Archive for the ‘George W. Bush’ Category

11 ill-starred presidential picks, from Abe Fortas to Susan Rice

by:

Susan Rice at the United Nations. (AP photo)

Most presidential nominations to key government posts sail through the Senate with little debate and (occasionally these days) little delay.

Not so with Susan Rice, President Obama’s first choice to serve as Secretary of State in the president’s second term. Republicans had put Obama on notice that they would do everything they can — that means threatened filibuster — to block the United Nations ambassador from becoming the nation’s top diplomat. The proximate cause of their anger: Rice’s comments on Sunday TV shows about the Sept. 11 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Democratic loyalists have been outraged at what they consider the unfair attacks on an African American woman with impressive academic credentials.

That debate will continue, but Rice won’t be Secretary of State. She withdrew her name from consideration this afternoon.

Rice joins a list of ill-starred presidential picks over the past half century. Some, like Rice, were never nominated. Some withdrew before Senate consideration. Others were rejected by the Senate.

Rice joins this list of ten presidential choices who didn’t end up with the job:

Abe Fortas

President Lyndon B. Johnson’s choice to replace Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren was blocked by Republicans led by South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond. Before the battle was over, Fortas had resigned his own court seat and the GOP ran out the clock on the Johnson administration, leaving new President Richard Nixon with a chance to shift the court to the right.

G. Harrold Carswell and Clement Haynsworth.

Nixon’s choice for Chief Justice, Warren Burger, won easy confirmation in 1969. But the Senate rejected two Nixon choices for the second high court vacancy: Clement Haynsworth of South Carolina and G. Harrold Carswell of Florida. Haynsworth was tarnished by accusations of being an unreconstructed segregationist and Carswell was accused of being both extreme and underqualified. Nebraska Republican Roman Hruska may have hammered the nail in Carswell’s political coffin when he defended him this way:

“Even if he were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they, and a little chance? We can’t have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.”

After the rejection of Haynsworth and Carswell, Nixon picked Minnesota judge Harry Blackmun, who was confirmed.

Mildred Lillie

The California appeals court judge might have become the first woman to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Nixon in 1971 announced his intention to choose her to fill one of the vacancies created by the retirements of John Marshall Harlan and Hugo Black. But the American Bar Association deemed her “unqualified.” Nixon relented and nominated William Rehnquist (whom he once referred to as “Renchberg”) and Lewis Powell instead. Lillie, a Democrat, served as an appellate judge for 44 years until her death at age 87 in 2002.

Robert Bork

The federal appeals court judge became a verb (to be “borked”) when President Reagan chose him for the Supreme Court in 1987. Liberal Democrat Ted Kennedy led the opposition, roaring these incendiary words:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is—and is often the only—protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Bork was rejected by the Senate, 58-42.

Douglas Ginsburg

Reagan’s first choice to follow Bork was federal appellate Judge Anthony Kennedy of California, but Republican Sen. Jesse Helms threatened a filibuster to prevent the “liberal” Republican from reaching the Supreme Court. Not eager for a fight with the prominent conservative lawmaker, Reagan opted instead for former Harvard law professor and then-judge Douglas Ginsburg, saying Ginsburg’s confirmation was ”vitally important to the fight against crime.” Nine days later, Ginsburg asked Reagan to withdraw after admitting that he had violated the law by smoking pot. ”I have today asked President Reagan not to forward my nomination to the Supreme Court,” a shell-shocked Ginsburg told reporters. Reagan then chose Kennedy for the high court.

Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood

Bill Clinton’s first choice for Attorney General was withdrawn after Baird acknowledged she had failed to pay federal withholding taxes for a nanny who was in the U.S. illegally. The new president’s next pick, New York federal judge Kimba Wood, paid the required taxes on her nanny and broke no law — but the controversy over her employment of an illegal immigrant led to her withdrawal. “Nannygate” changed the vetting process for a generation of presidential nominees. Clinton eventually chose Janet Reno, a Florida prosecutor who never married and had no children.

