A vintage postcard showing Main Street in Derby/File Photo
Back in 1934, before Interstate 95 and other major connectors were built to patch together the disparate corners of Connecticut, the State completed an aerial survey of every inch of the Nutmeg State to document state land. The result is a massive amount of data that other states can only dream of. If you want to see what your neighborhood, block or street looked like 79 years ago, you can.
And now, thanks to a collaborative project between Trinity College and the University of Connecticut Libraries, Map and Geographic Information Center, how every square foot of this state has changed over the decades. The groups have stitched together the images and now offer a fascinating tool, which allows internet users to view any address in the state back in 1934, next to what it looks like now.
In some of these towns and cities, you’ll see a wholesale change, as farm pastures have been transformed into residential villages. In others, you’ll see the square boxes indicating houses in 1934 transform into a more urban, downtown commercial feel. And yes, the shady dots you see by the thousand in 1934 that have mysteriously disappeared by the 2013 version are trees. Some of the most interesting changes occur in towns where you can say major highways, like Route 8 or Interstate 95 pop up in the time between the two photos.
So without further ado, in honor of #ThrowbackThursday, here’s a peek at what the address of each Southwestern Connecticut town or city’s Town Hall looked like in 1934, and what it looks like these days.
#TBT: What Your Downtown Looked Like in 1934
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
And in case you’re curious, you can look up your own neighborhood (or anyone else’s for that matter) at the MAGIC website here.
Across the nation, renters account for more than one in three residents of occupied housing units, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. But here in Southwestern Connecticut, the rate is a little bit lower at 28.8 percent.
If we were to compare the national rate of renters with the rate in a local community, Norwalk would be the one town in Southwestern Connecticut that comes closest to sharing the national profile. In Norwalk, 34.9 percent of occupied housing units are home to renters, while 65.1 percent are home to owners, making the city just slightly more renter-heavy than the nation, which hovers at 33.9 percent.
While there’s nothing incredibly out of the ordinary about the number of percentage of renters in Southwestern Connecticut when compared to the national figures, the growing share of renters in towns like Norwalk is climbing at a much faster rate than it is nationally. In 2005, only 38.6 percent of Norwalk’s occupied units were home to renters, but an addition of thousands of units to the rental market between then and 2011 helped push Norwalk ahead of the national average.
Similarly, other local cities have seen their rental rates increase at a faster rate than the rest of the nation between 2005 and 2011, according to census data, including Bridgeport, which has climbed from 51.1 percent to 55.4 percent and Stamford, which inched up a bit more slowly from 42.3 percent to 43.6 percent.
But what is it that keeps the overall share of renters in our area so low when such a large share of residents in the area’s biggest cities are renters? It’s those tiny towns, holding down the fort for owners. Fourteen of the 31 towns in Southwestern Connecticut have an 85 percent share of owners or greater, including the town of Easton, where only 2.6 percent of residents are renting.
FAIRFIELD – Marisa Torrieri Bloom sat on the kitchen floor of the house she rents in Fairfield, knees crossed and bending over, as she lifted a blue and green spoon to her 10-month-old son’s lips. It was dinner time in the Bloom household, and since her son, Nathan, was feeling under the weather, Bloom took the banana puree to a place he would be more comfortable than his high chair where he usually eats.
Marisa Torrieri Bloom spends some time with her son Nathan, 10 months, after work at their home on Andrassy Avenue in Fairfield, Conn. on Wednesday May 8, 2013. The Bloom family is part of a trend where couples are waiting until later in life to have children.
“I never thought this would be my life,” said Bloom, 37, who is originally from Silver Spring, Md., but spent her late 20s and early 30s living in New York City.
“If you’d told me a few years ago that right now I would be in Fairfield County about to buy a house with a little baby, I would have thought that was the most boring thing ever,” she said.
It doesn’t seem so boring this Mother’s Day. These days, it’s pretty blissful — and a little stressful, when she factors in her full-time writing job and part-time gig as a guitar teacher. And after worrying whether she would be able to have her first child at age 36, Bloom said she is thrilled to have Nathan and her husband Zack by her side.
Here in Southwestern Connecticut, women have children later in their lives than in most other parts of the country.
The Bridgeport-Stamford Metropolitan Statistical Area — which covers the same ground as the footprint of Fairfield County — has the second highest percentage of 35- to 50-year-old mothers in the nation. In total, census data shows that a little more than 36 percent of Fairfield County mothers who gave birth within a recent year were in that age bracket, lagging slightly behind the No. 1 metropolitan area: Boulder, Colo.
