Archive for the ‘Latinos’ Category

Obama embraces gay, lesbian bi-nationals on immigration

by:

As expected, President Obama endorsed inclusion of bi-national same sex couples in his own immigration framework announced in Las Vegas Tuesday, in contrast to Monday’s bipartisan Senate framework which omitted mention of gays and lesbians.

Obama did not mention bi-nationals in his Las Vegas speech but they were included in the written fact sheet, endorsing reform that “treats same-sex families as families by giving U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents the ability to seek a visa on the basis of a permanent relationship with a same-sex partner.”

Currently, married gay and lesbian couples, of whom one partner is a U.S. citizen and the other a foreigner, are banned under the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act from the spousal immigration preference given to straight couples. DOMA is currently before the Supreme Court. If the court overturns DOMA, the issue should be moot for gay and lesbian couples married any of the nine states (and D.C.) that permit it.

Gay rights activists worry that in the long, tough negotiations ahead, the interests of the small number of gay and lesbian couples of whom one member is a foreigner (est. 28,500) could be ditched to woo GOP votes. (How many depends first on how deeply Senate Republicans splinter on immigration, and second, on whether House Speaker John Boehner would allow an immigration bill to come to the floor that would need Democrats to pass.)

Sen. John McCain, the Arizona Republican who joined the bipartisan Senate Gang of Eight for comprehensive immigration reform, on Tuesday morning dismissed the issue as less important than broader immigration issues. “It’s something that, frankly, is not of paramount importance at this time,” McCain said. “We’ll have to look at it … to gauge how the majority of Congress feels. … We need to get broad consensus on our proposal to start with.”

Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck warned against Obama’s leftward tilt: “There are a lot of ideas about how best to fix our broken immigration system. Any solution should be a bipartisan one, and we hope the President is careful not to drag the debate to the left and ultimately disrupt the difficult work that is ahead in the House and Senate.”

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, a chieftain of the Gang of Eight, praised Obama for leaving “space” to Congress to work out the details: “He is using the bully pulpit to focus the nation’s attention on the urgency of immigration reform and set goals for action on this issue. But he is also giving lawmakers on both sides the space to form a bipartisan coalition.”

New effort to increase visas for tech workers as high as 300,000

by:

The tech industry, one of the most powerful players in the immigration debate, threw down its marker Tuesday with a bipartisan stand-alone bill to increase H-1B visas for skilled workers from 65,000 to 115,000 with an escalator that could bring total visas to 300,000 a year.

Silicon Valley has been chafing under H-1B caps since the last comprehensive bill collapsed in 2006. Industry leaders have long argued that a green card should be stapled to every diploma earned by a foreign student in math or engineering, on the grounds that the U.S. is losing talented people educated in its own universities. Despite support from California House Democrats Anna Eshoo (Palo Alto) and Zoe Lofgren (San Jose), the effort has been stymied by stiff resistance from some U.S. tech workers and bipartisan opponents in Congress who say the industry just wants cheap labor.

The bill would also “allow dual intent for foreign students at U.S. colleges and universities to provide the certainty they need to ensure their future in the United States.” And it would exempt from the employment-based green card cap dependents of employment-based visa holders, U.S. STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) advanced degree holders, “persons with extraordinary ability” and “outstanding professors and researchers.”

This year’s model of an H1b visa increase is called I-Squared, or the Immigration Innovation Act, sponsored by Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.).

The authors say the bill is critical to U.S. competitiveness in the global economy. In addition to increasing H-1B visas to 115,000 a year, the bill would create an automatic escalator “so that the cap can adjust – up or down – to the demands of the economy” with a total ceiling of 300,000.

Depending on how quickly the annual cap is reached, mini-escalators are included that would provide as many as 20,000 additional visas immediately. Additional sponsors include Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), and Mark Warner (D-Va,).

Whether 2013 will be a replay of the immigration failure of 2006, we shall know by summer. The various factions are suiting up for well-worn roles. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., will be pushing for expanded temporary slots for the farm workers who are essential to California’s produce industry. The bigger bipartisan Senate framework introduced Monday by the Gang of Eight has placeholders for both tech and farm workers. Florida Republican Marco Rubio is one of the Gang and also a sponsor of the separate tech worker bill, giving it added juice.

Pew just released a new estimate on the total U.S. immigrant population, tallying a record 40.4 million in 2011, or 13 percent of the population, based on an analysis of Census data by the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.