John Bolton

The fight over the feisty neo-conservative’s nomination to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations was messy and prolonged. Bush picked Bolton, one of the architects of the Iraq War, in the spring of 2005, but Senate Democrats blocked his confirmation. Bush refused to back down and gave Bolton the job temporarily as a “recess” appointee. Bolton’s confirmation hopes were dashed by the 2006 midterm election setbacks suffered by Republicans. He eventually withdrew as a nominee.

Harriet Miers

George W. Bush’s White House counsel, his former personal lawyer and a close friend, was the victim of friendly fire. While Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid hailed her nomination, conservative Republicans said she was unqualified for the high court. Under heavy pressure from his party’s right, Bush withdrew the Texas lawyer’s’ nomination. Her replacement was Samuel Alito, who has become a reliable conservative vote on the high court.

Excited George W. Bush wants grandkids to call him “sir” or “jefe”

by:

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

George W. Bush’s wish for a grandchild is finally coming true.

After a delay of a year or ten.

His daughter Jenna Bush Hager announced yesterday while appearing on The Today Show that she and her husband, Henry,  are going to have a baby in spring of 2013.

“I am fired up! Looking forward to it,” the 43rd president said about becoming a grandfather. “I am excited for Jenna and Henry, I could barely contain the news when I found out.”

As her father joined the show’s team via phone from Texas, Bush Hager greeted him, saying, “Hi Popsicle!”

The former president didn’t take well to the suggestion that his future grandchildren continue calling him that and suggested instead that he be called “sir” or “jefe.”

Dianne Feinstein torture report may conflict with Bin Laden movie

by:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein

Senate Intelligence Committee chair Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., will hold a a committee vote Thursday on a comprehensive report on U.S. torture (“enhanced interrogation techniques”) since 9/11, but anti-torture advocates said its findings could be swamped by a hot new movie that glorifies torture.

Zero Dark Thirty, set for release Dec. 19 in New York and Los Angeles and nationally Jan. 11, is getting rave reviews, as well as criticism for suggesting that torture is okay and works. The Intelligence Committee report is expected to rebut that view but the public will not get to see its findings.

Sen. Feinstein said last year that none of the information that led to the killing of arch terrorist Osama bin Laden came from torture or harsh detention policies practiced under the George W. Bush administration. She and Senate Armed Services chair Carl Levin, D-Mich. released a statement last April rebutting recent claims by a former CIA official that torture was effective in locating Bin Laden. They said the claims were “inconsistent with CIA records.”

The committee report was three years in the making, runs nearly 6,000 pages and reviews six million pages of documents from the Defense Department and the Central Intelligence Agency — virtually everything the agencies had on the subject. Committee Republicans boycotted the investigation, and a party-line vote is expected in closed-door session.

Feinstein said the report “is comprehensive, it is strictly factual, and it is the most definitive review of this CIA program to be conducted. Any decision on declassification and release of any portion of the report will be decided by committee members at a later time.”

In a conference call sponsored by Human Rights First, retired Brigadeer General David Irvine said he and two other retired generals, Ed Soyster, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Bill Nash, commander of troops in Bosnia met with Feinstein last summer to encourage her to release the report with as few redactions as possible.

“I don’t think I have seen her looking quite so burdened as she appeared last June when we had that meeting,” Irvine said. “She was very supportive of the request we made, I believe. I think she appreciated it’s important for people to understand what happened….The rest of world knows what we did; it’s the American people who are who are in the dark.”

Irvine belongs to a group of about 60 retired generals and admirals who have publicly condemned what he listed as “waterboardings, stress positions, forced nudity, sexual humiliation, beatings, drenching with cold water in cold temperatures, sleep deprivation for days at a time, sensory deprivation.” Irvine, who taught interrogation in the Army and served four terms as a Republican in the Utah House of Representatives, said the Senate report “won’t be made into a Hollywood movie, but the next generation “needs to understand at the very highest level that democracy and torture cannot exist in the same body politic.”

“We are confident the findings will show that all of the waterboarding and all of the brutality and everything else that trashed the Geneva Conventions produced nothing but a national tragedy” and no valuable intelligence.

Others, including former President Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney, have claimed that torture did provide good information. The CIA inspector general also released a 2009 report critical of the techniques.

