Alfonso Robinson

Political activist, online journalist

Archive for May, 2011

The DREAM becomes a reality

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

CTDreamers Carolina Bortolleto, Mariano Cardoso, Lorella Praeli, Hafid Dúmet, Camila Bortolleto, Wendy Cardenas, and Cynthia Romina Calderon at the Capitol yesterday (photo via Facebook)

After years of fighting for the rights of immigrants, activists from Greater Danbury and the state won a victory last night with the passage of the CTDreamAct.

CTNewsJunkie:

The Senate gave final passage to a bill Tuesday that will allow undocumented immigrants pay in-state tuition at Connecticut colleges and universities.

Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford said the bill has a strict threshold compared to states that have already implemented similar legislation and requires undocumented students to attend a Connecticut high school for four years and sign an affidavit stating they are seeking citizenship before receiving in-state tuition.

And unlike four years ago when a similar bill was vetoed by then Gov. M. Jodi Rell, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said he will sign the legislation.

“This is something that ran on,” Malloy said Tuesday. “I believe that if you have Connecticut high school diploma you should be able to attend a Connecticut public institution at state rates, pretty straightforward.”

A HUGE round of thanks goes out to the students and faculty at Western Connecticut State University who lobbied endlessly for the bill. I had the pleasure to meet several of the “CTDreamers” while following this story over the years and without their efforts, this bill that provides in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants would not be a reality.

Here’s video footage of the CTDream rally in New Haven:

…and from the CTDream Act forum at Western Connecticut State University, here’s my interview with Carolina and Camilla Bortolleto and Lorella Praeli.

Danbury closed for business

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG


Proposed site for a brewery on East Liberty Street

Joining the chorus of people who have decried about the anti-business atmosphere in downtown Danbury (here and here) comes this article from The Mercurial regarding an individual who wanted to open a brewery on East Liberty Street but became disgusted with City Hall.

Published in full by permission:

This is what Mark Tambascio, owner of My Place Restaurant and Tap Room in Newtown, Connecticut, has to say about award-winning homebrewer John Watson.

“[Breweries] are hard to run, and only a few stand out,” Tambascio said. “He would be one of them.”

Danbury was one place that Watson scouted for his brewery, specifically an industrial location on East Liberty Street. Ed Blasco, the owner of the East Liberty property, attempted to amend the building’s zoning so that Watson could open his business there, but there was no support for the amendment in City Hall. Blasco’s site is set to be rented by a bakery, and Watson is looking in Litchfield and New Haven County for a suitable location for his brewery.

“Danbury is run by closed-minded people,” said Watson in an email interview. “I am looking in other regions willing to work with me, not strongly opposed. It is a no-win situation when the city turns thier back on long-term building owners who cannot rent their buildings to new business. I would like to work with people who want to build their economy. Danbury has lost me forever.”

These sentiments were echoed by Blasco, who said his property has been “selectively zoned”.

“The City of Danbury is God,” Blasco said in a phone interview. “They determine what happens in town. There is no way to fight City Hall without years in court and at least $10,000.”

“You really have to choose your battles in Danbury,” Blasco continued. “The City Planner controls the city – when he decides to oppose you, he goes to Zoning, and there’s a high probability that they will turn it.”

Danbury’s City Planner, Dennis Elpern, who has occupied his position since 1988, said in a phone interview that he was not familiar with Blasco’s case. He did say that the city only wanted to allow restaurants downtown; however, any bar that were to open as an accessory to a restaurant would be permissible.

“We have had bad experiences with taverns in the past which have turned into areas of difficulty,” Elpern said. “Underage drinking, nickel shot nights, wet t-shirt contests, that kind of thing, and we don’t want to encourage that. Any tavern that is already there can, of course, continue.”

Since 2003, Danbury’s Zoning Commission has effected a moratorium on new liquor licenses in the downtown CityCenter district, which spans roughly from Franklin Street in the north to Keeler Street in the south, covering almost all of Main Street and one to two blocks transversely. Blasco’s property falls outside of this district, but in order for Watson to open his brewery there, Blasco would have had to get the location re-zoned.

Mark Cornhoss, co-owner of Artel Engineering Group in Brookfield, worked with Blasco in his attempts to re-zone his East Liberty Street property. In a phone interview, Cornhoss said that in order to re-zone a location, there needs to be support from within the city and it’s various planning departments.

