Archive for the ‘Marco Rubio’ Category

Battle of the excerpts: Obama vs. Rubio vs. Rand Paul

by:

In case you want the Cliff’s Notes version of tonight’s State of the Union (and the GOP and Tea Party responses), we are pleased to present you with excerpts released by each of the speakers.

First up, President Obama:

“It is our generation’s task, then, to reignite the true engine of America’s economic growth – a rising, thriving middle class.

It is our unfinished task to restore the basic bargain that built this country – the idea that if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, what you look like, or who you love.

It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few; that it encourages free enterprise, rewards individual initiative, and opens the doors of opportunity to every child across this great nation of ours.”

“A growing economy that creates good, middle-class jobs – that must be the North Star that guides our efforts. Every day, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation: How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills needed to do those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?”

“Tonight, I’ll lay out additional proposals that are fully paid for and fully consistent with the budget framework both parties agreed to just 18 months ago. Let me repeat – nothing I’m proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime. It’s not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth.”

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s official Republican Party response includes these remarks:

“This opportunity – to make it to the middle class or beyond no matter where you start out in life – it isn’t bestowed on us from Washington. It comes from a vibrant free economy where people can risk their own money to open a business. And when they succeed, they hire more people, who in turn invest or spend the money they make, helping others start a business and create jobs. Presidents in both parties – from John F. Kennedy to Ronald Reagan – have known that our free enterprise economy is the source of our middle class prosperity. But President Obama? He believes it’s the cause of our problems.”

“Mr. President, I still live in the same working class neighborhood I grew up in. My neighbors aren’t millionaires. They’re retirees who depend on Social Security and Medicare. They’re workers who have to get up early tomorrow morning and go to work to pay the bills. They’re immigrants, who came here because they were stuck in poverty in countries where the government dominated the economy. The tax increases and the deficit spending you propose will hurt middle class families. It will cost them their raises. It will cost them their benefits. It may even cost some of them their jobs. And it will hurt seniors because it does nothing to save Medicare and Social Security. So Mr. President, I don’t oppose your plans because I want to protect the rich. I oppose your plans because I want to protect my neighbors.”

“Economic growth is the best way to help the middle class. Unfortunately, our economy actually shrank during the last three months of 2012. But if we can get the economy to grow at just 4 percent a year, it would create millions of middle class jobs. And it could reduce our deficits by almost $4 trillion dollars over the next decade. Tax increases can’t do this. Raising taxes won’t create private sector jobs. And there’s no realistic tax increase that could lower our deficits by almost $4 trillion. That’s why I hope the President will abandon his obsession with raising taxes and instead work with us to achieve real growth in our economy.”

“The real cause of our debt is that our government has been spending 1 trillion dollars more than it takes in every year. That’s why we need a balanced budget amendment. The biggest obstacles to balancing the budget are programs where spending is already locked in. One of these programs, Medicare, is especially important to me. It provided my father the care he needed to battle cancer and ultimately die with dignity. And it pays for the care my mother receives now. I would never support any changes to Medicare that would hurt seniors like my mother. But anyone who is in favor of leaving Medicare exactly the way it is right now, is in favor of bankrupting it.”

“Despite our differences, I know that both Republicans and Democrats love America. I pray we can come together to solve our problems, because the choices before us could not be more important. If we can get our economy healthy again, our children will be the most prosperous Americans ever. And if we do not, we will forever be known as the generation responsible for America’s decline.”

And here are self-selected highlights from Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul’s Tea Party response:

“We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future. We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, ‘If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you.”

“The path we are on is not sustainable, but few in Congress or in this Administration seem to recognize that their actions are endangering the prosperity of this great nation.”

“Both parties have been guilty of spending too much, of protecting their sacred cows, of backroom deals in which everyone up here wins, but every taxpayer loses. It is time for a new bipartisan consensus. It is time Democrats admit that not every dollar spent on domestic programs is sacred. And it is time Republicans realize that military spending is not immune to waste and fraud.”

