Really? Hearst papers – Really? Who cares? Does this paper think that a 3 month jail sentence and a 4th degree conviction is that big a deal that it needs to republish this guy’s mistake? Are we to believe that we can’t run into a sex offender on the street, at the market or at Starbucks? The headline is disgraceful and the choice to rehash this and trash a campaign for the sensationalism is just pathetic. All that’s missing is nasty, insipid comment from Democrat bigwig Nancy “Trash Talking” DiNardo.
This is such an unbelievably cheap and misleading shot. The headline makes it sound like this guy joined Foley’s staff. In just interviewing people on the street, I’m sure Foley doesn’t know these people’s backgrounds. Dixon, your partisanship is showing and you should be ashamed of yourself. Some journalism!!!
I have a different view of the support. There are almost a million REGISTERED sex offenders in the country. Each of them have at least two supporters if not more. That is almost three million voters being ostrasized by the system and society. That could be a powerful lobby. If they were ever able to marshal their forces for “Corrections” changes and get the other several million former felons and their families for support . . .
Nobody really cares about this story other than lemmings looking for a bandwagon to jump on and the media trying to create a story where there is none.
So, the guy was a passer-by, and now Hearst sinks to digging up dirt on the interviewee and invading the guy’s private life. Yep, that makes me hate Foley and makes me want to keep that crook Malloy!
Truly despicable Mr. Dixon. May you never make a mistake.
Really? Hearst papers – Really? Who cares? Does this paper think that a 3 month jail sentence and a 4th degree conviction is that big a deal that it needs to republish this guy’s mistake? Are we to believe that we can’t run into a sex offender on the street, at the market or at Starbucks? The headline is disgraceful and the choice to rehash this and trash a campaign for the sensationalism is just pathetic. All that’s missing is nasty, insipid comment from Democrat bigwig Nancy “Trash Talking” DiNardo.
This headline is totally deceptive.
This is such an unbelievably cheap and misleading shot. The headline makes it sound like this guy joined Foley’s staff. In just interviewing people on the street, I’m sure Foley doesn’t know these people’s backgrounds. Dixon, your partisanship is showing and you should be ashamed of yourself. Some journalism!!!
I have a different view of the support. There are almost a million REGISTERED sex offenders in the country. Each of them have at least two supporters if not more. That is almost three million voters being ostrasized by the system and society. That could be a powerful lobby. If they were ever able to marshal their forces for “Corrections” changes and get the other several million former felons and their families for support . . .
Nobody really cares about this story other than lemmings looking for a bandwagon to jump on and the media trying to create a story where there is none.
Another Ken Dixon hit piece. How surprising. Looking for any like things you can point out about Democrats ? Thought not …..
I told everyone Foley was creepy!!!
Oooops, another Foley slip. Go Joe Visconti!!!
So, the guy was a passer-by, and now Hearst sinks to digging up dirt on the interviewee and invading the guy’s private life. Yep, that makes me hate Foley and makes me want to keep that crook Malloy!