UPDATE: Obama gave a plug to the tech side in Las Vegas Tuesday: “Right now, there are brilliant students from all over the world sitting in classrooms at our top universities. They’re earning degrees in the fields of the future, like engineering and computer science. But once they finish school, once they earn that diploma, there’s a good chance they’ll have to leave our country. Think about that.

“We’re giving them all the skills they need to figure that out, but then we’re going to turn around and tell them to start that business and create those jobs in China or India or Mexico or someplace else. That’s not how you grow new industries in America. That’s how you give new industries to our competitors. ”

Rubio advocates for comprehensive effort, not bill, on immigration

by:

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., speaks during the Reagan Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Tuesday, Aug. 23, 2011. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

During a POLITICO breakfast event this morning, Marco Rubio said there is nothing that Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan could have done to appeal to the Hispanic vote.

“Look the Hispanic vote, number one, is not monolithic. Number two, there are large numbers of Hispanics in this country who also happen to be liberal Democrats. And there’s nothing Romney or Ryan could have done to change that. There is a significant number of Hispanic voters who vote for the candidate, not the party. And I think there is lot of things that have happened even before this ticket came together, that hurt our opportunity to do it.”

According to the Republican senator from Florida, the fault lies in the portrayal of the GOP and its stance on immigration. The party is not wrong in its stance against illegal immigration, but instead of voicing that position, it should be touting its pro-legal immigration stance, he said.

“Unfortunately, I think, the Republican Party for many years allowed itself to be positioned as the anti-illegal immigration party and we certainly are against illegal immigration as most Americans are. But what we really need to be is the pro-legal immigration party.”

How do you shape that image? asked POLITICO’s Mike Allen.

“By being it,” said Rubio. Simple as that. Rubio noted that it’s a matter of putting out concrete proposals to show that Republicans are “proud of the fact that every year one million of people immigrate to the United States legally and permanently.”

“We understand that legal immigration is not just an important part of our heritage, it’s an important part of our future,” he said. “We’re not talking about plagues of locusts, we’re talking about people.”

Rubio stressed that the need to understand why people migrate to the U.S., echoing George W. Bush’s plea from yesterday for politicians to approach immigration with a “benevolent spirit.”

“These are real human beings. And that’s why it’s such a huge issue in the Hispanic community because it’s not just a statistical issue. You know somebody who is living under this circumstance and your heart breaks for them even if you know that what they have done is legally wrong, morally you feel for them. Because you recognize that, for the Grace of God, that could be you.”

Immigration can be addressed “comprehensively, but not in a comprehensive bill,” said Rubio, who suggested that it be addressed through a “comprehensive package of bills” instead.

“Portions of immigration reform can be dealt with quicker than others,” he said, listing issues such as guest worker programs, border security, e-Verify and an alternative to DREAM Act. By addressing these issues, Congress could restore the public’s faith in its intentions to stop illegal immigration, enabling the U.S. to celebrate legal immigration once again.

“It’s going to be a lot easier, not easy, but a lot easier both politically and from a policy perspective, to deal with those folks who are here undocumented if you deal with those other issues. Number one, there will be less of them because they will be able to avail themselves of the guest worker program, the alternative to the dream act or the reform legal immigration system. Second, the American people will say, ‘You did e-Verify, you did border security so we know this problem isn’t going to happen again. Now we can be what we have always been: the most compassionate people in the world and view this situation for what it is.’”

Rubio is optimistic that this can happen within the next two years, but he warned of expecting overnight miracles.

“This will take a while. There is not a magic solution to this. I believe we have to do it and I believe we can do it,” he said.

House passes bill to increase visas for highly educated immigrants

A bill to increase the number of visas available to highly educated immigrants and allow their families to stay in the United States while their visas are processed won House approval today by a vote of 245-139.

U.S. Representative Lamar Smith, R-Texas, holds a press conference at his office. JERRY LARA/glara@express-news.net

The STEM Jobs Act, sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, would increase the number of visas available for students who graduated from American universities with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics degrees by up to 55,000 a year.

“In a global economy, we cannot afford to educate these foreign graduates in the United States and then send them back home to work for our competitors,” Smith said. “This legislation will help us create jobs, increase our competitiveness, and spur our innovation.”

The bill originally was pushed through for a suspension of the rules in September but fell short of the necessary two-thirds majority by 20 votes.