“Not only should the sequester stand, many pundits say the sequester really needs to be at least $4 trillion to avoid another downgrade of America’s credit rating. Both parties will have to agree to cut, or we will never fix our fiscal mess.”

“Washington acts in a way that your family never could – they spend money they do not have, they borrow from future generations, and then they blame each other for never fixing the problem.”

“If Congress refuses to obey its own rules, if Congress refuses to pass a budget, if Congress refuses to read the bills, then I say: Sweep the place clean. Limit their terms and send them home!”

New effort to increase visas for tech workers as high as 300,000

by:

The tech industry, one of the most powerful players in the immigration debate, threw down its marker Tuesday with a bipartisan stand-alone bill to increase H-1B visas for skilled workers from 65,000 to 115,000 with an escalator that could bring total visas to 300,000 a year.

Silicon Valley has been chafing under H-1B caps since the last comprehensive bill collapsed in 2006. Industry leaders have long argued that a green card should be stapled to every diploma earned by a foreign student in math or engineering, on the grounds that the U.S. is losing talented people educated in its own universities. Despite support from California House Democrats Anna Eshoo (Palo Alto) and Zoe Lofgren (San Jose), the effort has been stymied by stiff resistance from some U.S. tech workers and bipartisan opponents in Congress who say the industry just wants cheap labor.

The bill would also “allow dual intent for foreign students at U.S. colleges and universities to provide the certainty they need to ensure their future in the United States.” And it would exempt from the employment-based green card cap dependents of employment-based visa holders, U.S. STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) advanced degree holders, “persons with extraordinary ability” and “outstanding professors and researchers.”

This year’s model of an H1b visa increase is called I-Squared, or the Immigration Innovation Act, sponsored by Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.).

The authors say the bill is critical to U.S. competitiveness in the global economy. In addition to increasing H-1B visas to 115,000 a year, the bill would create an automatic escalator “so that the cap can adjust – up or down – to the demands of the economy” with a total ceiling of 300,000.

Depending on how quickly the annual cap is reached, mini-escalators are included that would provide as many as 20,000 additional visas immediately. Additional sponsors include Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), and Mark Warner (D-Va,).

Whether 2013 will be a replay of the immigration failure of 2006, we shall know by summer. The various factions are suiting up for well-worn roles. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., will be pushing for expanded temporary slots for the farm workers who are essential to California’s produce industry. The bigger bipartisan Senate framework introduced Monday by the Gang of Eight has placeholders for both tech and farm workers. Florida Republican Marco Rubio is one of the Gang and also a sponsor of the separate tech worker bill, giving it added juice.

Pew just released a new estimate on the total U.S. immigrant population, tallying a record 40.4 million in 2011, or 13 percent of the population, based on an analysis of Census data by the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.

UPDATE: Obama gave a plug to the tech side in Las Vegas Tuesday: “Right now, there are brilliant students from all over the world sitting in classrooms at our top universities. They’re earning degrees in the fields of the future, like engineering and computer science. But once they finish school, once they earn that diploma, there’s a good chance they’ll have to leave our country. Think about that.

“We’re giving them all the skills they need to figure that out, but then we’re going to turn around and tell them to start that business and create those jobs in China or India or Mexico or someplace else. That’s not how you grow new industries in America. That’s how you give new industries to our competitors. ”

Some New Year’s Resolutions for prominent politicians

by:

Happy 2013, everyone!

While I’ll be celebrating New Year’s Day with my annual open house (you’re invited), our elected officials are nursing a case of fiscal-cliff hangover.

Here are some New Year’s Resolutions for the powerful and dysfunctional:

President Obama: Invite the other children over to your house more often.

John Boehner: Smoke more. Worry less.

Harry Reid: Pass a budget. Heck, pass anything!

Hillary Clinton: Rest up.

Joe Biden: Rest up.

Mitt Romney: Look for a job.

Rick Perry: Decide which job to look for.