Melina Milazzo, a fellow at Human Rights First, said the Senate report is important because it will be “the official government narrative of what happened.” Curt Goering, executive director of the Center for Victims of Torture, a St. Paul, MN-based torture survivor rehabilitation center, said he is “very afraid that the power of the movie and the broad swathes of society that will see it will come away with..an absolutely false impression” that torture works.

Poll: Public demands deal — but opposes almost every deficit-reduction option

by:

Deal-breakers

Wonder why we can’t get a deficit-reduction deal?

Well, look in the mirror.

A new McClatchy-Marist Poll highlights the dilemma of the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Seventy-one percent of Americans, the poll finds, say it’s important that Congress and the White House reach a deal to avoid automatic spending cuts and tax hikes triggered at the end of the year in the absence of an agreement.

But other than letting the George W. Bush-era tax cuts expire for American families earning more than $250,000, Americans oppose every other option to make major budget savings that was included in the poll.

There is a partisan divide. Republicans oppose every major option on the table, while Democrats and Independents strongly favor an expiration of Bush tax cuts for highest-income Americans (but nothing else).

“Most voters are worried about the fiscal cliff and think reaching a deal by month’s end matters,” says Dr. Lee M. Miringoff, Director of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion. “But, like Washington, voters are polarized along party lines on the question of whether to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire and for whom.”

Here’s our visualization of the data. What do you think?

Graphic by Rick Dunham / Hearst Newspapers

Michael ‘Heckuva Job’ Brown asks why Obama responded ‘so quickly’ to Sandy

by:

FEMA’s Michael Brown (left) and President George W. Bush, seen in 2003, were widely criticized for their response after Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast in 2005. (Getty Images)

Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s campaign has a new, unsolicited surrogate in Ohio.

Even as President Barack Obama’s and Romney’s campaigns have halted their campaigning in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy, the former director of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Michael Brown has stepped forward to criticize President Obama’s handling of the current natural disaster.

Brown is remembered for his time as the head of FEMA, when he was in charge of handling the agency response to Hurricane Katrina. At that time, President George W. Bush told Brown, “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job.”

In an interview with Denver Westword, Brown speculated that President Barack Obama might have acted too quickly:

“One thing he’s gonna be asked is, why did he jump on this so quickly and go back to D.C. so quickly when in…Benghazi, he went to Las Vegas? Why was this so quick?… At some point, somebody’s going to ask that question…. This is like the inverse of Benghazi.”

Specifically, Brown did not think it was necessary for President Obama to hold a press conference on Sunday afternoon if the storm was not expected to hit until late afternoon on Monday and at that time, local officials such as New York Michael Bloomberg seemed to have the situation under control. However, he understands that the president might have erred on the side of caution:

“My guess is, he wants to get ahead of it — he doesn’t want anybody to accuse him of not being on top of it or not paying attention or playing politics in the middle of it. He probably figured Sunday was a good day to do a press conference.”

Brown also offered President Obama some advice:

“My advice to him is that he needs to call the cabinet and tell the cabinet members that if [current FEMA director] Craig Fugate calls and asks for something, the expectation is he is going to get whatever he needs.”

The president has done just that. When he made an unannounced visit to the headquarters of the Red Cross in Washington, DC, President Obama said that he has ordered federal officials that the areas impacted by Superstorm Sandy should get all the help they need. According to him, he told them:

“Do not figure out why we can’t do something. I want you to figure out how we do something. I want you to cut through red tape, I want you to cut through bureaucracy, there is no excuse for inaction at this point. I want every agency to lean forward.”

To read the rest of Brown’s interview with Denver Westword, click here.

Debate report card: Grading Obama, Romney on foreign policy

by:

Before Monday’s final presidential debate, we outlined five things that President Barack Obama and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney needed to accomplish at the Lynn University event. Here’s a report card grading their efforts:

OBAMA

1. Accentuate the positive

Obama controlled the agenda of the debate from start to finish. He talked about moving “heaven and earth” to kill Osama bin Laden, standing arm in arm with Israel, backing tough sanctions on Iran, acting against unfair trade practices by China and ending the war in Iraq. Romney didn’t dent the Obama tank as it rolled forward.