Nationally, the figure is much lower, at about 20 percent, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
“I’ve been working in the Stamford area since 1995, and we have many women who are 35 to 45 having children — not necessarily their first child — but many women having a child then,” said Dr. Elisabeth Aronow, an obstetrician and gynecologist at Fairfield County OB-Gyn, who spends most of her time practicing in Stamford and Darien.
Darien’s rates of new moms between ages 35 and 50 are even higher than the Fairfield County norm. Of the 25 towns in Southwestern Connecticut with at least 100 births in a recent year, the town had the second highest percentage of moms in that age bracket, at 64 percent. It was barely outranked by New Fairfield, where 66.9 percent of births were to women between ages 35 and 50.
Part of the reason there is such a high percentage of older women having babies is likely because women begin the motherhood process at a much later age in Connecticut. While Aronow noted that not all children delivered to an older mother will be the first child in the birth order, the most recent data available from the National Center for Health Statistics shows Connecticut and New Jersey were tied for having the second-oldest average age of a mother at first birth in 2006, at 27.2 years old, just behind Massachusetts’s 27.7 average age.
When Women Become Moms, State by State
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
Share this gallery:
1 of 11
That year, the average age across the nation was 25, but while the NCHS said there are no more current figures for state-by-state breakdowns, the national average has continued to creep up slowly in recent years, to 25.4 years old in 2010 — a trend that a NCHS spokesman said is likely to be mirrored in Connecticut.
The reason for older moms in the Nutmeg State is multifaceted, but in a paper published by the Pew Research Center on Friday, Gretchen Livingston, a senior researcher at the Washington, D.C.-based “fact tank” wrote that a record share of new moms are now college educated, which can have a significant effect on the age at which mothers give birth.
In 2011, roughly two out of three mothers had at least some college education, up from about one in two in 1990, according to Livington’s report.
“And I would expect that in more affluent areas, where women have more education, it’s not a surprise that they would tend to be older when they have babies,” Livingston said Friday morning.
Fairfield County women, on the whole, are more educated than women across the nation. In this area, 39.7 percent of women who are 18 or older hold at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with 25.7 percent nationally.
Not only does earning a four-year or advanced degree often lead to delaying a marriage or the decision to become parents by several years simply to make time for education, there is also a high correlation between well-educated couples and the traditional order of marriage followed by parenthood, Livingston said.
Especially in Southwestern Connecticut.
“A number of people wait,” Aronow said. “Having children is one along the list of things to be ready for. It’s ‘We need our dog. We need our house, and then we can consider having children . . . I think there are many people around here with that Type-A personality, and everything has a time and an order for it to fit in.”
Marisa and Zack Bloom, both of whom hold a master’s degree, followed that order in their relationship, and after beginning to date in May 2008, when Marisa was 32, they found the pressure mounting to kick things into high gear. They were married in August of 2010, and began trying to conceive after about a year.
“I was very tense about the fact that I would be getting married at 34, and 35 was like this number I had in my head: ‘Must start before I turn 35. Must start before I turn 35.’ So I feel like it did start getting more prominent in the back of my head,” Marisa Bloom said.
“I mean, my parents were at my throat. They were like, ‘You know, we had two kids by the time we were 33,’” she said with a laugh.
When Marisa was born in 1976, the average age for a mother to give birth for the first time was 24.6 years old, and her mother was a few years older than that. Nathan is the first grandchild for Marisa’s parents in Maryland, and Zack’s parents who still live in Wilton where he grew up.
The pressure didn’t seem as heavy for Zack, who is seven years younger than his wife, and celebrated his 30th birthday last summer.
“I never had any pressure. I just knew I didn’t want to be an older dad when my kids were in high school and college, and I knew that people around here get married later, so this is more normal,” he said. “I’m a high-energy person, so I wanted to be able to play sports and be an active father with my kids. And in my late 20s and early 30s, I figured then I would be in my late 40s or early 50s when they’re in high school and college, so I could still be cool.”
The timing worked out for the couple, who said they plan to begin trying for a second baby in a few months, when Marisa has finished nursing Nathan.
“It’s funny, like would I space it out if I could?” Marisa asked. “That’s such a hard question to answer, because I don’t have the option of not spacing it out. But it’s good, fortuitous, that I want to try this summer because there really is no other choice.”
It still comes as a shock to Marisa when she examines her life from the outside. After living in the New York City bubble for so many years, where she felt like she was “living in an ageless place,” she still has trouble realizing she is 37 already — and that life is more baby gates and feeding time than Brooklyn bars and concerts.
“Life actually began for me when I was 30,” she said, spooning out another dose of the banana puree, some of which had made its way into her long blonde hair, courtesy of Nathan’s sticky fingers.