John Kerry: Practice your French.

Ashley Judd: Buy a comfortable pair of running shoes.

Mitch McConnell: Watch all of Ashley Judd’s movies.

Marco Rubio: Buy a good road map of Iowa.

Chris Christie: Buy a good road map of New Hampshire.

Paul Ryan: Buy a good road map of South Carolina.

Jan Brewer: Buy a good road map of Arizona.

Joaquin Castro: Practice the phrase, “no, that’s my brother.”

Julian Castro: Practice the phrase, “no, I’m not a congressman.”

Mark Sanford: Hike the Appalachian Trail again. No, really.

Jenny Sanford: Make sure Mark never gets elected to anything ever again.

Jim DeMint: Make a million dollars.

Dick Armey: Make eight million dollars.

Connie Mack and Mary Bono Mack: Spend more time with the family.

George H.W. Bush: Get well soon! (From all of us.)

Rubio advocates for comprehensive effort, not bill, on immigration

by:

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., speaks during the Reagan Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Tuesday, Aug. 23, 2011. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

During a POLITICO breakfast event this morning, Marco Rubio said there is nothing that Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan could have done to appeal to the Hispanic vote.

“Look the Hispanic vote, number one, is not monolithic. Number two, there are large numbers of Hispanics in this country who also happen to be liberal Democrats. And there’s nothing Romney or Ryan could have done to change that. There is a significant number of Hispanic voters who vote for the candidate, not the party. And I think there is lot of things that have happened even before this ticket came together, that hurt our opportunity to do it.”

According to the Republican senator from Florida, the fault lies in the portrayal of the GOP and its stance on immigration. The party is not wrong in its stance against illegal immigration, but instead of voicing that position, it should be touting its pro-legal immigration stance, he said.

“Unfortunately, I think, the Republican Party for many years allowed itself to be positioned as the anti-illegal immigration party and we certainly are against illegal immigration as most Americans are. But what we really need to be is the pro-legal immigration party.”

How do you shape that image? asked POLITICO’s Mike Allen.

“By being it,” said Rubio. Simple as that. Rubio noted that it’s a matter of putting out concrete proposals to show that Republicans are “proud of the fact that every year one million of people immigrate to the United States legally and permanently.”

“We understand that legal immigration is not just an important part of our heritage, it’s an important part of our future,” he said. “We’re not talking about plagues of locusts, we’re talking about people.”

Rubio stressed that the need to understand why people migrate to the U.S., echoing George W. Bush’s plea from yesterday for politicians to approach immigration with a “benevolent spirit.”

“These are real human beings. And that’s why it’s such a huge issue in the Hispanic community because it’s not just a statistical issue. You know somebody who is living under this circumstance and your heart breaks for them even if you know that what they have done is legally wrong, morally you feel for them. Because you recognize that, for the Grace of God, that could be you.”

Immigration can be addressed “comprehensively, but not in a comprehensive bill,” said Rubio, who suggested that it be addressed through a “comprehensive package of bills” instead.

“Portions of immigration reform can be dealt with quicker than others,” he said, listing issues such as guest worker programs, border security, e-Verify and an alternative to DREAM Act. By addressing these issues, Congress could restore the public’s faith in its intentions to stop illegal immigration, enabling the U.S. to celebrate legal immigration once again.

“It’s going to be a lot easier, not easy, but a lot easier both politically and from a policy perspective, to deal with those folks who are here undocumented if you deal with those other issues. Number one, there will be less of them because they will be able to avail themselves of the guest worker program, the alternative to the dream act or the reform legal immigration system. Second, the American people will say, ‘You did e-Verify, you did border security so we know this problem isn’t going to happen again. Now we can be what we have always been: the most compassionate people in the world and view this situation for what it is.’”

Rubio is optimistic that this can happen within the next two years, but he warned of expecting overnight miracles.

“This will take a while. There is not a magic solution to this. I believe we have to do it and I believe we can do it,” he said.