Grade: A

2. Portray Romney as a foreign-policy flip-flopper

Obama repeated talked about how Romney had changed positions on foreign policy issues, from Libya (where he supported U.S. military intervention but then cautioned against “mission creep” before the death of the dictator) to Iraq. When Romney protested, Obama shot back, “You keep trying to airbrush history.”

Grade: A

3. Have a plausible explanation for administration’s changing explanations of Benghazi consulate attack

He never had to defend his administration’s inconstant statements on the assassination of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Hill because Romney never pressed him on it. But he noted that the Libyan people are grateful to the U.S. for its assistance in creating a democracy in the longtime dictatorship.

Grade: B

4. Win the argument on Iran

Romney agreed that the sanctions backed by Obama were working. The president can’t do much better than that — even if the Republican nominee says the incumbent is a bit too anxious to talk to the Iranian regime.

Grade: A

5. Avoid a catastrophic blunder

No big mistake. And a funny line about battleships.

Grade: B

ROMNEY

1. Look like a plausible commander-in-chief

Romney didn’t look scary. He spent so much time seeming moderate (and unscary) that he didn’t land too many rhetorical punches.

Grade: B

2. Come up with an effective attack on the administration’s Libya mistakes — finally

Romney has not been able to capitalize politically on the terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya from the day of the attack. He hardly tried during the Boca Raton debate. He’s leaving the attacks to congressional Republicans and conservative pundits.

Grade: D

3. Open up a gap between the president and Israel

The Republican nominee repeat several times that he would “have Israel’s back” while the president failed to visit Israel during his “apology tour” of Muslim natons. But Obama pre-emptively embraced Israel, noting that he had implemented “the strongest military and intelligence cooperation with Israel in our history.” Romney did not say what action he would take that Obama has not.

Grade: C

4. Explain how China and Russia are threats to America

Romney successfully answered the Russia question, noting that the former superpower is a political adversary but not a military threat. And he zinged Obama for noting that the relationship could be “re-set” if he wins another term. But on China, there was little difference between the two candidates. And Obama sounded even tougher than Romney.

Grade: C

5. Bring everything back to the economy

Several times, Romney pivoted from a foreign policy question to a riff on the economy. Often, the question and the answer were unconnected, but Romney did repeatedly play to his strength — as an economic steward.

Grade: B

Obama drops the Dick Cheney-George Bush bomb on Romney

by:

Mitt Romney keeps trying to swerve off the foreign policy debate road and wrench this debate back onto the issue that he thinks will win him the election: The economy. The national debt, Romney said, “is our greatest national security threat” Mitt said.

Romney said, to lead internationally, you have to be strong economically at home. “Unfortunately, is nowhere in the world is America’s influence better than it was four years ago.”

Then Romney dropped the stone-cold, often-proven-wrong lie that Obama said that he promised unemployment would be at 5.4 percent. No. Obama never said that.

Obama countered that “our alliances have never been stronger in Asia, Europe, Africa” and even, yes, Israel, which has been a valuable intelligence partner.

Uh, Israel might be a stretch.

Then Obama dropped what everyone knew was coming: Tying Romney to the Bush-Cheney years, noting that Mitt has praised both of them.

And yes, Romney did say during a September campaign stop that Cheney was “a man of wisdom and judgment, and he could have been president of the United States.”

Twice, moderator Bob Schieffer said that we’ve got to get this conversation back onto foreign policy. Good luck with that.

And the winner is … Live analysis of the foreign policy debate

by:

With the two presidential candidates locked in a statistical tie two weeks before Election Day, their final debate could prove pivotal. As the foreign policy debate at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla., unfolds, Hearst Newspapers national political reporter Rick Dunham will offer analysis of the debate in real time.

You can also follow his latest tweets via @rickdunham.

★ ★ ★

Here is our list of five things each candidate needs to accomplish at the Boca Raton debate.

