Alfonso Robinson

Political activist, online journalist

Archive for July, 2010

The Tea Party’s favorite Democrat

by:

Do you remember the Connecticut Tea Party’s Sept 11th rallies in Hartford and Bridgeport? You know the rallies where far-right whackos desecrated the religion of Islam, labeled President Obama as a Nazi/Marxist loving terrorist, threatened by-standers, and turned a day of remembrance into a partisan hate-fest.

Two days after the 9/11 nonsense, the mob shifted their attention to Waterbury and held a rally in the Brass City…and guess which Democrat came out and welcomed them with open arms?

Mike Jarjura=the tea party’s favorite Democrat.

UPDATE 07.30.10: Today, Jarjura defended the indefensible.

“I was there at the request of Waterbury citizens. I wasn’t there to advocate for any political group,” he said. “Every one is trying to do a ‘gotcha’ in these campaigns and manipulate things to something you don’t even represent.”

You can’t make this up folks!

Fedele and the Ferrari

by:

Fedele_Video
via YouTube:

Geez, maybe Mike Fedele should sell his Ferrari to pay for his campaign instead of asking taxpayers to do it.

Click here to watch the video…

Is City Councilman Mike Halas violating the city regulations AGAIN?

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

For those who have followed the history of city violations from now 2nd ward city councilman Mike Halas, this latest controversy is no surprise.

Here’s a picture of a piece of property on Route 37 (31 Pembroke Rd) owned by 2nd ward councilman Mike Halas, owner of Halas Farm.

Halas_Property

Would you consider this the selling mulch on this property?

For those not familiar with the history of Halas, a little background is in order.

In August 2007, the zoning enforcement department issued Halas a cease and desist order for using his property on Pembroke Rd, which was zoned as a single family parcel, for commercial use. This was a violation of sections 10.B.1.a(4) & 4.A.5.f(8) of the zoning regulations on the property on Pembroke Rd.

From April 2008, here’s an interview I did with activist Ken Gucker on Halas’ violation.

Halas approached the zoning commission and asked for a request to use the property, which was zoned as residential property, for commercial use. Here’s a brief recap of the commission’s decision (note the section in bold).

News-Times May 14 2008:

The city’s Zoning Commission Tuesday passed a zoning amendment that gives Halas Farm on Route 37 permission to use land across the street from the store, provided owner Michael Halas does not allow retail sales to take place on the property.

[...]

While Halas’ original intent was to simply store mulch and farm equipment on the land across the street, Halas did acknowledge in April that some customers would be able to purchase mulch and the newly-acquired property.

That triggered safety concerns from members of the zoning commission, which is why they inserted language saying it could be used for storage and storage only.

Here’s video footage of the Zoning Commission’s amendment to Halas’ property as well as an explanation on why the amendment was necessary:

Here’s the exact wording of the amendment (via the Zoning Commission minutes: May 13 2008):

Mr. Elpern then suggested they consider adding the phrase “but not sold or picked up by customers” after the words temporarily stored. The language would then read as follows: Products intended for retail sale, as permitted in subsection (8) above, and farm machinery used for the operation of the farm, may be temporarily stored, but not sold or picked up by customers, on a lot zoned RA-40 or RA-80 which lies adjacent to but separated from the lot containing the farm and/or retail sales operation by a public right-of-way, provided the lot is under the same ownership as the owner of the existing farm and/or retail sales operation and is no less than 40,000 square feet in area. All new structures primarily used for housing said products and farm machinery shall meet the general use regulations specified for the zoning district in which they are located; all existing nonconforming structures may be used to house said products and farm machinery. No outdoor storage of said products and machinery may be closer than (1) 40 feet from a front lot line, 15 feet from a side lot line and 5 feet from a rear lot line and (2) 50 feet from the boundary of a lot containing a dwelling(s) in existence on the date of this amendment.

With all of the above in mind, here’s what Halas is doing with the property right now.

Would you call this a violation of the ruling from the zoning commission?

