Porky’s Revenge

Back to article

Comments

3 Responses

  1. Tony G says:

    Joe won the vote after months of hard work explaining how he was the better candidate. Millington refused to honor the democratic process and on the spot revealed a pre-arranged, back room deal to have the votes switched. This is a clearly corrupt practice, evidenced by the fact that Debicella didn’t even show. Our representatives should be mad when exposing corruption. I say Joe was entitled to one accurate epithet. It was a high price for integrity. There was no “late disclosure of pertinent information” in the moments between the vote and the confrontation. The pre-arranged plot was announced on the spot, rendering the democratic process a sham. Joe by the way is in favor of universal health care but only for catastrophic injury as the sensible alternative to Obamacare.

  2. John Rowland II says:

    What is scary is that this moron is an eye surgeon. I am sick of these so called medical professionals who are against universal health care. they are only in medicine for the money and we always seem to find out that most of them are quacks who should not be allowed anywhere near a patient

  3. George says:

    Delegates are (and should be) free to vote as they choose. Delegates cannot be permanently bound by a Town Committee endorsement vote.

    Simply consider the situation where late disclosure of pertinent information, either positive or negative, impacted a candidate. How could a delegate vote without considering the most recently available information?

    If a candidate believes his path to victory in November is securing 15 percent of delegates in May — he is delusional.