“The current city of Danbury zoning regulations do not permit breweries at any location as standalone use,” Cornhoss said. He explained that the The Colorado Brew Pub, a brewery that once operated on Delay Street, was able to exist because it was affiliated with a restaurant.

“The problem with 128 East Liberty is it’s zoned as an industrial zone, it’s an IL40,” Cornhoss explained. “So really a restaurant use in there, with a brew pub, would not be a compatible use. And that’s why it really didn’t go any further, because really nobody downtown would support that application.”

According to Cornhoss, upon looking at the location and talking with people in City Hall, he determined that Blasco likely would have met with resistance in his efforts to re-zone. Cornhoss then advised Blasco not to go any further in order to save time and money.

Blasco said he was fed up with City Hall and its affiliates, who he called a part of the “Good Ol’ Boy Network”:

“If you’re not in, you can’t do anything,” he said, “and there’s no law until the higher courts. No one in City Hall likes each other, and nobody in City Hall can be fired – they are all civic employees.”

“Danbury doesn’t know who they are,” he concluded. “[...]You have to learn how to work within the city, and there’s no way to go forward. It’s nice to try and do things. I just don’t know how to make a difference in a system that just doesn’t care.”

Danbury has recently committed itself to a downtown revitalization. The Main Street Renaissance Task Force was created in 2008, and the Task Force released Downtown Danbury: Issues and Recommendations 2010, a comprehensive plan for revitalization, in late 2010. Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton is currently appointing members to the Danbury Main Street Partnership, an 11-member committee who will put the revitalization plans into action.

However, amidst these plans and committees, downtown businesses are closing shop left and right, and prospective new businesses are settling anywhere but here.

Both Cornhoss and Tambascio expressed regret that Watson’s brewery was not able to come to Danbury, but perhaps the city itself should be feeling the most regret. Watson is well-known among professional brewers and already has a following, both locally and nationally. Among many awards, he has won “Best in Show” at the Southern New England Regional Homebrew Competition (SNERHC) and the Nimkasi Award at the National Homebrewer’s Competition. According to the Home Brewer’s Association website, the Nimkasi Award, named for the Sumerian Goddess of Beer, “is given to the brewer having the most wins in the Final Round of the National Homebrew Competition.”

It’s possible that something like a brew pub could give Danbury the lubrication it needs to come together. After another successful night in his tap room, Tambascio, who is also a homebrewer and a judge in the SNERHC, meditated on the community aspect of craft beer.

“Its about the history of a town and getting people together to drink local,” he said. “And it’s fresher than fresh. Craft beer is very community-oriented. That’s really been embraced in the business.”

Awaiting the misleading excuses spin from Danbury’s last honest man shortly…


RELATED POSTS:

VIDEO: Downtown parking problems claims another business on Main Street

Danbury’s Independent Music Festival Needs a Life Preserver

CT-05: Donovan is in

by:

CTNJ:

He previously expressed interest in running for U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy’s seat, but it was never more apparent than Monday evening at the Jefferson Jackson Bailey dinner where supporters were handing out guitar shaped stickers that said “Chris Donovan for Congress.”

Donovan, one of the most powerful men in the state legislature, waited until a budget deal was completed before softly announcing his campaign for the Fifth Congressional seat being vacated by Murphy, who is running for U.S. Senate. But even with the sticker Donovan played coy and refused to say it was official.

In a brief interview after exiting the V.I.P. room at the Connecticut Convention Center, Donovan said he’s the only candidate in the race who is already working to better the state for the people of Connecticut. He said he wants to work for them now in Washington D.C.

CT TECH JUNKIE: “Bethel Native Leads Development of New Space Navigation System”

by:

Jeanette Domber (via CT Tech Junkie)

Today, many of you might know that the space shuttle Endeavour launched this morning. What many of you might not know is that a new navigation system is being tested with the spacecraft…and a Bethel native is leading the project.

The great Lon Seidman over at CT Tech Junkie has the details:

Today’s launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour was the closest Bethel native Jeanette Domber has ever been to a moving spacecraft, but she is leading the effort to design a state-of-the-art navigation system for future space missions.

