Alfonso Robinson

Political activist, online journalist

Archive for April, 2011

FLASHBACK: Downtown parking problems claims another business on Main Street

by:

Throughout the day, my email inbox and phone were inundated with messages from business owners on Main Street who expressed outrage over today’s News-Times article on the downtown parking dilemma. At issue with most business owners is the claim from the Parking Authority’s that the parking woes are a “‘perception” problem that can be addressed “through marketing campaigns.”

In light of the “perception” claim from the city, here’s a video flashback post I did back in February on the closing of Upscale Downtown Consignments. The Main Street store was forced to close due in large part to the disappearance of available parking on Main Street, as well as confusion with the payment system at the new garage, and what many business owners called over-the-top parking enforcement.

Originally posted Feb. 4 2011:


Cross post from HatCityBLOG

Upscale Downtown Consignments is forced to close it’s doors due to parking problems on Main Street

While officials praised the recent downtown development plan, a list of recommendations which for the most part is a rehash of suggestions which were within Mayor Gene Eriquez’s Vision 21 plan over ten years ago, or ideas offered by Mayor Dyer during his watch in the 80s, over the last couple of years, the number of businesses along Main Street have been closing up shop for a variety of reason.

Now you can add the vintage clothing store Upscale Downtown Consignments to the list of retail businesses that are disappearing because of the problems associated with doing business on Main Street.

Several downtown store owners I talked to were quick to complain about the parking spaces that were removed on Main Street and how the lack of parking availability negatively effected their businesses.

Last month, did a two part interview with the store’s owner, Barbara Levitt where she described the unfriendly atmosphere for retail stores on Main Street and how those difficulties, which the disappearance of parking availability on Main Street, confusion with the parking system at the new garage on Library Place, and the lack of assistance she received from the city and state officials, contributed to the closing of her business.

Part 1: Background of Levitt’s business and the circumstances on Main Street that resulted in the closing of her business.

Part 2: Response from city of state officials to Levitt’s concerns.

For those who know about the problems on Main Street, Levitt isn’t the first person who has complained about the parking situation downtown nor is she the first person who was forced to close her door because of the situation. Years ago, the retailer “The Cow’s Outside” close it’s doors downtown and moved to Norwalk due in large part to the parking woes that Levitt described and other retailers who I talked to during my interview with Levitt echoed her concerns.

If the city truly wants a vibrant downtown, what’s needed is not rehash of suggestions from another committee but action and results.

Presdient Obama’s birth certificate through the eyes of State Senate Birther Mike McLachlan

by:

McLahclan_idiot

In honor of State Senate Mike McLachlan’s insanely racist birther bill, here’s my take on how our State Senator would view the President’s birth certificate.

Image via HuffPost

As I stated before, with the laundry list of ridiculous, hyper-partisan bills being proposed by our State Senator, one really has to wonder if McLachlan is really looking out for his district’s best interest?

Postal Workers Union opposes Main Street Post Office closure

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

Today, the American Postal Workers Union released a statement in opposition to the closure of the post office on Main Street.

According to sources, the union will be working on getting the word out to residents regarding the upcoming public meeting on the post office closure.

Spouse of Western Connecticut State University Employee Pays $400 for Ethics Violations

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

Press release from the state board of ethics:

Donald Stitt of Danbury, CT paid a $400 civil penalty for violating the Code of Ethics by entering into two contracts with the state valued at amounts over $100. Neither contract was awarded through an open and public process, as required by the Code of Ethics.

According to the stipulation and consent order finalized on April 26 with the Office of State Ethics (OSE), Stitt, who is married to a full-time faculty member of the Theatre Arts Department at Western Connecticut State University (WCSU), entered into contracts with WCSU in July of 2009 and 2010. The contracts, valued at $300 and $500 respectively, were for Stitt’s services in running workshops for the Master’s in Fine Arts program. Neither of the two contracts was awarded through an open and public process.

Connecticut law prohibits a state employee or an immediate family member of a state employee from entering into any contract with the state, valued at one hundred dollars or more, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process.

“To prevent public employees from having an inside track, either in appearance or actuality, the Code of Ethics requires all but the smallest state contracts to be awarded through an open and public process,” said OSE Executive Director, Carol Carson.

City Council Minority Leader criticizes scheduled time for post office hearing

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

The recently announced community meeting on the closure of the post office on Main Street has sparked a backlash of criticism. At issue is the time in which The United States Postal Service agreed to hold the hearing, which is set for May 4th at 5PM…an inconvenient time for most people and business owners who work during the day.

One of the most outspoken critics of the proposed closure of the post office closing has been City Council Minority Leader Tom Saadi and this afternoon, I had to chance to talk to the Councilman about his objections to the meeting’s schedule time.