OBAMA

1. Accentuate the positive

2. Portray Romney as a foreign-policy flip-flopper

3. Have a plausible explanation for administration’s changing explanations of Benghazi consulate attack

4. Win the argument on Iran

5. Avoid a catastrophic blunder

The official banner of the presidential debates. (AP photo)

ROMNEY

1. Look like a plausible commander-in-chief

2. Come up with an effective attack on the administration’s Libya mistakes — finally

3. Open up a gap between the president and Israel

4. Explain how China and Russia are threats to America

5. Bring everything back to the economy

★ ★ ★

Here are some debate-day headlines:

>>> Republicans ramp up their social media presence before third presidential debate

>>> Polls show public support for Obama on Afghanistan and Israel, but concern about China, Iran, Arab Spring

>>> Electoral College Update: Obama’s Midwestern firewall keeps him in contention

>>> Pre-debate poll: Obama and Romney tied

★ ★ ★

The few minutes before the debate are the most awkward. Ann Romney is trying to smile but looks stressed. Moderator Bob Schieffer warned the audience to be “quiet as mice.”

That’ll last until someone gets a text message that the Giants just scored again.

Debate commission co-chair Mike McCurry warned people NOT to cheer for a baseball team scoring in Game 7 of the National League playoffs.

Yeah, right.

★ ★ ★

Mitt Romney telegraphs his strategy in response to the opening question. He will embrace popular elements of Obama’s record (killing Osama bin Laden) and will focus on unpopular elements (Libya consulate).

Obama’s response: “Gov. Romney, I’m glad you agree that we’ve been successful in going against al-Qaeda.”

★ ★ ★

On second question, Romney makes clear that he’s ready to jettison George W. Bush. He indirectly attacks Bush 43 neo-con policies: “We don’t want another Iraq. We don’t want another Afghanistan.”

Obama’s not cutting him any slack. “Gov. Romney, I’m glad you recognize that al-Qaeda is a threat.”

★ ★ ★

Obama first to embrace Israel, “a true friend and our greatest ally in the region.”

★ ★ ★

A few good zingers for both candidates.

Obama says Romney has a foreign policy stuck in the ’80s, social policy stuck in the ’50s and economic policy stuck in the Roaring Twenties. (Honk if you’re for Herbert Hoover.)

On foreign policy, Obama says, “Every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong.”

Bam!

Responds Romney: “Attacking me is not an agenda.”

Wham!

★ ★ ★

Body language alert: Obama is now staring at Romney when he’s on camera, unlike the passive gaze of the first debate. And Romney was scribbling notes (a la Obama, first debate) when the president launched into attacks on his foreign policy. He said he would respond specifically to the president’s charges, but he never got a chance because Obama interrupted him about two sentences in.

More body language: The Twitterverse is hot into mention of Romney sweating, a la Nixon. The pursed lips and scrunched-up eyes play into this imagery.

★ ★ ★

Why is Obama constantly on the offense on Libya. Rather than explaining (or backpedaling on) the Benghazi violence, he does a left-right combination punch at Romney for — first — applauding the Republican for supporting U.S. military involvement in Libya and — later — opposing “mission creep” or “mission muddle” before Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown and killed. Gadhafi, says Obama, has more American blood on his hands than anyone other than Osama bin Laden.

Romney forced to look on with a neutral stare on his face.

★ ★ ★

Another Obama kudogram to Israel in response to a question about Egypt. That puts him up 2-0 in the pro-Israel answer score.

★ ★ ★

Two more Romney agreements with Obama. He says the president handled Egypt right. He says he would not have supported Hosni Mubarak remaining in power. The GOP nominee also agreed with Obama that U.S. troops are not needed in Syria.

Not sure where Romney would do things differently. Or what he would do differently. He needs to define the differences, as well as his vision for America in the world.

★ ★ ★

Romney’s vision for America in the world?

Freedom. Human rights. Free enterprise. Elections.

Anyone disagree with any of that?

Then a quick pivot to the U.S. economy: “America must be strong. America must lead. In order t do that, we need to strengthen our economy at home.”

Good idea to talk domestic issues. Obama beat him to it by a couple of minutes, talking about not just nation-building overseas but building U.S. education system and U.S. energy production.

★ ★ ★

Dick Cheney makes a cameo appearance in the debate. Obama reminds us of the former policy adventurism of the Bush-Cheney era.

Romney brushed it off — “I’ve got a policy for the future” — and then pivoted to talk about his five-point plan for America’s economic future. (See my colleague Joe Garofoli’s post on the Cheney mention and Romney pivot, just published on this site.)