…more to come.

New Haven Register provide startling new details in Boughton’s Danbury 11 deposition testimony absent in News-Times reporting

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

NHR_Danbury11_071810

Yesterday, the New Haven Register (NHR) published a massive 1660 word article on Mark Boughton’s deposition in the Danbury 11 civil lawsuit that provides startling new details regarding the mayor’s testimony in the case.

Over three times longer than News-Times Dirk Perrefort’s July 9th article, New Haven Register reporter Mary O’Leary provided several important details in the testimony of Boughton and officers for the Danbury police department that was noticeably absent in the News-Times write-up.

The first paragraph of O’Leary’s article outlines the mayor appearing to admit that using a traffic violation as a pretext for checking a person’s immigration status is wrong. According to the NHR report, the problem with the mayor’s statement is that Danbury police officers testified that they used this pretext in picking up the day laborers.

Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton, testifying under oath in a recent deposition for a civil rights lawsuit, agreed that using a traffic violation as a pretext to inquire about someone’s legal status is wrong, even though his police department rounded up a group of immigrants in 2006 on a crime they were never charged with.

That issue goes to the heart of the suit filed by a Yale Law School clinic against Danbury officials and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, charging that they had racially profiled 11 men in violation of their due process and unreasonable search protections when they were arrested in a sting operation in September 2006.

The suit concerns the events of Sept. 19, 2006 at Kennedy Park, when a Danbury police officer, posing as a contractor, picked up the 11 day laborers and drove them to another parking lot, where immigration officials were waiting. They were processed in Danbury by its police. Subsequently, ICE sent them to immigration facilities around the country, several as far away as Texas.

In their own depositions, Danbury police officers testified that the men were picked up for an alleged traffic violation, such as “illegal use of the highway by a pedestrian,” as they approached stopped vehicles seeking workers, but the men were never charged with any such infraction, according to the booking records.

The only charge was illegal entry into the U.S., which is a federal violation.

To the best of my knowledge, this critical piece of testimony from Boughton and the Danbury Police Department never appeared in any of the News-Times articles on the case.

Even more troubling is this portion of Boughton’s testimony.

Boughton said he did not know about the arrests or any planning leading up to them, and was not aware that the men had been booked by Danbury police until about a year ago, something he became aware of “through this case,” referring to the civil rights suit.

He said that’s when he learned about “courtesy booking and understood that we provide courtesy booking for the FBI, the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration), as well as ICE or anybody else that asks for it.”

The problem with this portion of the mayor’s testimony is that the revelation that the Danbury Police Department booked the day laborers came out back in 2007 in the Danbury 11 deportation case, which is different than the civil case. In fact, I reported on this in an AUDIO interview I did with Yale Law Student Simon Moshenberg back on Sept 18 2007.

Back when the civil case was announced, I also specifically asked the law students about when they learned about DanburyPD’s role in the case. Also, during Boughton’s press conference on the day the civil suit was filed, the mayor was questioned by the media about the disclosure in the deportation proceedings that the city played a larger role in the raid.

If O’Leary’s reporting of the mayor’s testimony is accurate, it appears that Boughton is not telling the truth about when he learned about the day laborers being booked by Danbury PD…something that did not appear in Perrefort’s article although he had a copy of Boughton’s deposition.

NHR O’Leary asked several attorney’s, including the attorney who defended former Danbury Mayor Jim Dyer against income tax fraud charges in the 1980s for their take on the Boughton’s “courtesy booking” terminology.

“There is no such thing,” said Hugh Keefe, a well-known criminal defense lawyer, of the term “courtesy booking.” He said he’s heard of FBI officers using a police facility to fill out their own paperwork, but not local police booking federal suspects.

[…]

“Danbury has a lot of real crime. It seems to me they have their hands full already. This is clearly a pretext arrest. When was the last time you heard of a police department arresting someone for being an unsafe pedestrian?” Keefe asked.

Also absent in all of the News-Times articles on the case are the quotes from an ICE agent and DanburyPD found in previous court documents that appear to contradict Boughton’s comments.