Although both parties support increasing visas for educated foreign graduates, Democrats contested the bill because the additional visas would be taken from the diversity visa lottery.

The lottery first was introduced in 1990 to increase opportunities for immigrants in underrepresented countries. The new legislation would end the program.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., has been an opponent of the bill since its inception and sponsored a bill earlier this year to increase visas for educated immigrants without cutting other programs. She said Smith’s bill was a “colossal diversion” and doesn’t expect the bill to be taken up by the Senate.

“This looks like a ‘double-down’ on the Grover Norquist-style ‘no new immigration’ pledge that they have been following for too long,” Lofgren said in a statement. “Republicans need to move past these kinds of gimmicks and work with Democrats to reform our immigration system so it works for businesses, our economy and families.”

After the STEM Jobs Act first flopped, Smith tacked on a provision that would allow spouses and children of permanent residents to wait in the United States for visas to become available after they have spent one year on the waiting list, a move immigration reform advocates have shown interest in.

The legislation now will move to the Senate, where Democratic leaders already have drafted similar legislation that includes the diversity lottery.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, introduced the Benefits to Research and American Innovation through Nationality Statutes, or BRAINS Act, earlier this year. The Senate bill also does not expand programs to allow immigrant families to wait in the United States for visas.

Hutchison, Kyl propose plan similar to DREAM Act — but without citizenship

by:

Outgoing Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., introduced legislation Tuesday designed to provide legal standing — but never citizenship — for young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. by their parents.

The “Achieve Act” creates a three tier system for illegal immigrants of “good moral character” under the age of 28 who were brought to the U.S. before the age of 14 to obtain legal standing while pursuing higher education or military service.

This bill comes after Republican candidates struggled mightily to garner votes from Latin Americans in the general election earlier this month, forcing the issue of bipartisanship in immigration reform.

Hutchison stressed the importance of changing this portion of immigration policy first as a way of “getting the ball rolling,” on comprehensive reform.

“We know that there are children in our country who have been brought here illegally by their parents,” she said. “We think the best step that we can take to address an issue that is very timely is to give a legal status that would be earned.”

The proposal by Hutchison and Kyl — both of whom are retiring Republicans from border states — resembles the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM, Act penned by Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Richard Durbin, D-Ill., in 2001.

A staple in immigration reform talks as of late, the DREAM Act also provided temporary legal standing for young immigrants brought to the U.S. as minors who are seeking education or enlisted in military service.

There are minor differences between the bills, such as the maximum age of arrival being lowered from 16 under the DREAM Act to 14 under the Achieve Act and the minimum military service requirement being increased from two years to four years.

The biggest difference is that the Achieve Act does not provide a direct path to full citizenship, as the DREAM Act does. That’s a distinction that Hutchison boasted about — but Democrats blasted.

“Ours is better than the Dream Act because it doesn’t allow them to cut in line,” Hutchison said.”It doesn’t keep them from applying under the rules today, but it doesn’t give them a special preference before those who have waited in line for years to get into the citizenship track.”

Democrats and DREAM Act supporters decried the act as political pandering and counter productive to the pursuit of immigration reform.

United We Dream, an advocacy group for immigrant youth education issued a statement calling the Achieve Act a “cynical political gesture” and rejected it out right for not providing a path to citizenship.

Texas Rep. Charlie Gonzalez, D-San Antonio, also was skeptical of the measure and described it as too little, too late.

“This could have been more timely and meaningfully had it been done in the spring when Sen. (Marco) Rubio was making every indication he was trying to get Republicans on board for DREAM Act,” Gonzalez said. “If this had been initiated and introduced at that time, it would have been a catalyst.

“At this point we’re all looking forward to a comprehensive approach bill that’s not just a DREAM Act for young people.”

Kyl said the Achieve Act clears up issues that both Democrats and Republicans had with the DREAM Act. He added that there are ways, such as marriage to a U.S. citizen, that could help Achieve Act beneficiaries reach full citizenship faster than those waiting for entry into the country.

“What we are basically saying is if you want to go to school — whatever kind of school will prepare you for a good job — and if you have a job and keep a job and don’t get into trouble in this country, you’re going to be here for the rest of your life with a legal status,” he said.

Instead of full citizenship, the final stage under the Achieve Act is a permanent nonimmigrant visa up for renewal every four years. The bill does not call for any changes to the green card system.