★ ★ ★

Joe Biden’s not there, but Barack Obama is smiling now. Romney can’t explain how he’ll spend $2 trillion more on military and end up with a balanced budget.

He says he’ll kill ObamaCare.

That dog ain’t gonna hunt. “The math doesn’t work,” Obama insists.

★ ★ ★

Romney finally finds his footing on military spending. Notes that the Navy will be smaller “since 1917.” He says Air Force will be “older and smaller” than any time since 1947.

Obama slams back: “We also have fewer horses and bayonets. We have these things called aircraft carriers that planes land on.”

This is not a game of battleship, the prez avers.

★ ★ ★

The two answers on Iran were interchangeable. Romney applauds sanctions, says they have worked. Team Obama must be happy about that.

The president quickly thanked Romney. “I’m glad that Gov. Romney agrees with the steps that we’re taking.”

If Romney doesn’t draw blood on Iran, Israel, Egypt, Syria or Libya, there’s not a whole lot of material for him to use to hammer Obama.

★ ★ ★

Strange answer by Romney on Iran. He goes off on an Obama-is-apologizing-for-America riff.

“Nothing Gov. Romney just said is true,” Obama shot back. “This is probably the biggest whopper that’s been said in this campaign.”

The Romney campaign — to use the dumbest cliche of the election year — doubled down on the “apology” thing.

“WE CAN’T AFFORD FOUR MORE YEARS OF APOLOGIZING FOR AMERICA,” the Boston press shop just blasted out to all of us in the media. “Since Taking Office, President Obama Has Repeatedly Apologized For America’s Leadership Throughout The World.”

Guess Romney finally is back on script…

★ ★ ★

The Obama mention of a discussion with the daughter of a 9/11 victim seems to be walking a fine line of politicizing 9/11. The president criticized Romney for saying four years ago that it is not worth moving heaven and earth to get one man. Citing the young girl who lost her father in the twin towers, he said, “It was worth moving heaven and earth to get him.”

But Bob Schieffer wouldn’t give Romney a chance to respond.

★ ★ ★

BOB SCHIEFFER JUST DID IT. “OBAMA BIN LADEN.”

No reaction from the president. Or from Romney.

But the Twittersphere won’t miss it.

★ ★ ★

Obama is pre-empting Romney on China, talking about how he’s been much tougher on China trade practices than the Bush administration, including a case for China dumping low-cost tires in the U.S. market. “Gov. Romney criticized me for being too tough in that case,” Obama noted.

Romney doesn’t try to attack Obama on China trade policy. Instead, he switches to talk of domestic economy and returns to campaign talking points — effective ones, to be sure, but not related to China.

Whoa! About midway into his answer, he says he would declare China a currency manipulator from Day One and turns to his get-tough rhetoric from the campaign trail. Quite a tonal shift in a few seconds.

Obama says currency exchange is at “most advantageous (to U.S. trade) since 1993.”

★ ★ ★

Romney just committed one of the cardinal sins of public relations. He pulled an “I am not a crook.”

Defending his opposition to the auto bailouts of the Bush and Obama administrations, he criticized Bush for writing “the first checks” to Detroit but then denied he would “liquidate” the domestic auto industry.

“Liquidate? Of course not. Of course not. That’s the height of silliness.”

Big mistake. You’re never supposed to repeat a charge and then deny it, as when Richard Nixon declared he wasn’t a crook and Fawn Hall (remember her?) declared “I am not a bimbo.”

★ ★ ★

“I love teachers,” said Romney. “I love teachers.”

“I think we all love teachers,” interjected moderator Schieffer.

★ ★ ★

In closing, Obama goes back to his theme of the evening: Romney foreign policy is “wrong and reckless.” But he spends most of the final two minutes talking about the U.S. economy (“nation-building at home”).

“I will always listen to your voices,” he said. “I will fight for your families.”

Romney criticizes Obama on economy, saying he’s put U.S. on a “path to Greece.”

He then closes with a bipartisan note, reaching out to the few undecided voters left out there. He notes that he can “work across the aisle” with Democrats to turn around the economy.

“I’ll work with good Democrats, I’ll work with good Republicans to do that,” he concluded.

Page 1 of 212