign policy debate?

A “word cloud” analysis of Monday night’s debate in Boca Raton reveals that the two candidates took a very different approach to persuading voters to back them on Nov. 6.

Romney talked most about the world in general — using words such as “world.” Obama specifically mentioned Israel, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Egypt and China more than the Republican candidate.

Romney also talked about the military more times than Obama, while the president spoke more about leadership.

Romney repeated words than Obama which indicates that he had an arsenal of key phrases and soundbites prepared for debate delivery. But the variety in Obama’s language indicated a greater attention to detail.

A final note: Neither candidate used the word “future” very often. This debate was much more about the present and the past — like those 1917 battleships.

Romney’s word cloud from the last debate (Alex Yap/Houston Chronicle)

Obama’s word cloud from the last debate (Summer Ballentine/Houston Chronicle)

Analysis: Obama barely breaks a sweat in final debate

by:

Barack Obama barely had to break a sweat in the final debate of the 2012 campaign.

While the social media world was abuzz with tweets about Mitt Romney’s alleged perspiration problem, a cool, calculating Obama portrayed his Republican presidential challenger as an inconstant opportunist in a constantly dangerous world. The Democratic incumbent painted the former Massachusetts governor as an ill-informed novice, zeroing in on Romney’s charge that Obama would leave the Navy with fewer ships than it had in 1917.

“Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed,” the president lectured Romney in the debate’s signature moment. “We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater: nuclear submarines. And so the question is not a game of Battleship, where we’re counting ships. It’s what are our capabilities.”

The exchange prompted 105,767 tweets in a minute, the most of any moment in the debate. and encapsulated a 90-minute encounter that Obama controlled, in substance and in style.

“President Obama showed great command of his foreign policy facts and vision,” said Aaron Kall, director of debate at the University of Michigan. “Gov. Romney was the one trying to avoid a catastrophic blunder. Ironically, he came closest by profusely sweating on stage and getting a few names and countries briefly confused.”

On issues from sanctions on Iran to the overthrow of the Mubarak regime in Egypt, Romney found himself agreeing with the president’s actions. The GOP nominee shied away from criticizing the administration’s response to the assassination of U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, leaving the attacks to congressional Republicans and conservative pundits.

“I frankly don’t think Romney had much to say in terms of points of departure from the president,” said Paul Brace, a political science professor at Rice University. “I don’t think Romney was dreadful. I just think in many exchanges he basically restated what the president said.”

A post-debate poll of undecided voters by CBS News found that 53 percent thought Obama had won, while 23 percent said Romney. A CNN poll of all debate-watchers found a narrower advantage for Obama, 48 percent to 40 percent.

“Mitt Romney’s job was to look like a plausible commander-in-chief, and he succeeded,” said David Lanoue, a political science professor at Columbus State University in Georgia. “On balance, this debate will probably not be a game-changer.”

Democrats begged to differ.

“I think POTUS just sank Romney’s battleship,” Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts tweeted immediately following the debate, using the acronym for the President of the United States.

“This debate was a rout,” crowed Democratic consultant James Carville, who previously had declared the first debate to be a rout in favor of Romney.

Republican analysts said they thought their nominee had been effective enough to close the deal with voters unhappy with Obama’s stewardship of the nation.

“Presidents always have an advantage when debating foreign policy,” GOP consultant Matt Mackowiak said moments after the debate ended. “Romney did well enough tonight to maintain his momentum and win the race.”

Page 1 of 712345...Last »