Beto Cardenas, a former Hutchison general counsel and current Houston lawyer, said immigration reform is crucial for the business community so employers can have a more reliable workforce, one that isn’t constantly threatened by deportation.

Through his work at a Houston-based law firm Vincent & Elkins, Cardenas acts as legal counsel to several businesses that are impacted by illegal immigration. He argues the Achieve Act is Congress’ best bet for getting immigration reform for young immigrants because of the repeatedly failed efforts to pass the DREAM Act.

“I wouldn’t say that one is better than the other for the business community, but one has failed to get the votes,” he said. ”You can continue to do the same thing over and over but some people would say that’s the definition of insanity when you’re expecting a different result.”

The bill could go to a vote during Congress’ lame duck session, but it is unlikely, Kyl admitted. Both Senators said they briefed the successors, Ted Cruz in Texas and Jeff Flake in Arizona, about the details of the bill. Kyl’s fellow Arizona Sen. John McCain and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio were major players in the drafting of the bill.

Hutchison said she does not want to speak for Cruz, whose father immigrated to the U.S. from Cuba, but she said she believed he will be a “major player” in immigration reform.

Obama promises to push for comprehensive immigration reform by January

by:

Four years ago, President-elect Barack Obama promised to push for comprehensive reform to fix a broken immigration system by the end of his first year in office.

This afternoon, at his first press conference since winning re-election last week, President Obama promised to push for comprehensive reform to fix a broken immigration system by next January.

This time he really means it.

The Democratic president said it is “my expectation” that a comprehensive immigration proposal will be introduced on Capitol Hill “very soon after my inauguration” on Jan. 20.

“We need to seize the moment,” he told reporters gathered in the East Room of the White House.

Obama was backed by 71 percent of Latino voters in the general election, according to exit polls, and 77 percent of  Hispanic women.

The president said the “significant increase in Latino turnout” in the 2012 election was an “incredibly encouraging sign” for the political empowerment of the nation’s largest minority group. The rising participation rates of Latino voters “is going to be powerful and good for the country,” Obama said.

In the short-run, he said, the Democratic dominance will “cause some reflection on the part of the Republicans.”

And that, he suggests, is “a positive sign” for immigration reform.

Obama said the elements of any comprehensive plan would include the following: strong border security measures, penalties for employers who hire undocumented workers, increased visas for high-skilled workers, a program for agricultural employers, a pathway to citizenship for young immigrants illegally brought into the U.S. by their parents, and a pathway toward legal status for illegal immigrants who have not engaged in criminal contact, pay back taxes and a fine, and learn English.

“I think that’s something we can get done,” he said.

Obama promised four years ago to aggressively push for immigration reform, but the issue was a lower priority than dealing with the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and the president’s health-care overhaul. Comprehensive immigration legislation passed the Democratic-controlled House in 2010 but died in the Senate, where Democrats could not muster the votes to foil a threatened Republican filibuster.

Ebullient immigration reform advocates predicted today that next year would be different.

“It now appears that 2013 will be the year that Congress passes real immigration reform,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice Education Fund.

Sharry said Obama now has “made it clear that comprehensive immigration reform is a top priority for early 2013.”

“As he predicted before the election, Latino voters punished the GOP and its nominee Mitt Romney for lurching to the right on immigration,” Sharry continued. “And as we see now, numerous Republicans – from John Boehner to Sean Hannity to John McCain to Rand Paul – are gearing up to work with Democrats to put 11 million undocumented immigrants – including DREAMers and their parents – on the road to citizenship. This is a dramatic and welcome set of developments.”

Other pro-immigration activists put both parties on notice that they expect action.

“The demand in the growing Latino, Asian and all immigrant communities for politicians to deliver citizenship is only going to get stronger and that demand is supported by the majority of Americans,” said Marisol Valero, communications director of the United We Dream Network, the largest network of immigrant youth-led organizations in the country .

Poll shows majority of Americans support immigration reform

by:

A majority of Americans support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants as well as a more lenient view on same-sex marriage and marijuana laws, results from a nationwide post election poll show.

According to the ABC News/Washington Post poll of 1,023 adults, 57 percent of Americans adults support a path to freedom for illegal immigrants currently working in the U.S. and 39 percent oppose it, well outside the 3.5 percent margin of error.