“We just had an offer accepted on a house in Fairfield,” she said. “It’s weird because now I feel like I really am a grownup. I have the house, a kid, a husband. It’s like it’s all complete.”
Mother’s Day is coming on Sunday, and in honor of the holiday, we decided to take a peek at mothers around Southwestern Connecticut to get a sense for how they compare to mothers across the country.
Nationally, about 6 in 10 new mothers are a part of the labor force, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Here in Connecticut the rate is a bit higher, at 66.9 percent. But you’ll find a lot of variation from town to town — some that you would expect, and some that you wouldn’t. For instance, would you have guessed that working moms are actually less common in Stamford than they are in New Canaan?
Trending: Where the Working Moms Live
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
Share this gallery:
1 of 25
We picked through census data to compare the rates of working mothers across the 31 towns in Southwestern Connecticut, but there were a few towns we had to leave off the list, due to a low number of births, which could skew the numbers (Easton, Monroe, Redding, Seymour, Sherman and Weston all had fewer than 100 births registered in the newest census data set and were left off the analysis). On the whole, Southwestern Connecticut lined up with the national trends; 14 of the 25 towns had a higher percentage of working moms than the national average.
But there were also some outliers. Across America, there is only one state with fewer than half of new moms in the labor force: Utah, with 49.1 percent. But here in Southwestern Connecticut, there are six towns with figures even lower than Utah’s, including Westport, which had the fewest working new mothers at 34 percent.
Stay tuned for a special Sunday edition of Trending in this week’s paper for more on motherhood in Southwestern Connecticut!
Schools around all of Southwestern Connecticut are quieter than usual this week as students hunker down for the annual Advanced Placement tests.
APs are challenging exams given to high school students after they’ve completed coursework for what is essentially a college-level class. And if the students pass (with a score of 3, 4 or 5 out of 5), they’re eligible for college credit at most major institutions. But passing an AP exam isn’t always an easy thing to do.
We searched through records from Connecticut’s State Department of Education to see just how well students in the southwestern corner of the state are doing on these tests. It turns out they’re doing better than students across the state, on whole. According to test data from the 2011 academic year, which is the most recent year on file, 18.7 percent of Connecticut 12th graders earned a score of 3 or higher on at least one AP test that year. But here in Southwestern Connecticut, 21 of the 36 high schools had higher percentages than that, including two schools where more than half of the senior class did so. See how your school stacks up here:
This home in Newtown is listed just below the $1 million mark. Check out the slideshow below to see what that budget gets you in every town in Southwestern Connecticut.
But in some of the towns, there was still a limited real estate pool to pick from (Location, Location, Location…). So here we go again, upping the budget once more to take a look at million-dollar listings across the 31 towns in Southwestern Connecticut. In some towns, we couldn’t even find homes to max out our budget, while others only scraped the tip of the iceberg for some of the high-price housing stock.
Check out what we were able to find in every town in our area.
What $1 million will buy you in Southwestern Connecticut
Feeling stressed? Well, you’re not alone. Across the state of Connecticut, 43 percent of residents said they feel stressed on any given day, according to a poll released by Gallup last week. That places the Nutmeg State in the Top 10 most stressed-out states across the country.
Most Stressed-Out States
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Share this gallery:
1 of 10
Wonder where stress is likely to be the worst in our area? We sorted through stacks of census data to compare the number of hours workers in each town put in at their jobs every week, in an effort to pinpoint the towns that are likely to have the most-stressed citizens.
On average, Connecticut workers clock a total of 38.2 hours of work every week, according to the census data. But here in Southwestern Connecticut, we spend extra hours behind our desks than our neighbors around the state. We found – among other things – that workers in 22 of the 31 towns in Southwestern Connecticut worked more than the state average. How many hours a week do the people in your town work?
Where We Work the Most
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Let us know how this stacks up against your personal experience in the comments section below.
Want to live on the water for less than $500,000? Give Stratford a look. We found this two-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom condo with a deck and 1,478 square feet of living space on the market for $475,000. The Census reports the median value of an owner-occupied house in the town is $289,300.
Last week, we looked at what the average New Englander’s home-buying budget of $260,000 would get for house hunters in our neck of the woods. The short answer: Not much. So we decided to raise the budget a little bit and shop around Southwestern Connecticut, armed wit a $500,000 budget.
What $500,000 will buy you in Southwestern Connecticut
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Share this gallery:
1 of 31
Just like last week, we saw quite the variation from town to town, which makes sense. According to the Census, the median value of an owner-occupied unit in Naugatuck comes in at $221,400, so the budget stretched pretty far in that town. But in places like Greenwich and Westport, where the median value of homes is more than $1 million, it was slim pickings.