Domber, a payload systems engineer at Colorado-based Ball Aerospace and Technology Corporation, is the project leader for the Sensor Test for Orion Relative Navigation Risk Mitigation, or, in NASA’s acronym laden parlance, STORRM.

An early version of the new system launched with Endeavour this morning and will test automated docking functions with the International Space Station. The STORRM system also can provide navigation tasks on future deep space missions NASA has planned — determining not only the distance to an object, but the shape of an object as well.

STORRM won’t be used to dock Endeavour with the space station later this week, but it will be tested on approach and during a fly-around maneuver after it undocks around Memorial Day.

Domber says the entire system was designed and built in just over a year, 10 months ahead of most projects. It was originally designed to fly on the Orion crew module, but it can be used in other low-orbit and deep-space vehicles in development.

Domber’s interest in science and technology began in Bethel under the encouragement of her mother, who gave the voracious reader a steady supply of Isaac Asimov science fiction novels. She remembers her mother waking her up to watch the first launch of Space Shuttle Columbia in 1981. Thirty years later, she was sitting in the commander’s seat on Space Shuttle Endeavour fine tuning the STORRM system and being mindful to avoid pressing the wrong button.

“The second time the shuttle was powered down, so it was a little less nerve wracking,” she laughed.

Endeavour was delivered to NASA about a month before Domber’s graduation from Bethel High school in 1991. She credits the public schools there for helping to develop the early math and science skills she needed to succeed in the aerospace field.

“Science and math were always some of my favorite subjects in school,” Domber said, “I had some really excellent teachers in high school.”

Before developing space navigation systems, Domber worked on the last Hubble Space Telescope servicing mission. Ball Aerospace built all four scientific instruments that were installed on orbit in 2009. Domber’s work involved planning the removal of old circuit boards and the installation of new ones — work that normally occurs on the ground in the controlled environment of a clean room.

“It was the first open heart surgery in space,” she said.

Domber’s family still resides in Bethel. Her mother is a technical writer and her father once worked at Northrop Grumman designing heads-up displays for aircraft. Domber, who now resides in Colorado, says she visits Connecticut several times a year.

Make sure to go over to CT Tech Junkie and read the entire article!

Is the food at school cafeterias in Greater Danbury safe?

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

On Sunday, The Connecticut Health I Team did a write-up on the state of local health inspections of school cafeterias and the results should outrage every parent who cares about their children’s food safety.

In October 2010, local health inspectors in Meriden found rodent droppings in the cafeteria of Maloney High School, as well as dirty cabinets and other health violations. Inspectors didn’t go back last year to check to see if the problems were remedied.

In Stamford last year, nine of 32 schools did not have their cafeterias inspected, with the remaining schools inspected fewer than the three times a year required under state regulations.

A similar situation occurred in New Haven, where many schools did not get the required inspections. One school, Nathan Hale School, had an inspection in March that found chicken was being served to children at a temperature that can carry bacteria. Inspectors did not go back to the school to re-inspect until December, when they found the same problem.

“There is no way we are meeting the state mandate on inspections,’’ acknowledged Paul Kowalski, New Haven’s environmental health director. “I have three sanitarians and over 1,100 food establishments to inspect.”

A C-HIT review of more than 1,700 inspection reports from 103 cities and towns in 2010 found that many local health agencies, responsible for ensuring that school cafeterias are safely preparing and serving food to children, are not meeting the state Public Health Code on mandated annual inspections. Of the 38 health agencies overseeing those towns, at least half were not meeting the state requirement, the review shows.

In addition to failing to meet the required number of inspections, the review found that timely re-inspections of cafeterias cited for violations were rare.

Also, the state Department of Public Health has not taken steps to proactively enforce state requirements on local health departments, but instead investigates complaints.

As a result, Connecticut parents know less they should about the way that food in schools is prepared and served, food safety experts said.

“We think inspections are a critical control point in controlling food borne illness,” said Sarah Klein, staff attorney for the Food Safety Program at the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington, DC. “We see the control of food borne illness as something that has preventive steps and reactive steps. Inspections are part of the prevention.”