In numerous news accounts at the time of the Sept. 19, 2006 arrests, Boughton said the operation was not ordered by the city, but was rather a federal operation that Danbury assisted with, based on information he received at the time from Police Chief Alan Baker.

ICE agent James Brown, according to court documents, rejected that description. “He (Boughton) said the city did not order the operation, that ICE was already on the way. That is not correct, not for this activity that we are talking about on Sept. 19,” Brown testified.

Danbury police Lt. James Fisher, in a separate deposition, testified that Danbury police initiated the action by seeking ICE assistance, which ICE approved after the third or fourth request. ICE agent Richard McCaffrey in his deposition, said Boughton was pressuring the police chief, who pressured the department’s Special Investigations Division “to do something about” the day laborers at Kennedy Park.

I highly recommend that you go to the New Haven Register and read the entire article and re-read Perrefort’s News-Times piece. Afterwards, ask yourself which article is more informative and why are key portions of Boughton’s testimony absent in Perrefort’s write-up.

NOTE:The New Haven Register revised the headline of the article online but several websites copied the original headline before it was altered.


RELATED POSTS:

CT 04, 05: Himes and Murphy released 2Q fundraising numbers

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

With the 2nd quarter campaign cycle behind us, here’s the latest fundraising figures from Jim Himes and Chris Murphy.

In the race for 4th congressional district seat, an official with the Jim Himes campaign released the freshman congressman’s fundraising numbers for the 2nd quarter.

Himes raised 505,000 in the 2nd quarter with 1.85 million cash on hand. To date, Himes has raised $2.7 million raised toward his re-election campaign. Himes will face either Dan Debicella, Rick Torres, or Rob Merkle after the Republicans have their primary in August.

In the 5th district, the Chris Murphy campaign announced that the congressman raised 480,000 for the 2nd quarter, with 1.5 million dollars on hand. For the 2010 cycle,

Murphy has raised a total of 2,094,000 to use in his campaign against the winner of the 5th district GOP primary in August.

VIDEO: Ned Lamont questioned by WTNH over refusal to participate in one-on-one debates

by:

Although Ned Lamont received criticism from The Day regarding his dropping out of the New London debate, until yesterday the other sponsor of the event at the Garde Arts Center didn’t offer a comment on the matter.

During a campaign stop in New Britain, WTNH’s Mark Davis questioned Lamont on his refusal to participate in one on one debates with Malloy.

Later in his report, Davis announced the station’s position on the matter.

It is News 8’s position that they are important for the voting public and that Mr. Lamont has made a mistake by deciding not to participate.

The case against John McGowan, day nine: DNA

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

The court case that’s making everyone shake their heads in disbelief continued last Wednesday…here’s the latest on the rape case against Greater Danbury’s leading anti-immigrant activist John McGowan.

McGowan, the former treasurer of the Greater Danbury chapter of the Connecticut Citizens for Immigration Control, co-founder/Vice President of United States Citizens for Immigration and Law Enforcement hate group, 2007 candidate for mayor, and Pseudolaw lunatic was charged with first degree sexual assault as a result of an investigation by the New Milford Police Department.

Here’s some background the case that’s been recognized as one top 10 crimes of 2009:
Here how the News-Times detailed the horrific assault.

In the 13-page affidavit, the woman describes a variety of sexual encounters to which she consented, but she claimed that on Oct. 20, 2008, after attending a meeting at McGowan’s church, he assaulted her anally at a house he was building on Juniper Road in New Milford.

The woman told police she said, “What are you doing?” and “Stop,” but McGowan instead “put his right arm around her neck and put her in a headlock,” according to the affidavit.

After speaking with counselors at the women’s shelter in Danbury, the victim went to New Milford Hospital on Oct. 22 and hospital personnel called police, according to the affidavit.

…the police report’s write-up on the incident is more graphic.

