Posts Tagged ‘love’

Trending: How much we spend on weddings

by:

The state of Connecticut is one of the costliest places in the country to say I do, with an average wedding price coming in at $10,000 more than the national average of $28,427, according to a survey conducted by TheKnot.com and WeddingChannel.com. The total is enough to land the Nutmeg State in the top 10 markets nationally, but it’s still only half of the cost of weddings in the most expensive market:

I’m a little skeptical about the figure quoted for Connecticut. As someone who’s seeing the majority of her friends began to plan their weddings (I’ll be going to eight ceremonies this year), I’ve started taking an interest in all the little details, and I get the feeling Southwestern Connecticut brides would be lucky to get away for under $40,000 at their weddings. Let me know what you think.

Do you think the $38,009 quote for Connecticut weddings in right?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Curious about where you can plan the most affordable wedding? According to the survey results, Alaska brides have the lowest wedding budget in the nation at $15,504.

In Connecticut, we find love at Stop & Shop

by:

An infographic created by Psychology Today

Nothing screams romance quite like the frozen foods section, am I right? A new map, published in the February edition of Psychology today broke down the hot spots for love state by state. In Connecticut, we spot our “missed connections” at Stop & Shop more frequently than any other spot, according to their research.

The map shows the most common places for “Missed Connections” – a post on Craigslist, in which the poster tries to track down a person they met somewhere and want to get in touch with – in each state. And it seems we’re not the only grocery-store love state in the union. Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa, Wyoming, Nebraska, Maine, New Hampshire and Alaska also have a penchant for the produce aisle.

As the map has made its rounds on the Internet, Psychology Today says it has received a wide variety of feedback, including:

Oklahomans crushing on Oklahomans at the state fair? Adorable!

WalMart, a leading love incubator in 15 states? How sad!

Indianans missing connections at home? Hm…

New Yorkers, Atlantans and Northwesterners commiserated about nearly meeting someone in transit.

Californians patted themselves on the backs for working out all the time.

What do you think, Connecticut?

How easy is it to find a few good men in Southwestern Connecticut?

by:

Last week, the Atlantic’s website published a story pointing out locations where it can be tough for a well-educated single lady to search for a few good men.

Of all places in the country, Sarasota, Fla., is apparently the worst place for college-educated young single women to find a man in their age bracket who is similarly educated, with 18 such women to every 10 such men. Here’s the Atlantic’s explanation:

No offense intended to Sarasota’s bachelors — I’m sure they’re lovely. But for every ten guys under 35 with a diploma, there are roughly 18 female college grads the same age roaming the city’s greater metro area. Nobody’s beach body is worth battling those odds.

Of course, Sarasota is just an extreme example of what’s true all over America. The number of college-educated women now far outstrips the number of college-educated men, which in turn has diminished their options in the dating pool.

But who cares about Sarasota? Where does Southwestern Connecticut rank?

According to the Atlantic, the Stamford-Bridgeport metro area (which lines up perfectly with the outline of Fairfield County) has good odds for young women, with a 24.2 percent gap between the number of “eligible” women and men — that means for every 10 men who fit the specs outlined by the Atlantic, there are about 12 women. That’s better than the national average, which was a 29.7 percent gap, meaning there were about 13 women per 10 men fitting the bill.

The Stamford-Bridgeport area seems to have it a bit better for young women than New Haven, where the gap is 30.6 percent, but according to the data, Hartford has the best balance in the state, with a 18.6 percent gap, making it the 11th most balanced metro in the country.

Just how much older are local grooms than their brides?

by:
Vintage Cake Topper

Vintage Cake Topper (Photo credit: vintage19_something)

If you grabbed a copy of the Connecticut Post, Danbury News-Times, Stamford Advocate or Greenwich Time Thursday morning, you likely saw a story about the fact that local grooms are the oldest in the nation to make their way down the aisle. And brides are near the top, too.

According to Census data, Connecticut grooms wait longer than men in any other state to say “I do,” with a median age at first marriage of 30.9 years old, while Connecticut brides wed at a median age of 28.7, the fourth highest in the nation.

You can read all about that in the paper, or online here, but that’s not the only interesting data tidbit that jumped off our marriage spreadsheets. There’s also the typical age difference between men and women when they get hitched.

On average, grooms in Southwestern Connecticut are two years and four months older than their brides, according to an analysis of 4,399 marriage licenses filed in Greenwich, Stamford, Darien, Fairfield, Norwalk, Bridgeport, Danbury and Bethel throughout 2012.

Of course, that figure ebbs and flows from town to town. For instance, Norwalk brides and grooms are the closes in age among the sample, with the average groom only one year and 10.5 months older than the average bride; they’re closely followed by Danbury, where grooms are an average of one year and 11 months older than their brides.

Then there’s Fairfield, the average age difference between husbands and wives married in 2012 was three years and seven months — almost a year bigger than the next widest gap in Greenwich, where grooms were an average of two years and eight months older than their brides.

Well, what about the largest age differences for couples married in 2012?

There were two couples with a 37-year age difference, married last year: A couple who wed in Danbury, with a 66-year-old groom and a 29-year-old bride; and a couple married in Norwalk, with a 62-year-old groom and a 25-year-old bride. In both cases, the groom had been married before, while the bride had not (and while we’re on the topic of multiple marriages, did you check out our story ‘Till Death Do Us Part?’ Not in Greenwich, which also ran Thursday).

While the numbers showed an overall trend of grooms who were older than brides, there were certainly couples with large gaps the other way around, like the Bridgeport wedding, where a 28-year-old groom married a 66-year-old bride. The 38-year age discrepancy was the largest between an older bride and her younger groom, and in this case the bride  had been married before while it was the groom’s first go-around.

What do you think is the perfect age gap between brides and grooms?

Page 1 of 11