RELATED POST:

Council Dems speak out in support of Main Street Post Office

Coincidence?

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

On Saturday, after a LONG PERIOD of silence, the City Council Democrats issued a press release where they expressed concerns about the lack of information regarding the US Post Office public hearing.

While encouraged by the Post Office’s statement that residents will have their say when the USPS holds a hearing in April or May about the future of the Main Street post office, City Council Democrats are concerned with the fact that the USPS has provided little information about the hearing.

“As we approach the end of April I have yet to see any specific information about the meeting and remain concerned that residents and businesses most impacted by a possible post office closure will not have the opportunity to be heard.” Stated City Council Minority Leader Tom Saadi continuing “We need specifics now regarding the where and when for the meeting and to see the plan for the Post Office to get the word out to those most affected by the possible closure.”

Saadi and other Council Democrats who live only minutes from downtown and represent Wards with many residents and businesses that rely on an official US Post Office Downtown, never received the recent postal survey. A fact of concern to them as it means that many people affected by possible closure were not included in the survey.

Why do I have the feeling that Mr. Honesty’s latest blog posting is not a coincidence…

2010 BUDGET FLASHBACK: Council plan to distrubute over 400,000 dollars with no accountability?!?

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

In honor of Mark Boughton’s laughable budget proposal and outrageous funding decrease to the Danbury school system, here’s a look back at a perfect example of the mayor and city council’s double standard when it comes to accountability.

Originally posted May 4 2010


Health and public safety budget ad-hoc committee meeting.
Photo by ctblogger 04.2010

With all the scrutinizing over the city’s allocation to grant agencies and schools, it should come to a surprise that this year’s budget proposal includes a line item that has absolutely no accountability.

During the public health and safety ad-hoc committee meeting, councilman Jack Knapp brought up the issue of a line item of 425,000 dollars in the Fire Department budget that goes to the volunteer fire department and questioned how the money was used. What happens next is quite remarkable as the members of the council admit that there is no accountability for the money used by the department.

COUNCILMAN VISCONTI: I just think that we are giving out almost a half a million dollars here. I think we should have some type of record keeping so we know what it’s being spent on.

FIRE CHIEF HERALD: It’s certainly a legitimate question.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT CAVO: Just for historical perspective…a couple of years ago, the previous director of finance made a request to all the receiving agencies that received money to supply that office with an accounting of their records…I believe that some departments complied and some did not. I still think that’s totally possible for the director of finance to request that from them. They should absolutely request that from the director of finance.

FIRE CHIEF HERALD: Similar as they do with the grant agencies.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT CAVO: Yes. If the grant agencies can do it…

COUNCILWOMAN STANLEY: Can they do that for this year’s budget?

COUNCIL PRESIDENT CAVO: I don’t know if they would have to get that to us before we vote.

FIRE CHIEF HERALD: Well, whether you…a dispersal is different than voting I would say—

COUNCILWOMAN STANLEY: That’s right—

FIRE CHIEF HERALD: When is the dispersal?

FINANCE DIRECTOR: Usually, funds are dispersed in July. In some cases, it’s distributed four times a year.

COUNCILWOMAN DEEP: You can distributed it whenever you want right?

FINANCE DIRECTOR: Well, with the grant agencies you like to do it on some type of pre-determined basis…so it’s clear and they can budget accordingly…

UNKNOWN COUNCILMAN: What determines that number [allocation to the volunteer fire department].

FIRE CHIEF HERALD: That number has been the same for about eight years from what I can see…

AD-HOC CHAIR (Charles Trombetta): I think that even that is about part of the budget…all the questions are legitimate, we need to have a separate ad-hoc committee to look into that…

With all due respect to the volunteer fire department, having over 400,000 in taxpayer’s money at their disposal without accountability is unacceptable…and according to members of the council, this is not the first time this issue was discussed.

In the past, the council has voted to withhold allocating money to a non profit agency without a first having detailed account on how the money was going to be used. The Hispanic Center was singled out and de-funded due in large part to their activism during the 287g/ICE ACCESS debate although their city funding was not used towards criticizing the city. If the council demanded accountability for non-profit agencies and scrutinized the education budget to the penny, surely you would think the council should have SOME CLUE how the allocation of 400,000+ dollars to the volunteer fire department was being used.

What we have hear is a classic case of a double standard and the council should not allocate anything until they have a detailed analysis on how this extremely large sum of money is being used.

…more later.

RIDGEFIELD VIDEO: League of Women Voters selectman debate

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

From last week, here’s video of the Ridgefield League of Women Voters Selectmen debate.

Page 1 of 212