CT Health I team further states that school violations ranged from “evidence of rodents and insects, to no hot water at the hand-wash sink, to no sneeze guards at the serving area, to dirty floors and walls” and that the grading system for violations are equally as troubling:

…in addition to lags in meeting inspection requirements, the system of scoring can camouflage some serious violations, the C-HIT review found. Schools with ratings in the 90s could have one or two four-point deductions, the records show. McGee Middle School in Berlin had a four-point violation for improper food temperatures but scored a 93. Honeyspot House Elementary in Stratford scored a 96 with one four-point violation in January for an equipment problem. The Stratford Health Department sent a letter to the school ordering that the violation be fixed in 10 days.

Also, some violations that the public might consider serious – such as evidence of mouse droppings or insects—are only a two-point deduction, under state rules. For example, Manchester Regional Academy scored a 97 in December 2010, despite evidence of rodent activity in the kitchen. St. Mary’s School in Branford had the same score of 97, but its only violations were a dirty stove hood grate and an empty paper towel dispenser.

Some inspectors appeared to be lenient in their scoring, noting violations in the “comments” section of reports but taking no points off the overall score. That occurred at least twice in New Britain, where an inspector noted that food was not at the correct temperature for holding before serving—but the overall scores were 98 and 99.

Although CT Health team has compiled a searchable database of 1,700 school cafeteria reports from 103 cities and towns in the state, none of the school in the greater Danbury area are listed. This begs the question, could what’s happening in various areas in the state be happening here?

…developing.

The poll that State Senator Mike McLachlan doesn’t want you to see

by:

Cross post from HatCityBLOG

I guess this news won’t make Danbury’s birther State Senator Mike McLachlan happy…

The number of Americans saying President Obama was born in another country has been sliced in half, according to a new Washington Post poll.

In interviews following the public release the president’s “long-form” birth certificate last week, fully 70 percent of Americans say Obama was born in Hawaii, a big bump-up from the 48 percent who said so a year ago. Even more say he was U.S.-born, or call that their best guess, for a total of 86 percent.

Overall, 10 percent of Americans say Obama was likely born abroad, down from 20 percent in an April 2010 Post-ABC poll. Almost all those who now say Obama was born in a foreign country say that it’s only their “suspicion;” just 1 percent claim “solid evidence” that the president was born elsewhere (9 percent said so last year).

Promise kept

by:

PolitiFact:

During the 2008 campaign, then candidate Barack Obama pledged several times that he would act to capture or kill terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden. Back then, his political rivals criticized him for saying he’d do it with or without Pakistan’s help.

Obama made one of his earliest and most formal statements in a major policy speech on Aug. 1, 2007. Obama savaged the war in Iraq as a misguided effort and said the United States needed to turn its attention to fighting terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It’s widely believed that at least some elements of the Pakistani government tolerate terrorists in their country because they see them as a useful foil against India, Pakistan’s longtime rival. In his speech, Obama said Pakistan, a U.S. ally, would be required to help fight terrorists, singling out Pervez Musharraf, then the president of Pakistan, by name.

“Now, I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me make this clear,” Obama said in 2007. “There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al-Qaida leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf will not act, we will.”

Back then, Obama’s rivals for the presidency criticized his remarks as naive, saying that direct, public criticism of Musharraf was unwise. In other attacks, his rivals distorted Obama’s position to say he wanted to bomb Pakistan, claims we rated Pants on Fire.

Obama stuck by his position to go after bin Laden in Pakistan. “I think that if we have Osama bin Laden in our sights, and we’ve exhausted all other options, we should take him out before he plans to kill another 3,000 Americans. I think that’s common sense,” Obama said.

[...]
In an October 2008 debate with Republican nominee John McCain, Obama said the following:.

“What I have said is we’re going to encourage democracy in Pakistan, expand our non-military aid to Pakistan so that they have more of a stake in working with us, but insisting that they go after these militants. And if we have Osama bin Laden in our sights and the Pakistani government is unable or unwilling to take them out, then I think that we have to act, and we will take them out.

“We will kill bin Laden. We will crush al-Qaida . That has to be our biggest national security priority.”

[...]

We did not notice this promise when we created our Obameter database in 2009, so we are adding it now, as we have done with other campaign vows that readers have pointed out.

We rate Obama’s pledge to kill bin Laden a Promise Kept.

…this is how conservatives reacted to Obama’s pledge back in 2008.

Memories

by: