Teacher Talk

Commentary on education in Fairfield County

Archive for 2011

241 Words on the College Essay

by:

It’s that time of year. With the November 1st application deadline looming, high school students, teachers, and guidance counselors across the country will have plenty of work to do over the next four days to fine tune the college essay (students), write recommendations (teachers), and put together all the required documents (guidance counselors).

With that said, the New York Times ran a front-page story today on the challenges students face in revising their college essay to meet the 250- to 500-word requirement of the Common Application.

Penn Weinberger had grown attached to his college admissions essay. The topic — coping with a brother’s attention deficit disorder — was important to him. The anecdotes clicked. The characters had dimension. The meaning, as his teachers at Hunter College High School had long advised him, was shown, not told.

The only problem with Penn’s writing was the math: It was 650 words, outside the 250- to 500-word range re-established by the Common Application this spring — after a four-year experiment with no upper limit — but only now being grappled with as deadlines for early admissions approach next week.

“I just had to chop down all the emotion,” Penn said.

Unlike other parts of the application, which, in its online version, cuts students off midword if they exceed character limits, the personal statement will not be truncated, raising the question in school corridors: Does 500 really mean 500?

In a word, no. In two words, kind of. Read more

*This post contains a total of 241 words, 1248 characters (no spaces), 1486 characters (with spaces), seven paragraphs, and 17 lines.

UConn’s Scarlet Letter

by:

When you take a look at the national press, you really get a sense of what’s going on with the NCAA, and from a local standpoint, the UConn Huskies. No newspaper covers college sports better than USA Today. Yesterday, columnist Christine Brennan wrote about the Huskies’ abysmal 25% graduation rate, sixth worst in the nation out of 338 Division I men’s basketball programs.

Here’s the view the rest of the country has of UConn, compliments of Brennan’s column:

For those keeping score at home, the graduation rate for the UConn men’s basketball team hasn’t topped 33% in the past six years, and now sits at 25%. It’s a good thing for the Huskies that their percentage from the field is considerably better.

Interestingly enough, the highly successful Connecticut women’s basketball team has a graduation rate of 90%, proving that dribbling a basketball and studying for a test don’t have to be mutually exclusive endeavors in the Nutmeg State.

If the NCAA goes through with its APR vote, and if it also continues to move forward on a rule change that would penalize the son or daughter of a parent who solicits money from schools on the child’s behalf, as Cam Newton’s father did from Mississippi State through a middleman two years ago, it would illustrate just how controversial the national titles of the UConn men’s basketball team and Auburn football team truly were.

Ouch! To be mentioned in the same sentence as Cam Newton’s father. For a college sports program, what could be worse?

In any event, all the Kool-Aid drinkers and pom-pom wavers can relax for one more year, because contrary to reports that surfaced earlier this week, new rules banning teams with a low Academic Progress Rate from the men’s basketball tournament will not go into effect until next season. As it stands now, by the APR numbers, UConn is in jeopardy of not being eligible for the 2013 men’s tournament. Here’s why (AP via USA Today):

Under the rules adopted by the NCAA’s Division I Board of Directors, a school cannot participate in the 2013 tournament unless it has a two-year average score of 930 or a four-year average of 900 on the NCAA’s annual Academic Progress Rate, which measures the academic performance of student athletes.

Connecticut’s men’s basketball scored 826 for the 2009-10 school year. A UConn official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the number isn’t official until next May, said the score for the 2010-11 school year would be approximately 975.

That would not be high enough. It would give Connecticut a two-year score of 900.5 and a four-year average of 888.5.

Maybe that will get the state’s attention. Academics didn’t do it, but no basketball? Well hold it now.

Back to Brennan’s column:

The thinking now is that it will begin with the 2012-13 season [as mentioned, that will be the case], giving Connecticut another year to have its male athlete-athletes return to the tournament to defend their title without fear of commencement or other distractions getting in the way.

If it weren’t so true, it would be. Why not put a grade corresponding to the graduation rate of each school on a patch on the players’ uniforms throughout the tournament or in a bowl game? For those schools at the top of the graduation list, their teams would have the honor of wearing an A. The next group, a B, and so on. Those schools at the very bottom, including the UConn men, would wear an F.

Every free throw, every touchdown pass, every replay — that letter would be there, for good or bad, for all to see.

It could be called, for better or worse, the NCAA’s scarlet letter. Or maize. Or crimson. Or blue.

