The Bronx View

The Bronx View

Short descriptive tagline

McGwire A Tragic Figure

Today, Mark McGwire admitted to having used steroids during his playing career.

For anyone with even a passing interest in baseball, this won’t be surprising.

What’s surprising to me is how sad I find this whole situation.

“I’m not here to talk about the past,” McGwire so infamously stated during a 2005 Congressional hearing ostensibly called to determine just how pervasive steroid use was in Major League Baseball.  I say ostensibly because while that may be how the hearing was portrayed to the public, in actuality it was little more than a cynical witch hunt designed to put a few of our more, shall we say, ambitious Congressmen in front of a national television audience.

They wanted to appear tough to their constituency.  They wanted to act as guardians of our nation’s great pastime.  They wanted blood.

March 16th, 2005 certainly wasn’t one of Major League Baseball’s greatest days.  We saw Rafael Palmeiro, one of his generation’s very greatest baseball talents, state with conviction, “I have never used steroids, period”.  This statement  began to live in infamy when, in August of that same year, Palmeiro tested positive for a banned substance and was suspended for 10 games.

Baseball fans watched intently in July of 2005 as Palmeiro became 1 of only 4 players in the game’s great history to collect 3000 hits and 500 home runs.  Just one month later, the man had to wear cotton balls in his ears to drown out of the chorus of boos and cat calls he was receiving on a nightly basis at visiting ballparks.

Just like that, in the blink of an eye or the prick of a needle, Rafael Palmeiro was transformed from finger-wagging, steroid-denying braggadocio to lowly, sad, broken former superstar.   His reputation will never fully recover.  He has slipped from a shoo-in first ballot Hall of Famer to now occupying the same purgatory as McGwire, whose testimony at that same Congressional hearing was so disastrous, so shockingly unconvincing, that for 5 years it has been looked upon as a covert confession.

Or at least until today.  McGwire, with languishing support for his Hall of Fame candidacy and a new job as the St. Louis Cardinals’ hitting coach, felt today was the right time to admit to everything everyone has suspected him of doing long since.

Think about it – what has changed in this nation’s consciousness between 1998 and 2010 to make us all so cynical when it comes to big guys putting up big numbers?  In 1998, we watched in anticipation as McGwire and Sammy Sosa both embarked on a chase to shatter one of baseball’s oldest and most hallowed records – Roger Maris’ 61 homeruns, set in the year 1961.  McGwire finished the 1998 season with 70 homeruns, Sosa with 66. In 1998, baseball fans could look upon those numbers and smile.  Nowadays, we look upon them and frown.

We collectively made these guys into folk heros just 12 years ago.  Now, there’s a constant campaign to denigrate them with nasty rumors, with vicious innuendo.  McGwire has been routinely mocked for his Congressional performance, his reluctance to discuss the past morphing into a national punchline.  He’s been portrayed as a hermit, a liar, a fraud, a bad person.  Sosa, meanwhile, is a particular kind of punching bag.  He’s been mocked for his shaky English during the 2005 hearing, was mocked for making a comeback attempt in 2007, and more recently, was mocked for appearing ‘too white’ at a public event.

When it was all happening, it was so exciting.  Baseball took a hit following the 1994 strike, but during the 1998 season, as McGwire and Sosa slugged their way into the history books, fans began to crawl back to the game they used to passionately love.  These were big guys with big personalities, hitting baseballs a very long way, and the country was enthralled.  I’ll never forget watching McGwire’s record breaking homerun quickly disappear just over the left field wall in St. Louis, and the joyous celebration that followed.  Everyone was in the big guy’s corner.

Four years later, he followed some bad legal advice and kept his mouth shut at a Congressional hearing that felt a lot like baseball’s own version of a witch hunt.  His eyes filled with tears.  It hurt him to be there, clearly, and the barrage of questions from our nation’s concerned Congressmen made it difficult to stick to the script.  He was drowning up there, and it was sad.  A lot of people thought it was funny.

The truth is a lot more complex than simply saying “Mark McGwire broke the rules”.  Yes, of course, he did break the rules; he used steroids, and steroids were not legal in baseball despite the absence of what one could term an MLB steroids ‘policy’.  That didn’t occur until 2003, and even then was only used as a survey to determine how serious it all was.  Turns out, it was pretty serious.