…he [McGowan] pushed his penis into her anus. When he did this, Victim stated that she asked “What are you doing” and “Stop.” Victim states that she arched her back as she initially struggled to to get him out of her. When she did this, McGowan put his right arm around her neck and put her in a headlock.

According to the affidavit, after speaking with representatives at the Women’s Shelter in Danbury, the victim went to New Milford Hospital and a police investigation was conducted, which resulted in McGowan’s arrest.

According to CT Defense Lawyer website, first degree sexual assault is a CLASS B felony, if found guilty, the local xenophobe could be sentenced to 1 to 20 years in prison and fined up to 15,000 dollars.

RECAP OF LATEST COURT HEARING:

If you’ve followed this case from the beginning, then you know that McGowan’s bizarre antics in court are nothing new….what IS new is the fact that the judge is indicating that he’s had enough of anti-immigrant extremist’s nonsense.

After irritating the marshals by resisting to rise when Judge James P. Ginochio called for recess, once court was reconvened and his name was called, as usual McGowan initially refused to come forward citing his Pseudolaw claim that the court (and state) had no jurisdiction over him.

MCGOWAN: “I do not grant you jurisdiction either knowingly or unknowingly…”

JUDGE: Come forward or else I’ll have the marshals escort you forward

At this point, it seemed like Judge Ginocchio had enough of McGowan’s antics. Stating that the court already ruled on the matter of jurisdiction, the judge issued a standing order that McGowan enter the come forward when his case is called.

After McGowan finally complied with the judge’s order, the issue of McGowan providing a DNA sample came up.

According to prosecutor Dawn Gallo, the lab has conducted some analysis of material that was provided to them (I’m assuming from the rape kit that was conducted on the victim). The lab has completed their analysis and the prosecution issued a request from the court for a swab sample of DNA from McGowan.

Acknowledging that they were together that evening, McGowan didn’t understand the need for him to provide a sample.

McGOWAN: There’s no reason to take it because there was no dispute that she and I were together.

Oh course, there had to be conspiracy their conspiracy theory behind McGowan’s rationale in not providing a sample.

McGOWAN: I don’t trust the state taking the DNA because they could use it against me 20 years from now.

JUDGE: It’s that your argument sir?

McGOWAN: For now.

Ultimately, the judge ruled in the favor of the prosecutor and informed McGowan to go with the marshals to a room and comply with the order. He then asked McGowan if he had any questions.

Claiming that a “party of interest” hasn’t filed a case against him, although the judge already ruled on the issue of jurisdiction, like clockwork, McGowan went back into his Pseudolaw mode and continued his claim that the state is a corporation.

McGOWAN: The prosecutor represents the corporation and anything she says is hearsay.

JUDGE: What exactly are you asking?

McGOWAN: I’m asking for someone who has a real claim, a real party of interest, to stand up and present that claim with the evidence…

JUDGE: That’s why we have a trial.

Although McGowan tried to rehash his theories regarding the government being cooperation, the judge again reminded McGowan’s “issue” was addressed and repeated him to go with the marshals and submit a DNA sample.

…but McGowan had more questions.

McGOWAN: I’d like to see a copy of the prosecutor’s bar registration to make sure that she’s authorized to be here.

JUDGE: Do you want to be heard on that Attorney Gallo.

GALLO: “No.”

JUDGE: Denied.

Finally McGowan requested something that was so bizarre and incoherent that neither the judge or prosecutor could make out what he was talking about.

JUDGE: I’m going to ask you to put that in writing and submit it to the court.

After McGowan was done with his show and provided a sample of his DNA, the judge continued the case for November 3rd at 9:30. Hopefully, now that the Judge has put his foot down when it comes to McGowan’s ramblings, the case can move forward and justice can be served.


RELATED ARTICLE:

RELATED POSTS:

LIVE VIDEO STREAM: Ned Lamont comes to Danbury

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

Tonight at 7:30, Lamont is scheduled to address the Danbury Democratic Town Committee and I’ll provide a live video stream of the meeting.

Page 1 of 212