You don’t need an English teacher to explain that one.

(Charles Costello is a contributing writer for Yahoo! Sports.)

UConn’s Graduation Rate Sinks to New Low

by:

While Connecticut continues to drink the Husky Kool-Aid, this is how USA Today, ”The Nation’s Newspaper,” portrays the UConn men’s basketball program:

Connecticut’s national championship men’s basketball program is showing a little more tarnish.

UConn’s 25% rate — for players arriving from 2001-04, allowing them six years to graduate — was tied for sixth-lowest among 338 Division I men’s programs. Two more regional finalists in last season’s NCAA tournament had sub-50% grad rates: Florida (38%) and Arizona (43%).

The Huskies are doing one of the worst jobs in the country of graduating their players, according to findings released Tuesday by the NCAA, seeing only a quarter of those on scholarship come away with degrees over a four-year period.

To repeat: UConn’s 25% rate was tied for sixth-lowest among 338 Division I men’s programs.

Back to USA Today:

Six weeks before the Huskies defeated Butler in early April for their third national championship, they were assessed scholarship and recruiting sanctions by the NCAA because of recruiting violations. Coach Jim Calhoun was suspended from their first three Big East Conference games of the 2011-12 season.

When the NCAA released a separate set of academic numbers in May — Academic Progress Rates (APRs) measuring schools’ success in retaining players, keeping them eligible and ultimately graduating them — UConn’s score of 893 fell well beneath the NCAA benchmark of 925 (on a scale of 1000). That drew further scholarship reductions, and will keep the Huskies out of future tournaments if not improved.

The NCAA is set to impose an APR qualifier of 930 for the tournament and all other championship events, beginning in 2012-13. The cutoff would start lower, at 900, and move upward over four years.

Connecticut’s graduation rate, meanwhile, hasn’t topped 33% in men’s basketball in the past six years. Tuesday’s 25% marked the low.

In a statement, UConn President Susan Herbst said she favors holding schools accountable for both academic measurements. “UConn will not only support new rules,” she said, “but it is my intention that we will lead the charge as a model for the highest academic standards, paired with the highest level of play.”

This state can continue to hide behind its pom poms, but when it comes to the APR, to be in the company of UAB and Alabama State ain’t gettin’ it done.

Book Talk: Bill O’Reilly

by:

Bill O’Reilly’s latest book - Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever - is #1 on the New York Times bestseller list for the second week in a row.

The host of the No. 1 rated cable news program – The O’Reilly Factor - on the No. 1 rated cable news network – Fox News - writes about Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, providing ”mostly an account of the last two weeks of Lincoln’s life and the search for his killer,” according to USA Today.

Inspired in part by how little we know about U.S. history, O’Reilly, a former high school history teacher, told the paper, “I wanted it to read like a thriller so you’d roar through it. I wanted to make history come alive for people who are not particularly interested in history and to show what true leaders (namely Lincoln) are like.”

Here’s a description of the book from Bill O’Reilly’s website:

The anchor of The O’Reilly Factor recounts one of the most dramatic stories in American history-how one gunshot changed the country forever. In the spring of 1865, the Civil War finally comes to an end after a series of incredibly bloody battles. President Abraham Lincoln’s generous terms for Robert E. Lee’s surrender are devised to fulfill Lincoln’s dream of healing a divided nation, with the former Confederates allowed to reintegrate into American society. One man and his band of murderous accomplices, perhaps reaching into the highest ranks of the U.S. government, are not appeased.

And here’s O’Reilly talking about Killing Lincoln courtesy of USA Today:

Teen Drinking: GHS Athletics

by:

The Greenwich Time article on teen drinking should force this town to have a discussion about one of its biggest problems. In order to do that, we first must accept that this is a major crisis in Greenwich, and across the country.

I want to point out that a big part of the article centered on sports, with athletic departments at both Greenwich High School and Darien High School put on the defensive. Here’s what was said about GHS:

Even if kids are caught, there is no guarantee they will be punished, students said. Once a member of the GHS junior varsity water polo team, Hale [McSharry, Greenwich High School's junior class president] said he has seen Facebook pictures of his former teammates engaging in drinking and drug use without suffering discipline.

“I remember having to sign a form that you could get kicked off the team for drinking,” Hale said. “But I would not hesitate to say that they look the other way if they hear about it. The water polo team in particular does not have a good reputation. It comes down to the coaches and they need the players.”

We all know that teen drinking is a widespread problem, and we’d be naive to suggest that athletes are the exception. They’re not. Without getting into the reputations of various sports, allow me to share some thoughts based on the experiences I’ve had as a coach at the high school.

I believe that student-athletes at Greenwich High are held to a higher standard than anyone else at the school. All student-athletes at the high school must sign a Code of Conduct before they even try out for a team. If a coach is aware of a student-athlete drinking or doing drugs, they will be disciplined. Now, that doesn’t mean that a coach will always know. How could they? But trust me, I’ve been around the athletic department for a decade. Before the school got smart and adopted an attendance policy, the athletic department had one in place. That’s just one example of the athletic office being a step ahead. The school’s AD, Gus Lindine, insists that student-athletes, as well as coaches, agree to, and abide by, this Code of Conduct. If they don’t, they’ll be held accountable. I don’t know what more you could expect.

GREENWICH HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC CODE OF CONDUCT

Our athletes have a responsibility to provide a positive image in the classroom, on the playing fields, and in our community. They must be reminded that participation in athletics is a privilege and not a right. All athletes are expected to meet this athletic code and failure to comply during their season could result in suspension or removal from a team.  All athletes and parents must sign our code of conduct prior to participation.

While at school: A good athlete is also a good student and one who obeys all school rules and regulations. This means good attendance, participation, effort and behavior.  An athlete must be in school and attend all scheduled classes (including physical education) in order to participate in any practices or contests. If an athlete is suspended from school, she/he may not participate in practices or games during her/his suspension period.

On the playing fields or courts: Fair play and good sportsmanship is expected at all times. No athlete will use profanity. An athlete will respect teammates, opponents, officials and spectators.

In our community: The way an athlete acts in our community is very important. As an athlete, she/he shall respect the rights of others and represent our team, our school and the Town of Greenwich with dignity.

The use of illegal substances:  Any use, possession or involvement with illegal substances (drugs/alcohol) of an athlete is prohibited. This is a twenty-four hour rule, extends beyond the school day, and includes the following circumstances:

  • Being in a motor vehicle with alcohol or drugs regardless of whether the athlete is the passenger or driver, or whether the athlete is in personal possession of any alcohol or drugs.
  • Permitting the illegal consumption of alcohol or use of drugs in the athlete’s home or on an athlete’s premises.
  • Postings on blogs and social-networking web sites that confirm a violation.

Failure to comply with this code will result in the following consequences:

  • First offense – A two week suspension from all practices and games (minimum of two games). The  athlete will be required to meet with her/his school social worker prior to rejoining the team. Upon completion of the suspension, the athlete may apply for reinstatement through a conference with the Athletic Director, Coach and Parent.
  • Subsequent offense – A subsequent offense during the school year, will result in the removal of the athlete from their team for the remainder of their current season. The athlete will be ineligible for any post-season awards, recognition or participation at team events, and excluded from the opportunity of becoming a varsity captain. 

The use of androgenic / anabolic steroids or other performance enhancing substances:  Any athlete who has been determined to have used, in or out-of-season, androgenic / anabolic steroids or other performance enhancing substances shall be declared ineligible for all CIAC-controlled activities for one hundred eighty (180) school days on each occurrence. This one hundred eighty (180) school day period of ineligibility commences on the day the CIAC Board of Control makes such determination. 

The use of tobacco products:  An athlete shall not use or have in possession any tobacco products. This is a twenty-four hour rule and extends beyond the school day. Failure to comply with this code will result in a one-week suspension from all practices and games (minimum of one game).The athlete will be required to enroll in our high school smoking cessation course. Upon the conclusion of the suspension, the athlete will be reinstated with the understanding that the smoking cessation course must be completed.

The Greenwich High School Athletic Department does not wish to penalize an athlete attempting to act correctly in situations not of their own making or that could not be avoided. The Director of Athletics and Coach will assess each alleged violation and provide enforcement of this code when and where appropriate. A violation of the Athletic Code of Conduct or Cardinal Rules during team tryouts could negatively impact an athlete’s selection to that team.

 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 I have read the Greenwich High School Athletic Code of Conduct and agree to adhere to it while participating in athletics at GHS. Failure to comply could result in suspension or dismissal from my team.