But a larger part of the truth is that taking steroids helped keep McGwire on the field, doing the things that he earned millions of dollars for doing – and that earned him the adulation of millions of people.  It’s not so black and white as “he cheated”.  Yes, he cheated, but there was an culture of cheating in baseball at the time, a culture that the public and particularly the baseball press chose actively to ignore.  McGwire could have sat idly by as countless peers used steroids to extend their careers, to improve their offensive output, to get stronger, faster, better.  He could have taken the high road – of course he could have – but what’s the likelihood that you, or I, or anyone in that particular climate would have chosen peace of mind over millions of dollars in salary and endorsements and the chance to break some storied records and to be admired?

Everyone enjoyed the ride 12 years ago.  We thought baseball was entering another Golden Age.  Now, people want to look at the the numbers compiled during this era and demolish them, strike them from the books as though they never happened.

They did happen.  And you probably loved it.  Baseball owners loved it.  Fans loved it.  The press loved it.

I’m not saying what McGwire did is right.  But he’s one of many, and he’s only human.  To single him out, to ridicule him and denigrate his character seems unfair.  My takeaway from all this is not to tear down those that did use, but to have a heightened respect for those whose character was strong enough to abstain.  McGwire was only going along for the ride, giving the people what they wanted, doing the thing he most loved to do, quite possibly the only thing he could do.

Were you not entertained?

Posted in General | 2 Comments
2 Comments »
  1. The bottom line here is there is way too much money to be made in professional sports, the owners and the athletes.
    If athletes were paid normal wages just like the rest of us, with say a salary cap of $100,000.00, no one would take drugs. There is too much incentive to use drugs when there are multi- million dollar contracts available.
    Back in the day’ I used to work-out in a gym where “roids” were readily available. Every spring there were a few young kids who would “juice-up,” The transformation of their bodies was amazing to watch. It usually took about 5 weeks to go from wimp to the “King of the Beach.” In the Fall and Winter thet would go off the roids and shrink back down.
    The Hall of Fame just needs to cteate a separate catagory with an asterisk “The Steroid Era”

    Comment by Wee Man — January 12th, 2010 @ 5:16 am

  2. Just to clarify the amazing tranaformation of steroids. One of the kids developed a severe case of acne on his body, and one also needed surgery twice to remove an enlargement of his breasts!
    ” Stay off Drugs”

    Comment by Wee Man — January 12th, 2010 @ 7:36 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a Comment

Recent Comments

  • McGwire A Tragic Figure (2)
    • Wee Man: Just to clarify the amazing tranaformation of steroids. One of the kids developed a severe case of acne on...
    • Wee Man: The bottom line here is there is way too much money to be made in professional sports, the owners and the...
  • Yankees Waiting on Pujols and Mauer? (2)
    • Scott Ham: Agreed. If Mauer hits the open market, the Yankees and Red Sox will be stumbling over themselves to sign...
    • Jonathan Kantrowitz: All bets are off? What does that mean? Joe Mauer is a Yankee wet dream – his age,position...
  • Why Nick and Not Matsui? (2)
    • Scott Ham: I don’t think the Yankees would take Damon back at anything but a bargain price. Ask Bobby Abreu how...
    • NS: Matsui was a casualty of protracted (and apparently futile) discussion b/w Yankees and Damon/Boras. If Matsui was...
  • Annoying Things About the Yankees 2010 Schedule (1)
    • #2: HEY .. CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHEN THE 1ST YANKEES VS PHILLIES GAME 2010 IN PHILLY IS.. I <33 THE YANKEES BUT IM...

More blogs

Jaime DeLoma

Tech Talk

Observations from Jamie DeLoma, journalist and computer nerd.
Saint Bernadette

Saint Bernadette

A patron of Bridgeport by its every definition: a regular patron of its bars and restaurants.
Ken Dixon

Ken Dixon's Blog-O-Rama

Connecticut Politics is a contact sport.
Rich Elliott

UConn women's basketball

Don't miss the latest news on the Huskies.

  • Archives

Note: The Connecticut Media Group is not responsible for posts and comments written by non-staff members.