A majority of support came from the western and southern parts of the country with 64 and 56 percent support, respectively. A majority of self-described liberals and moderates expressed support for immigration reform as did 47 percent of self-described conservatives.

Latinos polled in the survey expressed the most favorability toward a path to citizenship with 82 percent supporting and 17 percent opposing. Hispanic voter turnout reached an all-time high of 10 percent this past election, with President Barack Obama winning more than 70 percent of the Latino vote.

In the wake of the large racial gap between Democrats and Republicans in the election, some GOP politicians and conservative pundits have called for more Latino outreach and reconsideration of immigration reform.

The poll also showed a majority of Americans support same-sex marriage, but by a significantly smaller margin than immigration reform. Fifty-one percent of respondents said they support same-sex marriage compared to 47 percent who oppose, putting it squarely within the margin of error.

This past election three states — Maine, Maryland and Oregon — legalized same-sex marriage through ballot measures and joined six other states and the District of Columbia as the only bodies recognizing marriages between two men or two women.

Minnesota voted down a ballot measure making same-sex marriage unconstitutional last week, however, a majority of states have such bans.

The poll showed 59 percent of respondents in the Northeast supported same-sex marriage, compared to 37 percent opposing. In the West 54 percent supported, with 43 percent in opposition.

According to the poll the Midwest supported same-sex marriage by the slimmest of margins — 50 percent to 49 percent. The South showed solid opposition, with 52 percent against and 45 percent for same-sex marriage.

Though support was down 2 percent since the last ABC News/Washington Post sponsored poll on May 20, overall, support for same-sex marriage has been on the rise since 2003 when it polled at 37 percent support.

Another major ballot movement, the legalization of marijuana, also was examined in the poll, revealing 48 percent support the measure and 50 percent oppose legalizing “small amounts of marijuana for personal use.”

Colorado and Washington both passed measures to legalize the drug for personal use. A similar measure in Oregon was voted down.

Legalized marijuana received more support from men than women, 52 percent against 45 percent, and more support from adults 18-29 compared to those 65 and older, 55 percent against 30 percent.

Like same-sex marriage, legalization of marijuana also has been on the rise, starting out at 39 percent in 2002.

Diversity in action: Straight white men are a minority among House Democrats

by:

Though they weren’t able to pick up the 25 seats necessary for a majority in the House, Democratic leaders are touting the incoming class of freshman Congressman, particularly for its diversity.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.., and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Steve Israel, D-N.Y., introduced the newly elected lawmakers this week on Capitol Hill.

“These new members reflect the priorities and diversity and the values of the districts that elected them,” Israel said. “The Republican Caucus, if you look at it, it looks like a re-run of the show ‘Mad Men.’ Our caucus looks like America.”

The DCCC estimates there will be 200 members in the Democratic caucus at the beginning of the 113th Congress, that number includes five Democratic candidates that are leading in races that are yet to be called.

Among those 200 members, Pelosi said there will be 61 women, 43 blacks, 11 Asians/Pacific Islanders and six gay members, marking the first time straight white males will make up a minority of either party’s caucus.

The diversity is highlighted by a Democratic freshman class that is comprised of one-third women and boasts eight Latinos, four blacks, three Asian Americans, one Indian American and the first Hindu ever elected to Congress. It also has the first gay person of color to serve in Congress.

The Republican caucus has a 36 confirmed freshmen with three more candidates in races  they deem too close to call.  All 36 are white and just three are women.

According to an email from the National Republican Congressional Committee, the GOP still considers the Arizona District 9 race to be in contention, which leaves them one chance of adding a minority representative: Vernon Parker, a black councilman and former mayor of Paradise Valley, Ariz.

Most news sources tracking the elections have called the Arizona District 9 race for Parker’s opponent, Krysten Sinema. Republicans trail by a few hundred votes in the other two tight races.

Texas reflects the diversity disparity between the two parties.

Among the eight first-time congressmen headed to Washington via the Lone Star State, the five Democrats consist of one white, one black and three Latinos while the three Republicans are all white. All eight are men.

Pelosi said the Democratic House caucus was a “picture of America” and she expects the incoming members to accurately reflect the diverse ideologies of their constituents.

Israel said the diverse members of his party represent the beginning of the end of far-right Republicans dominating the House.

“With these new members the Tea Party starts to roll back and the progress starts to move forward,” he said.

The women senators in the U.S Congress:

Page 1 of 212