____________________                                                                   _____________________

athlete’s signature                                                                                   parent or guardian signature

Teen Drinking: The ‘Affluence’ Factor

by:

From the Greenwich Time: Teen Drinking Culture Exposed

Encouraging healthy decisions is no easy task in a town like Greenwich, experts said.

“Affluence is a risk factor,” Hamilton said. “They have the resources and additional pressure to model themselves after their parents. So, they mirror the alcohol use of their parents. It’s a matter of shifting the social norms.”

It’s a factor that caused one Greenwich parent to pause before she decided to move to town.

“Underage drinking is a pervasive problem in upper-echelon societies,” said Greenwich resident Maura Fitzgerald, the mother of two teenagers. “Part of the reason that I didn’t want to live here is that it is relaxed on drinking and the issue is constantly put under the rug.”

Teen Drinking: The Role of Parents

by:

From the Greenwich Time: Teen Drinking Culture Exposed

Although many cite the influence of mass media in presenting underage drinking as acceptable, perhaps the strongest stimulus is closer to home. A family therapy clinician at Child Guidance Center in Greenwich, Shari Fanelli finds treating teenagers with a family history of alcohol-abuse problems or parents who drink regularly provides an “extra layer of complications” because they are not receiving consistent messages.

“If you look at any adult function in this town, you would see alcohol being served,” Silver said. “It is part of the social demographic in Connecticut. If you go to a fashion show, there are mimosas there. When that example is being set for someone who is 15, 16, 17, that is significant.”

While teens themselves create a secret culture of drinking, underage alcohol use often occurs with the consent of parents.

“Parents of the kids who are hosting the parties say, `I don’t mind if my child is drinking, so long as I can see them in the house. I know they are here and they are safe,” said 15-year-old Hale McSharry, Greenwich High School’s junior class president. “Often, the parents of the hosts are aware, but, unfortunately, the parents of the guests are not. They have sleepovers after drinking late at night so parents don’t find out.”

According to Sgt. Mark Zuccerella of the Greenwich Police Department, the town has had 15 arrests of high-school-age individuals charged with underage drinking and three reports of underage subjects who were hospitalized for alcohol poisoning since Jan. 1.

However, the arrest record does not account for the widespread teen alcohol use that occurs at house parties under the radar, he said. When police approach a party, “kids scram and leave behind alcohol,” “scattering like flies,” Zuccerella said.

Teen Drinking: A Culture Exposed

by:

Not much time to blog these days, but I did want to keep the spotlight on Nicole Narea’s article on teen drinking that appeared a couple Sundays ago in the Greenwich Time.

We’ll start with just how widespread the problem is:

Over the past year, Arch Street [Teen Center in Greenwich] witnessed eight instances in which students arrived drunk at events for high school-age teens, according to director Kyle Silver. But the center remains a recognized safe haven compared to the parties that occur behind closed doors around Greenwich and lower Fairfield County.

“At most parties, alcohol would be present,” said Marguerite, a 17-year-old senior at Darien High School. “People drink to get tipsy. If you don’t drink, you’re out of place.”

Bombarded by subliminal pressures to engage in what they say has become a normal social activity, teenagers in Greenwich and Darien said that underage drinking is more than common, it’s rampant. 

Greenwich Academy junior Sydney Burnett, 16, said teen drinking in Greenwich is common, estimating “7 out of 10″ teens have had a drink.

Her estimate is on par with that of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, which reported in June that 72.5 percent of high school students have consumed alcohol, and cited adolescent substance abuse as America’s “No. 1 public health problem.”

Connecticut ranks second among the 50 states for binge drinking and fourth for alcohol use among teens age 12 to 17. About 13 percent of teens in the state binge drink and nearly 19 percent participate in underage drinking in a single month, according to a 2009 report by the U.S. Department of Health and Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

More evidence of the magnitude of the problem:

But Hale [McSharry, Greenwich High School's junior class president] has come to learn through his role in planning GHS’s Oct. 29 homecoming dance that convincing teens to engage in social events that do not involve alcohol is easier said than done. Last year, the dance was canceled as a result of minimal ticket sales, which Hale claims is due to the fact that students are tested with breathalyzers at the entrance.

“The dance has a reputation of being a fail of an event,” Hale said after meeting with the school’s executive board to brainstorm how to attract more teens. “It consists of the parade, game and dance. People drink beforehand and go home after the game to drink more. They drink to have fun.”

Greenwich Time: Teen Drinking Culture Exposed