Cross post from HatCityBLOG
The above moronic comment from Danbury’s finest is just a sample of the over-the-top racist comments that’s spreading like wildfire throughout the city in response to the sentencing of Danbury landlord Joe DaSilva for causing the death of Ecuadorian immigrant Luis Encalada Bueno.
Since word of DaSilva’s sentencing, the News-Times has been in overdrive scrubbing the vitriol from the xenophobes from their comments section
Lets just say thank goodness the paper severed ties with the Topix comment system…
In response to the outlandish display of hate, the News-Times had this to say…
THUMBS DOWN to the insensitive and downright racist comments made in various forums — most notably in online comments — in response to the sentencing Wednesday of Danbury landlord Joseph DaSilva Jr., who has been sentenced to serve 18 months in prison for his role in the death of Ecuadorean immigrant Luis Encalada in November 2009. Encalada was found squatting on property owned by DaSilva, who physically threw the man down the stairs and inflicted fatal internal injuries. Justice is depicted as blindfolded, the judge told the courtroom at the sentencing, so that it is not swayed by wealth or standing — or lack of either.
I couldn’t agree more…
RELATED POSTS:
City Clerk Jean Natale stands next to skinhead who displays a highly offensive anti-immigrant sign
Hate-group co-founder desecrates Mexican flag a immigration rally
Ok slow down, I’m still trying to figure out what language this FatT is speaking, since it’s certainly not English, at least as taught in any school. Alzheimers would be a blessing to him.
As to the difference between anti-immigrant and anti-illegal immigrant racism, that’s very clear in the comments from this Stacey Small Scott who is clearly anti-immigrant.
I don’t see any “anti-IMMIGRANT racism”. What I see is “anti-ILLEGAL ALIEN” racism. That’s a horse of a different color.
What I’d like to know is, why is the News-Times so intolerant of peoples’ opinions? After all, it’s just the citizenry using their FREE SPEECH rights! Furthermore, I’ve seen certain News-Times “journalists” (I use that term very loosely) use their soapboxes to promote what THEY say is a column on “diversity” yet they NEVER – and I repeat NEVER – deviate from discussion of Black/White or Hispanic/White issues.
And anytime this deviation is pointed out to them the comments are deleted! How’s that for CENSORSHIP, News-Times?
There are far more ethnicities in Danbury than simply Central Americans or Blacks. Yet when it comes to pandering to “diversity” issues that involve Russians, British, Asians, or Europeans are completely ignored.
WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD, NEWS-TIMES?
There certainly is a great deal of emotion in the community about illegal aliens, but not about immigrants.
I understand why a cluster of “journalists” and commentators at this newspaper chose to substitute the inaccurate word “immigrants” for “illegal aliens”, but when you deliberately make this false substitution today in your headlines and commentators, the only effect it has now is to discredit everything else you have to say. Perhaps some of the animosity towards undocumented “squatters” is that our news sources deliberatly lie about them even in refering to them?